, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 168–173 | Cite as

Barrett’s esophagus is negatively associated with eosinophilic esophagitis in Japanese subjects

  • Shingo Takashima
  • Fumio TanakaEmail author
  • Koji Otani
  • Shuhei Hosomi
  • Yasuaki Nagami
  • Noriko Kamata
  • Koichi Taira
  • Hirokazu Yamagami
  • Tetsuya Tanigawa
  • Shinya Fukumoto
  • Toshio Watanabe
  • Yasuhiro Fujiwara
Original Article



Although both eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are considered to be associated with T helper (Th) 2-mediated immune responses, the association between EoE and BE is unclear. We investigated the clinical relationship between EoE and BE.


We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study. The study included 95 patients with EoE and randomly selected age- and sex-matched controls who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy during a medical health check-up at Osaka City University in a ratio of 1:2 for comparison. We compared the clinical characteristics and the prevalence rate of BE, reflux esophagitis (RE), hiatal hernia, and atrophic gastritis between EoE patients and controls by univariate analysis. Furthermore, we performed multivariate logistic regression analysis to investigate the association of these factors with EoE.


On univariate analysis, the prevalence rate of BE was significantly lower in patients with EoE than in controls (2.1% vs. 13.2%; p = 0.00528). In contrast, the prevalence rate of RE was higher in EoE patients than in controls, but it was not statistically significant (absence and Grades A, B, and C: 74.7%, 18.9%, 5.3%, and 1.1% vs. 83.7%, 12.6%, 3.7%, and 0%; p = 0.193, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that BE was negatively associated with EoE (odds ratio: 0.132; 95% confidence interval: 0.0302–0.573; p = 0.00686).


BE is negatively associated with EoE in Japanese subjects. The mechanism behind the inverse relationship between EoE and BE should be examined.


Eosinophilic esophagitis Barrett’s esophagus Peptic esophagitis Esophagus Eosinophils 



ST, FT, and YF were involved in study conception and design. ST and FT had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of data analysis. KO and SF acquired the data. ST and FT analyzed and interpreted the data. Drafting of the manuscript was performed by ST and FT. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content was conducted by ST, FT, KO, SH, YN, NK, KT, HY, TT, SF, TW, and YF. All authors have approved the final draft of this manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical Statement

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and its amendments. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine (No. 3951).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests for this article.


  1. 1.
    Abe Y, Nomura E, Sato T, Ueno Y. The diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterol Endosc. 2014;56:3378–93.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liacouras CA, Furuta GT, Hirano I, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128:3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Safroneeva E, Coslovsky M, Kuehni CE, et al. Eosinophilic oesophagitis: relationship of quality of life with clinical, endoscopic and histological activity. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;42:1000–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fujiwara Y, Sugawa T, Tanaka F, et al. A multicenter study on the prevalence of eosinophilic esophagitis and PPI-responsive esophageal eosinophilic infiltration. Intern Med. 2012;51:3235–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fujishiro H, Amano Y, Kushiyama Y, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis investigated by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in Japanese patients. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:1142–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stewart MJ, Shaffer E, Urbanski SJ, et al. The association between celiac disease and eosinophilic esophagitis in children and adults. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sherrill JD, Gao PS, Stucke EM, et al. Variants of thymic stromal lymphopoietin and its receptor associate with eosinophilic esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:160–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fitzgerald RC, Onwuegbusi BA, Bajaj-Elliott M, et al. Diversity in the oesophageal phenotypic response to gastro-oesophageal reflux: immunological determinants. Gut. 2002;50:451–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohata Y, Fujiwara Y, Machida H, et al. Role of Th-2 cytokines in the development of Barrett’s esophagus in rats. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:883–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lucendo AJ, Molina-Infante J, Arias Á, et al. Guidelines on eosinophilic esophagitis: evidence-based statements and recommendations for diagnosis and management in children and adults. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2017;5:335–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer, 11th Edition: part II and III. Esophagus. 2017;14:37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Matsuzaki J, Suzuki H, Asakura K, et al. Etiological difference between ultrashort- and short-segment Barrett’s esophagus. J Gastroenterol. 2011;46:332–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lundell LR, Dent J, Bennett JR, et al. Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification. Gut. 1999;45:172–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kimura K, Takemoto T. An endoscopic recognition of the atrophic border and its significance in chronic gastritis. Endoscopy. 1969;1:87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transpl. 2013;48:452–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Francalanci P, De Angelis P, Minnei F, et al. Eosinophilic esophagitis and Barrett’s esophagus: an occasional association or an overlap disease? Esophageal ‘double trouble’ in two children. Digestion. 2008;77:16–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mukkada V, Atkins D, Furuta GT. Uncertain association of Barrett’s esophagus with eosinophilic esophagitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:832–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saboorian MH, Genta RM, Marcus PB, et al. Inverse association of esophageal eosinophilia and Barrett esophagus. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46:752–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kim HP, Vance RB, Shaheen NJ, et al. The prevalence and diagnostic utility of endoscopic features of eosinophilic esophagitis: a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012;10:988–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Manabe N, Haruma K, Imamura H, et al. Does short-segment columnar-lined esophagus elongate during a mean follow-up period of 5.7 years? Dig Endosc. 2011;23:166–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sun D, Wang X, Gai Z, et al. Bile acids but not acidic acids induce Barrett’s esophagus. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:1384–92.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rothenberg ME. Molecular, genetic, and cellular bases for treating eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:1143–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Palles C, Chegwidden L, Li X, et al. Polymorphisms near TBX5 and GDF7 are associated with increased risk for Barrett’s esophagus. Gastroenterology. 2015;148:367–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang KK, Sampliner RE. Updated guidelines 2008 for the diagnosis, surveillance and therapy of Barrett’s esophagus. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:788–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Amano Y, Ishimura N, Furuta K, et al. Which landmark results in a more consistent diagnosis of Barrett’s esophagus, the gastric folds or the palisade vessels? Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;64:206–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Watari J, Hori K, Toyoshima F, et al. Association between obesity and Barrett’s esophagus in a Japanese population: a hospital-based, cross-sectional study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2013;13:143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Esophageal Society and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shingo Takashima
    • 1
  • Fumio Tanaka
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Koji Otani
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shuhei Hosomi
    • 1
  • Yasuaki Nagami
    • 1
  • Noriko Kamata
    • 1
  • Koichi Taira
    • 1
  • Hirokazu Yamagami
    • 1
  • Tetsuya Tanigawa
    • 1
  • Shinya Fukumoto
    • 2
  • Toshio Watanabe
    • 1
  • Yasuhiro Fujiwara
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka City UniversityOsakaJapan
  2. 2.Premier Preventive Medicine, Graduate School of MedicineOsaka City UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations