Advertisement

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

, Volume 63, Issue 4, pp 317–321 | Cite as

Clinical factors contributing to postoperative aqueous flare intensity after 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy for the primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment

  • Akira Tetsumoto
  • Hisanori ImaiEmail author
  • Keiko Otsuka
  • Wataru Matsumiya
  • Akiko Miki
  • Makoto Nakamura
Clinical Investigation
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the perioperative clinical factors, which contribute to the postsurgical aqueous flare intensity (AFI) following 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy (27GPPV) for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Study design

Retrospective clinical study.

Methods

We performed retrospective analyses of the medical records of 47 eyes of 47 patients with primary RRD who had undergone 27GPPV with a wide-angle viewing system. AFI was measured preoperatively and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the surgery.

Results

AFI was significantly increased 1 week after the surgery (p<0.01) and then decreased overtime. At 6 months after surgery it was still statistically significantly higher than preoperative AFI (p=0.03). There was no statistical difference between preoperative AFI and that at 12 months following surgery. Multiple regression analyses revealed that the number of retinal photocoagulations and the performance of scleral indentation had significant positive correlation with AFI at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months, and at 1 month and 3 months after the surgery, respectively.

Conclusion

Intraoperative retinal photocoagulation and scleral indentation are probable causes of increased AFI after 27G PPV for RRD.

Keywords

Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment Aqueous flare value Retinal photocoagulation Scleral indentation 27-Gauge 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

A. Tetsumoto, None; H. Imai, None; K. Otsuka, None; W. Matsumiya, None; A. Miki, None; M. Nakamura, None.

References

  1. 1.
    Kobashi H, Takano M, Yanagita T, Shiratani T, Wang G, Hoshi K, et al. Scleral buckling and pars plana vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: an analysis of 542 eyes. Curr Eye Res. 2014;39:204–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Miki D, Hida T, Hotta K, Shinoda K, Hirakata A. Comparison of scleral buckling and vitrectomy for retinal detachment resulting from flap tears in superior quadrants. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2001;45:187–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kadonosono K, Yamakawa T, Uchio E, Yanagi Y, Tamaki Y, Araie M. Comparison of visual function after epiretinal membrane removal by 20-gauge and 25-gauge vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;142:513–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yoon YH, Kim DS, Kim JG, Hwang JU. Sutureless vitreoretinal surgery using a new 25- gauge transconjunctival system. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging. 2006;37:12–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Park DH, Shin JP, Kim SY. Surgically induced astigmatism in combined phacoemulsification and vitrectomy: 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge standard vitrectomy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;247:1331–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Galway G, Drury B, Cronin BG, Bourke RD. A comparison of induced astigmatism in 20- vs 25-gauge vitrectomy procedures. Eye (London). 2010;24:315–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rizzo S, Genovesi-Ebert F, Murri S, Belting C, Vneto A, Cresti F, et al. 25-gauge, sutureless vitrectomy and standard 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative pilot study. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2006;244:472–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Falkner-Radler CI, Myung JS, Moussa S, Chan RV, Smretschnig E, Kiss S, et al. Trends in primary retinal detachment surgery: results of a Bicenter study. Retina. 2011;31:928–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ho JD, Liou SW, Tsai CY, Tsai RJ, Lin HC. Trends and outcomes of treatment for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a 9-year nationwide population-based study. Eye (London). 2009;23:669–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wong CW, Wong WL, Yeo IY, Loh BK, Wong DW, Onq SG, et al. Trends and factors related to outcomes for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment surgery in a large asian tertiary eye center. Retina. 2014;34:684–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Otsuka K, Imai H, Fujii A, Miki A, Tagami M, Azumi A, et al. Comparison of 25- and 27-gauge pars plana vitrectomy in repairing primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. J Ophthalmol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7643174.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rizzo S, Polizzi S, Barca F, Caporossi T, Virgili G. Comparative study of 27-gauge versus 25-gauge vitrectomy for the treatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. J Ophthalmol. 2017.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/6384985.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Romano MR, Cennamo G, Ferrara M, Cennamo M, Cennamo G. Twenty-seven-gauge versus 25-gauge vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2017;37:637–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Otsuka K, Imai H, Miki A, Nakamura M. Impact of postoperative positioning on the outcome of pars plana vitrectomy with gas tamponade for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: comparison between supine and prone positioning. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13482.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yoon YH, Sheu SJ, Terasaki H. Primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. In: Schachat AP, Wilkinson CP, Wiedemann P, editors. Ryan’s retina. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2018. p. 1933–42.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Conart JB, Kurun S, Ameloot F, Tréchot F, Leroy B, Berrod JP. Validity of aqueous flare measurement in predicting proliferative vitreoretinopathy in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol. 2017;95:e278–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mulder VC, Tode J, van Dijk EH, Purtskhvanidze K, Roider J, van Meurs JC, et al. Preoperative aqueous humour flare values do not predict proliferative vitreoretinopathy in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:1285–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mulder VC, van Dijk EHC, van Meurs IA, La Heij EC, van Meurs JC. Postoperative aqueous humour flare as a surrogate marker for proliferative vitreoretinopathy development. Acta Ophthalmol. 2018;96:192–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoshi S, Okamoto F, Hasegawa Y, Sugiura Y, Okamoto Y, Hiraoka T, et al. Time course of changes in aqueous flare intensity after vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina. 2012;32:1862–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Osawa S, Oshima Y. 27-Gauge vitrectomy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014;54:54–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Inoue M, Tsukahara Y, Shirabe H, Yamamoto M. Disruption of the blood-aqueous barrier following retinal laser photocoagulation and cryopexy in pigmented rabbits. Ophthalmic Res. 2001;33:37–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marshall J, Hamilton AM, Bird AC. Histopathology of ruby and argon laser lesions in monkey and human retina. A comparative study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1975;59:610–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yamada Y, Takamura Y, Matsumura T, Morioka M, Gozawa M, Inatani M. Posterior subtenon infusion of triamcinolone acetonide as adjunctive treatment to panretinal photocoagulation using pattern scan laser for diabetic retinopathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018;62:686–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Arimura S, Takamura Y, Miyake S, Gozawa M, Iwasaki K, Tomomatsu T, et al. The effect of triamcinolone acetonide or bevacizumab on the levels of proinflammatory cytokines after retinal laser photocoagulation in pigmented rabbits. Exp Eye Res. 2016;149:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Takamura Y, Shimura M, Katome T, Someya H, Sugimoto M, Hirano T, et al. Effect of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide injection at the end of vitrectomy for vitreous haemorrhage related to proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:1351–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akira Tetsumoto
    • 1
  • Hisanori Imai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Keiko Otsuka
    • 1
  • Wataru Matsumiya
    • 1
  • Akiko Miki
    • 1
  • Makoto Nakamura
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Surgery-Related, Division of OphthalmologyKobe University Graduate School of MedicineKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations