Advertisement

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

, Volume 63, Issue 1, pp 82–89 | Cite as

Kago-Eye2 software for semi-automated segmentation of subfoveal choroid of optical coherence tomographic images

  • Shozo Sonoda
  • Hiroto Terasaki
  • Naoko Kakiuchi
  • Hideki Shiihara
  • Tomonori Sakoguchi
  • Masatoshi Tomita
  • Yuki Shinohara
  • Takehiro Yamashita
  • Eisuke Uchino
  • Taiji SakamotoEmail author
Clinical Investigation
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the capabilities of the “Kago-Eye2” software to semi-automatically segment the choroid in the optical coherence tomographic (OCT) images.

Study design

A cross-sectional, prospective study of 44 healthy volunteers.

Methods

The Kago-eye2 software was developed to detect the border between Choriocapillaris and Sattler’s layer (C–S) and between Sattler’s layer and Haller’s layer (S–H). The intra- and inter-grader agreements were determined for the segmentations made with semi-automated and manual analysis using the Kago-Eye2 software. The inter-method agreements were determined for two independent graders.

Results

Forty-four right eyes of 44 heathy volunteers (22 men) with a mean age of 35.0 ± 8.8 years were studied. The intra-grader agreement of the C–S border was 0.97 for grader 1 and 0.892 for grader 2 for the manual segmentation, and 0.908 for grader 1 and 0.842 for grader 2 for the Kago-Eye2 segmentation. For the S–H border, the intra-grader agreement was 0.96 for grader 1 and 0.981 for grader 2 for manual segmentation and 0.855 for grader 1 and 0.839 for grader 2 with the Kago-Eye2. For the C–S and S–H border, the inter-grader agreement was 0.548 and 0.902 for manual segmentation and 0.947 and 0.833 for the Kago-Eye2. The inter-method agreement was 0.565 for the C–S border and 0.759 for the S–H border.

Conclusion

The Kago-Eye2 software can segment the layers of the subfoveal choroid with good reproducibility and repeatability. We conclude that the Kago-Eye2 software can be used for semi-automatic segmentation of the choroidal layers.

Keywords

EDI-OCT Choroid Image binarization Kago-Eye2 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Emeritus Duco Hamasaki of the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute of the University of Miami for providing critical discussions and suggestions to our study and revision of the final manuscript. This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 15H04996.

Funding

The funding organizations had no role in the design or conduct of this research.

Conflicts of interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest in any materials, software or methods in this manuscript.

Supplementary material

10384_2018_631_MOESM1_ESM.docx (12 kb)
Supplemental File S1. Regional difference of choriocapillaris thickness
10384_2018_631_MOESM2_ESM.tif (2.7 mb)
Supplemental File S2. Scale size information in the embedded software in Spectralis OCT

References

  1. 1.
    Castro-Correia J. Understanding the choroid. Int Ophthalmol. 1995;19:135–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Imamura Y, Fujiwara T, Margolis R, Spaide RF. Enhanced depth imaging optical coherence tomography of the choroid in central serous chorioretinopathy. Retina. 2009;29:1469–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laude A, Cackett PD, Vithana EN, Yeo IY, Wong D, Koh AH, et al. Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy and neovascular age-related macular degeneration: same or different disease? Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lutty GA, Cao J, McLeod DS. Relationship of polymorphonuclear leukocytes to capillary dropout in the human diabetic choroid. Am J Pathol. 1997;151:707–14.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saito M, Kano M, Itagaki K, Ise S, Imaizumi K, Sekiryu T. Subfoveal choroidal thickness in polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy after switching to intravitreal aflibercept injection. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2016;60:35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yoshikawa M, Akagi T, Nakanishi H, Ikeda HO, Morooka S, Yamada H, et al. Longitudinal change in choroidal thickness after trabeculectomy in primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017;61:105–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pablo LE, Bambo MP, Cameo B, Ferrández B, Güerri N, Polo V, et al. The use of zonal analysis of peripapillary choroidal thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2018;62(1):41–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Song YJ, Kim YK, Jeoung JW, Park KH. Assessment of peripapillary choroidal thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma patients with choroidal vascular prominence. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017;61:448–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Enaida H, Nagata S, Takeda A, Nakao S, Ikeda Y, Ishibashi T. Changes in chorioretinal blood flow velocity and cerebral blood flow after carotid endarterectomy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2016;60:459–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Spaide RF, Koizumi H, Pozzoni MC. Enhanced depth imaging spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;146:496–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim JH, Kang SW, Kim JR, Kim SJ. Variability of subfoveal choroidal thickness measurements in patients with age-related macular degeneration and central serous chorioretinopathy. Eye (Lond). 2013;27:809–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rayess N, Rahimy E, Ying GS, Bagheri N, Ho AC, Regillo CD, et al. Baseline choroidal thickness as a predictor for response to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy in diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(85–91):e81–3.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sonoda S, Sakamoto T, Otsuka H, Yoshinaga N, Yamashita T, Kii Y, et al. Responsiveness of eyes with polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy with choroidal hyperpermeability to intravitreal ranibizumab. BMC Ophthalmol. 2013;13:43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sonoda S, Sakamoto T, Yamashita T, Shirasawa M, Uchino E, Terasaki H, et al. Choroidal structure in normal eyes and after photodynamic therapy determined by binarization of optical coherence tomographic images. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:3893–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sonoda S, Sakamoto T, Yamashita T, Uchino E, Kawano H, Yoshihara N, et al. Luminal and stromal areas of choroid determined by binarization method of optical coherence tomographic images. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159(1123–31):e1121.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sonoda S, Sakamoto T, Kakiuchi N, Shiihara H, Sakoguchi T, Tomita M, et al. Semi-automated software to measure luminal and stromal areas of choroid in optical coherence tomographic images. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2017 (in press).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kinoshita T, Mitamura Y, Mori T, Akaiwa K, Semba K, Egawa M, et al. Changes in choroidal structures in eyes with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy after half-dose photodynamic therapy. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sonoda S, Sakamoto T, Kuroiwa N, Arimura N, Kawano H, Yoshihara N, et al. Structural changes of inner and outer choroid in central serous chorioretinopathy determined by optical coherence tomography. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shirasawa M, Sakamoto T, Terasaki H, Yamashita T, Uchino E, Sonoda S. Objective determination of optimal number of spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic images of retina to average. PLoS One. 2014;9:e110550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yamashita T, Yamashita T, Shirasawa M, Arimura N, Terasaki H, Sakamoto T. Repeatability and reproducibility of subfoveal choroidal thickness in normal eyes of Japanese using different SD-OCT devices. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1102–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nickla DL, Wallman J. The multifunctional choroid. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2010;29:144–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Adhi M, Ferrara D, Mullins RF, Baumal CR, Mohler KJ, Kraus MF, et al. Characterization of choroidal layers in normal aging eyes using enface swept-source optical coherence tomography. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Almeida DR, Zhang L, Chin EK, Mullins RF, Kucukevcilioglu M, Critser DB, et al. Comparison of retinal and choriocapillaris thicknesses following sitting to supine transition in healthy individuals and patients with age-related macular degeneration. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133:297–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fleckenstein M, Charbel Issa P, Helb HM, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Finger RP, Scholl HP, et al. High-resolution spectral domain-OCT imaging in geographic atrophy associated with age-related macular degeneration. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:4137–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hassenstein A, Meyer CH. Clinical use and research applications of Heidelberg retinal angiography and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography - a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2009;37:130–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Ophthalmological Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shozo Sonoda
    • 1
  • Hiroto Terasaki
    • 1
  • Naoko Kakiuchi
    • 1
  • Hideki Shiihara
    • 1
  • Tomonori Sakoguchi
    • 1
  • Masatoshi Tomita
    • 1
  • Yuki Shinohara
    • 1
  • Takehiro Yamashita
    • 1
  • Eisuke Uchino
    • 1
  • Taiji Sakamoto
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of OphthalmologyKagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesKagoshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations