Tear film change and ocular symptoms after reading printed book and electronic book: a crossover study
- 33 Downloads
To evaluate and compare tear film changes and ocular symptoms after reading an electronic book (e-book) and a printed book.
Clinical and experimental.
Crossover study was conducted in 30 healthy volunteers, some of whom read an e-book and others a printed book for 20 minutes and then switched the following week. Tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), fluorescein break up time (FBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining score, and questionnaires about seven ocular symptoms were evaluated before and after reading by both reading methods.
After reading an e-book, FBUT and NIBUT were significantly decreased (p<0.001for both). Similar to printed book readers (p=0.006, p=0.04, respectively). TMH and corneal and conjunctival staining score showed no significant differences in either group. Comparing the two groups, the e-book group showed more decrease in TMH, FBUT, and NIBUT (p>0.05). Ocular symptoms were significantly increased in both groups. The e-book group showed more increase in all symptoms, but only tearing (p=0.03) and burning sensation (p=0.02) were significantly different.
Reading an e-book affected tear film instability and significantly increased burning sensation and tearing to a larger extend than reading a printed book.
KeywordsTear film change Ocular symptoms Computer vision syndrome Dry eye Electronic book
The authors gratefully acknowledge Ms.Julaporn Pooliam from the Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Health Research and Development, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital for assistance with statistical analysis, Mr.Dhanach Dhirachaikulpanich from Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital and Mr.Anupong Veeraburinon from the Research Division for preparing the manuscript.
Conflicts of interest
P Prabhasawat, None; W. Pinitpuwadol, None; D. Angsriprasert, None; P. Chonpimai, None; M. Saiman, None.
- 1.Electronic Transactions Development Agency, Ministry of Information and Communication Technology: Thailand Internet User Profile 2015. https://www.etda.or.th/publishing-detail/thailand-internet-user-profile-2015.html. 2016. Accessed 6 Aug 2017.
- 8.Scheiman M. Accommodative and binocular vision disorders associated with video display terminals: diagnosis and management issues. J Am Optom Assoc. 1996;67:531–9.Google Scholar
- 9.Agarwal S, Goel D, Sharma A. Evaluation of the factors which contribute to the ocular complaints in computer users. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7:331–5.Google Scholar
- 12.Porcar E, Pons AM, Lorente A. Visual and ocular effects from the use of flat-panel displays. Int J Ophthalmol. 2016;9:881–5.Google Scholar
- 15.Chu CA, Rosenfield M, Portello JK. Blink patterns: reading from a computer screen versus hard copy. Optom Vis Sci. 2014;91:297–302.Google Scholar
- 19.Hue JE, Rosenfield M, Saa G. Reading from electronic devices versus hardcopy text. Work. 2014;47:303–7.Google Scholar
- 26.Rossignol AM, Morse EP, Summers VM, Pagnotto LD. Video display terminal use and reported health symptoms among Massachusetts clerical workers. J Occup Med. 1987;29:112–8.Google Scholar
- 38.Ashish M. Difference between LED, LCD, plasma TVs and which one to buy. Guiding Media Pvt Ltd. 2017. https://www.guidingtech.com/26940/led-lcd-plasma-difference. Accessed 6 Aug 2017.
- 42.Fenety A, Walker JM. Short-term effects of workstation exercises on musculoskeletal discomfort and postural changes in seated video display unit workers. Phys Ther. 2002;82:578–89.Google Scholar
- 46.Tung CI, Perin AF, Gumus K, Pflugfelder SC. Tear meniscus dimensions in tear dysfunction and their correlation with clinical parameters. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;157(301–10):e1.Google Scholar