Advertisement

Service trade restrictiveness and internationalisation of retail trade

  • Andre JungmittagEmail author
Original Paper
  • 14 Downloads

Abstract

Based on a review of recent economic theories dealing with the internationalisation of firms and a discussion of necessary adaptations of these theories to special features of the retail trade sector, this paper offers an empirical analysis of the determinants of the extensive and intensive margin of retail trade FDI activities of 42 countries in 23 EU countries. Special attention is paid within a gravity model framework to the impact of service trade restrictions on both margins of retail trade internationalisation. The use of hurdle models for count data to estimate the determinants of the extensive margin takes into account that there are a lot of zero counts for the number of retail trade firms controlled by a country j in an EU country i. The estimation results for the extensive margin of retail trade FDI activities show that service trade restrictiveness increases the hurdle that at least one firm from country j controls a retail trade firm in country i. Once one firm from country j has been able to jump over this hurdle, the existing service trade restrictions are neither a relevant factor for the number of following firms from country j in that market nor for the average employment and sales of these firms.

Keywords

Economic integration Multinational enterprises Foreign direct investment Entry modes Location decisions Retail trade Service trade restrictions Count data model Hurdle model 

Notes

References

  1. Anderson JE, van Wincoop E (2003) Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle. Am Econ Rev 93:170–192Google Scholar
  2. Andrenelli A, et al. (2018) Multinational production and trade in services, OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 212, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard AB, et al. (2012) The empirics of firm heterogeneity and international trade. Annu Rev Econ 4:283–313Google Scholar
  4. Bhattacharya R, Patnaik I, Shah A (2012) Export versus FDI in services. World Econ 35:61–78Google Scholar
  5. Blind K, Jungmittag A (2004) Foreign direct investment, imports and innovations in the service industry. Rev Ind Organ 25:205–227Google Scholar
  6. Blonigen BA, Piper J (2014) Determinants of foreign direct investment. Can J Econ 47:775–812Google Scholar
  7. Boddewyn JJ, Halbrich MB, Perry AC (1986) Service multinationals: conceptualisation, measurement and theory. J Int Bus Stud 17:41–58Google Scholar
  8. Boylaud O, Nicoletti G (2001) Regulatory reform in retail trade. OECD Econ Stud 32:253–274Google Scholar
  9. Brainard SL (1993) A simple theory of multinational corporations and trade with a trade-off between proximity and concentration. NBER Working Paper No. 4269Google Scholar
  10. Brainard SL (1997) An empirical assessment of the proximity-concentration trade-off between multinational sales and trade. Am Econ Rev 87:520–544Google Scholar
  11. Carr DL, Markusen JR, Maskus K E (2001) Estimating the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise. Am Econ Rev 91:693–708Google Scholar
  12. Castellacci F (2014) Service innovation and the proximity-concentration trade-off model of trade and FDI. Econ Innov New Technol 23:92–108Google Scholar
  13. Chaney T (2008) Distorted gravity: the intensive and extensive margins of international trade. Am Econ Rev 98:1707–1721Google Scholar
  14. Chellaraj G, Mattoo A (2015) Can the knowledge capital model explain foreign investment in services? The Case of Singapore, World Bank Group Policy Research Working Paper 7186Google Scholar
  15. Chen MX, Moore MO (2010) Location decision of heterogeneous multinational firms. J Int Econ 80:188–199Google Scholar
  16. Dakora EAN, Bytheway AJ (2014) Entry mode issues in the internationalisation of South African retailing. Mediterr J Soc Sci 5:194–205Google Scholar
  17. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (2017) Global powers of retailing 2017—The art and science of customersGoogle Scholar
  18. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (2018) Global powers of retailing 2018—Transformative change, reinvigorated commerceGoogle Scholar
  19. Dobson PW, Waterson M (1997) Countervailing power and consumer prices. Econ J 107:418–430Google Scholar
  20. Dunning JH (1977) Trade, location of economic activity and the MNE: a search for an eclectic approach. In: Ohlin B, Hesselborn P O, Wijkman P M (eds) The international allocation of economic activity, LondonGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunning JH (1979) Explaining changing patterns of international production: in defence of the eclectic theory. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 41:269–295Google Scholar
  22. Dunning JH (1981) Explaining the international direct investment position of countries: towards a dynamic or developmental approach. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 117:30–64Google Scholar
  23. Dunning JH, Norman G (1987) The location choice of offices of international companies. Environ Plan 19:613–631Google Scholar
  24. Dunning JH, Pak YS, Beldona S (2007) Foreign ownership strategies of UK and US international franchisors: an exploratory application of Dunning’s envelope paradigm. Int Bus Rev 16:534–548Google Scholar
  25. EU Commission (2018) A European retail sector fit for the 21st century, Commission staff working document accompanying the document communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, SWD/2018/236 finalGoogle Scholar
  26. Evans J, Bridson K (2005) Explaining retail offer adaptation through psychic distance. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 33:69–78Google Scholar
  27. Falk M (2016) A gravity model of foreign direct investment in the hospitality industry. Tour Manag 55:225–237Google Scholar
  28. Faraway JJ (2016) Extending the linear model with R: generalized linear, mixed effects and nonparametric regression models, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  29. Fariñas JC, Martín-Marcos A, Velázquez FJ (2018) Multinational activity of European firms and heterogeneity. World Econ 41:1166–1195Google Scholar
  30. Fernandes AM, Paunov C (2012) Foreign direct investment in services and manufacturing productivity: evidence for Chile. J Dev Econ 97:305–321Google Scholar
  31. Fournier J (2015) The negative effect of regulatory divergence on foreign direct investment, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1268, ParisGoogle Scholar
  32. Garrett JZ (2016) Explaining asymmetries in bilateral FDI flows. Int Rev Econ Financ 41:155–171Google Scholar
  33. Gollnhofer JF, Turkina E (2015) Cultural distance and entry modes: implications for global expansion strategy. Cross Cult Manag 22:21–41Google Scholar
  34. Golub S, et al. (2003) The influence of policies on trade and foreign direct investment. OECD Econ Stud 36:7–83Google Scholar
  35. Greene WH (2012) Econometric analysis, 7th edn. Pearson Education, BostonGoogle Scholar
  36. Harris RG (1998) The internet as a GPT: factor market implications. In: Helpman E (ed) General purpose technologies and economic growth. Cambridge and London, pp 145–166Google Scholar
  37. Helpman E, Melitz MJ, Rubinstein Y (2008) Estimating trade flows: trading partners and trading volumes. Q J Econ 123:441–487Google Scholar
  38. Helpman E, Melitz MJ, Yeaple SR (2004) Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. Am Econ Rev 94:300–316Google Scholar
  39. Hewitt G (2000) Buying power of multiproduct retailers, Background note. OECD J Competition Law and Policy 2(1):93–166Google Scholar
  40. Hofstede G (2011) Dimensionalizing cultures: the Hofstede model in context. Online Read Psychol Cult 2(1):1–26Google Scholar
  41. Hollensen S (2007) Global marketing: a decision-oriented approach, 4th edn.Prentice Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  42. Horstmann I, Markusen JR (1992) Endogenous market structures in international trade. J Int Econ 32:109–129Google Scholar
  43. Khanna T, et al. (2009) METRO Cash & Carry, Harvard Business School Case 707-505Google Scholar
  44. Kogut B, Singh H (1988) The effect of national culture on the choice of entry model. J Int Bus Stud 19:411–432Google Scholar
  45. Krautheim S (2013) Export-supporting FDI. Can J Econ 46:1571–1605Google Scholar
  46. Krugman P (1983) The ‘new theories’ of international trade and the multinational enterprise. In: Audretsch D B, Kindleberger C (eds) The multinational corporation in the 1980s. CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  47. Linder GJ (2005) Cultural and institutional determinants of bilateral trade flows, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper, No. 05-074/3Google Scholar
  48. Mainer-Casado C, Fariñas JC, Moreno L (2018) The scope, scale and locational preferences of Spanish multinationals, MPRA Paper No. 85766Google Scholar
  49. Mariotti S, Nicolini M, Piscitello L (2013) Vertical linkages between foreign MNEs in service sectors and local manufacturing firms. Struct Chang Econ Dyn 25:133–145Google Scholar
  50. Markusen JR (1997) Trade versus investment liberalization. NBER Working Paper No. 6231Google Scholar
  51. Markusen JR (2002) Multinational firms and the theory of international trade. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Markusen JR, Maskus KE (2002) Discriminating among alternative theories of the multinational enterprise. Rev Int Econ 10:694–707Google Scholar
  53. Markusen JR, Strand B (2009) Adapting the knowledge-capital model of the multinational enterprise to trade and investment in business services. World Econ 32:6–29Google Scholar
  54. Melitz MJ (2003) The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica 71:1695–1725Google Scholar
  55. Miozzo M, Soete L (2001) Internationalization of services: a technological perspective. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 67:159–185Google Scholar
  56. Mohr A, Batsakis G (2018) Firm resources, cultural distance and simultaneous international expansion in the retail sector. Int Bus Rev 27:113–124Google Scholar
  57. Mullahy J (1986) Specification and testing of some modified count data models. J Econometr 33:341–365Google Scholar
  58. Nordas HK (2008) Gatekeepers to consumer markets: the role of retailers in international trade, The International Review of retail. Distribution and Consumer Research 18:449–472Google Scholar
  59. Nordas HK, Rouzet D (2017) The impact of services trade restrictiveness on trade flows. World Econ 40:1155–1183Google Scholar
  60. OECD (2017) Services trade policies and the global economy, ParisGoogle Scholar
  61. Oldenski L (2012) Export versus FDI and the communication of complex information. J Int Econ 87:312–322Google Scholar
  62. Park Y, Sternquist B (2008) The global retailer’s strategic proposition and choice of entry mode. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 36:281–299Google Scholar
  63. Pellegrini L (1991) The internationalization of retailing and 1992 Europe. J Mark Channels 1:3–27Google Scholar
  64. Pellegrini L (2000) Regulations and retail trade. In: Galli G, Pelkmans J (eds) Regulatory reform and competitiveness in Europe. II. CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  65. Pellegrini L (2003) Retail internationalisation: an organising framework. ECR J—Int Commerce Rev 3:30–41Google Scholar
  66. Petersen B, Welch L S (2000) International retailing operations: downstream entry and expansion via franchising. Bus Rev 9:479–496Google Scholar
  67. Philippides G, Resano-Ezcaray H, Sanjuán-López A I (2013) Capturing zero-trade values in gravity equations of trade: an analysis of protectionism in agro-food sectors. Agric Econ 44:141–159Google Scholar
  68. Quinn B, Alexander N (2002) International retail franchising: a conceptual framework. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 30:264–276Google Scholar
  69. Ramasamy B, Yeung M (2010) The determinants of foreign direct investment in services. World Econ 33:573–596Google Scholar
  70. Saffari SE, Adnan R, Greene WH (2012) Hurdle negative binomial regression model with right censored count data. SORT: Stat Oper Res Trans 36:181–194Google Scholar
  71. Shenkar O (2001) Cultural distance revisited: towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. J Int Bus Stud 32:519–535Google Scholar
  72. Sternquist B (1997) International expansion of US retailers. Int J Retail Distrib Manag 25:262–268Google Scholar
  73. Sternquist B (2007) International retailing, 2nd edn. Fairchild Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  74. Tanaka K (2015) Firm heterogeneity and FDI in distribution services. World Econ 38:1295–1311Google Scholar
  75. UNCTAD (2017) Investment and trade in services: the out-sized role of holdings and intrafirm services. UNCTAD Investment Trends Monitor, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  76. Williams B (1997) Positive theories of multinational banking: eclectic theory versus internalisation theory. J Econ Surv 11:71–100Google Scholar
  77. Yeaple SR (2009) Firm heterogeneity and the structure of U.S. multinational activity. J Int Econ 78:206–215Google Scholar
  78. Zeileis A, Kleiber C, Jackman S (2008) Regression models for count data in R. J Stat Softw 27:1–25Google Scholar
  79. Zwinkels RCJ, Beugelsdijk S (2010) Gravity equations: Workhorse or Trojan horse in explaining trade and FDI patterns across time and space? Int Bus Rev 19:102–115Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DG Joint Research Centre of the European CommissionSevilleSpain
  2. 2.FB3: Business and LawFrankfurt University of Applied SciencesFrankfurt am MainGermany

Personalised recommendations