Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift

, Volume 168, Issue 13–14, pp 361–366 | Cite as

Sustained attractiveness and natural youthful appearance by upper lip rejuvenation

Minimally invasive procedures to combat facial aging
  • Uwe WollinaEmail author
  • Alberto Goldman


Facial aging is a complex process individualized by interaction with exogenous and endogenous factors. The upper lip is one of the facial components by which facial attractiveness is defined. Upper lip aging is significantly influenced by maxillary bone and teeth. Aging of the cutaneous part can be aggravated by solar radiation and smoking. We provide a review about minimally invasive techniques for correction of aging signs of the upper lip with a tailored approach to patient’s characteristics. The treatment is based upon use of fillers, laser, and minor surgery.


Upper lip Exogenous aging Endogenous aging Esthetic medicine Anatomy 

Nachhaltige Attraktivität und natürliches jugendliches Aussehen durch Oberlippenrejuvenation

Minimalinvasive Verfahren zur Korrektur der Gesichtsalterung


Die Alterung des Gesichts ist ein komplexer Prozess, welcher durch die Wechselwirkung exogener und endogener Faktoren individuell geprägt wird. Die Oberlippe zählt zu den fazialen Komponenten, welche die Attraktivität des Gesichts definieren. Die Alterung der Oberlippe wird durch den Oberkieferknochen und die Zähne beeinflusst. Alterungsprozesse des kutanen Anteils können durch Sonnenbestrahlung und Rauchen aggraviert werden. Die Autoren stellen eine Übersicht zur den minimalinvasiven Verfahren der Korrektur altersbedingter Veränderungen der Oberlippe mit Individualisierung je nach Patientenmerkmalen vor. Die Technik basiert auf der Nutzung von Fillern, Lasern und kleineren chirurgischen Eingriffen.


Oberlippe Exogene Alterung Endogene Alterung Ästhetische Medizin Anatomie 


Conflict of interest

U. Wollina and A. Goldman declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. 1.
    Penna V, Fricke A, Iblher N, Eisenhardt SU, Stark GB. The attractive lip: a photomorphometric analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68:920–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Penna V, Stark GB, Voigt M, Mehlhorn A, Iblher N. Classification of the aging lips: a foundation for an integrated approach to perioral rejuvenation. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015;39:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raschke GF, Rieger UM, Bader RD, Schaefer O, Guentsch A, Gomez Dammeier M, et al. Perioral aging – an anthropometric appraisal. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2014;42:e312–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prendergast PM. Anatomy of the face and neck. In: Shiffman MA, Di Giuseppe A, editors. Cosmetic surgery. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. pp. 29–45.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cotofana S, Schenck TL, Trevidic P, Sykes J, Massry GG, Liew S, Graivier M, et al. Midface: clinical anatomy and regional approaches with injectable fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136:219S–234S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Phumyoo T, Tansatit T, Rachkeaw N. The soft tissue landmarks to avoid injury to the facial artery during filler and neurotoxin injection at the nasolabial region. J Craniofac Surg. 2014;25:1885–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee SH, Gil YC, Choi YJ, Tansatit T, Kim HJ, Hu KS. Topographic anatomy of the superior labial artery for dermal filler injection. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;135:445–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nolano M, Provitera V, Caporaso G, Stancanelli A, Leandri M, Biasiotta A, et al. Cutaneous innervation of the human face as assessed by skin biopsy. J Anat. 2013;222:161–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lagier A, Pénicaud M, Le Corroller T, Guenoun D, Cammilleri S, Champsaur P, et al. Lymphatic drainage of skin areas of head and neck: in vivo approach by the location of the sentinel node. Morphologie. 2014;98:32–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wollina U. Facial rejuvenation starts in the midface: three-dimensional volumetric facial rejuvenation has beneficial effects on nontreated neighboring esthetic units. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016;15:82–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wollina U. Perioral rejuvenation: restoration of attractiveness in aging females by minimally invasive procedures. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1149–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cartier H, Trevidic P, Rzany B, Sattler G, Kestemont P, Kerrouche N, et al. Perioral rejuvenation with a range of customized hyaluronic acid fillers: efficacy and safety over six months with a specific focus on the lips. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11:s17–s26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rzany B, Becker-Wegerich P, Bachmann F, Erdmann R, Wollina U. Hyaluronidase in the correction of hyaluronic acid-based fillers: a review and a recommendation for use. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2009;8:317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    San Miguel Moragas J, Reddy RR, Hernández Alfaro F, Mommaerts MY. Systematic review of “filling” procedures for lip augmentation regarding types of material, outcomes and complications. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2015;43:883–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beer K, Glogau RG, Dover JS, Shamban A, Handiwala L, Olin JT, et al. A randomized, evaluator-blinded, controlled study of effectiveness and safety of small particle hyaluronic acid plus lidocaine for lip augmentation and perioral rhytides. Dermatol Surg. 2015;41:S127–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tabrizi R, Shafiei E, Danesteh H. Dimensional changes of the upper lip using dermis fat graft for lip augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73:2030–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tansatit T, Apinuntrum P, Phetudom T. A typical pattern of the labial arteries with implication for lip augmentation with injectable fillers. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014;38:1083–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramirez OM, Khan AS, Robertson KM. The upper lip lift using the ‘bull’s horn’ approach. J Drugs Dermatol. 2003;2:303–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lee DE, Hur SW, Lee JH, Kim YH, Seul JH. Central lip lift as aesthetic and physiognomic plastic surgery: the effect on lower facial profile. Aesthet Surg J. 2015;35:698–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holden PK, Sufyan AS, Perkins SW. Long-term analysis of surgical correction of the senile upper lip. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011;13:332–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Luebberding S, Alexiades-Armenakas MR. Fractional, nonablative Q‑switched 1,064-nm neodymium YAG laser to rejuvenate photoaged skin: a pilot case series. J Drugs Dermatol. 2012;11:1300–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trelles MA, Shohat M, Urdiales F. Safe and effective one-session fractional skin resurfacing using a carbon dioxide laser device in super-pulse mode: a clinical and histologic study. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011;35:31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hedelund L, Bjerring P, Egekvist H, Haedersdal M. Ablative versus non-ablative treatment of perioral rhytides. A randomized controlled trial with long-term blinded clinical evaluations and non-invasive measurements. Lasers Surg Med. 2006;38:129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cohen JL. Perioral rejuvenation with ablative erbium resurfacing. J Drugs Dermatol. 2015;14:1363–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kruglikov IL. Neocollagenesis in non-invasive aesthetic treatments. J Cosmet Dermatol Sci Appl. 2013;3:26410.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wollina U. Capryloic salicylic acid (CSA) peel for acne and actinic damage. Kosmet Med. 2009;30:142–5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Wien 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Dermatology and AllergologyAcademic Teaching Hospital Dresden-FriedrichstadtDresdenGermany
  2. 2.Clinica GoldmanPorto Alegre/RSBrazil

Personalised recommendations