Advertisement

Changes in liver function tests after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with low- and high-pressure pneumoperitoneum

  • Zagor Zagorac
  • Rastko ZivicEmail author
  • Miljan Milanovic
  • Berislav Vekic
  • Branislav Dakovic
  • Zoran Bukumiric
  • Dragan Radovanovic
original article
  • 7 Downloads

Summary

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of pneumoperitoneum on liver function during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Methods

This prospective study comprised a total of 165 patients, who were divided into two groups: The first group had low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (12 mm Hg; N = 78) and the second group had high-pressure pneumoperitoneum (14 mm Hg; N = 87). A detailed statistical analysis included sex, age, operation time, and liver function tests including total bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), albumin, fibrinogen, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which were obtained preoperatively and 24 h, 7 days, and 30 days postoperatively. The statistical hypotheses were tested with a t test, Mann–Whitney test, chi-square test, Friedman test, and Wilcoxon’s test.

Results

There was no statistical difference between the two groups considering age, gender, and operation time (p = 0.740, p = 0.255, and p = 0.480, respectively). There was also no statistical difference in the median values of bilirubin, AST, GGT, LDH, albumin, and fibrinogen between the two groups. There was a significant statistical difference between the two groups in the median values of ALT on the 30th postoperative day (p = 0.045). There was a statistical difference for all hematochemical parameters as a function of time, independent of the level of intra-abdominal pressure (IAP).

Conclusion

There were no statistically significant differences in the values of parameters of structural damage to the liver between the two groups, but within the groups themselves. From this we conclude that both values of elevated IAP cause microstructural and functional damage to the liver.

Keywords

Liver function Cholecystectomy Pneumoperitoneum Capnoperitoneum Laparoscopy Anti-Trendelenburg position 

Notes

Conflict of interest

Z. Zagorac, R. Zivic, M. Milanovic, B. Vekic, B. Dakovic, Z. Bukumiric, and D. Radovanovic declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Neudecker J, Sauerland S, Neugebauer E, et al. The European Association for Endoscopic Surgery clinical practice guideline on the pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:1121–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lai H, Mo X, Yang Y, et al. Association between duration of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic abdominal surgery and hepatic injury: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(8):e104067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Richter S, Olinger A, Hildebrandt U, Menger MD, Vollmar B. Loss of physiologic hepatic blood flow control (“hepatic arterial buffer response”) during CO2-pneumoperitoneum in the rat. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(4):872–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Singh RK, Saini AM, Goel N, Bisht D, Seth A. Major laparoscopic surgery under regional anesthesia: a prospective feasibility study. Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71(2):126–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hirvonen EA, Nuutinen LS, Kauko M. Hemodynamic changes due to Trendelenburg positioning and pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic hysterectomy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1995;39(7):949–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sassa N, Hattori R, Yamamoto T, et al. Direct visualization of renal hemodynamics affected by carbon dioxide-induced pneumoperitoneum. Urology. 2009;73(2):311–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saber AA, Laraja RD, Nalbandian HI, Pablos-Mendez A, Hanna K. Changes in liver function tests after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: not so rare, not always ominous. Am Surg. 2000;66(7):699–702.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ishizaki Y, Bandai Y, Shimonura K, Abe H, Ohtomo Y, Idezuki Y. Safe intraabdominal pressure of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic surgery. Surgery. 1993;114(3):549–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blobner M, Bogdanski R, Kochs E, Henke J, Findeis A, Jelen-Esselborn S. Effects of intraabdominally insufflated carbon dioxide and elevated intraabdominal pressure on splanchnic circulation: an experimental study in pigs. Anesthesiology. 1998;89(2):475–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hasukic S. Postoperative changes in liver function tests. Randomized comparison of low- and high-pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:1451–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Richardson PD, Withrington PG. Liver blood flow. Intrinsic and nervous control of liver blood flow. Gastroenterology. 1981;81(1):356–75.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jeoung GA, Cho GS, Shin EJ, Lee MS, Kim HC, Song OP. Liver function alterations after laparoscopy assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer and its clinical significance. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:372–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tan M, Xu FF, Peng JS, et al. Changes in the level of serum liver enzymes after laparoscopic surgery. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:364–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zagor Zagorac
    • 1
  • Rastko Zivic
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Miljan Milanovic
    • 1
  • Berislav Vekic
    • 1
    • 3
  • Branislav Dakovic
    • 1
  • Zoran Bukumiric
    • 2
  • Dragan Radovanovic
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Surgical ClinicClinical Center Dr. Dragiša Mišović—DedinjeBelgradeSerbia
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of BelgradeBelgradeSerbia
  3. 3.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of KragujevacKragujevacSerbia

Personalised recommendations