Advertisement

Landslides

, Volume 16, Issue 11, pp 2219–2232 | Cite as

Investigation and numerical simulation of the 22 February 2018 landslide-triggered long-traveling debris flow at Pasir Panjang Village, Brebes Regency of Central Java, Indonesia

  • Hendy SetiawanEmail author
  • Wahyu Wilopo
  • Tuban Wiyoso
  • Teuku Faisal Fathani
  • Dwikorita Karnawati
Recent Landslides

Abstract

On 22 February 2018 at 08:00 am, a landslide occurred in the dense conserved forest area of the Cigunung Sub-River Basin at Pasir Panjang Village, Brebes Regency of Central Java Province, Indonesia. The landslide materials transformed into debris and flowed down along the river channel rapidly with a distance of more than 2 km, causing 18 people dead and 14 people injured. About 8.5 ha of farm fields, two bridges, 507 m of the provincial road, and 25 houses were destroyed due to the impact of debris flow. This paper reports the site investigation of Pasir Panjang landslide conducted in early June 2018 which covers geological on-site measurement, soil sampling for laboratory tests, and mapping using the unmanned aerial vehicle. Results imply that the source of Pasir Panjang landslide came from a highly weathered layer of volcanic breccia which fails from a steep slope. The landslide materials then entrained weathered tuffaceous sandstone and volcanic breccia layers along the river bank. Hydro-meteorological data shows that the two series of antecedent rainfalls in 10 consecutive days may generate the excess pore water pressure and high saturation condition within the landslide and debris flow area. The balancing depth of saturated soil layer then calculated to estimate the pore water pressure by using the slope infiltration distributed equilibrium model at each time interval of rainfall. We used the LS-RAPID numerical model to simulate the integration of failure mechanism of Pasir Panjang landslide and its debris motion behavior. The simulation results show that the slope fails from the unstable area of approximately 28,000 m2 with the velocity around 13–14 m/s and the maximum depth of 25–26 m. The landslide materials transformed into debris when hit the provincial road with the velocity of more than 30 m/s and traveling down rapidly to the farm field and civilization area. From this study and investigation, we concluded the enlarging volume, flow velocity, and long traveling of the debris materials of Pasir Panjang landslide controlled by the steep slope topography, highly weathered volcanic breccia, and saturated layers in the vicinity of the river and farm field area.

Keywords

Antecedent rainfall Steep slope Entrainment process Debris flow LS-RAPID Central Java 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the Indonesian Meteorological, Climatological and Geophysical Agency (BMKG) for the provision of hydro-meteorological data. We would like to thank our team Thema Arrisaldi, Egy Erzagian, Yusuf Bagaskoro, Adam Raka Ekasara, M. Naufal Alfaiz, and Leonardus Agung in the Department of Geological Engineering for their cooperation during site investigation and laboratory testing for samples taken from the Pasir Panjang landslide. We also thank to the anonymous referees and the editor for their constructive feedbacks and suggestions that encourage us to improve the quality of this paper.

Funding information

This research was financially supported by Tahir Foundation in Indonesia.

References

  1. Aldrian E, Dwi Susanto R (2003) Identification of three dominant rainfall regions within Indonesia and their relationship to sea surface temperature. Int J Climatol 23:1435–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apip TK, Yamashiki Y, Sassa K, Ibrahim AB, Fukuoka H (2010) A distributed hydrological–geotechnical model using satellite-derived rainfall estimates for shallow landslide prediction system at a catchment scale. Landslides 7:237–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dang K, Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Sakai N, Sato Y, Takara K, Quang LH, Loi DH, Van Tien P, Ha ND (2016) Mechanism of two rapid and long-runout landslides in the 16 April 2016 Kumamoto earthquake using a ring-shear apparatus and computer simulation (ls-rapid). Landslides 13:1525–1534.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-016-0748-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fathani TF, Karnawati D, Legono D, Faris F (2011) Development of early warning system for rainfall-induced landslide in Indonesia. In: Shieh C-L (ed) The 2nd International Workshop on Multimodal Sediment Disaster - Asian Cloud Network on Disaster Research, the Disaster Prevention Research Center. National Chung Kung University, Taiwan, pp 103–113Google Scholar
  5. Fathani TF, Karnawati D, Wilopo W (2016) An integrated methodology to develop a standard for landslide early warning systems. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 16:2123–2135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fukuoka H, Sassa K, Wang G (2007) Influence of shear speed and normal stress on the shear behavior and shear zone structure of granular materials in naturally drained ring shear tests. Landslides 4:63–74.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-006-0053-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hadmoko DS, Lavigne F, Sartohadi J, Hadi P, Winaryo (2010) Landslide hazard and risk assessment and their application in risk management and landuse planning in eastern flank of Menoreh mountains, Yogyakarta Province, Indonesia. Nat Hazards 54:623–642.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-009-9490-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11:167–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Huy LD, Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Sato Y, Takara K, Setiawan H, Pham T and Dang K (2018) Txt-tool 3.081-1.4: initiation mechanism of rapid and long run-out landslide and simulation of Hiroshima landslide disasters using the integrated simulation model (ls-rapid). Landslide dynamics: Isdr-icl landslide interactive teaching tools, Springer, pp 149–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jovančević SD, Nagai O, Sassa K and Arbanas Ž (2014) Deterministic landslide susceptibility analyses using ls-rapid software. The first regional symposium on landslides in Adrian-Balkan Region, pp 73–77Google Scholar
  11. Karnawati D, Fathani TF, Ignatius S, Andayani B, Legono D, Burton PW (2011) Landslide hazard and community-based risk reduction effort in Karanganyar and the surrounding area, Central Java, Indonesia. J Mt Sci 8:149–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kastowo (1975) Geologic map of the Majenang quadrangle, Java. Geological Survey of IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee J-h, Sassa K (1996) A study on the apparent friction angle mobilized during the undrained loading in long run-out landslides. Bull Disas Prev Res Inst Kyoto Univ 45:99–124Google Scholar
  14. Liao Z, Hong Y, Wang J, Fukuoka H, Sassa K, Karnawati D, Fathani F (2010) Prototyping an experimental early warning system for rainfall-induced landslides in Indonesia using satellite remote sensing and geospatial datasets. Landslides 7:317–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mangeney A (2011) Geomorphology: landslide boost from entrainment. Nat Geosci 4:77–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Marfai MA, King L, Singh LP, Mardiatno D, Sartohadi J, Hadmoko DS, Dewi A (2008) Natural hazards in Central Java Province, Indonesia: an overview. Environ Geol 56:335–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Montrasio L, Valentino R (2008) A model for triggering mechanisms of shallow landslides. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 8:1149–1159.  https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-1149-2008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Okada Y, Ochiai H, Okamoto T, Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Igwe O (2007) A complex earth slide–earth flow induction by the heavy rainfall in July 2006, Okaya City, Nagano Prefecture, Japan. Landslides 4:197–203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-006-0075-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sassa K, Dang K (2018) Txt-tool 0.081-1.1: landslide dynamics for risk assessment. In: Sassa K, Tiwari B, Liu K-F, McSaveney M, Strom A, Setiawan H (eds) Landslide dynamics: Isdr-icl landslide interactive teaching tools : volume 2: testing, risk management and country practices. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 1–79Google Scholar
  20. Sassa K, Fukuoka H, Wang G, Ishikawa N (2004) Undrained dynamic-loading ring-shear apparatus and its application to landslide dynamics. Landslides 1:7–19.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-003-0004-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sassa K, Nagai O, Solidum R, Yamazaki Y, Ohta H (2010) An integrated model simulating the initiation and motion of earthquake and rain induced rapid landslides and its application to the 2006 Leyte landslide. Landslides 7:219–236.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-010-0230-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sassa K, He B, Miyagi T, Strasser M, Konagai K, Ostric M, Setiawan H, Takara K, Nagai O, Yamashiki Y, Tutumi S (2012) A hypothesis of the Senoumi submarine megaslide in Suruga Bay in Japan—based on the undrained dynamic-loading ring shear tests and computer simulation. Landslides 9:439–455.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-012-0356-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sassa K, Setiawan H, He B, Gradiški K, Dang K (2018) Txt-tool 3.081-1.5: manual for the ls-rapid software. In: Sassa K, Tiwari B, Liu K-F, McSaveney M, Strom A, Setiawan H (eds) Landslide dynamics: Isdr-icl landslide interactive teaching tools : volume 2: testing, risk management and country practices. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 191–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Scheidegger AE (1973) On the prediction of the reach and velocity of catastrophic landslides. Rock Mech Rock Eng 5:231–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. See-Sew G, Dwikorita K, Shiao-Yun W (2009) Policy and institutional framework for landslide mitigation and risk reduction. In: Sassa K, Canuti P (eds) Landslides – disaster risk reduction. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 531–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang G, Sassa K (2003) Pore-pressure generation and movement of rainfall-induced landslides: effects of grain size and fine-particle content. Eng Geol 69:109–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00268-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wang G, Sassa K, Fukuoka H (2003) Downslope volume enlargement of a debris slide–debris flow in the 1999 Hiroshima, Japan, rainstorm. Eng Geol 69:309–330.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0013-7952(02)00289-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversitas Gadjah MadaYogyakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.Center for Disaster Mitigation and Technological Innovation (GAMA-InaTEK)Universitas Gadjah MadaYogyakartaIndonesia
  3. 3.Indonesian Meteorological, Climatological and Geophysical Agency (BMKG)JakartaIndonesia
  4. 4.Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringUniversitas Gadjah MadaYogyakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations