Advertisement

Landslides

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 585–596 | Cite as

Risk assessment for landslide-induced impulse waves in the Three Gorges Reservoir, China

  • Bolin HuangEmail author
  • Yueping Yin
  • Jianmin Tan
Original Paper
  • 160 Downloads

Abstract

The Three Gorges Reservoir, which is located in an area with a high incidence of geological hazards, has recently suffered great losses owing to landslide-induced impulse waves. Along with the rapid development of cities in the vicinity of the Yangtze River, the Three Gorges Reservoir, with current daily traffic of about 235 large vessels, is an increasingly important logistics channel. The risk related to impulse waves in this channel cannot be ignored. In this study, a combined quantitative-qualitative technical framework is proposed to assess the risk of landslide-induced impulse waves in the Three Gorges Reservoir based on a combination of risk assessment methods for landslides and tsunamis. The proposed assessment method is applied to the Wu Gorge section of the reservoir, which is prone to landslides and consequent impulse waves. A risk analysis is performed on landslides known-to-date to be of potential threat to the Wu Gorge through tsunami genesis, including the Maocaopo landslide, Gongjiafang IV landslide, Ganjingzi landslide, Jianchuandong rockfall, Quchitan rockfall, and Banbiyan rockfall. As communities along the Yangtze River are more likely to be exposed to impulse waves when there is a high water level of 175 m above sea level, there are significant differences for areas affected by impulse waves under different water level conditions. The vulnerability of both sailing and moored ships is analyzed by a simple quantitative method, while a vulnerability assessment for riverside communities is performed qualitatively. Based on the results of the risk assessment, the potential landslides can be ranked from high to low level of risk as Jianchuandong rockfall, Banbiyan rockfall, Quchitan rockfall, Gongjiafang IV landslide, Maocaopo landslide, and Ganjingzi landslide. The impulse waves caused by the Jianchuandong rockfall could cause the highest level of human loss, as the Qingshi community will be attacked by it, while the Ganjingzi landslide could cause the highest economic loss (about 8 million RMB or 1.16 million USD), as many wharf boats and vessels docked in the wharf of Wushan County will be attacked by it. The Qingshi and Peishi communities have fallen into the very high-risk rank. The proposed method for risk analysis may provide a basis for the risk priority control of geological hazards and early warning in the Wu Gorge section. However, there is still a long journey before a mature technical framework for risk assessment on landslide-induced impulse waves in reservoirs can be achieved. The methods presented here can help to control, prevent, and reduce the destructive consequences of landslide-induced waves in reservoirs around the world.

Keywords

Three Gorges Reservoir Landslide-induced impulse wave Vulnerability analysis Risk assessment Case study 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors appreciate the anonymous reviewers of this paper and Barberopoulou Aggeliki for their detailed remarks and helpful suggestions. Meanwhile, the authors acknowledge Vikas Narang who helped us polish our English writing.

Funding information

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (ID 2018YFC1504803), National Natural Science Foundation of China (ID 41372321) and China Geological Survey Project (121201009000150018).

References

  1. Arrow KJ (1971) Insurance, Risk and Resource Allocation Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, pp 134–143Google Scholar
  2. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Najafi-Jilani A (2008) Laboratory investigations on impulsive waves caused by underwater landslide. Coast Eng 55:989–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Shobeyri G (2008) Numerical simulation of landslide impulsive waves by incompressible smoothed particle hydrodynamics. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 56:209–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ataie-Ashtiani B, Yavari-Ramshe (2011) Numerical simulation of wave generated by landslide incidents in dam reservoirs. Landslides 8(4):417–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Australian Geomechanics Society (2000) Landslide Risk Management Concepts and Guidelines. Aust Geomech 5(1):49–92Google Scholar
  6. Barberopoulou A, Mark RL, Burak U, Costas ES (2011) Reassessing the tsunami risk in major ports and harbors of California I: San Diego. Nat Hazards 58:479–496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baum RL, Coe JA, Godt JW et al (2005) Regional landslide-hazard assessment for Seattle, Washington, USA. Landslides 4:266–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Birkmann J (2006) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Birkmann J, Von TK, Welle T et al (2010) The unperceived risk to Europe’s coasts: tsunamis and the vulnerability of Cadiz, Spain. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 10:2659–2675CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Charalampakis M, Stefatos A, Mpourdopoulos K, Ferentinos G (2007) Towards the mitigation of the tsunami risk by submarine mass failures in the gulf of Corinth: the xylocastro resort town case study. Submarine Mass Movements and Their Consequences, pp 367–375Google Scholar
  11. Chen L, Yang QF, Yu T et al (2017) Model experimental studies of safety of moored ship under landslide surge action. Hydro-Sci Eng 1:80–86 (in Chinese)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clague JJ, Munro A, Murty T (2003) Tsunami hazard and risk in Canada. Nat Hazards 28(2–3):433–461Google Scholar
  13. Crichton D (1999) The risk triangle. In: Ingleton J (ed) Natural Disaster Management. Tudor Rose, London, pp 102–103Google Scholar
  14. De Girolamo P, Di Risio M, Romano A, Molfetta MG (2014) Landslide tsunami: physical modeling for the implementation of tsunami EarlyWarning Systems in the Mediterranean Sea. Procedia Engineering 70:429–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Risio M, Sammarco P (2008) Analytical modeling of landslidegenerated impulse waves. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 134:53–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Di Risio M, Bruschi A, Lisi I, Pesarino V, Pasquali D (2017) Comparative analysis of coastal flooding vulnerability and Hazard assessment at National Scale. J Mar Sci Eng 5:51–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fell R (1994) Landslide risk assessment and acceptable risk. Can Geotech J 31(2):261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fournier DEM (1979) Objectives of volcanic monitoring and prediction. J Geol Soc 136:321–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fritz HM, Hager WH, Minor HE (2004) Near field characteristics of landslide generated impulse waves. ASCE J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng 130:287–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Galli M, Guzzetti F (2007) Landslide vulnerability criteria: a case study from Umbria, Central Italy. Environ Manag 40:649–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Geological Team of ChongQing City (2016) Geo-hazard survey in Yangtze River main stream of Three Gorges Reservoir of Chongqing City. Report of Land & Resources Department of ChongQing City, 2016, ChongqingGoogle Scholar
  22. Gornitz VM, Daniels RC, White TW, Birdwell KR (1994) The development of a coastal risk assessment database: vulnerability to sea-level rise in the US southeast. J Coast Res 327-338Google Scholar
  23. Granger K, Jones T, Leiba M, Scott G (1999) Community risk in Cairns: a multi-hazard risk assessment. Australian Geological Survey Organization, CanberraGoogle Scholar
  24. Grezio A, Gasparini P, Marzocchi W, Patera A (2012) Tsunami risk assessments in Messina, Sicily – Italy. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 12(1):151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guo XiY, Wu D, Luo Y (2017) The freight volume via Three Gorges ship lock reached a record of 1.3 million tons in 2016, which is the highest record of history. http://www.chinanews.com/cj/2017/01-06/8116159.shtml. (in Chinese). Accessed 4 Sept 2017
  26. Hiroaki S, Hitoshi M, Yasunori K, Naoaki Y (2003) Study on a simplified method of tsunami risk assessment. Nat Hazards 29:325–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ho KKS, Leroi E, Roberds B (2000) Quantitative risk assessment-application, myths and future direction. Proc. of the international conference on geotechnical and geological engineering. Melbourne 1:269–312Google Scholar
  28. Huang BL, Chen LD, Peng XM et al (2010) Assessment of the risk of rockfalls in Wu gorge, three gorges, China. Landslides 7(1):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang BL, Yin YP, Liu GN, Wang S, Chen X, Huo Z (2012) Analysis of waves generated by Gongjiafang landslide in Wu gorge, three gorges reservoir, on November 23, 2008. Landslides 9(3):395–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huang BL, Liu GN, Wang SC, Chen XT, Qi X (2015) Disaster mechanism study on high-steep Bank of Three Gorges Rerservoir. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  31. Huang BL, Yin YP, Du C (2016) Risk management study on impulse waves generated by Hongyanzi landslide in three gorges reservoir of China on June 24, 2015. Landslides 13(3):603–616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huber A, Hager WH (1997) Forecasting impulse waves in reservoirs. In: Dixneuvie’me congress des grands barrages C, Florence, Italy, vol 31. Commission International des Grands Barrages, Paris, pp 993–1005Google Scholar
  33. Hungr O, Leroueil S, Picarelli L (2014) The Varnes classification of landslide types, an update. Landslides 11(2):167–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jelinek R, Krausmann E, Gonzalez M, Alvarez-Gomez JA, Birkmann J, Welle T (2012) Approaches for tsunami risk assessment and application to the city of Cadiz, Spain. Nat Hazards 60:273–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee KH, Kim SW, Kim SH (2016) Simulating floods triggered by volcanic activities in the Cheon-ji caldera lake for hazards and risk analysis. J Flood Risk Manag 11:S479–S488.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12245 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lu D, Wang PY, Yu T et al (2014) Experimental studies of restricted waterway for ships during landslide generated waves. Hydro-Sci Eng 4:70–77 (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  37. Martínez-Graña A, Boski T, Goy J, Zazo C, Dabrio C (2016) Coastal-flood risk management in Central Algarve:vulnerability and flood risk indices (South Portugal). Ecol Indic 71:302–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oppenheimer D, Rhoades JM, Roberts C, Von Hillebrandt-Andrade, Whitmore P, Williams C (2009) National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program 2009–2013 Strategic Plan. U.S. NTHMP, Silver Spring, p 34Google Scholar
  39. Rynn J, Davidson J (1999) Contemporary assessment of tsunami risk and implication for early warnings for Australia and its island territories. Sci Tsunami Hazards 17(2):107–125Google Scholar
  40. Sergio F, Chrisroph A, Stephanie W (2013) Advaning tsunami risk assessment by impr oving spatio-temporal population exposure and evacuation medeling. Nat Hazards 68:1311–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Strunz G, Post J, Zosseder K et al (2011) Tsunami risk assessment in Indonesia. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:37–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. The Command of the Geo-hazard Prevention and Control Work for the Three Gorges Reservoir Area (2014) Technical requirements for geological exploration for geological Hazard control projects in the three gorges reservoir region. China University of Geosciences Press CO., LTD, WuhanGoogle Scholar
  43. The State Oceanic Administration of PRC (2015) Emergency Plan for Storm Surge, Sea Wave, Tsunami, and Sea Ice Disasters. http://www.china.com.cn/haiyang/2014-07/15/content_32953307.htm (in Chinese). Accessed 4 Sept 2017
  44. Thieler E, Hammar-Klose E (1999) National Assessment of coastal vulnerability to Future Sea level rise: preliminary results for the U.S. Atlantic Coast; technical report open-file report 99-593; U.S. Geological Survey: Reston, VA, USAGoogle Scholar
  45. Thywissen K (2006) Core terminology of disaster reduction: a comparative glossary. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards. UNU Press, Tokyo, pp 448–496Google Scholar
  46. Van Westen CJ, Asch TWJ, Soeters R (2005) Landslide hazard and risk zonation-why is it still so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Environ 65(2):167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walder JS, Watts P, Oscar ES, Kenneth J (2003) Water waves generated by subaerial mass flows. J Geophys Res 108:2236–2255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wang SC, Huang BL, Liu GN (2015) Numerical simulation of tsunami due to slope failure at Gongjiafang on three gorges reservoir. Chin J Rock Soil Mech 36(01):212–218Google Scholar
  49. Watts P, Grilli ST, Kirby JT, Fryer GJ, Tappin DR (2005) Landslide tsunami case studies using a Boussinesq model and a fully nonlinear tsunami generation model. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 3:391–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wu SR (2012) Theory and Technology of Landslide Risk Assessment. Science Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  51. Wu SR, Shi JS, Zhang CS, Wang T (2009) Preliminary discussion on technical guideline for geohazard risk assessment. Geol Bull China 2009(8):995–1005 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  52. Xiang XQ, Huang RQ (2000) Risk assessment and risk management for slope geohazards. Chin J Geol Hazards Environ Preserv 1:38–41 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  53. Xie JS, Ioan N, Tad M (2012) Tsunami risk for Western Canada and numerical modelling of the Cascadia fault tsunami. Nat Hazards 60:149–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yanagisawa H, Koshimura S, Miyagi T et al (2010) Tsunami damage reduction performance of a mangrove forest in Banda Aceh, Indonesia inferred from field data and a numerical model. J Geophys Res Oceans 115(C6):1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yin K, Liu Y, Wang Y, Jiang Z (2012) Physical model experiments of landslide-induced surge in three gorges reservoir. Earth Sci J China Univ Geosci 37(5):1067–1074Google Scholar
  56. Yin YP, Huang BL, Liu GN, Wang S (2015) Potential risk analysis on a Jianchuandong dangerous rockmass - generated impulse wave in the three gorges reservoir, China. Environ Earth Sci 74:2595–2607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Yin YP, Huang BL, Wang WP, Wei YJ, Ma XH, Ma F, Zhao CJ (2016) Reservoir-induced landslides and risk control in three gorges project on Yangtze River, China. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 8:577–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zeynep CC, Mehmet LS, Ahmet CY, Cagil K, Andrey Z, Betul A (2016) A New GIS-based tsunami risk evaluation: MeTHuHVA (METU tsunami human vulnerability assessment) at Yenikapl, Istanbul. Earth Planets Space 68:133–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zhang ZH, Huang BL, Wang P (2017) Geo-hazard survey report of Banbiyan Rockfall, report of Land & Resources Department of ChongQing City, 2016, Chongqing (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hubei Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and MitigationChina Three Gorges UniversityYichangChina
  2. 2.Wuhan Center of China Geological SurveyWuhanChina
  3. 3.China Institute of Geo-environment MonitoringBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations