Advertisement

Spatial patterns of climate–growth relationships across species distribution as a forest management tool in Moncayo Natural Park (Spain)

  • Edurne Martínez del CastilloEmail author
  • Luis Alberto Longares
  • Roberto Serrano-Notivoli
  • Ute G. W. Sass-Klaassen
  • Martin de Luis
Original Paper
  • 35 Downloads

Abstract

Forests exhibit strategies to cope with climate change; however, the rate of the changes on forests can be slower than the actual changes in environmental conditions. Forest management policies, such as assisted migration, may help forests to adapt their species distribution to changing climate conditions. Nonetheless, it certainly requires a better knowledge of climate influences on trees to ensure the success of specific management actions. In this study, we apply dendroclimatological methods to investigate the growth response of the main forest species present in Moncayo Natural Park to climate to assess their current relationship and to model these responses over the potential distribution of each species across the study area. Our results revealed large differences in the response of beech, pine and Pyrenean oak to prevailing climate factors and indicated species-specific patterns of climate sensitivity. The general importance of summer conditions for tree growth was confirmed. In addition, we found directional trends in correlation with specific climate factors along spatial gradients; these results are consistent with the autoecology of the studied species. Based on these findings, we present a new model approach that can serve as a key tool for forest managers to design forest communities that are more stable during climatic change.

Keywords

Forest management Climate Tree growth GAMs Dendrochronology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by DGA-La Caixa (Project GA-LC-031/2010) and by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and competitiveness (Projects CGL2012-31668, CGL2015-69985). E. Martinez del Castillo benefited from a PhD Grant (No. BES-2013-064453) funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and competitiveness. International cooperation was supported by a short stay (No. EEBB-I-15-09810) and by the COST Action FP1106, (STReESS). The authors gratefully thank the staff of Moncayo Natural Park (Gob. Aragón) for their help in the field work.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Supplementary material

10342_2019_1169_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 16 kb)

References

  1. Aranda I, Gil L, Pardos JA (2000) Water relations and gas exchange in Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Mattuschka) Liebl. in a mixed stand at their southern limit of distribution in Europe. Trees Struct Funct 14:344–352.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004680050229 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrechea E (2002) La gestión forestal en los espacios naturales protegidos: el ejemplo del Parque Natural del Moncayo. Rev Ecosistemas 11(2)Google Scholar
  3. Booth TH (2017) Assessing species climatic requirements beyond the realized niche: some lessons mainly from tree species distribution modelling. Clim Change 145:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2107-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bunn AG (2008) A dendrochronology program library in R (dplR). Dendrochronologia 26:115–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2008.01.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cailleret M, Davi H (2011) Effects of climate on diameter growth of co-occurring Fagus sylvatica and Abies alba along an altitudinal gradient. Trees Struct Funct 25:265–276.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-010-0503-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Camarero JJ, Olano JM, Parras A (2010) Plastic bimodal xylogenesis in conifers from continental Mediterranean climates. New Phytol 185:471–480.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03073.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cavin L, Jump AS (2016) Highest drought sensitivity and lowest resistance to growth suppression are found in the range core of the tree Fagus sylvatica L. not the equatorial range edge. Glob Change Biol 23:1–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13366 Google Scholar
  8. Chen K, Dorado-Liñán I, Akhmetzyanov L et al (2015) Influence of climate drivers and the North Atlantic Oscillation on beech growth at marginal sites across the Mediterranean. Clim Res 66:229–242.  https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01345 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Corcuera L, Camarero JJ, Sisó S, Gil-Pelegrín E (2006) Radial-growth and wood-anatomical changes in overaged Quercus pyrenaica coppice stands: functional responses in a new Mediterranean landscape. Trees Struct Funct 20:91–98.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-005-0016-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Čufar K, Prislan P, De Luis M, Gričar J (2008) Tree-ring variation, wood formation and phenology of beech (Fagus sylvatica) from a representative site in Slovenia, SE Central Europe. Trees Struct Funct 22:749–758.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0235-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Čufar K, Grabner M, Morgós A et al (2014) Common climatic signals affecting oak tree-ring growth in SE Central Europe. Trees Struct Funct 28:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-013-0972-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. de Luis M, Gričar J, Čufar K, Raventós J (2007) Seasonal dynamics of wood formation in Pinus halepensis from drya and semi-arid ecosystems in Spain. IAWA J 28:389–404.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-007-0199-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Luis M, Novak K, Raventós J et al (2011) Climate factors promoting intra-annual density fluctuations in Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis) from semiarid sites. Dendrochronologia 29:163–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2011.01.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Luis M, Čufar K, Di Filippo A et al (2013) Plasticity in dendroclimatic response across the distribution range of Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensis). PLoS ONE 8:e83550.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083550 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Filippo A, Biondi F, Čufar K et al (2007) Bioclimatology of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in the Eastern Alps: spatial and altitudinal climatic signals identified through a tree-ring network. J Biogeogr 34:1873–1892.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01747.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dorado-Liñán I, Akhmetzyanov L, Menzel A (2017) Climate threats on growth of rear-edge European beech peripheral populations in Spain. Int J Biometeorol 61:2097–2110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-017-1410-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Farahat E, Linderholm HW (2018) Growth–climate relationship of European beech at its northern distribution limit. Eur J For Res 137:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1129-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fritts HC (1972) Tree rings and climate. Sci Am 226:92–100.  https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0572-92 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. García-González I, Souto-Herrero M (2017) Earlywood vessel area of Quercus pyrenaica Willd. is a powerful indicator of soil water excess at growth resumption. Eur J For Res 136:329–344.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-017-1035-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. García-Suárez AM, Butler CJ, Baillie MGL (2009) Climate signal in tree-ring chronologies in a temperate climate: a multi-species approach. Dendrochronologia 27:183–198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2009.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Granier A, Reichstein M, Bréda N et al (2007) Evidence for soil water control on carbon and water dynamics in European forests during the extremely dry year: 2003. Agric For Meteorol 143:123–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2006.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gričar J, Zupančič M, Čufar K, Oven P (2007) Regular cambial activity and xylem and phloem formation in locally heated and cooled stem portions of Norway spruce. Wood Sci Technol 41:463–475.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-006-0109-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gričar J, Prislan P, De Luis M et al (2016) Lack of annual periodicity in cambial production of phloem in trees from Meditterranean areas. IAWA J 37:349–364.  https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-20160138 Google Scholar
  24. Hartl-Meier C, Dittmar C, Zang C, Rothe A (2014) Mountain forest growth response to climate change in the Northern Limestone Alps. Trees 28:819–829.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-014-0994-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hastie T, Tibshirani R (1986) Generalized additive models. Stat Sci 1:297–310.  https://doi.org/10.1214/ss/1177013604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. IPCC (2013) Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. In: Pachauri RK, Meyer LA (eds) Core Writing Team. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 151 ppGoogle Scholar
  27. Kharal DK, Thapa UK, St. George S et al (2017) Tree-climate relations along an elevational transect in Manang Valley, central Nepal. Dendrochronologia 41:57–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dendro.2016.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kraus C, Zang C, Menzel A (2016) Elevational response in leaf and xylem phenology reveals different prolongation of growing period of common beech and Norway spruce under warming conditions in the Bavarian Alps. Eur J For Res 135:1011–1023.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-016-0990-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Longares Aladrén LA (2004) Moncayo vegetal landscape in Aragón. In: Peña Monne JL, Longares LA, Sanchez Fabre M (eds) Physical Geography of Aragón. General and thematic subjects. Universidad de Zaragoza and Institución Fernando el Católico, Zaragoza, pp 187–197Google Scholar
  30. Loran C, Kienast F, Bürgi M (2018) Change and persistence: exploring the driving forces of long-term forest cover dynamics in the Swiss lowlands. Eur J For Res 137:693–706.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-018-1134-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martínez del Castillo E, García-Martin A, Longares Aladrén LA, de Luis M (2015) Evaluation of forest cover change using remote sensing techniques and landscape metrics in Moncayo Natural Park (Spain). Appl Geogr 62:247–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.05.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martínez del Castillo E, Longares Aladrén LA, Gričar J et al (2016) Living on the edge: contrasted wood-formation dynamics in Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris under Mediterranean Conditions. Front Plant Sci 7:370.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00370 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martínez del Castillo E, Prislan P, Gričar J et al (2018a) Challenges for growth of beech and co-occurring conifers in a changing climate context. Dendrochronologia 52:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DENDRO.2018.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martínez del Castillo E, Tejedor E, Serrano-Notivoli R et al (2018b) Contrasting patterns of tree growth of Mediterranean Pine Species in the Iberian Peninsula. Forests 9:416.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f9070416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mérian P, Bontemps J-D, Bergès L, Lebourgeois F (2011) Spatial variation and temporal instability in climate–growth relationships of sessile oak (Quercus petraea [Matt.] Liebl.) under temperate conditions. Plant Ecol 212:1855–1871.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-011-9959-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mott CL (2010) Environmental constraints to the geographic expansion of plant and animal species. Nat Educ Knowl 3(10):72Google Scholar
  37. Nabuurs GJ, Delacote P, Ellison D et al (2017) By 2050 the mitigation effects of EU forests could nearly double through climate smart forestry. Forests 8:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f8120484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. National Research Council (2012) Assessing the reliability of complex models. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  39. Nieto Quintano P, Caudullo G, de Rigo D (2016) Quercus pyrenaica in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: San-Miguel-Ayanz J, de Rigo D, Caudullo G, Houston Durrant T, Mauri A (eds) European atlas of forest tree species. The Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, p e01f807Google Scholar
  40. Novak K, De Luis M, Gričar J et al (2016) Missing and dark rings associated with drought in Pinus halepensis. IAWA J 37:260–274.  https://doi.org/10.1163/22941932-20160133 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pearson RG, Dawson TP (2003) Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 12:361–371.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1466-822X.2003.00042.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pearson RG, Dawson TP, Liu C (2004) Modelling species distributions in Britain: a hierarchical integration of climate and land-cover data. Ecography (Cop) 27:285–298.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03740.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pérez-de-Lis G, Rozas V, Vázquez-Ruiz RA, García-González I (2018) Do ring-porous oaks prioritize earlywood vessel efficiency over safety? Environmental effects on vessel diameter and tyloses formation. Agric For Meteorol 248:205–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.09.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ponocná T, Spyt B, Kaczka R et al (2016) Growth trends and climate responses of Norway spruce along elevational gradients in East-Central Europe. Trees 30:1633–1646.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-016-1396-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Porté A, Bartelink H (2002) Modelling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management. Ecol Modell 150:141–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00476-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Prislan P, Gričar J, de Luis M et al (2013) Phenological variation in xylem and phloem formation in Fagus sylvatica from two contrasting sites. Agric For Meteorol 180:142–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prislan P, Gričar J, de Luis M et al (2016) Annual cambial rhythm in Pinus halepensis and Pinus sylvestris as indicator for climate adaptation. Front Plant Sci 7:1923.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01923 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Reed KL, Clark SG (1978) The niche and forest growth. In: Edwards RL (ed) The natural behavior and response to stress of Western Coniferous Forests, IBP SYNTHE. Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, StroudsburgGoogle Scholar
  49. Risser PG (1995) The status of the science examing ecotones. Bioscience 45:318–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rozas V, Camarero JJ, Sangüesa-Barreda G et al (2015) Summer drought and ENSO-related cloudiness distinctly drive Fagus sylvatica growth near the species rear-edge in northern Spain. Agric For Meteorol 201:153–164.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2014.11.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sáenz-Romero C, Lindig-Cisneros RA, Joyce DG et al (2016) Assisted migration of forest populations for adapting trees to climate change. Rev Chapingo Ser Ciencias For y del Ambient XXII:303–323.  https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchscfa.2014.10.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sass-Klaassen UGW, Fonti P, Cherubini P et al (2016) A tree-centered approach to assess impacts of extreme climatic events on forests. Front Plant Sci 7:1069.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.01069 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Serrano-Notivoli R, Beguería S, Saz Sánchez MA et al (2017a) SPREAD: a high-resolution daily gridded precipitation dataset for Spain—an extreme events frequency and intensity overview. Earth Syst Sci Data 9:721–738.  https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-9-721-2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Serrano-Notivoli R, de Luis M, Beguería S (2017b) An R package for daily precipitation climate series reconstruction. Environ Model Softw 89:190–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tegel W, Seim A, Hakelberg D et al (2014) A recent growth increase of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) at its Mediterranean distribution limit contradicts drought stress. Eur J For Res 133:61–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-013-0737-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Walentowski H, Falk W, Mette T et al (2017) Assessing future suitability of tree species under climate change by multiple methods: a case study in southern Germany. Ann For Res 60:101–126.  https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2016.789 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang X, Yu D, Wang S et al (2017) Tree height-diameter relationships in the alpine treeline ecotone compared with those in closed forests on Changbai Mountain, Northeastern China. Forests 8:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.3390/f8040132 Google Scholar
  58. Weemstra M, Eilmann B, Sass-Klaassen UGW, Sterck FJ (2013) Summer droughts limit tree growth across 10 temperate species on a productive forest site. For Ecol Manag 306:142–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wullschleger SD, Epstein HE, Box EO et al (2014) Plant functional types in Earth system models: past experiences and future directions for application of dynamic vegetation models in high-latitude ecosystems. Ann Bot 114:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zimmermann J, Hauck M, Dulamsuren C, Leuschner C (2015) Climate warming-related growth decline affects Fagus sylvatica, but not other broad-leaved tree species in Central European mixed forests. Ecosystems 18:560–572.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-015-9849-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geography and Regional PlanningUniversity of Zaragoza-IUCASaragossaSpain
  2. 2.Forest Ecology and Forest Management GroupWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations