Advertisement

Quantification Analysis of Biochemical and Phenolic Composition in Hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) Fruits

  • Ferhad MuradoğluEmail author
  • Saime Gürsoy
  • Kenan Yıldız
Original Article
  • 91 Downloads

Abstract

Crataegus species are used in food and traditional medicine because of its beneficial effect on human health. The aim of this study was to identify biochemical and phenolic composition of fruit from the genotypes belonging to four Crataegus species; C. monogyna subsp. monogyna Jocq, C. atrosanguinea Pojark, C. orientalis var. orientalis Pallasex. Bieb and C. meyeri Pojark. C. meyeri differed from the other species with having higher saccharose and succinic acid. Fructose and glucose were major sugars in all hawthorn species. Rutin, catechin and caffeic acid were the most plentiful phenolic compounds in all genotypes belonging to four different species. In addition, substantial amount syringic and p‑qumaric acid were identified in all genotypes. Wide variability in sugar, vitamin c, organic acid and phenolic components between the genotypes within the same species was observed. Vitamin C contents of the genotypes within C. monogyna subsp. monogyna were changed between 21.8 and 34.4 mg/100 g FW. Rutin content ranged from 31.9 to 96.3 mg/100 g FW in C. monogyna subsp. monogyna whereas it was between 13.3 and 39.2 mg/100 g FW in C. meyeri. The highest caffeic acid was observed in the genotypes belonging to C. atrosanguinea species, with ranging from 54.5 to 108.4 mg/100 g FW.

Keywords

Crataegus Phenolic composition Sugar Vitamin C 

Quantitative Analyse der biochemischen und phenolischen Zusammensetzung von Weißdornfrüchten verschiedener Arten (Crataegus spp.) und Genotypen

Schlüsselwörter

Crataegus Phenolische Zusammensetzung Zucker Vitamin C Genotyp 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This manuscript consist a part of M.sc thesis of Saime GÜRSOY and the authors express their gratitude to Yuzuncu Yıl University, Scientific Research Projects Unit for their financial support (Project No. 2014-FBE-YL 130).

Conflict of interest

F. Muradoğlu, S. Gürsoy and K. Yıldız declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Bahri-Sahloul R, Ammar S. Harzallah-Skhiri F (2009) Chemical characterisation of Crataegus azarolus L. fruit from 14 genotypes found in Tunisia. J Hortic Sci Biotechol 84:23–28Google Scholar
  2. Balta MF, Yörük İH, Aşkın MA, Yarılgaç T, Kazankay A (2007) Characterization of free sugars in hawthorn (Creatageus spp.) species. Asian J Chem 19:5675–5680Google Scholar
  3. Bernatoniene J, Masteikova R, Majiene D, Savickas A, Kevelaitis E, Bernatoniene R, Dvorackova K, Civinskiene G, Lekes R, Vitkevicius K, Peciura R (2008) Free radical-scavenging activities of Crataegus monogyna extracts. Medicina (Kaunas) 44:706–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bernatoniene J, Trumbeckaite S, Majiene D, Baniene R, Baliutyte G, Savickas A, Toleikis A (2009) The effect of Crataegus fruit extract and some of its flavonoids on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in the heart. Phytother Res 23:1701–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bevilacqua AE, Califano AN (1989) Determination of organic acids in dairy products by high performance liquid chromatography. J Food Sci 54:1076–1079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bignami C, Paolocci M, Scossa A, Bertazza G (2003) Preliminary evaluation of nutritional and medicinal components of Crataegus azarolus fruits. Acta Hortic 597:95–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cemeroğlu B (2007) Meyve ve Sebze Işleme Endüstrisinde Temel Analiz Metodları. Ankara Biltav Yayınları 1991:381Google Scholar
  8. Chang Q, Zuo Z, Chow MS, Ho WK (2006) Effect of storage temperature on phenolics stability in hawthorn (Crataegus pinnatifida var. major) fruits and a hawthorn drink. Food Chem 98:426–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang Q, Zuo Z, Harrison F, Chow MSS (2002) Hawthorn. J Clin Pharmacol 42:605–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Çoklar H, Akbulut M (2016) The change in antioxidant activity, total phenolic content and phenolic profile of Hawthorn (Crataegus orientalis) fruit with maturity. Fruit Research Instıtute Fruit. Science 3:30–37Google Scholar
  11. Cosmulescu S, Trandafir I, Nour V (2016) Phenolic acids and flavonoids profiles of extracts from edible wild fruits and their antioxidant properties. Int J Food Prop Doi.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10942912.2016.1274906 Google Scholar
  12. El-Sayed AM (2011) The Pherobase: Database of Insect Pheromones and Semiochemicals. http://www.pherobase.com Google Scholar
  13. Ercişli S (2004) A short rewiev of the fruit germplasm resources of Turkey. Gen Res Crop Evol 51:419–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gundoğdu M, Özrenk K, Ercişli S, Kan T, Kodad O, Hegedus A (2014) Organic acids, sugars, vitamin c content and some pomological characteristics of eleven hawthorn species (Crataegus spp.) from Turkey. Biol Res 47:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu P (2012) Composıtıon of hawthorn (Crataegus spp.) fruits and leaves and emblic leafflower (Phyllanthus emblica) fruits. Department of Biochemistry and Food Chemistry University of. (Ph D Tesis). Finland, TurkuGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu P, Kallio H, Lu D, Zhou C, Ou S, Yang B (2010) Acids, sugars and sugars alcohols in Chine hawthorn (Creatageus spp.) fruit. J Agric Food Chem 58:1012–1019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Melgarejo P, Salazar DM, Artes F (2000) Organic acids and sugars composition of harvested pomegranate fruits. Eur Food Res Technol 211:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morales P, Ferreira ICFR, Carvaho AM, Fernandez-Ruiz V, Sanchez-Mata MC, Camara M, Morales R, Tardio J (2013) Wild edible fruits as a potential source of phytochemicals with capacity to inhibit lipid peroxidation. Eur J Lipid Sci Techno 115:176–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Osawa T (1994) Novel natural antioxidants for utilization in food and biological systems. In: Tropics, Uritani I, Garcia VV, Mendoza EM (eds) Postharvest Biochemistry of Plant Food-Materials in the. Scientific Societies Press, Japan, pp 241–251Google Scholar
  20. Phipps JB, O’Kennon RJ, Lance RW (2003) Hawthorns and Medlars. Royal Horticultural Society, Cambridge U.K. pp:180Google Scholar
  21. Rodriguez-Delgado MA, Malovana S, Perez JP, Borges T, Garcia-Montelongo FJ (2001) Separation of phenolic compounds by high-performance liquid chromatography with absorbance and fluorimetric detection. J Chromatogr A 912:249–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang Z, Ho WKKH, Huang Y, Chen ZY (2002) Hypocholesterolemic activity of hawthorn fruit is mediated by regulation of cholesterol-7α-hydroxylase and acyl CoA: cholesterol acyltransferase. Food Res Int 35:885–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhao H, Tian B (1996) China Fruit-plant Monograph, Hawthorn Flora. Zhongguo Linye. Press, Beijing, pp 13–15Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ferhad Muradoğlu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Saime Gürsoy
    • 2
  • Kenan Yıldız
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural SciencesAbant Izzet Baysal UniversityBoluTurkey
  2. 2.Ministry of Food Agriculture and LivestockBozkırTurkey
  3. 3.Department of Horticulture, Faculty of AgricultureGaziosmanpaşa UniversityTokatTurkey

Personalised recommendations