Plant glucosinolate content increases susceptibility to diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) regardless of its diet

  • Francisco Rubén Badenes-PérezEmail author
  • Jonathan Gershenzon
  • David G. Heckel
Original Paper


Glucosinolates are plant defense compounds used in host-plant recognition by insects specialized on Brassicaceae, such as the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella L. (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). We tested whether there were differences in oviposition and larval survival among three strains of P. xylostella after more than 100 generations continuously reared on cabbage leaves, pea leaves, and wheat germ-casein artificial diet. Pea leaves and wheat germ-casein diet contain no glucosinolates. Tests were conducted with a total of 30 different plant species, and their glucosinolate contents were determined. Two-choice oviposition tests (comparing each plant species to Arabidopsis thaliana L.) and no-choice oviposition tests showed that, regardless of diet, total glucosinolate content and chemical complexity index for glucosinolates were positively correlated with oviposition preference, total oviposition, and larval survival in P. xylostella across the wide range of plants tested. Our research shows that long-term feeding on glucosinolate-free diet hardly affects oviposition preference and larval survival in P. xylostella. Our study also suggests that, even when comparing different plant species, glucosinolate content is likely to be associated with host-plant preference and host-plant suitability in P. xylostella. This indicates that crop varieties with high glucosinolate content are likely to be more susceptible to damage by P. xylostella than crop varieties with lower glucosinolate content. Additional implications of these findings for management of this important pest are discussed. This is the first time that a study includes oviposition preference, total oviposition, larval survival, and glucosinolate content across such a wide range of plant species.


Brassicaceae Brassicales Glucosinolates Host-plant preference Oviposition Plutella xylostella 



We thank Dr. Michael Reichelt for help with glucosinolate analysis and comments on the manuscript; Jutta Steffen and Christin Heinrich for insect rearing and/or technical assistance during the experiments; Laura Barrios for help with statistical analysis; Andreas Weber and Birgit Hohmann for help in cultivating plants; Dr. Bernd Schneider for NMR analysis to confirm the identity of several glucosinolates; Drs. Bernhard Löhr and Anthony M. Shelton for providing P. xylostella strains; and Drs. Niels Agerbirk and Tamara Krügel for providing seeds of B. vulgaris and other plants. This research was supported by the Max Planck Society.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not describe any studies that involve human participants. All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.

Supplementary material

10340_2019_1139_MOESM1_ESM.doc (221 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 221 kb)


  1. Agerbirk N, Olsen CE (2012) Glucosinolate structures in evolution. Phytochemistry 77:16–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agerbirk N, Olsen CE, Bibby BM, Frandsen HO, Brown LD, Nielsen JK, Renwick JAA (2003) A saponin correlated with variable resistance of Barbarea vulgaris to the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella. J Chem Ecol 29:1417–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agerbirk N, Olsen CE, Chew FS, Ørgaard M (2010) Variable glucosinolate profiles of Cardamine pratensis (Brassicaceae) with equal chromosome numbers. J Agric Food Chem 58:4693–4700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Badenes-Pérez FR, Shelton AM, Nault BA (2004) Evaluating trap crops for diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J Econ Entomol 97:1365–1372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badenes-Pérez FR, Nault BA, Shelton AM (2005) Manipulating the attractiveness and suitability of hosts for diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J Econ Entomol 98:836–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Badenes-Pérez FR, Nault BA, Shelton AM (2006) Dynamics of diamondback moth oviposition in the presence of a highly preferred non-suitable host. Entomol Exp Appl 120:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Badenes-Pérez FR, Reichelt M, Heckel DG (2010) Can sulfur fertilisation increase the effectiveness of trap crops for diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae)? Pest Manag Sci 66:832–838Google Scholar
  8. Badenes-Pérez FR, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J, Heckel DG (2011) Phylloplane location of glucosinolates in Barbarea spp. (Brassicaceae) and misleading assessment of host suitability by a specialist herbivore. New Phytol 189:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Badenes-Pérez FR, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J, Heckel DG (2013) Interaction of glucosinolate content of Arabidopsis thaliana mutant lines and feeding and oviposition by generalist and specialist lepidopterans. Phytochemistry 86:36–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Badenes-Pérez FR, Gershenzon J, Heckel DG (2014) Insect attraction versus plant defense: young leaves high in glucosinolates stimulate oviposition by a specialist herbivore despite poor larval survival due to high saponin content. PLoS ONE 9:e95766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bailey CD et al (2006) Toward a global phylogeny of the Brassicaceae. Mol Biol Evol 23:2142–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barron AB (2001) The life and death of Hopkins’ host-selection principle. J Insect Behav 14:725–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Becerra JX, Noge K, Venable DL (2009) Macroevolutionary chemical escalation in an ancient plant–herbivore arms race. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:18062–18066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Beilstein MA, Al-Shehbaz IA, Mathews S, Kellogg EA (2008) Brassicaceae phylogeny inferred from phytochrome A and ndhF sequence data: tribes and trichomes revisited. Am J Bot 95:1307–1327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bidart-Bouzat MG, Kliebenstein DJ (2008) Differential levels of insect herbivory in the field associated with genotypic variation in glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Chem Ecol 34:1026–1037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Boege K, Dirzo R, Siemens D, Brown P (2007) Ontogenetic switches from plant resistance to tolerance: minimizing costs with age? Ecol Lett 10:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bones A, Rossiter J (1996) The glucosinolate-myrosinase system, its organisation and biochemistry. Physiol Plant 97:194–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bottomley W, White DE (1950) The chemistry of Western Australian plants. Part II. The essential oil of Codonocarpus cotinifolius (Desf.) F. Muell. R Aust Chem Inst J Proc 17:31–32Google Scholar
  19. Brown PD, Tokuhisa JG, Reichelt M, Gershenzon J (2003) Variation of glucosinolate accumulation among different organs and developmental stages of Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 62:471–481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Buchner R (1987) Approach to determination of HPLC response factors for glucosinolates. In: Wathelet JP (ed) Glucosinolates in rapeseeds: analytical aspects. Proceedings of a Seminar in the CEC Programme of Research on Plant Productivity, held in Gembloux (Belgium). Springer, Dordrecht, pp 50–58.
  21. Cacho NI, Kliebenstein DJ, Strauss SY (2015) Macroevolutionary patterns of glucosinolate defense and tests of defense-escalation and resource availability hypotheses. New Phytol 208:915–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cartea ME, Velasco P (2008) Glucosinolates in Brassica foods: bioavailability in food and significance for human health. Phytochem Rev 7:213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Clarke DB (2010) Glucosinolates, structures and analysis in food. Anal Methods 2:310–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. D’Antuono LF, Elementi S, Neri R (2008) Glucosinolates in Diplotaxis and Eruca leaves: diversity, taxonomic relations and applied aspects. Phytochemistry 69:187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. De Vos M, Kriksunov KL, Jander G (2008) Indole-3-acetonitrile production from indole glucosinolates deters oviposition by Pieris rapae. Plant Physiol 146:916–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Eigenbrode SD, Shelton AM (1992) Survival and behavior of Plutella xylostella larvae on cabbages with leaf waxes altered by treatment with S-ethyl dipropylthiocarbamate. Entomol Exp Appl 62:139–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ettlinger MG, Lundeen AJ (1956) The mustard oil of Limnanthes douglasii seed, m-methoxybenzyl isothiocyanate. J Am Chem Soc 78:1952–1954CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fahey JW, Zalcmann AT, Talalay P (2001) The chemical diversity and distribution of glucosinolates and isothiocyanates among plants. Phytochemistry 56:5–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Furlong MJ, Wright DJ, Dosdall LM (2013) Diamondback moth ecology and management: problems, progress, and prospects. Annu Rev Entomol 58:517–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gols R, Bukovinszky T, van Dam N, Dicke M, Bullock J, Harvey J (2008) Performance of generalist and specialist herbivores and their endoparasitoids differs on cultivated and wild Brassica populations. J Chem Ecol 34:132–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gripenberg S, Mayhew PJ, Parnell M, Roslin T (2010) A meta-analysis of preference-performance relationships in phytophagous insects. Ecol Lett 13:383–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grosser K, van Dam NM (2017) A straightforward method for glucosinolate extraction and analysis with high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). J Vis Exp 121:e55425Google Scholar
  33. Gupta PD, Thorsteinson AJ (1960a) Food plant relationships of the diamondback moth (Plutella maculipennis [Curt.]). I. Gustation and olfaction in relation to botanical specificity of the larva. Entomol Exp Appl 3:241–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Gupta PD, Thorsteinson AJ (1960b) Food plant relationships of the diamondback moth (Plutella maculipennis [Curt.]). II. Sensory regulation of oviposition of the adult female. Entomol Exp Appl 3:305–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Halkier BA, Gershenzon J (2006) Biology and biochemistry of glucosinolates. Annu Rev Plant Biol 57:303–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Handley R, Ekbom B, Ågren J (2005) Variation in trichome density and resistance against a specialist insect herbivore in natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana. Ecol Entomol 30:284–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hopkins RJ, van Dam NM, van Loon JJA (2009) Role of glucosinolates in insect-plant relationships and multitrophic interactions. Annu Rev Entomol 54:57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huang C-H et al (2016) Resolution of Brassicaceae phylogeny using nuclear genes uncovers nested radiations and supports convergent morphological evolution. Mol Biol Evol 33:394–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. IBM (2017) SPSS statistics core system user’s guide. SPSS Inc., ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  40. Jeschke V, Kearney EE, Schramm K, Kunert G, Shekhov A, Gershenzon J, Vassão DG (2017) How glucosinolates affect generalist lepidopteran larvae: growth, development and glucosinolate metabolism. Front Plant Sci 8:1995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kim S-J, Jin S, Ishii G (2004) Isolation and structural elucidation of 4-(β-D-glucopyranosyldisulfanyl)butyl glucosinolate from leaves of rocket salad (Eruca sativa L.) and its antioxidative activity. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 68:2444–2450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kjær A, Schuster A (1972) Glucosinolates in seeds of Neslia paniculata. Phytochemistry 11:3045–3048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Knill T, Reichelt M, Paetz C, Gershenzon J, Binder S (2009) Arabidopsis thaliana encodes a bacterial-type heterodimeric isopropylmalate isomerase involved in both Leu biosynthesis and the Met chain elongation pathway of glucosinolate formation. Plant Mol Biol 71:227–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kos M et al (2011) Relative importance of plant-mediated bottom-up and top-down forces on herbivore abundance on Brassica oleracea. Funct Ecol 25:1113–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kühnle A, Müller C (2011a) Prefeeding and acceptance behavior of an oligophagous beetle is dependent on plant suitability and rearing history. J Insect Behav 25(2):155–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kühnle A, Müller C (2011b) Responses of an oligophagous beetle species to rearing for several generations on alternative host-plant species. Ecol Entomol 36:125–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lin J, Dickson MH, Eckenrode CJ (1984) Resistance of Brassica lines to the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae) in the field, and inheritance of resistance. J Econ Entomol 77:1293–1296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Löhr B, Gathu B (2002) Evidence of adaptation of diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.), to pea, Pisum sativum L. Insect Sci Appl 22:161–173Google Scholar
  49. Marazzi C, Städler E (2004) Influence of plant sulphur nutrition on oviposition and larval performance of the diamondback moth. Entomol Exp Appl 111:225–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mithen R, Bennett R, Marquez J (2010) Glucosinolate biochemical diversity and innovation in the Brassicales. Phytochemistry 71:2074–2086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Møldrup ME, Geu-Flores F, de Vos M, Olsen CE, Sun J, Jander G, Halkier BA (2012) Engineering of benzylglucosinolate in tobacco provides proof-of-concept for dead-end trap crops genetically modified to attract Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth). Plant Biotechnol J 10:435–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Mosleh Arany A, de Jong T, Kim H, van Dam N, Choi Y, Verpoorte R, van der Meijden E (2008) Glucosinolates and other metabolites in the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana from natural populations and their effects on a generalist and a specialist herbivore. Chemoecology 18:65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Müller C (2009) Interactions between glucosinolate- and myrosinase-containing plants and the sawfly Athalia rosae. Phytochem Rev 8:121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Müller R, de Vos M, Sun J, Sønderby I, Halkier B, Wittstock U, Jander G (2010) Differential effects of indole and aliphatic glucosinolates on lepidopteran herbivores. J Chem Ecol 36:905–913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Müller C et al (2018) The role of the glucosinolate-myrosinase system in mediating greater resistance of Barbarea verna than B. vulgaris to Mamestra brassicae larvae. J Chem Ecol 44:1190–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Newman K, You M, Vasseur L (2016) Diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) exhibits oviposition and larval feeding preferences among crops, wild plants, and ornamentals as host plants. J Econ Entomol 109:644–648CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Okamura Y, Sawada Y, Hirai MY, Murakami M (2016) Effects of different secondary metabolite profiles in plant defense syndromes on specialist and generalist herbivores. Entomol Sci 19:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Olsen CE et al (2016) Glucosinolate diversity within a phylogenetic framework of the tribe Cardamineae (Brassicaceae) unraveled with HPLC-MS/MS and NMR-based analytical distinction of 70 desulfoglucosinolates. Phytochemistry 132:33–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pagnotta E, Agerbirk N, Olsen CE, Ugolini L, Cinti S, Lazzeri L (2017) Hydroxyl and methoxyl derivatives of benzylglucosinolate in Lepidium densiflorum with hydrolysis to isothiocyanates and non-isothiocyanate products: substitution governs product type and mass spectral fragmentation. J Agric Food Chem 65:3167–3178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Poelman EH, Van Loon JJA, Van Dam NM, Vet LEM, Dicke M (2008) Performance of specialist and generalist herbivores feeding on cabbage cultivars is not explained by glucosinolate profiles. Entomol Exp Appl 127:218–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Proffit M, Khallaf MA, Carrasco D, Larsson MC, Anderson P (2015) Do you remember the first time? Host plant preference in a moth is modulated by experiences during larval feeding and adult mating. Ecol Lett 18:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ratzka A, Vogel H, Kliebenstein DJ, Mitchell-Olds T, Kroymann J (2002) Disarming the mustard oil bomb. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:11223–11228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Reichelt M et al (2002) Benzoic acid glucosinolate esters and other glucosinolates from Arabidopsis thaliana. Phytochemistry 59:663–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Renwick JAA, Chew FS (1994) Oviposition behavior in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 39:377–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Renwick JAA, Haribal M, Gouinguené S, Stadler E (2006) Isothiocyanates stimulating oviposition by the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. J Chem Ecol 32:755–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Robin AHK, Hossain MR, Park J-I, Kim HR, Nou I-S (2017) Glucosinolate profiles in cabbage genotypes influence the preferential feeding of diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella). Front Plant Sci 8:1244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Rohr F, Ulrichs C, Schreiner M, Nguyen C, Mewis I (2011) Impact of hydroxylated and non-hydroxylated aliphatic glucosinolates in Arabidopsis thaliana crosses on plant resistance against a generalist and a specialist herbivore. Chemoecology 21:171–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ryan SF, Bidart-Bouzat MG (2014) Natal insect experience with Arabidopsis thaliana plant genotypes influences plasticity in oviposition behavior. Entomol Exp Appl 152:216–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Santolamazza-Carbone S, Velasco P, Soengas P, Cartea ME (2014) Bottom-up and top-down herbivore regulation mediated by glucosinolates in Brassica oleracea var. acephala. Oecologia 174:893–907CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Santolamazza-Carbone S, Sotelo T, Velasco P, Cartea ME (2016) Antibiotic properties of the glucosinolates of Brassica oleracea var. acephala similarly affect generalist and specialist larvae of two lepidopteran pests. J Pest Sci 89:195–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sarfraz M, Dosdall LM, Keddie BA (2006) Diamondback moth-host plant interactions: implications for pest management. Crop Protect 25:625–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sarfraz RM, Dosdall LM, Keddie BA (2010) Performance of the specialist herbivore Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on Brassicaceae and non-Brassicaceae species. Can Entomol 142:24–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sarfraz RM, Dosdall LM, Keddie AB, Myers JH (2011) Larval survival, host plant preferences and developmental responses of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae) on wild brassicaceous species. Entomol Sci 14:20–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Sarosh B, Wittstock U, Halkier B, Ekbom B (2010) The influence of metabolically engineered glucosinolates profiles in Arabidopsis thaliana on Plutella xylostella preference and performance. Chemoecology 20:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Shelton AM, Cooley RJ, Kroening MK, Wilsey WT, Eigenbrode SD (1991) Comparative analysis of two rearing procedures for diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae). J Entomol Sci 26:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shinoda T, Nagao T, Nakayama M, Serizawa H, Koshioka M, Okabe H, Kawai A (2002) Identification of a triterpenoid saponin from a crucifer, Barbarea vulgaris, as a feeding deterrent to the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. J Chem Ecol 28:587–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Siemens DH, Mitchell-Olds T (1996) Gluosinolates and herbivory by specialists (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae, Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): consequences of concentration and induced resistance. Environ Entomol 25:1344–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Spencer JL, Pillai S, Bernays EA (1999) Synergism in the oviposition behavior of Plutella xylostella: sinigrin and wax compounds. J Insect Behav 12:483–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. StataCorp (2015) Stata power and sample-size reference manual release 14. Stata Press, College StationGoogle Scholar
  80. Stevens JF, Reed RL, Alber S, Pritchett L, Machado S (2009) Herbicidal activity of glucosinolate degradation products in fermented meadowfoam (Limnanthes alba) seed meal. J Agric Food Chem 57:1821–1826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Stoner KA (1990) Glossy leaf wax and plant resistance to insects in Brassica oleracea under natural infestation. Environ Entomol 19:730–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Sun J, Sønderby I, Halkier B, Jander G, de Vos M (2009) Non-volatile intact indole glucosinolates are host recognition cues for ovipositing Plutella xylostella. J Chem Ecol 35:1427–1436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Talekar NS, Shelton AM (1993) Biology, ecology, and management of the diamondback moth. Annu Rev Entomol 38:275–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Textor S, Gershenzon J (2009) Herbivore induction of the glucosinolate–myrosinase defense system: major trends, biochemical bases and ecological significance. Phytochem Rev 8:149–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. van Loon JJA, Wang CZ, Nielsen JK, Gols R, Qiu YT (2002) Flavonoids from cabbage are feeding stimulants for diamondback moth larvae additional to glucosinolates: chemoreception and behaviour. Entomol Exp Appl 104:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Verkerk R et al (2009) Glucosinolates in Brassica vegetables: the influence of the food supply chain on intake, bioavailability and human health. Mol Nutr Food Res 53:219–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wang H, Guo W-F, Zhang P-J, Wu Z-Y, Liu S-S (2008) Experience-induced habituation and preference towards non-host plant odors in ovipositing females of a moth. J Chem Ecol 34:330–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Wittstock U, Halkier BA (2002) Glucosinolate research in the Arabidopsis era. Trends Plant Sci 7:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zalucki MP, Shabbir A, Silva R, Adamson D, Shu-Sheng L, Furlong MJ (2012) Estimating the economic cost of one of the world’s major insect pests, Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae): just how long is a piece of string? J Econ Entomol 105:1115–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Zhang P-J, Liu S-S (2006) Experience induces a phytophagous insect to lay eggs on a nonhost plant. J Chem Ecol 32:745–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Zhang P-J, Liu S-S, Wang H, Zalucki MP (2007) The influence of early adult experience and larval food restriction on responses toward nonhost plants in moths. J Chem Ecol 33:1528–1541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Zhang P-J, Lu Y-b, Zalucki M, Liu S-S (2012) Relationship between adult oviposition preference and larval performance of the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella. J Pest Sci 85:247–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EntomologyMax Planck Institute for Chemical EcologyJenaGermany
  2. 2.Instituto de Ciencias AgrariasConsejo Superior de Investigaciones CientíficasMadridSpain
  3. 3.Department of BiochemistryMax Planck Institute for Chemical EcologyJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations