Advertisement

Supplementary UV radiation on eggplants indirectly deters Bemisia tabaci settlement without altering the predatory orientation of their biological control agents Nesidiocoris tenuis and Sphaerophoria rueppellii

  • Inés Prieto-Ruiz
  • Elisa Garzo
  • Aránzazu Moreno
  • Beatriz Dáder
  • Pilar Medina
  • Elisa Viñuela
  • Alberto FereresEmail author
Original Paper
  • 82 Downloads

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation that reaches the earth surface has increased substantially in the past decades, altering insect–plant interactions by directly affecting herbivores behavior or indirectly by modifying plant chemistry and morphogenesis. We evaluated the indirect effect of supplementary UV radiation under glasshouse conditions on Bemisia tabaci settlement, eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) production and its effects on the flight activity of Nesidiocoris tenuis and Sphaerophoria rueppellii. Eggplants were daily radiated with different supplemental UV treatments, A +/B +, A −/B + or A −/B −, during 30, 60 or 90 min for 21 days. The whitefly settlement was assessed immediately after the UV treatments or after 18 extra days on plants kept under regular glasshouse conditions with no further supplemental UV radiation. The number of whitefly settled on plants was counted after 2, 6, 24 and 48 h. Supplementary UV radiation reduced whitefly settlement for all exposure times with alterations on the morphology and increased nitrogen and amino acid content of eggplants, mainly after 90 min of UV radiation exposition. When plants were allowed to recover under regular light conditions, growth traits were similar, and whiteflies showed no preference. Fruit parameters were not negatively altered by supplementary UV radiation. Natural enemy captures per sticky trap were more abundant under A −/B + and A +/B + conditions; however, indirect host preference tests indicated no differences among treatments. In conclusion, supplementary UV radiation could be used to reduce whitefly infestation in glasshouses at the early stages of plant development without detrimental effects on crop yield or beneficial orientation.

Keywords

UV Whitefly Natural enemies Host plant resistance Fruit production Plant growth 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Sandra Pla, Marina Morente, Irene Ontiveros, Andrea Wanumen, Miriam Gurpegui and Ignacio Morales for their assistance in the laboratory experiments. This work was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (AGL2013-47603-C2-1-R to E. Viñuela and P. Medina and AGL2013-47603-C2-2-R to A. Fereres). A. Fereres, A. Moreno, P. Medina and E. Viñuela are members of the Associate unit IVAS (CSIC-UPM): Control of insect vectors of viruses in horticultural sustainable systems.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals (vertebrates) performed by any of the authors.

References

  1. Abd El-Aal HA, Rizk AM, Mousa IE (2018) Evaluation of new greenhouse covers with modified light regime to control cotton aphid and cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) productivity. Crop Prot 107:64–70.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2018.01.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acosta-Quezada PG, Riofrío-Cuenca T, Rojas J, Vilanova S, Plazas M, Prohens J (2016) Phenological growth stages of tree tomato (Solanum betaceum Cav.), an emerging fruit crop, according to the basic and extended BBCH scales. Sci Hortic 199:216–223.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.12.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adamse P, Britz SJ (1992) Amelioration of UV-B damage under high irradiance. I: role of photosynthesis. photochem. Photochem Photobiol 56:645–650.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.1992.tb02216.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexieva V, Sergiev I, Mapelli S, Karanov E (2001) The effect of drought and ultraviolet radiation on growth and stress markers in pea and wheat. Plant Cell Environ 24:1337–1344.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00778.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Almeida SL, Schmidt ÉC, Pereira DT, Kreusch M, Felix MRL, Osorio LKP, Martins RP, Latini A, Ramlov F, Chow F, Maraschin M, Rodrigues AC, Bouzon ZL (2013) Effect of ultraviolet-B radiation in laboratory on morphological and ultrastructural characteristics and physiological parameters of selected cultivar of Oryza sativa L. Protoplasma 250:1303–1313.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-013-0512-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antignus Y, Lapidot M, Hadar D, Messika Y, Cohen S (1998) Ultraviolet-absorbing screens serve as optical barriers to protect crops from virus and insect pests. J Econ Entomol 91:1401–1405.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/91.6.1401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ben-Yakir D, Fereres A (2016) The effects of UV radiation on arthropods: a review of recent publications (2010–2015). Acta Hortic.  https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2016.1134.44 Google Scholar
  8. Berlinger MJ, Magal Z, Benzioni A (1983) The importance of pH in food selection by the tobacco whitefly, Bemisia tabaci. Phytoparasitica 11:151.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02980686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernal M, Llorens L, Badosa J, Verdaguer D (2013) Interactive effects of UV radiation and water availability on seedlings of six woody Mediterranean species. Physiol Plant 147:234–247.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2012.01660.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Caldwell MM, Flint SD, Searles PS (1994) Spectral balance and UV-B sensitivity of soybean: a field experiment. Plant Cell Environ 17:267–276.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1994.tb00292.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chiel E, Messika Y, Steinberg S, Antignus Y (2006) The effect of UV-absorbing plastic sheet on the attraction and host location ability of three parasitoids: Aphidius colemani, Diglyphus isaea and Eretmocerus mundus. BioControl 51:65–78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-005-8667-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chyzik R, Dobrinin S, Antignus Y (2003) Effect of a UV-deficient environment on the biology and flight activity of Myzus persicae and its hymenopterous parasite Aphidius matricariae. Phytoparasitica 31:467–477.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02979740 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coombe PE (1982) Visual behaviour of the greenhouse whitefly, Trialeurodes vaporariorum. Physiol Entomol 7:243–251.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3032.1982.tb00297.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Corrales AR, Nebauer SG, Carrillo L, Fernández-Nohales P, Marqués J, Renau-Morata B, Granell A, Pollmann S, Vicente-Carbajosa J, Molina RV, Medina J (2014) characterization of tomato cycling dof factors reveals conserved and new functions in the control of flowering time and abiotic stress responses. J Exp Bot 65:995–1012.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert451 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. D’Mello JPF (ed) (2015) Amino acids in higher plants. CABI, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  16. Dáder B, Gwynn-Jones D, Moreno A, Winters A, Fereres A (2014) Impact of UV-A radiation on the performance of aphids and whiteflies and on the leaf chemistry of their host plants. J Photochem Photobiol B 138:307–316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2014.06.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dáder B, Plaza M, Fereres A, Moreno A (2015) Flight behaviour of vegetable pests and their natural enemies under different ultraviolet-blocking enclosures. Ann Appl Biol 167(1):116–126.  https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12213 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dáder B, Moreno A, Gwynn-Jones D, Winters A, Fereres A (2017) Aphid orientation and performance in glasshouses under different UV-A/UV-B radiation regimes. Entomol Exp Appl 163(3):344–353.  https://doi.org/10.1111/eea.12583 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Demukra PV, Abdala G, Baldwin IT, Ballaré CL (2010) Jasmonate-dependent and independent pathways mediate specific effects of solar ultraviolet B radiation on leaf phenolics and antiherbivore defense. Plant Physiol 152:1084–1095.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.148999 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dhomse SS, Kinnison D, Chipperfield MP, Salawitch RJ, Cionni I, Hegglin MI, Abraham NL, Akiyoshi H, Archibald AT, Bednarz EM, Bekki S, Braesicke P, Butchart N, Dameris M, Deushi M, Frith S, Hardiman SC, Hassler B, Horowitz LW, Hu R-M, Jöckel P, Josse B, Kirner O, Kremser S, Langematz U, Lewis J, Marchand M, Lin M, Mancini E, Marécal V, Michou M, Morgenstern O, O’Connor FM, Oman L, Pitari G, Plummer DA, Pyle JA, Revell LE, Rozanov E, Schofield R, Stenke A, Stone K, Sudo K, Tilmes S, Visioni D, Yamashita Y, Zeng G (2018) Estimates of ozone return dates from chemistry-climate model initiative simulations. Atmos Chem Phys 18:8409–8438.  https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-8409-2018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Díaz B, Fereres A (2007) Ultraviolet-blocking materials as a physical barrier to control insect pests and pathogens in protected crops. Pest Technol 1(2):85–95Google Scholar
  22. Doukas D, Payne CC (2007) The use of ultraviolet-blocking films in insect pest management in the UK; effects on naturally occurring arthropod pest and natural enemy populations in a protected cucumber crop. Ann Appl Biol 151:221–231.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2007.00169.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dwivedi A, Tripathi AK, Singh J, Pal MK (2018) Ultraviolet radiation (UVR): an introduction. Photocarcinogenesis & photoprotection. Springer, Berlin.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5493-8_1 Google Scholar
  24. Enciso YJ, Santa Cruz LA, Hackney Price JF (2018) Scrutinizing the effects of UV-C radiation on developmental timing and adult morphology of Drosophila melanogaster. J Ariz Nev Acad Sci 47(2):5.  https://doi.org/10.2181/036.047.0206 Google Scholar
  25. Escobar-Bravo R, Cheng G, Kim HK, Grosser K, van Dam NM, Leiss KA, Klinkhamer PGL (2018) Ultraviolet radiation exposure time and intensity modulate tomato resistance against herbivory through activation of the jasmonic acid signaling. J Exp Bot.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ery347 Google Scholar
  26. Foster JJ, Sharkey CR, Gaworska AVA, Roberts NW, Whitney HM, Partridge JC (2014) Bumblebees learn polarization patterns. Curr Biol 24:1415–1420.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. González JA, Rosa M, Parrado MF, Hilal M, Prado FE (2009) Morphological and physiological responses of two varieties of a highland species (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) growing under near-ambient and strongly reduced solar UV–B in a lowland location. J Photochem Photobiol B 96:144–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Halford NG, Curtis TY, Chen Z, Huang J (2015) Effects of abiotic stress and crop management on cereal grain composition: implications for food quality and safety. J Exp Bot 66:1145–1156.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru473 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Izaguirre MM, Mazza CA, SvatoŠ A, Baldwin IT, Ballaré CL (2007) Solar ultraviolet-B radiation and insect herbivory trigger partially overlapping phenolic responses in Nicotiana attenuata and Nicotiana longiflora phenolics. Ann Bot 99:103–109.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jansen MAK (2002) Ultraviolet-B radiation effects on plants: induction of morphogenic responses. Physiol Plant 116:423–429.  https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2002.1160319.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jayakumar M, Amudha P, Kulandaivelu G (2003) Changes in growth and yield of Phaseolus mungo L. induced by UV-A and UV-B enhanced radiation. J Plant Biol 46:59–61.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030303 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johansen N, Vänninen I, Pinto DM, Nissinen A, Shipp L (2011) In the light of new greenhouse technologies: 2. Direct effects of artificial lighting on arthropods and integrated pest management in greenhouse crops. Ann Appl Biol 159:1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2011.00483.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kataria S, Guruprasad KN, Ahuja S, Singh B (2013) Enhancement of growth, photosynthetic performance and yield by exclusion of ambient UV components in C3 and C4 plants. J Photochem Photobiol B 127:140–152.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2013.08.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kirchner SM, Döring TF, Saucke H (2005) Evidence for trichromacy in the green peach aphid, Myzus persicae (Sulz.) (Hemiptera: Aphididae). J Insect Physiol 51:1255–1260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2005.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kittas C, Tchamitchian M, Katsoulas N, Karaiskou P, Papaioannou C (2006) Effect of two UV-absorbing greenhouse-covering films on growth and yield of an eggplant soilless crop. Sci Hortic 110:30–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.06.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Krizek DT (2004) Influence of PAR and UV-A in determining plant sensitivity and photomorphogenic responses to UV-B radiation. Photochem Photobiol 79:307–315.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2004.tb00013.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Legarrea S, Diaz BM, Plaza M, Barrios L, Morales I, Viñuela E, Fereres A (2012a) Diminished UV radiation reduces the spread and population density of Macrosiphum euphorbiae (Thomas) [Hemiptera: Aphididae] in lettuce crops. Hortic Sci 39:74–80Google Scholar
  38. Legarrea S, Weintraub PG, Plaza M, Vinuela E, Fereres A (2012b) Dispersal of aphids, whiteflies and their natural enemies under photoselective nets. BioControl 57:523–532.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-011-9430-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Legarrea S, Velázquez E, Aguado P, Fereres A, Morales I, Rodríguez D, Estal PD, Viñuela E (2014) Effects of a photoselective greenhouse cover on the performance and host finding ability of Aphidius ervi in a lettuce crop. BioControl 59:265–278.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-014-9564-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mackerness SAH (2000) Plant responses to ultraviolet-B (UV-B: 280–320 nm) stress: what are the key regulators? Plant Growth Regul 32:27–39.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006314001430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Matthews REF, Hull R, Matthews REF (2002) Matthews’ plant virology. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  42. McKenzie RL, Aucamp PJ, Bais AF, Björ LO, Ilyas M (2007) Changes in biologically-active ultraviolet radiation reaching the Earth’s surface. Photochem Photobiol Sci 6:218–231.  https://doi.org/10.1039/B700017K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mellor HE, Bellingham J, Anderson M (1997) Spectral efficiency of the glasshouse whitefly Trialeurodes vaporariorum and Encarsia formosa its hymenopteran parasitoid. Entomol Exp Appl 83:11–20.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.1997.00152.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mewis I, Schreiner M, Nguyen CN, Krumbein A, Ulrichs C, Lohse M, Zrenner R (2012) UV-B irradiation changes specifically the secondary metabolite profile in broccoli sprouts: induced signaling overlaps with defense response to biotic stressors. Plant Cell Physiol 53:1546–1560.  https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcs096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Michaud JP, Mackauer M (1995) The use of visual cues in host evaluation by aphidiid wasps. Entomol Exp Appl 74:267–275.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1995.tb01900.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mittler TE, Dadd RH, Daniels SC (1970) Utilization of different sugars by the aphid Myzus persicae. J Insect Physiol 16:1873–1890.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1910(70)90234-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Monselise EBI, Levkovitz A, Kost D (2015) Ultraviolet radiation induces stress in etiolated Landoltia punctata, as evidenced by the presence of alanine, a universal stress signal: a 15 N NMR study. Plant Biol 17:101–107.  https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mound LA (1962) Studies on the olfaction and colour sensitivity of Bemisia tabaci (Genn.) (Homoptera, Aleyrodidae). Entomol Exp Appl 5:99–104.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1570-7458.1962.tb00571.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Neugart S, Schreiner M (2018) UVB and UVA as eustressors in horticultural and agricultural crops. Sci Hortic 234:370–381.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.02.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Oliveira MRV, Henneberry TJ, Anderson P (2001) History, current status, and collaborative research projects for Bemisia tabaci. Crop Prot 20:709–723.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-2194(01)00108-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Onzo A, Sabelis MW, Hanna R (2010) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on predatory mites and the role of refuges in plant structures. Environ Entomol 39:695–701.  https://doi.org/10.1603/EN09206 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Paul ND, Moore JP, McPherson M, Lambourne C, Croft P, Heaton JC, Wargent JJ (2012) Ecological responses to UV radiation: interactions between the biological effects of UV on plants and on associated organisms. Physiol Plant 145:565–581.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01553.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peng S, Ingram KT, Neue HU, Ziska LH (1995) Climate change and rice. International Rice Research Institute, Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Puysseleyr VD, Man SD, Höfte M, Clercq PD (2013) Plantless rearing of the zoophytophagous bug Nesidiocoris tenuis. BioControl 58:205–213.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-012-9486-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Raviv M, Antignus Y (2004) Invited review: UV radiation effects on pathogens and insect pests of greenhouse-grown crops. Photochem Photobiol 79:219–226.  https://doi.org/10.1562/SI-03-14.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rozema J, van de Staaij J, Björn LO, Caldwell M (1997) UV-B as an environmental factor in plant life: stress and regulation. Trends Ecol Evol 12:22–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-5347(96)10062-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Schreiner M, Mewis I, Huyskens-Keil S, Jansen MAK, Zrenner R, Winkler JB, O’Brien N, Krumbein A (2012) UV-B-induced secondary plant metabolites—potential benefits for plant and human health. Crit Rev Plant Sci 31:229–240.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2012.664979 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Short BD, Janisiewicz W, Takeda F, Leskey TC (2018) UV-C irradiation as a management tool for Tetranychus urticae on strawberries. Pest Manag Sci 74:2419–2423.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Solomon S (1999) Stratospheric ozone depletion: a review of concepts and history. Rev Geophys 37:275–316.  https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Storeck A, Poppy GM, van Emden HF, Powell W (2000) The role of plant chemical cues in determining host preference in the generalist aphid parasitoid Aphidius colemani. Entomol Exp Appl 97:41–46.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1570-7458.2000.00714.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Štroch M, Materová Z, Vrábl D, Karlický V, Šigut L, Nezval J, Špunda V (2015) Protective effect of UV-A radiation during acclimation of the photosynthetic apparatus to UV-B treatment. Plant Physiol Biochem 96:90–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.07.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Su Q, Preisser EL, Zhou XM, Xie W, Liu BM, Wang SL, Wu QJ, Zhang YJ (2015) Manipulation of host quality and defense by a plant virus improves performance of whitefly vectors. J Econ Entomol 108:11–19.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jee/tou012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sullivan JH, Gitz DG, Peek MS, McElrone AJ (2003) Response of three eastern tree species to supplemental UV-B radiation: leaf chemistry and gas exchange. Agric For Meteorol 120:219–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2003.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tezuka T, Hotta T, Watanabe I (1993) Growth promotion of tomato and radish plants by solar UV radiation reaching the Earth’s surface. J Photochem Photobiol B 19:61–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(93)80094-P CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Tezuka T, Yamaguchi F, Ando Y (1994) Physiological activation in radish plants by UV-A radiation. J Photochem Photobiol B 24:33–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/1011-1344(94)07006-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Turnbull TL, Barlow AM, Adams MA (2013) Photosynthetic benefits of ultraviolet-A to Pimelea ligustrina, a woody shrub of sub-alpine Australia. Oecologia 173:375–385.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2640-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vänninen I, Pinto DM, Nissinen AI, Johansen NS, Shipp L (2010) In the light of new greenhouse technologies: 1. Plant-mediated effects of artificial lighting on arthropods and tritrophic interactions. Ann Appl Biol 157:393–414.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.2010.00438.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Verdaguer D, Llorens L, Bernal M, Badosa J (2012) Photomorphogenic effects of UVB and UVA radiation on leaves of six Mediterranean sclerophyllous woody species subjected to two different watering regimes at the seedling stage. Environ Exp Bot 79:66–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Verdaguer D, Jansen MAK, Llorens L, Morales LO, Neugart S (2017) UV-A radiation effects on higher plants: exploring the known unknown. Plant Sci 255:72–81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.11.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Victório CP, Leal-Costa MV, Schwartz Tavares E, Machado Kuster R, Salgueiro Lage CL (2011) Effects of supplemental UV-A on the development, anatomy and metabolite production of Phyllanthus tenellus cultured in vitro. Photochem Photobiol 87:685–689.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00905.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Vile D, Garnier É, Shipley B, Laurent G, Navas ML, Roumet C, Lavorel S, Díaz S, Hodgson JG, Lloret F, Midgley GF, Poorter H, Rutherford MC, Wilson PJ, Wright IJ (2005) Specific leaf area and dry matter content estimate thickness in laminar leaves. Ann Bot 96:1129–1136.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mci264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. WMO, UNEP, NOAA, NASA, European Commission (2018) Executive summary: scientific assessment of ozone depletion: 2018 World Meteorological Organization, United Nations Environment Programme, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Aeronautics, Space Administration European Commission, p 58Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departamento de Protección VegetalInstituto de Ciencias Agrarias (ICA-CSIC)MadridSpain
  2. 2.Unidad de Protección de Cultivos, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Alimentaria y de Biosistemas (ETSIAAB)Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)MadridSpain
  3. 3.Associate Unit IVAS (CSIC-UPM): Control of Insect Vectors of Viruses in Horticultural Sustainable SystemsMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations