Journal of Pest Science

, Volume 92, Issue 2, pp 579–593 | Cite as

Environmental influences on stem borer incidence in Australian subtropical Corymbia plantations

  • Valerie J. Debuse
  • Tim E. Smith
  • Chris T. Holloway
  • Aaron N. Wiegand
  • Helen F. Nahrung
  • Simon A. LawsonEmail author
Original Paper


Population dynamics of forest insect pests are a key determinant of forest health globally, but there is often insufficient information on tree susceptibility and environmental drivers of attack to construct pest population models that inform management. We investigated susceptibility of Corymbia citriodora subsp. variegata (spotted gum) plantations to two stem borer families (Cerambycidae, Cossidae) for which the drivers of attack are largely unknown. We surveyed 20 plantations for borer incidence (proportion of trees attacked), severity (number of attacks/attacked tree) and height and collected environmental variables in six categories (site characteristics, physical soil characteristics, foliar nutrition, landscape structure, climate and management). Most attacks on tree stems were associated with the cerambycid beetle Phoracantha solida, which were positively related to secondary attack from the cossid moth Culama australis. Mean incidence of borer attack was 3.5% and highly variable across plantations (0–22%). Phoracantha solida incidence was highly correlated with severity at a plantation scale. Relative tree diameter was the most important associate of P. solida attack incidence; proportionately larger diameter trees were more likely to be attacked where no thinning had occurred. Foliar nutrients, specifically lower concentrations of potassium, iron and nitrogen, were associated with higher P. solida attack incidence. We suggest that measuring incidence can be used as a proxy for severity of P. solida-associated damage at a plantation scale in operational pest surveillance. The results indicate that thinning may reduce the occurrence of proportionately larger diameter trees being attacked. We also recommend further research to determine the effectiveness of adding fertiliser to remediate sites that are deficient in potassium, nitrogen and iron.


Phoracantha Cerambycidae Beetles Eucalyptus Plantations Stem borer 



We thank everyone who helped with the fieldwork including Scott Swift, John Huth, Tony Burridge, Janet McDonald, Manon Griffiths, Bruce Hogg and Chris Fitzgerald. Special thanks go to Bruce Hogg for his work on data management and programming to create the climate variables used in the study. We are very grateful to Matt Nagel for GIS analysis and to Angus Carnegie for his expertise in borer biology and his help in identifying potential sites in New South Wales. We are very grateful to Neil Gourley, formerly of HQPlantations for providing the plantation management data, and for the cooperation of HQPlantations staff more widely. We thank the land owners for allowing access to the land and the Queensland Government’s Plantation Hardwood Research Fund, HQ Plantations and the former forestry company Elders Forestry for funding the project.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

10340_2018_1069_MOESM1_ESM.docx (37 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 37 kb)


  1. Abbott I, Smith R, Williams M, Voutier R (1991) Infestation of regenerated stands of karri (Eucalyptus diversicolor) by bullseye borer (Tryphocaria acanthocera, Cerambycidae) in Western Australia. Aust For 54:66–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aukema BH, Carroll AL, Zhu J, Raffa KF, Sickley TA, Taylor SW (2006) Landscape level analysis of mountain pine beetle in British Columbia, Canada: spatiotemporal development and spatial synchrony within the present outbreak. Ecography 29:427–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aukema BH, Carroll AL, Zheng Y, Zhu J, Raffa KF, Moore RD, Stahl K, Taylor SW (2008) Movement of outbreak populations of mountain pine beetle: influences of spatiotemporal patterns and climate. Ecography 31:348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carnegie AJ, Cant RG, Eldridge RH (2008a) Forest health surveillance in New South Wales, Australia. Aust For 71:164–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carnegie AJ, Lawson SA, Smith TE, Pegg GS, Stone C, McDonald JM (2008) Healthy hardwoods: a field guide to pests, diseases and nutritional disorders in subtropical hardwoods. Forest and Wood Products Australia, Victoria. Last accessed 31 Jan 2018
  6. Daniel WW (1999) Biostatistics: a foundation for analysis in the health sciences, 7th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. De Schepper V, Steppe K, Van Labeke M-C, Lemeur R (2010) Detailed analysis of double girdling effects on stem diameter variations and sap flow in young oak trees. Environ Exp Bot 68:149–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dell B, Robinson J (1993) Symptoms of mineral nutrient deficiencies and the nutrient concentration ranges in seedlings of Eucalyptus maculata Hook. In: Barrow NJ (ed) Plant nutrition—from genetic engineering to field practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 285–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Di Vaio C, Petito A, Buccheri M (2001) Effect of girdling on gas exchanges and leaf mineral content in the “Independence” nectarine. J Plant Nutr 24:1047–1060CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, Buchmann C, Carl G, Carré G, Marquéz JRG, Gruber B, Lafourcade B, Leitão PJ, Münkemüller T (2013) Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography 36:27–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Driscoll DA, Kirkpatrick JB, McQuillan PB, Bonham KJ (2010) Classic metapopulations are rare among common beetle species from a naturally fragmented landscape. J Anim Ecol 79:294–303CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Elith J, Leathwick JR, Hastie T (2008) A working guide to boosted regression trees. J Anim Ecol 77:802–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliott HJ, Ohmart CP, Wylie FR (1998) Insect pests of Australian forests: ecology and management. Inkata Press, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  14. Etxebeste I, Sanchez-Husillos E, Álvarez G, Mass i Gisbert H, Pajares J (2015) Dispersal of Monochamus galloprovincialis (Col.:Cerambycidae) as recorded by mark–release–recapture using pheromone traps. J Appl Ent 140:485–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Evans JR (1989) Photosynthesis and nitrogen relationships in leaves of C3 plants. Oecologia 78:9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farr JD, Dick SG, Williams MR, Wheeler IB (2000) Incidence of bullseye borer (Phoracantha acanthocera, (Macleay) Cerambycidae) in 20–35 year old regrowth karri in the south west of Western Australia. Aust For 63:107–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Feldman RM, Curry GL, Coulson RN (1981) A mathematical model of field population dynamics of the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis. Ecol Model 13:261–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fischer RA (1968) Stomatal opening: role of potassium uptake by guard cells. Science 160:784–785CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Flower CE, Gonzalez-Meler MA (2015) Responses of temperate forest productivity to insect and pathogen disturbances. Annu Rev Plant Biol 66:547–569CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Friedman JH (2001) Greedy function approximation: the gradient boosting machine. Ann Stat 29:1189–1232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Friedman JH (2002) Stochastic gradient boosting. Comput Stat Data Anal 38:367–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grove SJ (2002) Saproxylic insect ecology and the sustainable management of forests. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hanks LM, Paine TD, Millar JG (1991) Mechanisms of resistance in Eucalyptus against larvae of the eucalyptus longhorned borer (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Environ Entomol 20:1583–1588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hanks LM, Paine TD, Millar JG, Hom JL (1995) Variation among Eucalyptus species in resistance to eucalyptus longhorned borer in Southern California. Entomol Exp Appl 74:185–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hanks LM, Paine TD, Millar JG, Campbell CD, Schuch UK (1999) Water relations of host trees and resistance to the phloem-boring beetle Phoracantha semipunctata F. (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Oecologia 119:400–407CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Holland JD, Bert DG, Fahrig L (2004) Determining the spatial scale of species’ response to habitat. Bioscience 54:227–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Isbell R (2002) The Australian soil classification. CSIRO Publishing, CollingwoodCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jenkins MJ, Hebertson E, Page W, Jorgensen CA (2008) Bark beetles, fuels, fires and implications for forest management in the Intermountain West. For Ecol Manag 254:16–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kareiva P, Wennergren U (1995) Connecting landscape patterns to ecosystem and population processes. Nature 373:299–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lawson SA, Debuse VJ (2016) Native phloem and wood borers in Australian Mediterranean forest trees. In: Paine TD, Lieutier F (eds) Insects and diseases of Mediterranean forest systems. Springer International Publishing, Bern, pp 455–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lawson SA, Wylie FR, Wylie RL, Ryan P (2002). Longicorn beetles (Phoracantha spp.) and giant wood moths (Endoxyla spp.): emerging threats in tropical and subtropical eucalypt plantations in Queensland, Australia. FORSPA Publication (FAO), pp 33–45Google Scholar
  32. Lindsay WL (1974) Role of chelation in micronutrient availability. In: Carson EW (ed) The plant root and its environment. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville, pp 507–524Google Scholar
  33. Maathuis FJM, Amtmann A (1999) K+ nutrition and Na+ toxicity: the basis of cellular K+/Na+ ratios. Ann Bot 84:123–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marschner P (2012) Marschner’s mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Martinez-Egea JM (1982) Phoracantha semipunctata Fab.en el suroeste Espanol: resumen de la campana de colocacion de arboles cebo. Boletin de la Estacion Central de Ecologia 11:57–69Google Scholar
  36. Mattson WJ, Addy ND (1975) Phytophagous insects as regulators of forest primary production. Science 190:515–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mattson WJ, Haack RA (1987) The role of drought in outbreaks of plant-eating insects. Bioscience 37:110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Morin RS, Liebhold AM, Pugh SA, Crocker SJ (2016) Regional assessment of emerald ash borer, Agrilus planipennis, impacts in forests of the Eastern United States. Biol Invasions. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nahrung HF, Smith TE, Wiegand AN, Lawson SA, Debuse VJ (2014) Host tree influences on longicorn beetle (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae) attack in subtropical Corymbia (Myrtales: Myrtaceae). Environ Entomol 43:37–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Naing L, Winn T, Rusli BN (2006) Practical issues in calculating the sample size for prevalence studies. Arch Orofac Sci 1:9–14Google Scholar
  41. New South Wales Office of Environment and Heritage (2015) A vegetation map for the Northern Rivers Catchment Management Authority to support application of the Biodiversity Forecasting Toolkit VIS_ID 524 + Mid North Coast Vegetation (EcoLogical Version) VIS_ID 3886. Last accessed Apr 2014
  42. Paine TD, Malinoski MK, Scriven GT (1990) Rating Eucalyptus vigor and the risk of insect infestation: leaf surface area and sapwood: heartwood ratio. Can J For Res 20:1485–1489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. R Development Core Team (2004) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Last accessed 11 Aug 2016
  44. Ridgeway G (2004) GBM Generalized boosted regression models. R package, version 1.3-5. Last Accessed 17 Dec 2018
  45. Safranik L, Wilson B (2006) The mountain pine beetle: a synthesis of biology, management and impacts on lodgepole pine. Can For Serv, Victoria, p 299Google Scholar
  46. Sattler PS, Williams RD (1999) The conservation status of Queensland’s bioregional ecosystems. Environmental Protection Agency, BrisbaneGoogle Scholar
  47. Schachtman D, Liu W (1999) Molecular pieces to the puzzle of the interaction between potassium and sodium uptake in plants. Trends Plant Sci 4:281–287CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Seaton S, Matusick G, Ruthrof KX, Hardy GESJ (2015) Outbreak of Phoracantha semipunctata in response to severe drought in a Mediterranean Eucalyptus forest. Forests 6:3868–3881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shore TL, Safranyik L, Hawkes BC, Taylor SW (2006) Effects of the mountain pine beetle on lodgepole pine stand structure and dynamics. In: Safranik L, Wilson B (eds) The mountain pine beetle: a synthesis of biology, management and impacts on lodgepole pine. Canadian Forest Service, VictoriaGoogle Scholar
  50. Sousa E, Rodrigues JM, Bonifáco LF, Naves PM, Rodrigues A (2011) Management and control of the pine wood nematode, Bursaphelenchus xylophilus, in Portugal. In: Boeri F, Chung JA (eds) Nematodes: morphology, functions and management strategies. Hauppauge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Stone C (1993) Insect pest problems of eucalypt plantations in Australia. 2. New South Wales. Aust For 56:363–369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tscharntke T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Kruess A, Theis C (2002) Characteristics of insect populations on habitat fragments: a mini review. Ecol Res 17:229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wang Q (1995) A Taxonomic revision of the Australian genus Phoracantha Newman (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae). Invertebr Taxon 9:865–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. White TCR (1969) An index to measure weather-induced stress of trees associated with outbreaks of psyllids in Australia. Ecology 50:905–909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wylie FR, Peters BC (1993) Insect pest problems of eucalypt plantations in Australia. 1. Queensland. Aust For 56:358–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Forestry Industries Research CentreUniversity of the Sunshine CoastMaroochydore DCAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Agriculture and FisheriesUniversity of the Sunshine CoastMaroochydore DCAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Agriculture and FisheriesEcosciences PrecinctDutton ParkAustralia
  4. 4.Faculty of Science, Health, Education and EngineeringUniversity of the Sunshine CoastMaroochydore DCAustralia
  5. 5.Environmental Futures Research InstituteGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations