Trap height considerations for detecting two economically important forest beetle guilds in southeastern US forests
- 289 Downloads
Wood-infesting beetles continue to be introduced into new areas at high rates through global trade. Once established, these species can be difficult or impossible to eradicate and can be extremely damaging to both ecosystems and economies. Efforts to detect newly arrived species before they become widespread represent an important early line of defense against these threats. There is considerable interest in optimizing trapping methods to best detect taxa of greatest concern. The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of trap height in influencing detection rates for two economically important guilds of forest Coleoptera [phloem/wood feeders (Buprestidae, Cerambycidae and some scolytine Curculionidae) and ambrosia beetles (scolytine Curculionidae)]. We examine this question using three datasets from southeastern US forests. In general, we found phloem/wood feeders and ambrosia beetles to exhibit contrasting vertical distribution patterns. Whereas phloem/wood feeders generally became more species-rich and abundant with increasing trap height, the opposite pattern was found for ambrosia beetles. Moreover, all species found to be significantly associated with the highest traps were phloem/wood feeders, whereas all but one of the species significantly associated with the lowest traps were ambrosia beetles. It is clear from these findings that detection efforts targeting both guilds will be most effective when traps are deployed at multiple heights in southeastern US forests.
KeywordsBark beetles Invasive Saproxylic Vertical stratification Woodborers Xylophagous
We thank Bob Rabaglia, Dan Miller and Rick Hoebeke for helping with scolytine identifications; Scott Horn, Jim Hanula and Mike Cody for assisting with field work; and Cavell Brownie for providing help with the analyses. We also thank three anonymous reviewers for comments that greatly improved the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Colwell RK (2013) EstimateS: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples version 9 persistent. http://purl.oclc.org/estimates
- Hardersen S et al (2014) Spatio-temporal analysis of beetles from the canopy and ground layer in an Italian lowland forest. Bull Insectol 67:87–97Google Scholar
- McCune B, Mefford MJ (2011) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. Version 6. MjM Software, Gleneden BeachGoogle Scholar
- Miller DR (2002) Short-range horizontal disruption by verbenone in attraction of mountain pine beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) to pheromone-baited funnel traps in stands of lodgepole pine. J Entomol Soc Brit Columbia 99:103–105Google Scholar
- Rabaglia R, Duerr D, Acciavatti R, Ragenovich I (2008) Early detection and rapid response for non-native bark and ambrosia beetles. USDA FS Forest Health and Protection, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
- SAS Institute (1999) SAS system for windows, Version 8, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NCGoogle Scholar