Advertisement

Higher social power increases occupational gender stereotyping in Chinese culture

  • Xiaobin Zhang
  • Qiong LiEmail author
  • Bin ZuoEmail author
Research Article
  • 28 Downloads

Abstract

Prior studies have used the perspective of the social function of social power (such as how power affects interpersonal interaction between the powerful and the powerless) to explore how powerful people stereotype powerless people. In the present research, we further explored how high and low levels of social power affect occupational gender stereotyping from the perspective of how social power affects cognitive processing, that is, social categorization. We proposed that higher social power-primed participants, compared to low social power-primed participants, would be more inclined to use category-based representation and thus use stereotyping. In two studies, we investigated these effects and found that high social power, compared to low social power, increased occupational gender stereotyping in Chinese culture.

Keywords

Social power Social categorization Occupational gender stereotyping 

Notes

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (31760287, 31400902, 31571147) and the Humanity and Social Science Youth Foundation of the Ministry of Education of China (14YJC190025).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Allport GW (1954) The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley, ReadingGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargh JA, Chartrand TL (2000) The mind in the middle: a practical guide to priming and automaticity research. In: Reis HT, Judd CM (eds) Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 253–285Google Scholar
  3. Bass BM (1998) Transformational leadership: individual, military and educational impact. Mahwah, ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodenhausen GV, Kramer GP, Süsser K (1994) Happiness and stereotypic thinking in social judgment. J Personal Soc Psychol 66(4):621–632.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brewer MB (1988) A dual process model of impression formation. In: Srull TK, Wyer RS (eds) Advances in social cognition. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 177–183Google Scholar
  6. Brinol P, Petty RE, Valle C, Rucker DD, Becerra A (2007) The effects of message recipients’ power before and after persuasion: a self-validation analysis. J Personal Soc Psychol 93(6):1040–1050.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.6.1040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen S, Ybarra O, Kiefer AK (2004) Power and impression formation: the effect of power on the desire for morality and competence information. Soc Cognit 22(4):241–391.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.22.4.391.38296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Claypool HM, Bernstein MJ (2014) Social exclusion and stereotyping: Why and when exclusion fosters individuation of others. J Personal Soc Psychol 106(4):571–589.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035621 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Dreu CKW, Van Kleef GA (2004) The influence of power on the information search, impression formation, and demands in negotiation. J Exp Soc Psychol 40(3):303–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dovidio JF, Evans N, Tyler RB (1986) Racial stereotypes: the contents of their cognitive representations. J Exp Soc Psychol 22(1):22–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90039-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Emerson RM (1962) Power-dependence relations. Am Soc Rev 27(1):31–41.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2089716 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fiske ST (1993) Controlling other people: the impact of power on stereotyping. Am Psychol 48(6):621–628.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fiske ST (2001) Effects of power on bias: power explains and maintains individual, group, and societal disparities. In: Lee-Chai AY, Bargh JA (eds) The use and abuse of power: multiple perspectives on the causes of corruption. Psychology Press, New York, pp 181–193Google Scholar
  14. Fiske ST, Dépret E (1996) Control, interdependence and power: understanding social cognition in its social context. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 7:31–61.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779443000094 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fiske ST, Neuberg SL (1990) A continuum model of impression formation: from category-based to individuating processes as a function of information, motivation, and attention. In: Zanna MP (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–74Google Scholar
  16. Förster J (2009) Relations between perceptual and conceptual scope: How global versus local processing fits a focus on similarity versus dissimilarity. J Exp Psychol Gen 138(1):88–111.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014484 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodwin SA, Operario D, Fiske ST (1998) Situational power and interpersonal dominance facilitate bias and inequality. J Soc Issues 54(4):677–698.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01243.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodwin SA, Gubin A, Fiske ST, Yzerbyt VY (2000) Power can bias impression processes: stereotyping subordinates by default and by design. Group Process Intergroup 3(3):227–256.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430200003003001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guinote A (2007a) Power affects basic cognition: increased attentional inhibition and flexibility. J Exp Soc Psychol 43(5):685–697.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.06.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guinote A (2007b) Power and goal pursuit. Personal Soc Psychol B 33(8):1076–1087.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207301011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgins ET (1996) Knowledge activation: accessibility, applicability, and stimulus salience. In: Higgins ET, Kruglanski AW (eds) Social psychology: handbook of basic principles. Guilford Press, New York, pp 133–168Google Scholar
  22. Keltner D, Gruenfeld DH, Anderson C (2003) Power, approach, and inhibition. Psychol Rev 110(2):265–284.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.265 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Lammers J, Stoker JI, Stapel DA (2009) Differentiating social and personal power opposite effects on stereotyping, but parallel effects on behavioral approach tendencies. Psychol Sci 20(12):1543–1549.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02479.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Leyens JP, Dardenne B, Fiske ST (1998) Why and under what circumstances is a hypothesis-consistent testing strategy preferred in interviews? Br J Soc Psychol 37(3):259–274.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1998.tb01171.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCrea SM, Wieber F, Myers AL (2012) Construal level mind-sets moderate self- and social stereotyping. J Personal Soc Psychol 102(1):51–68.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026108 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Müller F, Rothermund K (2014) What does it take to activate stereotypes? Simple primes don’t seem enough. Soc Psychol 45(3):187–193.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000183 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neely JH (1977) Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention. J Exp Psychol Gen 106:226–254.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.106.3.226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Overbeck JR (2010) Concepts and historical perspectives on power. In: Guinote A, Vescio TK (eds) The social psychology of power. Guilford Press, New York, pp 19–45Google Scholar
  29. Overbeck JR, Park B (2001) When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. J Personal Soc Psychol 81(4):549–565.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ranganath C, Rainer G (2003) Neural mechanisms for detecting and remembering novel events. Nat Rev Neurosci 4(3):193–202.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1052 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rucker DD, Galinsky AD (2009) Conspicuous consumption versus utilitarian ideals: How different levels of power shape consumer behavior. J Exp Soc Psychol 45(3):549–555.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith PK, Trope Y (2006) You focus on the forest when you’re in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. J Personal Soc Psychol 90(4):578–596.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.4.578 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stephan WG, Stephan CW (1993) Cognition and affect in stereotyping: parallel interactive networks. In: Mackie DM, Hamilton DH (eds) Affect, cognition, and stereotyping: interactive processes in group perception. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 111–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Theeuwes J (1994) Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 20:799–806.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.4.799 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Torelli CJ, Shavitt S (2011) The impact of power on information processing depends on cultural orientation. J Exp Soc Psychol 47(5):959–967.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.04.003 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Dijke M, Poppe M (2006) Striving for personal power as a basis for social power dynamics. Eur J Soc Psychol 36(4):537–556.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang X, Zhang J, Xu ZY, Xu Z (2008) Risk dominance strategy in imperfect information multi-player game. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on intelligent systems design and applications, vol 2, pp 596–601.  https://doi.org/10.1109/isda.2008.228
  38. White M, White G (2006) Implicit and explicit occupational gender stereotypes. Sex Roles 55:259–266.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9078-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. White M, Kruczek T, Brown M (1998) Occupational sex stereotypes among college students. J Vocat Behav 34:289–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8791(89)90021-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. White KR, Crites SL Jr, Taylor JH, Corral G (2009) Wait, What? Assessing stereotype incongruities using the N400 ERP component. Soc Cognit Affect Neurosci 4:191–198.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsp004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yantis S (1998) Control of visual attention. In: Pashler H (ed) Attention. Psychology Press, Hove, UKGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang X, Li Q, Sun S, Zuo B (2018) The time course from gender categorization to gender-stereotype activation. Soc Neurosci 13(1):52–60.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2016.1251965 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Marta Olivetti Belardinelli and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyNorthwest Normal UniversityLanZhouChina
  2. 2.School of PsychologyCentral China Normal UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations