Determination and Chemical Profiling of Toxic Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids in Botanical Samples with UPLC–Q-TOFMS
- 11 Downloads
Pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) and their N-oxides (PANOs) can cause liver toxicity and genotoxicity in humans and animals, necessitating the development of screening tools for these alkaloids. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization-quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC–ESI–Q-TOFMS) can provide accurate precursor and fragment ion mass information (MSE mode) as well as simultaneous quantification. A method for rapidly and accurately determining nine PAs with UPLC–ESI–Q-TOF MS was developed and validated herein. Analytes were separated using a C18 column with water containing 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile, showing high-resolution peaks within 11 min. The validation results showed excellent linearity (R2 > 0.9951), limits of detection (0.4–2.0 ng mL−1), and limits of quantification (0.6–6.0 ng mL−1). Moreover, 70 PAs, their N-oxides precursors, and characteristic fragment ions that were generated according to their chemical structure were characterized. A method for the chemical profiling of alkaloids was also proposed using the mass information obtained from the chromatograms of the tested sample. Lycopsamine, senecionine, senkirkine, and echimidine were identified in four potentially PA-containing plants and quantified by matching with authentic standards. Eight PAs and PANOs were also tentatively identified using the mass data from the previously listed alkaloids. This approach will provide a database that can be used to instantly identify alkaloids in botanical samples.
KeywordsPyrrolizidine alkloids UPLC–Q-TOF/MS Chemical profiling Structural identification
No funding was provided for this study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by authors. The authors confirm compliance with ethical standards.
- 1.Petruczynik A (2012) Analysis of alkaloids from different chemical groups by different liquid chromatography methods. Cent Eur J Chem 10(3):802–835Google Scholar
- 5.Zhu L, Ruan JQ, Li N, Fu PP, Ye Y, Lin G (2016) A novel ultra-performance liquid chromatography hyphenated with quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry method for rapid estimation of total toxic retronecine-type of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in herbs without requiring corresponding standards. Food Chem 194:1320–1328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Martinello M, Borin A, Stella R, Bovo D, Biancotto G, Gallina A, Mutinelli F (2017) Development and validation of a QuEChERS method coupled to liquid chromatography and high resolution mass spectrometry to determine pyrrolizidine and tropane alkaloids in honey. Food Chem 234:295–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Zhou Y, Li N, Choi FF, Qiao CF, Song JZ, Li SL, Liu X, Cai ZW, Fu PP, Lin G, Xu HX (2010) A new approach for simultaneous screening and quantification of toxic pyrrolizidine alkaloids in some potential pyrrolizidine alkaloid-containing plants by using ultra performance liquid chromatography–tandem quadrupole mass spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 681(1–2):33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Schurmann A, Dvorak V, Cruzer C, Butcher P, Kaufmann A (2009) False-positive liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric confirmation of sebuthylazine residues using the identification points system according to EU directive 2002/657/EC due to a biogenic insecticide in tarragon. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom RCM 23(8):1196–1200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Perez-Arribas LV, Manuel de Villena-Rueda FJ, Leon-Gonzalez ME, Gonzalo-Lumbreras R, Polo-Diez LM (2010) New approach to optimize HPLC separations of acid-base compounds with elution order involved, by using combined three-band resolution maps. Anal Bioanal Chem 396(7):2647–2656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Mudge EM, Jones AMP, Brown PN (2015) Quantification of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in North American plants and honey by LC–MS: single laboratory validation. Food Addit Contam Part A 32(12):2068–2074Google Scholar