Stability-Indicating Size Exclusion Chromatography Method for the Analysis of IgG mAb-Cetuximab
- 38 Downloads
A simple and sensitive stability-indicating size exclusion chromatography method was developed and validated for the quantitative analysis of cetuximab. The effect of variety of parameters including mobile phase composition, pH, flow rate and injection volume was investigated to achieve acceptable peak resolution and the optimum condition was selected. The proposed method was validated in accordance with the International Conference on Harmonization guidelines. Method validation showed good linearity over the concentration range of 1.56–250 µg mL−1 (r2 = 0.9997), acceptable precision (relative standard deviations < 2.8%) and accuracy (recovery of 97.6–99.5%). The limits of detection and quantitation were 0.34 µg mL−1 and 1.03 µg mL−1, respectively. The robustness of the method was evaluated by small variation in buffer composition, buffer pH and flow rate and was determined to be acceptable. Assessment of the specificity and stability-indicating capability of the method using thermally stressed, photo degraded, acidic and oxidative stressed samples revealed no interference between cetuximab and excipients or force degradation products. Furthermore, evaluation of bioactivity of stressed samples showed significant differences (p < 0.05). The proposed method could be utilized as a precise and robust stability-indicating method which can be reproduced in any labs for high-throughput quantitative analysis, stability monitoring and quality control of cetuximab in pharmaceutical formulation.
KeywordsSize exclusion chromatography Stability-indicating method Method validation Monoclonal antibody Cetuximab
This work is a part of A. Farjami’s thesis, submitted for PhD degree (no. 117) and supported by Research Council, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences and we would like to thank the CinnaGen Medical Biotechnology Center for kindly providing all of the cetuximab medicinal samples.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors state no conflict of interest.
Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 7.Sundaram S, Matathia A, Qian J, Zhang J, Hsieh M-C, Liu T, Crowley R, Parekh B, Zhou Q (2011) An innovative approach for the characterization of the isoforms of a monoclonal antibody product. In: MAbs, vol 6. Taylor & Francis, pp 505–512Google Scholar
- 8.Ayoub D, Jabs W, Resemann A, Evers W, Evans C, Main L, Baessmann C, Wagner-Rousset E, Suckau D, Beck A (2013) Correct primary structure assessment and extensive glyco-profiling of cetuximab by a combination of intact, middle-up, middle-down and bottom-up ESI and MALDI mass spectrometry techniques. In: MAbs, vol 5. Taylor & Francis, pp 699–710Google Scholar
- 10.Biacchi M, Said N, Beck A, Leize-Wagner E, Francois YN (2017) Top-down and middle-down approach by fraction collection enrichment using offline capillary electrophoresis–mass spectrometry coupling: application to monoclonal antibody Fc/2 charge variants. J Chromatogr A 1498:120–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2017.02.064 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Shah DD, Zhang J, Hsieh MC, Sundaram S, Maity H, Mallela KMG (2018) Effect of peroxide- versus alkoxyl-induced chemical oxidation on the structure, stability, aggregation, and function of a therapeutic monoclonal antibody. J Pharm Sci 107(11):2789–2803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2018.07.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Ehkirch A, Goyon A, Hernandez-Alba O, Rouviere F, D’Atri V, Dreyfus C, Haeuw JF, Diemer H, Beck A, Heinisch S, Guillarme D, Cianferani S (2018) A novel online four-dimensional SECxSEC-IMxMS methodology for characterization of monoclonal antibody size variants. Anal Chem. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b03333 Google Scholar
- 24.ICH: International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (2005) Topic Q2 (R1): validation of analytical methods—text and methodology. http://www.ich.org/fleadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q2_R1/Step4/Q2_R1_Guideline.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
- 28.Riley CM, Rosanske TW (1996) Development and validation of analytical methods, vol 3. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 32.Hernandez-Jimenez J, Salmeron-Garcia A, Cabeza J, Velez C, Capitan-Vallvey LF, Navas N (2016) The effects of light-accelerated degradation on the aggregation of marketed therapeutic monoclonal antibodies evaluated by size-exclusion chromatography with diode array detection. J Pharm Sci 105(4):1405–1418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2016.01.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Farrell A, Bones J, Cook K (2017) Optimizing protein aggregate analysis by SEC. Biopharm Int 30(10):46–46+Google Scholar
- 35.Stahl M (2003) Peak purity analysis in HPLC and CE using diode-array technology. Agilent Technologies, WaldbronnGoogle Scholar
- 36.ICH: International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (1995) Topic Q5C: stability testing of biotechnological/biological products. http://www.ich.org/fleadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q5C/Step4/Q5C_Guideline.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2018
- 41.ICH: International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (1996) Topic Q1B: stability testing: photostability testing of new drug substances and products. https://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Quality/Q1B/Step4/Q1B_Guideline.pdf. Accessed 30 Oct 2018