Advertisement

Experimental reduction of nestling hemoglobin concentration in combination with ectoparasite load manipulation affects nestling morphology and begging behavior, but not adult behavior

  • Ilsa A. GriebelEmail author
  • Russell D. Dawson
Original Article

Abstract

Young nest-bound birds often face a diversity of ectoparasites that typically feed on blood and can negatively affect nestling morphological and physiological traits, including hemoglobin concentration. While hemoglobin concentration can be correlated with nestling performance, such as body mass, it is unknown whether variation in hemoglobin is the direct proximate factor responsible for variation in morphology, or if nestling traits simply co-vary with hemoglobin concentration due to a number of similar factors influencing both traits. If hemoglobin concentration does directly influence the phenotype of nestlings, then the reduction in nestling hemoglobin concentration by ectoparasites may cause other negative effects commonly associated with parasitism. By experimentally reducing the hemoglobin concentration of nestling Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) using phenylhydrazine hydrochloride (PHZ), we tested whether reduced hemoglobin concentration could be the mechanism that causes changes in nestling morphology and behavior in response to increased parasitism. Parasite loads were manipulated in conjunction with the PHZ treatment. Nestlings injected with PHZ displayed no change in hemoglobin concentration 2 days post-injection, whereas control nestlings showed the typical increase that occurs during early development. By 6 days post-injection, the parasite, but not PHZ, treatment significantly affected hemoglobin concentration. Both treatments interacted to affect begging intensity, while size and growth rate of nestlings were only affected by the parasite load manipulation. This study demonstrates the potential use of PHZ in nestlings to tease apart the effects of parasitism and reduced hemoglobin, but the results suggest incorporating a second injection of PHZ to better replicate the pattern of hemoglobin reduction created by hematophagous ectoparasites.

Keywords

Hemoglobin Parasitism Phenylhydrazine hydrochloride Tree Swallow Tachycineta bicolor 

Zusammenfassung

Experimentelle Reduzierung der Hämoglobinkonzentration bei Nestlingen in Kombination mit Manipulation der Ektoparasitenlast beeinflusst Morphologie und Bettelverhalten der Nestlinge jedoch nicht das Verhalten der Altvögel.

Nesthocker sind häufig einer Vielfalt an Ektoparasiten ausgesetzt, die sich typischerweise vom Blut ernähren und die morphologischen und physiologischen Eigenschaften der Nestlinge einschließlich der Hämoglobinkonzentration negativ beeinflussen können. Die Hämoglobinkonzentration kann mit der Nestlingsentwicklung, wie z. B. mit der Körpermasse, korrelieren. Jedoch ist unbekannt, inwiefern die Unterschiede im Hämoglobingehalt als direkter, unmittelbarer Faktor für die Variation in der Morphologie verantwortlich sind, oder ob aufgrund ähnlicher Faktoren sowohl die Eigenschaften der Nestlinge also auch die der Hämoglobinkonzentration beeinflusst werden und diese somit miteinander kovariieren. Falls die Hämoglobinkonzentration den Phänotyp der Nestlinge direkt beeinflussen würde, dann riefe die durch eine Ektoparasitenlast reduzierte Hämoglobinkonzentration der Nestlinge möglicherweise weitere typische negative parasitäre Effekte hervor. Durch eine experimentell reduzierte Hämoglobinkonzentration bei Nestlingen der Sumpfschwalbe (Tachycineta bicolor) mittels Phenylhydrazinhydrochlorid (PHZ) haben wir getestet, ob eine reduzierte Hämoglobinkonzentration der verantwortliche Mechanismus für die Veränderungen in Nestlingsmorphologie und –verhalten darstellen könnte, als Reaktion auf einen erhöhten Parasitismus. Die Parasitenlast wurde in Verbindung mit der PHZ-Behandlung manipuliert. Nestlinge, welche PHZ injiziert bekommen hatten, zeigten zwei Tage nach der Injektion keine Veränderung in der Hämoglobinkonzentration, wohingegen Nestlinge der Kontrollgruppe eine für die frühe Entwicklungsphase typische Erhöhung der Konzentration zeigten. Sechs Tage nach der Injektion beeinflusste die Parasitenlast, jedoch nicht die PHZ-Behandlung, die Hämoglobinkonzentration signifikant. Beide Behandlungen zusammen beeinflussten das Bettelverhalten, während Größe und Wachstumsrate der Nestlinge nur durch die Manipulation der Parasitenlast beeinflusst wurden. Wir demonstrieren hier die potentielle Anwendung von PHZ bei Nestlingen, um die Auswirkungen durch die Parasiten und denen des reduzierten Hämoglobins zu trennen. Jedoch raten wir dazu, eine zweite PHZ-Injektion einzubeziehen, um das durch hämatophage Ektoparasiten hervorgerufene Muster der Hämoglobinreduzierung besser zu replizieren.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Bisaro, S. Sparks, and K. Sweet for assistance in the field and the City of Prince George for granting us access to their property. Comments by two anonymous referees improved a previous version of the manuscript.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada through a Discovery Grant to RDD and an Alexander Graham Bell Canada Graduate Scholarship to IAG. Additional funding was provided by the University of Northern British Columbia, Canada Foundation for Innovation, and the British Columbia Knowledge Development Fund. None of the funders had any input into the content of the manuscript, nor required approval of the manuscript prior to the submission.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval

This study complies with the current laws of Canada. The University of Northern British Columbia Animal Care and Use Committee on behalf of the Canadian Council on Animal Care approved our research protocols. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution at which the study was conducted.

Supplementary material

10336_2019_1706_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 20 kb)

References

  1. Antoniazzi LR, Manzoli DE, Rohrmann D, Saravia MJ, Silvestri L, Beldomenico PM (2011) Climate variability affects the impact of parasitic flies on Argentinean forest birds. J Zool 283:126–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brommer JE, Pitala N, Siitari H, Kluen E, Gustafsson L (2011) Body size and immune defense of nestling blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus) in response to manipulation of ectoparasites and food supply. Auk 128:556–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buyse J, Decuypere E (2015) Adipose tissue and lipid metabolism. In: Scanes CG (ed) Sturkie’s avian physiology. Academic Press, London, pp 443–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cantarero A, López-Arrabé J, Redondo AJ, Moreno J (2013) Behavioural responses to ectoparasites in pied flycatchers Fecidula hypoleuca: an experimental study. J Avian Biol 44:591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christe P, Richner H, Oppliger A (1996) Begging, food provisioning, and nestling competition in great tit broods infested with ectoparasites. Behav Ecol 7:127–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cornell A, Gibson K, Williams TD (2017) Physiological maturity at a critical life-history transition and flight ability at fledging. Funct Ecol 31:662–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dawson RD, Lawrie CC, O’Brien EL (2005) The importance of microclimate variation in determining size, growth and survival of avian offspring: experimental evidence from a cavity nesting passerine. Oecologia 144:499–507CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. DeSimone JG, Clotfelter ED, Black EC, Knutie SA (2018) Avoidance, tolerance, and resistance to ectoparasites in nestling and adult tree swallows. J Avian Biol 49:e01641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dupont WD (2009) Statistical modeling for biomedical researchers: a simple introduction to the analysis of complex data. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fargallo JA, Laaksonen T, Korpimäki E, Pöyri V, Griffith SC, Valkama J (2003) Size-mediated dominance and begging behaviour in Eurasian kestrel broods. Evol Ecol Res 5:549–558Google Scholar
  11. Godfray HCJ (1991) Signalling of need by offspring to their parents. Nature 352:328–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grafen A (1990) Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol 144:517–546CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Griebel IA (2018) Variability in susceptibility of nestling passerines to parasites. MSc thesis. University of Northern British Columbia, Prince GeorgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Harriman VB, Dawson RD, Clark RG, Fairhurst GD, Bortolotti GR (2014) Effects of ectoparasites on seasonal variation in quality of nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor). Can J Zool 92:87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Heist CA, Ritchison G (2016) Effects of variation in nestling hunger levels and begging on the provisioning behavior of male and female eastern phoebes (Sayornis phoebe). Wilson J Ornithol 128:132–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kaliński A, Bańbura M, Glądalski M, Markowski M, Skwarska J, Wawrzyniak J, Zieliński P, Bańbura J (2017) Relationships between nestling haemoglobin concentration and brood performance until fledging in great tits Parus major and blue tits Cyanistes caeruleus. Acta Ornithol 52:141–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kenward MG, Roger JH (1997) Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53:983–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Klenova AV (2015) Chick begging calls reflect degree of hunger in three auk species (Charadriiformes: Alcidae). PLoS One 10:e0140151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Knutie SA, Owen JP, McNew SM, Bartlow AW, Arriero E, Herman JM, DiBlasi E, Thompson M, Koop JAH, Clayton DH (2016) Galápagos mockingbirds tolerate introduced parasites that affect Darwin’s finches. Ecology 97:940–950PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Leech SM, Leonard ML (1996) Is there an energetic cost to begging in nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor)? Proc R Soc Lond B 263:983–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leonard ML, Horn AG (2001) Acoustic signalling of hunger and thermal state by nestling tree swallows. Anim Behav 61:87–93CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Leonard ML, Horn AG, Porter J (2003) Does begging affect growth in nestling tree swallows, Tachycineta bicolor? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:573–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lill A, Rajchl K, Yachou-Wos L, Johnstone CP (2013) Are haematocrit and haemoglobin concentration reliable body condition indicators in nestlings: the welcome swallow as a case study. Avian Biol Res 6:57–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McCarty JP (1996) The energetic cost of begging in nestling passerines. Auk 113:178–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKilligan NG (1996) Field experiments on the effect of ticks on breeding success and chick health of cattle egrets. Austral J Ecol 21:442–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Minias P (2015) The use of haemoglobin concentrations to assess physiological condition in birds: a review. Conserv Physiol 3:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2012) Introduction to linear regression, 5th edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  28. O’Brien EL, Morrison BL, Johnson LS (2001) Assessing the effects of haematophagous ectoparasites on the health of nestling birds: haematocrit vs haemoglobin levels in house wrens parasitized by blow fly larvae. J Avian Biol 32:73–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’Connor JA, Robertson J, Kleindorfer S (2014) Darwin’s finch begging intensity does not honestly signal need in parasitised nests. Ethology 120:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O’Dwyer TW, Buttemer WA, Priddel DM (2007) Differential rates of offspring provisioning in Gould’s petrels: are better feeders better breeders? Austral J Zool 55:155–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pryke SR, Rollins LA, Griffith SC (2011) Context-dependent sex allocation: constraints on the expression and evolution of maternal effects. Evolution 65:2792–2799CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Pryor L, Casto JM (2017) Ectoparasites as developmental stressors: effects on somatic and physiological development. J Exp Zool 327:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richner H, Oppliger A, Christe P (1993) Effect of an ectoparasite on reproduction in great tits. J Anim Ecol 62:703–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sabrosky CW, Bennett GF, Whitworth TL (1989) Bird blow flies (Protocalliphora) in North America (Diptera: Calliphorida). Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Scanes CG (2015a) Carbohydrate metabolism. In: Scanes CG (ed) Sturkie’s avian physiology. Academic Press, London, pp 421–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scanes CG (2015b) Protein metabolism. In: Scanes CG (ed) Sturkie’s avian physiology. Academic Press, London, pp 455–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwagmeyer PL, Mock DW (2008) Parental provisioning and offspring fitness: size matters. Anim Behav 75:291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shutler D, Clark RG, Fehr C, Diamond AW (2006) Time and recruitment costs as currencies in manipulation studies on the costs of reproduction. Ecology 87:2938–2946CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Simmons P, Lill A (2006) Development of parameters influencing blood oxygen carrying capacity in the welcome swallow and fairy martin. Comp Biochem Physiol A 143:459–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Streby HM, Peterson SM, Kapfer PM (2009) Fledging success is a poor indicator of the effects of bird blow flies on ovenbird survival. Condor 111:193–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Trivers RL (1974) Parent-offspring conflict. Am Zool 14:249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Whitworth TL (2003) A key to the puparia of 27 species of North American Protocalliphora Hough (Diptera: Calliphoridae) from bird nests and two new puparial descriptions. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 105:995–1033Google Scholar
  43. Whitworth TL, Bennett GF (1992) Pathogenicity of larval Protocalliphora (Diptera: Calliphoridae) parasitizing nestling birds. Can J Zool 70:2184–2191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Williams TD, Fronstin RB, Otomo A, Wagner E (2012) Validation of the use of phenylhydrazine hydrochloride (PHZ) for experimental manipulation of haematocrit and plasma haemoglobin in birds. Ibis 154:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zach R, Mayoh KR (1982) Weight and feather growth of nestling tree swallows. Can J Zool 60:1080–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecosystem Science and Management ProgramUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada
  2. 2.Centre for Conservation ResearchCalgary Zoological SocietyCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations