Advertisement

Offspring sex ratio is unrelated to parental quality and time of breeding in a multiple-breeding shorebird

  • Pinjia Que
  • Tamás Székely
  • Pengcheng Wang
  • Qi Lu
  • Weipan Lei
  • Yang Liu
  • Zhengwang ZhangEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Sex ratio is a fundamental concept in evolutional biology, and theory predicts that parents should invest in sons and daughters according to the fitness returns they expect from them. The fitness returns may depend on the timing of breeding and on parental conditions leading to sex ratios that depend on breeding date and/or parental quality. Here, we investigate the offspring sex ratio in a small shorebird, the Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus, in a large breeding population in Eastern China, and test whether the parents adjust their offspring’s sex in response to hatch date, brood age and their own body condition. Using 1264 chicks from 676 broods that were molecularly sexed, we show that hatchling sex ratio was not significantly different from unity. Hatchling sex ratios were not related to hatch date or to the body condition of parents. In addition, we sexed 138 eggs that were confiscated from illegal egg collectors and found that the mortality of female and male embryos was not significantly different. The latter result is important by suggesting that neither primary sex ratio (i.e., at conception) nor secondary sex ratio (i.e., at hatching) is biased. Taken together, the even offspring sex ratio in Chinese Kentish Plovers is consistent with recent analyses of six plover populations that found even sex ratios at hatching. Future works should investigate whether the even sex ratio persists into adulthood, or it may shift toward more males (or females) due to sex-biased mortalities of juveniles and/or adults.

Keywords

Brood age Parental investment Parental size Sex-biased mortality Trivers-Willard hypothesis 

Zusammenfassung

Das Geschlechterverhältnis des Nachwuchses einer Küstenlimikole ist unabhängig von den Eigenschaften der Eltern und dem Brutzeitbeginn

Das Geschlechterverhältnis ist ein fundamentales Konzept der Evolutionsbiologie, und die Theorie sagt voraus, dass Eltern in Söhne und Töchter proportional zu dem von ihnen erwarteten Fitnessertrag investieren sollten. Der Fitnessertrag hängt möglicherweise vom Brutzeitbeginn und der elterlichen Qualität ab, was dazu führen kann, dass das Geschlechterverhältnis selbst vom Beginn der Brutzeit und den Eigenschaften der Eltern abhängt. Hier untersuchen wir das Geschlechterverhältnis des Nachwuchses einer kleinen Küstenvogelart, dem Seeregenpfeifer Charadrius alexandrinus, in einer großen Brutpopulation in Ostchina und testen, ob die Eltern das Geschlechterverhältnis ihres Nachwuchses dem Schlüpfzeitpunkt, Brutalter und den eigenen körperlichen Bedingungen anpassen. Mittels 1264 Küken aus 676 Bruten, die alle molekular geschlechtsbestimmt waren, zeigen wir, dass das Geschlechterverhältnis nicht signifikant von gleichförmig abwich. Das Geschlechterverhältnis beim Schlupf war weder vom Schlüpfzeitpunkt noch von der Körperkondition der Eltern abhängig. Zusätzlich bestimmten wird das Geschlecht von 138 Eiern, die von illegalen Eisammlern beschlagnahmt wurden, und fanden, dass die Sterblichkeit von weiblichen und männlichen Embryos nicht signifikant verschieden war. Dies zeigt, dass weder das primäre Geschlechterverhältnis (bei der Zeugung) noch das sekundäre Geschlechterverhältnis (beim Schlupf) unausgeglichen sind. Das ausgeglichene Geschlechterverhältnis in den chinesischen Seeregenpfeifern stimmt mit jüngsten Ergebnissen von sechs Regenpfeiferpopulationen überein, die auch ausgeglichene Geschlechterverhältnisse beim Schlupf fanden. Zukünftige Arbeiten sollten untersuchen, ob das ausgeglichene Geschlechterverhältnis bis in das Erwachsenenalter fortbesteht, oder ob es sich zu mehr Männchen (oder Weibchen) verschiebt aufgrund von geschlechtsabhängigen Sterberaten von Jung- und/oder Altvögeln.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 31600297 and 31572288). We especially thank Zhiwei Tian and Jianli Song, who provided much help in the fieldwork. We are grateful to Yajing Chang, Bingrun Zhu, Jin Liu, Jia Zheng, Boshi Liang, Siyuan Huang, Karen Kim, Siyao Zhong, Zhuoxue Chen, Guang Yang, Pei Luo, Christopher Dudley, Carrie Wendt, Rebecca Gouge, Robert Weber, Kai Chen, Xiaoyan Long, Nan Zhang, and Xuecong Zhang for field assistance. We also thank Xunqiang Mo and Jianmin Wang for intercepting the illegal egg collectors and bringing the confiscated eggs to us. We thank Dr. Benjamin Werner for translating the abstract to German. Tamás Székely was a fellow of the Advanced Institute of Berlin at the time of writing the manuscript, and his work was funded by a Royal Society Wolfson Merit Award (WM170050), and by the Hungarian scientific funding agency, NKFIH (ÉLVONAL KKP-126949, K-116310). All experiments described in this study comply with current Chinese laws.

Supplementary material

10336_2018_1620_MOESM1_ESM.docx (393 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 392 kb)

References

  1. Arroyo B (2002) Sex-biased nestling mortality in the Montagu’s Harrier Circus pygargus. J Avian Biol 33:455–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barton K (2015) MuMIn: multi-model inference. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/MuMIn/index.html
  3. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell SC, Owens IP, Lord AM (2014) Quality of breeding territory mediates the influence of paternal quality on sex ratio bias in a free-living bird population. Behav Ecol 25:352–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bize P, Roulin A, Tella JL, Richner H (2005) Female-biased mortality in experimentally parasitized Alpine Swift Apus melba nestlings. Funct Ecol 19:405–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booksmythe I, Mautz B, Davis J, Nakagawa S, Jennions MD (2017) Facultative adjustment of the offspring sex ratio and male attractiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biol Rev 92:108–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bordier C, Saraux C, Viblanc VA, Gachot-Neveu H, Beaugey M, Le Maho Y, Le Bohec C (2014) Inter-annual variability of fledgling sex ratio in King Penguins. PLoS One 9:e114052PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bowers EK, Thompson CF, Sakaluk SK (2015) Persistent sex-by-environment effects on offspring fitness and sex-ratio adjustment in a wild bird population. J Anim Ecol 84:473–486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowers EK, Thompson CF, Sakaluk SK (2017) Maternal natal environment and breeding territory predict the condition and sex ratio of offspring. Evol Biol 44:11–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burley N (1981) Sex ratio manipulation and selection for attractiveness. Science 211:721–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and interference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Carmona-Isunza MC, Ancona S, Székely T, Ramallo-González AP, Cruz-López M, Serrano-Meneses MA, Küpper C (2017) Adult sex ratio and operational sex ratio exhibit different temporal dynamics in the wild. Behav Ecol 28:523–532Google Scholar
  13. Cooper NW, Sherry TW, Marra PP (2015) Experimental reduction of winter food decreases body condition and delays migration in a long-distance migratory bird. Ecology 96:1933–1942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daan S, Dijkstra C, Weissing FJ (1996) An evolutionary explanation for seasonal trends in avian sex ratios. Behav Ecol 7:426–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Darwin C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. Murray, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donald PF (2007) Adult sex ratios in wild bird populations. Ibis 149:671–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Eberhart-Phillips LJ, Küpper C, Miller TE, Cruz-López M, Maher KH, Dos Remedios N, Stoffel MA, Hoffman JI, Krüger O, Székely T (2017) Sex-specific early survival drives adult sex ratio bias in Snowy Plovers and impacts mating system and population growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 117:E5474–E5481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eberhart-Phillips LJ, Küpper C, Carmona-Isunza MC, Vincze O, Zefania S, Cruz-López M, Kosztolányi A, Miller TE, Barta Z, Cuthill IC, Burke T (2018) Demographic causes of adult sex ratio variation and their consequences for parental cooperation. Nat Commun 9:1651PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ellegren H, Gustafsson L, Sheldon BC (1996) Sex ratio adjustment in relation to parental attractiveness in a wild bird population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:11723–11728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fiala KL (1981) Sex ratio constancy in the Red-winged Blackbird. Evolution 35:898–910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection: a complete variorum edition. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fraga RM, Amat JA (1996) Breeding biology of a Kentish Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) population in an inland saline lake. Ardeola 43:69–85Google Scholar
  23. Fridolfsson AK, Ellegren H (1999) A simple and universal method for molecular sexing of non-ratite birds. J Avian Biol 1:116–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goławski A, Kasprzykowski Z, Ledwoń M, Mróz E, Morelli F (2016) Brood sex ratio in expansive and non-expansive tern species in east-central Poland. Bird Study 63:31–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gomendio M, Clutton-Brock TH, Albon SD, Guinness FE, Simpson MJ (1990) Mammalian sex ratios and variation in costs of rearing sons and daughters. Nature 343:261–263PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hall LK, Cavitt JF (2012) Comparative study of trapping methods for ground-nesting shorebirds. Waterbirds 35:342–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hamilton WD (1967) Extraordinary sex ratios. Science 156:477–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hardy ICW (2002) Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayman P, Marchant J, Prater T (1986) Shorebirds. An identification guide to the waders of the world. Helm, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Heinsohn R, Langmore NE, Cockburn A, Kokko H (2011) Adaptive secondary sex ratio adjustments via sex-specific infanticide in a bird. Curr Biol 21:1744–1777PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hewison AJM, Gaillard JM (1999) Successful sons or advantaged daughters? The Trivers-Willard model and sex-biased maternal investment in ungulates. Trends Ecol Evol 14:229–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hipkiss T, Hornfeldt B, Eklund U, Berlin S (2002) Year-dependent sex-biased mortality in supplementary-fed Tengmalm’s Owl nestlings. J Anim Ecol 71:693–699CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Howe HF (1977) Sex-ratio adjustment in the Common Grackle. Science 198:744–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kalmbach E, Benito MM (2007) Sexual size dimorphism and offspring vulnerability in birds. In: Fairbairn DJ, Blanckenhorn WU, Székely T (eds) Sex, size and gender roles: evolutionary studies of sexual size dimorphism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 133–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kalmbach E, Furness RW, Griffiths R (2005) Sex-biased environmental sensitivity: natural and experimental evidence from a bird species with larger females. Behav Ecol 16:442–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kokko H, Jennions MD (2008) Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. J Evol Biol 21:919–948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kölliker M, Heeb P, Werner I, Mateman AC, Lessells CM, Richner H (1999) Offspring sex ratio is related to male body size in the Great Tit (Parus major). Behav Ecol 10:68–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kosztolányi A, Barta Z, Küpper C, Székely T (2011) Persistence of an extreme male-biased adult sex ratio in a natural population of polyandrous bird. J Evol Biol 24:1842–1846PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Küpper C, Augustin J, Kosztolányi A, Burke T, Flguerola J, Székely T (2009) Kentish versus Snowy Plover: phenotypic and genetic analyses of Charadrius alexandrinus reveal divergence of Eurasian and American subspecies. Auk 126:839–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lehikoinen A, Öst M, Hollmén T, Kilpi M (2008) Does sex-specific duckling mortality contribute to male bias in adult common eiders? Condor 110:574–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lei W (2017) Studies on the waterbirds used saltpans in north of Bohai Bay. Dissertation, Beijing Normal UniversityGoogle Scholar
  42. Leimar O (1996) Life-history analysis of the Trivers and Willard sex-ratio problem. Behav Ecol 7:316–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lessells CM (1984) The mating system of Kentish Plovers Charadrius alexandrinus. Ibis 126:474–483CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lessells CM, Mateman AC, Visser J (1996) Great Tit hatchling sex ratios. J Avian Biol 1:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Liebezeit JR, Smith PA, Lanctot RB, Schekkerman H, Tulp I, Kendall SJ, Tracy DM, Rodrigues RJ, Meltofte H, Robinson JA, Gratto-Trevor C (2007) Assessing the development of shorebird eggs using the flotation method: species-specific and generalized regression models. Condor 109:32–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liker A, Freckleton RP, Székely T (2013) The evolution of sex roles in birds is related to adult sex ratio. Nat Commun 4:1587PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liker A, Freckleton RP, Székely T (2014) Divorce and infidelity are associated with skewed adult sex ratios in birds. Curr Biol 24:880–884PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lu X, Zeng X, Du B (2013) Body attributes of both parents jointly affect offspring sex allocation in a socially monogamous, size-monomorphic passerine. Curr Zool 59:271–277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maddox JD, Weatherhead PJ (2009) Seasonal sex allocation by Common Grackles? Revisiting a foundational study. Ecology 90:3190–3196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. McIntosh RR, Kats R, Berg M, Komdeur J, Elgar MA (2003) Breeding ecology and bias in offspring sex ratio in Little Grassbirds (Megalurus gramineus). Aust J Zool 51:505–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Minias P (2016) Seasonal trends in brood sex ratio reflect changes in early-life physiological condition of chicks in the Whiskered Tern. Ethol Ecol Evol 28:385–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Myers JH (1978) Sex ratio adjustment under food stress: maximization of quality or numbers of offspring. Am Nat 112:381–388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Orzack SH, Stubblefield JW, Akmaev VR, Colls P, Munné S, Scholl T, Steinsaltz D, Zuckerman JE (2015) The human sex ratio from conception to birth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:E2102–E2111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Page GW, Quinn PL, Warriner JC (1989) Comparison of the breeding of hand-and wild-reared Snowy Plovers. Conserv Biol 3:198–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peig J, Green AJ (2009) New perspectives for estimating body condition from mass/length data: the scaled mass index as an alternative method. Oikos 118:1883–1891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peig J, Green AJ (2010) The paradigm of body condition: a critical reappraisal of current methods based on mass and length. Funct Ecol 24:1323–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pen I, Weissing FJ, Daan S (1999) Seasonal sex ratio trend in the European kestrel: an evolutionarily stable strategy analysis. Am Nat 153:384–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Que P (2015) Breeding success and population genetic structure of Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus in China. Dissertation, Beijing Normal UniversityGoogle Scholar
  59. Que P, Chang Y, Eberhart-Phillips L, Liu Y, Székely T, Zhang Z (2015) Low nest survival of a breeding shorebird in Bohai Bay, China. J Ornithol 156:297–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Råberg L, Stjernman M, Nilsson JÅ (2005) Sex and environmental sensitivity in Blue Tit nestlings. Oecologia 145:496–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ramula S, Öst M, Lindén A, Karell P, Kilpi M (2018) Increased male bias in eider ducks can be explained by sex-specific survival of prime-age breeders. PLoS ONE 13:e0195415PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Redfern CPF, Clark JA (2001) Ringers’ manual. British Trust for Ornithology, ThetfordGoogle Scholar
  63. Riordan MM, Lukacs PM, Huyvaert KP, Dreitz VJ (2015) Sex ratios of Mountain Plovers from egg production to fledging. Avian Conserv Ecol 10:3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Robertson BC, Gemmell NJ (2006) PCR-based sexing in conservation biology: wrong answers from an accurate methodology? Conserv Genet 7:267–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Romano A, Romano M, Caprioli M, Costanzo A, Parolini M, Rubolini D, Saino N (2015) Sex allocation according to multiple sexually dimorphic traits of both parents in the Barn Swallow (Hirundo rustica). J Evol Biol 28:1234–1247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Saalfeld ST, Conway WC, Haukos DA, Johnson WP (2013) Seasonal variation in offspring sex ratio in the Snowy Plover. West N Am Nat 73:60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Saunders SP, Cuthbert FJ (2015) Chick mortality leads to male-biased sex ratios in endangered Great Lakes Piping Plovers. J Field Ornithol 86:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schacht R, Kramer KL, Székely T, Kappeler PM (2017) Adult sex ratios and reproductive decisions: a critical re-examination of sex differences in human and animal societies. Philos Trans R Soc B 372:1729Google Scholar
  69. Sheldon BC, Andersson S, Griffith SC, Örnborg J, Sendecka J (1999) Ultraviolet colour variation influences Blue Tit sex ratios. Nature 402:874–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Smallwood PD, Smallwood JA (1998) Seasonal shifts in sex ratios of fledgling American Kestrels (Falco sparverius paulus): the early bird hypothesis. Evol Ecol 12:839–853CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stenzel LE, Page GW, Warriner JC, Warriner JS, Neuman KK, George DE, Eyster CR, Bidstrup FC (2011) Male-skewed adult sex ratio, survival, mating opportunity and annual productivity in the Snowy Plover Charadrius alexandrinus. Ibis 153:312–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Székely T (2014) Sexual conflict between parents: offspring desertion and asymmetrical parental care. In: Rice WR, Gavrilets S (eds) The genetics and biology of sexual conflict. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp 245–263Google Scholar
  73. Székely T, Cuthill IC (1999) Brood desertion in the Kentish Plover: the value of parental care. Behav Ecol 10:191–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Székely T, Lessells CM (1993) Mate change by Kentish Plovers Charadrius alexandrinus. Ornis Scand 24:317–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Székely T, Cuthill IC, Kis J (1999) Brood desertion in Kentish Plover: sex differences in remating opportunities. Behav Ecol 10:185–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Székely T, Cuthill IC, Yezerinac S, Griffiths R, Kis J (2004) Brood sex ratio in the Kentish Plover. Behav Ecol 15:58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Székely T, Kosztolányi A, Küpper C (2008) Practical guide for investigating breeding ecology of Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus. University of Bath. http://www.bath.ac.uk/bio-sci/biodiversity-lab/pdfs/KP_Field_Guide_v3.pdf. Accessed 2 Feb 2015
  78. Székely T, Liker A, Freckleton RP, Fichtel C, Kappeler PM (2014a) Sex-biased survival predicts adult sex ratio variation in wild birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 281:20140342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Székely T, Weissing FJ, Komdeur J (2014b) Adult sex ratio variation: implications for breeding system evolution. J Evol Biol 27:1500–1512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tan LXL, Buchanan KL, Maguire GS, Weston MA (2015) Cover, not caging, influences chronic physiological stress in a ground-nesting bird. J Avian Biol 46:482–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Trivers RL (1985) Social evolution. Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo ParkGoogle Scholar
  82. Trivers RL, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. van der Velde M, Haddrath O, Verkuil YI, Baker AJ, Piersma T (2017) New primers for molecular sex identification of waders. Wader Study 124:147–151Google Scholar
  84. Weatherhead PJ (1983) Secondary sex ratio adjustment in Red-winged Blackbirds (Agelaius phoeniceus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 12:57–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. West S (2009) Sex allocation. Princeton University Press, PrincetonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Whittingham LA, Dunn PO (2000) Offspring sex ratios in Tree Swallows: females in better condition produce more sons. Mol Ecol 9:1123–1129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Wiersma P, Kirwan GM, Boesman P (2018) Kentish Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E (ed) Handbook of the birds of the world alive. Lynx, Barcelona. http://www.hbw.com/node/53835. Accessed 22 Jan 2018
  88. Yang H, Chen B, Barter M, Piersma T, Zhou C, Li F, Zhang Z (2011) Impacts of tidal land reclamation in Bohai Bay, China: ongoing losses of critical Yellow Sea waterbird staging and wintering sites. Bird Conserv Int 21:241–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Deutsche Ornithologen-Gesellschaft e.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Sciences and Ecological Engineering, College of Life SciencesBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Milner Centre for Evolution, Department of Biology and BiochemistryUniversity of BathBathUK
  3. 3.State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Department of Ecology, School of Life SciencesSun Yat-sen UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations