The System of Rice Intensification (SRI) is known as a climate-smart agricultural practice that increases rice production by changing the management of plants, soil, water, and nutrients. SRI water management relies on intermittent irrigation rather than on the continuous flooding of conventionally managed rice production. Different water table levels affect the soil conditions which contribute to different fluxes of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This study estimated the impact on global warming potential (GWP) of GHG emissions from rice paddies when an SRI crop is managed with different water table levels. In this study, CO2 equivalence was assessed using a Simple Greenhouse Gas model, and an artificial neural network model for assessing CH4 and N2O. SRI paddy rice was grown in experimental pots under varying water table treatments, with the water table controlled by using Mariotte tubes set at + 2, 0, − 3, − 5, − 7, and − 12 cm from the soil surface. GHG emissions, which could be monitored more closely in pot trials than in fields, are a composite of the plants’ respiration, soil respiration (which is a result primarily of microbial activity), and the respiration that results from root exudates. With SRI practices, rice paddies can serve as a sink rather than a source for CH4 as seen from the negative values for CH4 emissions at all water table treatments. While there were N2O emissions with SRI practice, they were much less in terms of CO2 equivalence than the GWP reduction achieved by reducing CH4. Overall, under the experimental conditions the best water table level for SRI cultivation, with the most rice produced relative to GHG emissions, was − 5 cm from the soil surface. For each kg of grain produced, there were 0.80 kg CO2 eq of GHG emissions. By comparison, a normally flooded paddy field with usual crop management methods emits 1.97 kg CO2 eq per kg of grain produced, almost 150% more. This finding that a water table of − 5 cm is optimal will not necessarily apply for all field conditions, but the research addresses the desirability of seeking to optimize between GHG reductions and increased yield when growing paddy rice, and of developing appropriate methodology for achieving this composite objective.
ANN model Greenhouse gas emissions Paddy production SG model System of Rice Intensification
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work was supported by a grant under PMDSU research project “Automation of Irrigation and Drainage to Improve the Productivity of Land and Water and Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions Factor” from the Ministry of Research, Technology and Higher Education, Indonesia. This work was further supported by UII through international conference travel grants 2018.
Campbell GS (1985) Gas diffusion in soil. Soil physics with basic transport models for soil-plant systems. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp 12–25Google Scholar
Chan ASK, Parkin TB (2001) Effect of land use on methane flux from soil. J Environ Qual 30:786–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapagain T, Riseman A, Yamaji E (2011) Assessment of System of Rice Intensification (SRI) and conventional practices under organic and inorganic management in Japan. Rice Sci 18:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi J, Kim G, Park W et al (2014) Effect of SRI water management on water quality and greenhouse gas emissions in Korea. Irrig Drain 63:263–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Datta SK (1981) Principles and practices of rice production. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
Dill J, Deichert G, Le TNT (eds) (2013) Promoting the System of Rice Intensification: lessons learned from Trà Vinh Province, Vietnam. Deutsche Gesellschar für Internationale Zusammenarbeit and International Fund for Agricultural Development, HanoiGoogle Scholar
Jain N, Dubey R, Dubey DS, Singh J, Khanna M, Pathak H, Bhatia A (2014) Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions with system of rice intensification in the Indo-Gangetic plains. Paddy Water Environ 12:355–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kampman B, Brouwer F, Schepers B (2008) Agricultural land availability and demand in 2020: a global analysis of drivers and demand for feedstock, and agricultural land availability. CE Delft, DelftGoogle Scholar
Pratiwi ES, Turjaman M (2010) Karakteristik habitat pohon penghasil gaharu di beberapa hutan tanaman di Jawa Barat (Habitat characteristics of gaharu inducing tree species (Aquilaria spp.) in several forest plantations in West Java). Info Hutan 7:129–139Google Scholar
Rajkishore SK, Doraisamy P, Subramanian KS, Maheswari M (2013) Methane emission patterns and their associated soil microflora with SRI and conventional systems of rice cultivation in Tamil Nadu, India. Taiwan Water Conserv 61:126–134Google Scholar
Ramaswamy V, Boucher O, Haigh J et al (2001) Radiative forcing of climate change. In: Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 388Google Scholar
Setiawan BI, Imansyah A, Arif C et al (2014) SRI paddy growth and GHG emissions at various groundwater levels. Irrig Drain 63:612–620CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sofiyuddin HA, Martief LM, Setiawan BI, Arif C (2010) Evaluation of crop coefficients from water consumption in paddy fields. In: Proceedings of the 6th Asian regional conference of international commission on irrigation and drainage. ICID, Yogyakarta (ID), p 8Google Scholar
Uphoff N (2006) The system of rice intensification (SRI) as a methodology for reducing water requirements in irrigated rice production. In: International dialogue on rice and water: exploring options for food security and sustainable environments. Los Baños (PH), pp 1–23Google Scholar
Uphoff N, Kassam A, Thakur A (2013a) Challenges of increasing water saving and water productivity in the rice sector: introduction to the system of rice intensification (SRI) and this issue. Taiwan Water Conserv 61:1–13Google Scholar
Uphoff N, Chi F, Dazzo FB, Rodriguez RJ (2013b) Soil fertility as a contingent rather than inherent characteristic: Considering the contributions of cropsymbiotic soil biota. In: Lal R, Stewart B (eds) Principles of sustainable soil management in agroecosystems. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar