Public–private collaboration in allotment garden operation has the potential to provide ecosystem services to urban dwellers more efficiently

  • Shizuka HashimotoEmail author
  • Yuta Sato
  • Hidetsugu Morimoto


There has been a growing global interest in urban agriculture that contributes to the well-being of urban dwellers by providing various ecosystem services. Focusing on allotment gardens, this study quantitatively analyzed their economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, economic and environmental efficiencies, and the differences among them as regards their location and management. A questionnaire survey was used for data collection as a basic input for the quantification of economic conditions and ecosystem services of 223 allotments in Saitama Prefecture, Japan. Data envelopment analysis (DEA) was used for analyzing the economic and environmental efficiency of each allotment. Statistical analyses were conducted to explore statistically significant differences in economic conditions, ecosystem service provisions, and economic and environmental efficiencies among the four groups of allotment gardens classified by location (i.e., urbanization promotion area [UPA] and urbanization control area [UCA]) and type of actor (i.e., public or private). Our analysis identified that the expenditures of public allotments tended to be significantly larger than those of private allotments, whereas there was no difference in the income among the four groups, which resulted in lower economic efficiency of public allotments. Moreover, although public allotments in UCA and UPA provided a large amount of food production, recreation, and disaster prevention services, DEA revealed that they were less environmentally efficient when expenditures such as land rent, construction cost, and operational cost were considered. Our findings also identified that public allotments provided a significantly large amount of ecosystem services for urban dwellers in exchange of large public expenditures, which often resulted in inefficient allotment operation. If local governments and private actors build a collaborative relationship and strategically divide their roles, the governments could decrease the financial burden in the establishment and operations of allotments while maintaining/increasing benefits arising from allotment gardens.


Allotment garden Ecosystem services Food provision Recreation Disaster prevention 



This research was supported by the Environment Research and Technology Development Fund (S-15 Predicting and Assessing Natural Capital and Ecosystem Services (PANCES)) of the Ministry of the Environment, Japan, JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 17KT0076, and “Research and Social Implementation of Ecosystem-based Disaster Risk Reduction as Climate Change Adaptation in Shrinking Societies” of the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, Japan.


  1. Abbott M, Doucouliagos C (2003) The efficiency of Australian universities: a data envelopment analysis. Econ Educ Rev 22:89–97. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler N, Friedman L, Sinuany-Stern Z (2002) Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. Eur J Oper Res 140:249–265. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30:1078–1092. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clucas B, Parker ID, Feldpausch-Parker AM (2018) A systematic review of the relationship between urban agriculture and biodiversity. Urban Ecosyst 21:635–643. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Elhami B, Akram A, Khanali M (2016) Optimization of energy consumption and environmental impacts of chickpea production using data envelopment analysis (DEA) and multi objective genetic algorithm (MOGA) approaches. Inf Process Agric 3:190–205. Google Scholar
  7. Farrell MJ (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A 120:253. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fei R, Lin B (2017) The integrated efficiency of inputs–outputs and energy—CO2 emissions performance of China’s agricultural sector. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:668–676. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Genter C, Roberts A, Richardson J, Sheaff M (2015) The contribution of allotment gardening to health and wellbeing: a systematic review of the literature. Br J Occup Ther 78:593–605. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gómez-Limón JA, Picazo-Tadeo AJ, Reig-Martínez E (2012) Eco-efficiency assessment of olive farms in Andalusia. Land Use Policy 29:395–406. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guitart D, Pickering C, Byrne J (2012) Past results and future directions in urban community gardens research. Urban For Urban Green 11:364–373. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haines-Young R, Potschin M (2018) Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) V5.1 Guidance on the application of the revised structureGoogle Scholar
  13. Hebbert M (1994) Sen-biki amidst desakota: urban sprawl and urban planning in Japan. In: Shapira P, Masser I, Edgington DW (eds) Planning for cities and regions in Japan, 1st edn. Liverpool University Press, Liverpool, pp 70–91Google Scholar
  14. Hein L, van Koppen K, de Groot RS, van Ierland EC (2006) Spatial scales, stakeholders and the valuation of ecosystem services. Ecol Econ 57:209–228. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Higuchi M (1999) Analysis of the Present Condition of an Allotment Garden in Japan (in Japanese). Jpn J Hum Geogr 51:291–304. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (2016) The methodological assessment report on scenarios and models of biodiversity and ecosystem services. BonnGoogle Scholar
  17. Japan International Cooperation Agency (2007) Urban land use planning system in Japan, 2nd edn. Japan International Cooperation Agency, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  18. Kono M, Fujita N (2014) Characteristics and user demands of urban farms: a case study on the “Machinaka Saien” in-town farm. J Jpn Inst Landsc Archit 77:433–436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Li T, Baležentis T, Makutėnienė D et al (2016) Energy-related CO2 emission in European Union agriculture: driving forces and possibilities for reduction. Appl Energy 180:682–694. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin BB, Philpott SM, Jha S (2015) The future of urban agriculture and biodiversity-ecosystem services: challenges and next steps. Basic Appl Ecol 16:189–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mardani A, Zavadskas EK, Streimikiene D et al (2017) A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach in energy efficiency. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:1298–1322. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2014) Summary of urban agriculture promotion basic act (in Japanese)Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2017) Efforts of disaster prevention cooperative farmland in the three major metropolitan areas. Accessed 25 Jul 2018 (in Japanese)
  24. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (2018) Situation surrounding allotment gardens. Accessed 20 Jul 2018
  25. Mitarai Y, Matsushima K (2017) Classification of allotment gardeners in urban area: case study of Atsugi City. Pap Environ Inf Sci 31:237–240. Google Scholar
  26. Mougeot LJA (2005) Agropolis : the social, political, and environmental dimensions of urban agriculture. EarthscanGoogle Scholar
  27. Oba R, Obase R (2001) A study on the allotment gardens in tokyo area and the financial situation of landowners (in Japanese). J City Plan Inst Japan 36:283–288. Google Scholar
  28. Osaka Prefectural Government (2006) Disaster-resistant urban development guidelines. Accessed 25 Jul 2018
  29. Perez-Vazquez A, Anderson S, Wiltshire R, Fraser R (2010) Valuing non-market benefits derived from allotments in southeast England: a contingent valuation study valuing non-market benefits derived from allotments in southeast England: a contingent valuation study. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 13:103–112. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Saitama Prefectural Government (2017) About the establishment of citizen farm. Accessed 26 Jul 2018
  31. Seiford LM, Thrall RM (1990) Recent developments in DEA: the mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. J Econom 46:7–38. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Speak AF, Mizgajski A, Borysiak J (2015) Allotment gardens and parks: provision of ecosystem services with an emphasis on biodiversity. Urban For Urban Green 14:772–781. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Susaeta A, Adams DC, Carter DR, Dwivedi P (2016) Climate change and ecosystem services output efficiency in southern loblolly pine forests. Environ Manage 58:417–430. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tahara S, Yokohari M, Kurita H, Terada T (2011) A quantitative assessment of agricultural production from allotment gardens (in Japanese). J Jpn Inst Landsc Archit 74:685–688. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tzoulas K, James P (2010) Peoples’ use of, and concerns about, green space networks: a case study of Birchwood, Warrington New Town, UK. Urban For Urban Green 9:121–128. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. UNDESA (2018) World Urbanization Prospects—Population Division—United Nations. Accessed 20 Jul 2018
  37. Ushirozawa S, Makiyama M, Takahashi T (2010) Cost-benefit analysys of Kleingartens in Japan (in Japanese). J Rural Plan Assoc 29:293–298. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. van den Berg AE, van Winsum-Westra M, de Vries S, van Dillen SM (2010) Allotment gardening and health: a comparative survey among allotment gardeners and their neighbors without an allotment. Environ Heal 9:74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vlontzos G, Pardalos PM (2017) Assess and prognosticate green house gas emissions from agricultural production of EU countries, by implementing, DEA Window analysis and artificial neural networks. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 76:155–162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vlontzos G, Niavis S, Manos B (2014) A DEA approach for estimating the agricultural energy and environmental efficiency of EU countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 40:91–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilhelm JA, Smith RG (2017) Ecosystem services and land sparing potential of urban and peri-urban agriculture: a review. Renew Agric Food Syst 1–14.
  42. Yagi H (2013) Site location and demand for the farm experience business in urban areas. J Rural Plan Assoc 32:323–328. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Yuzawa A (2012) A study on user characteristics and effect of allotment garden. J Archit Plan (Trans AIJ) 77:1095–1102. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zadmirzaei M, Mohammadi Limaei S, Olsson L, Amirteimoori A (2017) Assessing the impact of the external non-discretionary factor on the performance of forest management units using DEA approach. J For Res 22:144–152. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2008) A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. Eur J Oper Res 189:1–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of Agricultural and Life SciencesThe University of TokyoTokyoJapan
  2. 2.IchikawaJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Tourism and Environmental StudiesNagano UniversityUedaJapan

Personalised recommendations