Effect of application of vermicompost on methane emission and grain yield of Chinna Ponni paddy crop

  • C. Dhanuja
  • D. K. Saxena
  • Tasneem Abbasi
  • S. A. AbbasiEmail author
Short Communications


In separate treatments rice (Oryza sativa) of the Chinna Ponni variety was grown either with the application of synthetic fertilizer (SF) containing 120 kg/ha, 60 kg/ha, and 60 kg/ha of nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium, respectively, or vermicompost (4 t/ha) with equivalent nitrogen content. The objective was to see whether vermicompost performs as well, or better, than the SF in terms of grain length, unit mass, and overall yield of rice. The relative contribution of the two fertilizer applications on the emission of the global warming gas methane was also studied. Direct sowing method was applied for the rice cultivation which spanned 140 days during which intermittent flooding of the plots was done. The average grain yield (2300 kg/ha), grain weight (21 mg), and grain length (6.3 mm) of the vermicompost-fertilized rice were all marginally higher than the corresponding values: 2060 kg/ha, 18 mg, and 6.1 mm, respectively, of the SF-fertilized rice. The overall hourly methane flux in vermicompost-fertilized plots was 111.3 ± 58.3 µg/m2 h in comparison with 71.0 ± 81.0 µg/m2 h emitted by the SF-fertilized plots, but the difference was not statistically significant.


Rice Vermicompost Paddy Methane NPK Chinna Ponni 



SAA thanks Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, for Emeritus Scientist grant (21(1034)/16/EMR-II).


  1. Abbasi T, Gajalakshmi S, Abbasi SA (2009) Towards modeling and design of vermicomposting systems: mechanisms of composting/vermicomposting and their implications. Indian J Biotechnol 8:177–182Google Scholar
  2. Abbasi T, Tauseef SM, Abbasi SA (2011) The inclined parallel stack continuously operable vermireactor. Official J Patent Office 22:9571Google Scholar
  3. Abbasi SA, Nayeem-Shah M, Abbasi T (2015) Vermicomposting of phytomass: limitations of the past approaches and the emerging directions. J Clean Prod 93:103–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Bierman P, Metzger JD, Lee S, Welch C (2003). Effects of vermicomposts on growth and marketable fruits of field-grown tomatoes, peppers and strawberries: The 7th international symposium on earthworm ecology, Cardiff, Wales, Pedobiologia, vol 47, pp 731–735Google Scholar
  5. Bradford KB, Nonogaki H (2008) Seed development, dormancy and germination. Annual Plant Reviews, Annals of Botany 102:877–880Google Scholar
  6. Dhanuja C, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2018a) Fertilization of paddy cultivation with vermicompost: a mini review, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, communicated in 2019.Google Scholar
  7. Dhanuja C, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2018b) Greenhouse gas emissions from paddy fields in peninsular South India. Int J Eng Sci Res 6:56–63Google Scholar
  8. Edwards CA, Norman QA, Sherman R (2011) Vermiculture technology, earthworms, organic waste and environmental management. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellur RK, Singh AK, Gupta HS, Shetty PK, Ayyappan S, Swaminathan MS (2013) Enhancing rice productivity in India: aspects and prospects. Climate change and sustainable food security. National institute of advanced studies, IISC, Bangalore and Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp 99–132Google Scholar
  10. Goldenfum JA (2009) The UNESCO/IHA measurement specification guidance for evaluating the GHG status of man-made freshwater reservoirs, UNESCO/IHA greenhouse gas (GHG) research project, united nations educational, scientific and cultural organization and international hydrological programme, pp 25–36Google Scholar
  11. Hasanuzzaman M, Ahamed KU, Rahmatullah M, Akhter N, Nahar K, Rahman ML (2010) Plant growth characters and productivity of wetland rice (Oryza sativa L.) as affected by application of different manures. Emir J Food Agric 22(1):46–58Google Scholar
  12. Hilhorst HW, Karssen CM (2000) Effect of chemical environment on seed germination. In: Fenner M (ed) Seeds-the ecology of regeneration in plants communities. Cab International, Oxon, pp 293–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hussain N, Abbasi SA (2018) Efficacy of the vermicomposts of different organic wastes as “clean” fertilizers: state-of-the-art. Sustainability 10:1–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2015) Vermicomposting eliminates the toxicity of Lantana (Lantana camara) and turns it into a plant friendly organic fertilizer. J Hazard Mater 298:46–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2016a) Transformation of toxic and allelopathic lantana into a benign organic fertilizer through vermicomposting. Spectrochim Acta Part A: Mol Biomel Spectrosc 163:162–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2016b) Transformation of the pernicious and toxic weed parthenium into an organic fertilizer by vermicomposting. Int J Environ Stud 73(5):731–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2016c) Vermicomposting transforms allelopathic parthenium into a benign organic fertilizer. J Environ Manag 180c:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2016d) Vermicomposting-mediated conversion of the toxic and allelopathic weed ipomoea into a potent fertilizer. Proc Saf Environ Prot 103:97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2016e) Vermiremediation of an invasive and pernicious weed salvinia (Salvinia molesta). Ecol Eng 91:432–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2017a) Detoxification of parthenium (Parthenium hysterophorus) and its metamorphosis into an organic fertilizer and biopesticide. Bioresour Bioprocess 26(4):1–9Google Scholar
  21. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2017b) Enhancement in the productivity of ladies finger (Abelmoschus esculentus) with concomitant pest control by the vermicompost of the weed salvinia (Salvinia molesta, Mitchell). Int J Recycl Org Waste Agric. Google Scholar
  22. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2018a) Generation of highly potent organic fertilizer from pernicious aquatic weed Salvinia molesta. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:4989–5002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hussain N, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2018b) Evaluating the fertilizer and pesticidal value of vermicompost generated from a toxic and allelopathic weed ipomoea. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 25:30. Google Scholar
  24. Jayakumar M, Sivakami T, Ambika D, Karmegam N (2011) Effect of turkey litter (Meleagris gallopavo L.) vermicompost on growth and yield characteristics of paddy, Oryza sativa (ADT-37). Afr J Biotechnol 10(68):15295–15304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kalra A, Shukla S, Singh R, Verma RK, Chandra M, Singh S, Tomar VKS, Krishna A, Zaim M, Ram G, Chand S (2013) Contribution and assessment of recycled menthol mint vermicompost on productivity and soil quality in mint and mint–rice–wheat rotation: a case study. Renew Agric Food Syst 28(3):212–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar R, Singh MK, Kumar V, Verma RK, Kushwah JK, Pal M (2015) Effect of nutrient supplementation through organic sources on growth, yield and quality of coriander (Coriandrum sativum L.). Indian J Agric Res 49(3):278–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laughlin RJ, Stevens RJ (2003) Changes in composition of nitrogen-15-labeled gases during storage in septum-capped vials. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67(2):540–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Luithui C, Dhanuja C, Abbasi T, Abbasi SA (2017) Greenhouse gas emissions and wetlands: a brief review of the state-of-the-art. Int J Environ Sci Technol 8(2):1–50Google Scholar
  29. Mousavi SM, Bahmanyar MA, Pirdashti H, Gilani SS (2010) Trace metals distribution and uptake in soil and rice grown on a 3-year vermicompost amended soil. Afr J Biotechnol 9(25):3780–3785Google Scholar
  30. Pandian BJ, Rajakumar D, Chellamuthu S (2011) System of rice intensification: a synthesis of scientific experiments and experiences. National Consortium of SRIGoogle Scholar
  31. Saha G, Kar B, Karmakar S (2017) Methane and nitrous oxide emission from Kharif rice field as influenced by nutrients and moisture regimes in new alluvial agroclimatic region of West Bengal. Curr Sci 112(5):989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sharma SK, Singh YV, Tyagi S, Bhatia A (2016) Influence of rice varieties, nitrogen management and planting methods on methane emission and water productivity. Paddy Water Environ 14(2):325–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singh SK, Bharadwaj V, Thakur TC, Pachauri SP, Singh PP, Mishra AK (2009) Influence of crop establishment methods on methane emission from rice fields. Curr Sci 97(1):84–89Google Scholar
  34. Singh DK, Akhtar Z, Gupta S, Srivastava A, Chakraborty M (2017) Production strategies of organic basmati rice in Tarai region of Uttarakhand. India. Org Agr 7(1):21–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tauseef SM, Abbasi T, Banupriya D, Vaishnavi G, Abbasi SA (2013) HEVSPAR: a novel vermireactor system for treating paper waste. Off J Patent Office 24:12726Google Scholar
  36. Wilson DP, Carlile WR (1988) Plant growth in potting media containing worm-worked duck waste. In: Symposium on substrates in horticulture other than soils in situ, vol 238, pp 205–220Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The International Society of Paddy and Water Environment Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Dhanuja
    • 1
  • D. K. Saxena
    • 1
  • Tasneem Abbasi
    • 1
  • S. A. Abbasi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Centre for Pollution Control and Environmental EngineeringPondicherry UniversityChinakalapet, PuducherryIndia

Personalised recommendations