Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of different treatment regimens for IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer

  • Published:
The Chinese-German Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this study was to explore the difference of long-term prognosis of different treatment regimens in patients with stage IB2, IIA2 cervical cancer.

Methods

From August 1995 to September 2005, radical hysterectomy was chosen as primary treatment regimen for 122 patients (group A), 85 patients underwent radical hysterectomy after effective neoadjuvant therapy (group B), and 98 patients received surgery after ineffective preoperative therapy (group C). All patients received postoperative therapy.

Results

A total of 305 patients were analyzed. The maximum diameter of tumor was largest in group B, while the pathological risk factors (cervical infiltration, positive surgical margins) were in the lowest proportion. The 5-year mortality rate and relapse rate of group B were the highest, and the overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the shortest (P < 0.05). No significant difference of long-term survival was found in group C and group A. No difference was found in the surgical of three groups. Large tumor more than 5.5 cm had higher effective ratio of treatment than those 5.5 cm or less. Patients received effective preoperative radiotherapy had better long-term prognosis than those received chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy.

Conclusion

neoadjuvant treatment using for patients with IB2, IIA2 cervical cancer is effective in reducing risk factors of pathological, but it could not improve the long-term survival. The indications of adjuvant therapy after surgery should be reconsidered. Those tumors of diameter 5.5 cm or less response poor to neoadjuvant treatment, and no improvement of survival was found, so direct surgical treatment is suggested for these patients. Radiotherapy is a better choice of preoperative treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buda A, Fossati R, Colombo N, et al. Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin wIth ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the SNAP01 (Srudio Neo-Adjuvante Portio) Italian Collaborative Study. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23: 4137–4145.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Eddy GL, Bundy BN, Creasman WT, et al. Treatment of (“bulky”) stage IB cervical cancer with or without neoadjuvant vincristine and cisplatin prior to radical hysterectomy and pelvic/para-aortic lymphadenectomy: a phase III trial of the gynecologic oncology group. Gynecol Oncol, 2007, 106: 362–369.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tanaka T, Kokawa K, Umesaki N. Preoperative chemotherapy with irinotecan and mitomycin for FIGO stage IIIB cervical squamous cell carcinoma: a pilot study. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 2005, 26: 605–607.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Termrungruanglert W, Tresukosol D, Vasuratna A, et al. Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in (bulky) squamous cell carcinoma of cervix stage IB2. Gynecol Oncol, 2005, 97: 576–581.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Meta-analysis Collaboration. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 21 randomised trials. Eur J Cancer, 2003, 39: 2470–2486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dueñas-Gonzalez A, López-Graniel C, González-Enciso A, et al. A phase II study of multimodality treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer: neoadjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel followed by radical hysterectomy and adjuvant cisplatin chemoradiation. Ann Oncol, 2003, 14: 1278–1284.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu Q, Zhang Y. Neoadjuvant intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by surgery in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Chinese-German J Clin Oncol, 2009, 8: 537–540.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi YS, Sin JI, Kim JH, et al. Survival benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery versus radiotherapy in locally advanced chemoresistant cervical cancer. J Korean Med Sci, 2006, 21: 683–689.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng XD, Lv WG, Ye F, et al. Evaluation of neoadjyvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancinoma. Chin J Obstet Gynecol (Chinese), 2006, 41: 95–98.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lissoni AA, Colombo N, Pellegrino A, et al. A phase II, randomized trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy comparing a three-drug combination of paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cispltin (TIP) versus paclitaxel and cispltin (TP) followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the Snap-02 Italian Collaborative Study. Annals of Oncology, 2009, 20: 660–665.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho YH, Kim DY, Kim JH, et al. Comparative study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before radical hysterectomy and radical surgery alone in stage IB2-IIA bulky cervical cancer. J Gynecol Onocol, 2009, 20: 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Long HJ 3rd, Laack NN, Gostout BS, et al. Gostout. Prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of cervical cancer. Mayo Clin Proc, 2007, 82: 1566–1574.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Btady PC, Chen X, Burke WM, et al. Detection and significance of parametrial micrometastases in early-stage cervical cancer. Anticancer Res, 2011, 31: 243–247

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zand B, Euscher ED, Soliman PT, et al. Rate of para-aortic lymph node micrometastasis in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 2010, 119: 422–425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cândido EB, Silva-Filho AL, Triginelli SA, et al. Histopathological and immunohistochemical (cytokeratins AE1/AE3) study of the parametrium of patients with early stage cervical cancer. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2008, 141: 58–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lentz SE, Muderspach LI, Felix JC, et al. Identification of micrometastases in histologically negative lymph nodes of early-stage cervical cancer patients. Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 103: 1204–1210.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhong X, Zhong S, Yang L, et al. Combination of subradical external radiation and brachytherapy plus radical operation in the treatment of carcinoma of uterine cervix. Chin J Oncol (Chinese), 2002, 24: 291–293.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zhong XP, Tong XK, Yang, LF et al. Clinical study on radiotherapy combined with surgical treatment of 162 patients with cervical cancer. Chinese-German J Clin Oncol, 2008, 7: 484–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanna Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, D., Zhang, Y., Sun, X. et al. Comparison of different treatment regimens for IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer. Chin. -Ger. J. Clin. Oncol. 11, 37–42 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-011-0889-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10330-011-0889-1

Key words

Navigation