Advertisement

Journal of General Plant Pathology

, Volume 85, Issue 1, pp 44–48 | Cite as

Disease suppression by the cyclic lipopeptides iturin A and surfactin from Bacillus spp. against Fusarium wilt of lettuce

  • Shohei Fujita
  • Kenji Yokota
Disease Control
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

Iturin A and surfactin are antimicrobial cyclic lipopeptides secreted by antagonistic Bacillus strains, and both elicit defence gene expression in host plants. We previously showed that a soil amendment with either of the purified lipopeptides confers suppression against Fusarium yellows of tatsoi (Brassica rapa) caused by the soil-borne pathogen Fusarium oxysporum and that excess amounts of iturin A or surfactin do not confer suppression. Here, we evaluated the impacts of purified iturin A or surfactin against Fusarium wilt of lettuce (Lactuca sativa). As a soil amendment, iturin A and surfactin each conferred suppression of Fusarium wilt of lettuce on diverse lettuce cultivars similar to the results for tatsoi. However, higher concentrations of iturin A (1.88 mg/l of soil or higher) but not of surfactin (up to 7.5 mg/l of soil) negated the suppression. Growth of Fusarium in liquid cultures was suppressed by iturin A but not surfactin.

Keywords

Lipopeptide Lettuce Fusarium Iturin A Surfactin Bacillus 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr. Russell A. Scott for helpful discussions. We thank Dr. Masashi Fujinaga of the Nagano Vegetable and Ornamental Crops Experiment Station for providing Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae race 2 F9501. This study was funded by Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (KAKENHI 16K07628).

Compliance with ethical standards

Human and animal rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Amer GA, Utkhede RS (2000) Development of formulations of biological agents for management of root rot of lettuce and cucumber. Can J Microbiol 46:809–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chowdhury SP, Uhl J, Grosch R, Alquéres S, Pittroff S, Dietel K, Schmitt-Kopplin P, Borriss R, Hartmann A (2015) Cyclic lipopeptides of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum colonizing the lettuce rhizosphere enhance plant defense responses toward the bottom rot pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 28:984–995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fujinaga M, Ogiso H, Tuchiya N, Saito H, Yamanaka S, Nozue M, Kojima M (2003) Race 3, a new race of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lactucae determined by a differential system with commercial cultivars. J Gen Plant Pathol 69:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. García-Gutiérrez L, Zeriouh H, Romero D, Cubero J, de Vicente A, Pérez-García A (2013) The antagonistic strain Bacillus subtilis UMAF6639 also confers protection to melon plants against cucurbit powdery mildew by activation of jasmonate- and salicylic acid-dependent defence responses. Microb Biotechnol 6:264–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gordon TR, Koike ST (2015) Management of Fusarium wilt of lettuce. Crop Prot 73:45–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hiradate S, Yoshida S, Sugie H, Yada H, Fujii Y (2002) Mulberry anthracnose antagonists (iturins) produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens RC-2. Phytochemistry 61:693–698CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jourdan E, Henry G, Duby F, Dommes J, Barthélemy JP, Thonart P, Ongena M (2009) Insights into the defense-related events occurring in plant cells following perception of surfactin-type lipopeptide from Bacillus subtilis. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 22:456–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kawagoe Y, Shiraishi S, Kondo H, Yamamoto S, Aoki Y, Suzuki S (2015) Cyclic lipopeptide iturin A structure-dependently induces defense response in Arabidopsis plants by activating SA and JA signaling pathways. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 460:1015–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Pane C, Villecco D, Campanile F, Zaccardelli M (2012) Novel strains of Bacillus, isolated from compost and compost-amended soils, as biological control agents against soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi. Biocontrol Sci Techn 22:1373–1388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Peypoux F, Bonmatin JM, Wallach J (1999) Recent trends in the biochemistry of surfactin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 51:553–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Phae CG, Shoda M, Kubota H (1990) Suppressive effect of Bacillus subtilis and it's products on phytopathogenic microorganisms. J Ferment Bioeng 69:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Romero D, de Vicente A, Rakotoaly RH, Dufour SE, Veening JW, Arrebola E, Cazorla FM, Kuipers OP, Paquot M, Pérez-García A (2007) The iturin and fengycin families of lipopeptides are key factors in antagonism of Bacillus subtilis toward Podosphaera fusca. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 20:430–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Kloepper JW, Paré PW (2004) Bacterial volatiles induce systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 134:1017–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Yokota K, Hayakawa H (2015) Impact of antimicrobial lipopeptides from Bacillus sp. on suppression of Fusarium yellows of tatsoi. Microbes Environ 30:281–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yokota K, Teraoka T, Suzuki H, Murakami K, Miwa E, Higuchi K (2010) Effect of inorganic ions on bud cell formation by Fusarium oxysporum in potato dextrose broth. J Gen Plant Pathol 76:331–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Phytopathological Society of Japan and Springer Japan KK, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural ChemistryTokyo University of AgricultureTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations