Advertisement

Environment-friendly packaging material: banana fiber/cowdung composite paperboard

  • M. VishnuvarthananEmail author
  • R. Dharunya
  • S. Jayashree
  • B. Karpagam
  • R. Sowndharya
Original Paper
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

Wood is the main raw material for paper production, which in turn contributes to the decrease of forest resources. There is therefore a need of finding alternate sources for the production of paper. Here we prepared paperboard from the cowdung and banana fibers by chemical pulping. Banana fibers provide cellulose fibers, and lignin is removed. Pectin was added finely to the suspended pulp for binding fibers. Hydrogen peroxide was added to improve pulp brightness. The paper was tested for physical and mechanical properties. Results show that incorporation of cowdung increased the tensile and burst strength from 1 to 5 MPa and 10 to 50 kPa. The porosity was also decreased from 5 to 1 mL/min. The efficient water absorption (COBB) value was obtained for 50% of cowdung. The barrier properties such as oxygen transmission rate and water vapor transmission rate were gradually decreased to 1000 cc/m2 day atm and 5 g/m2 day. The antimicrobial properties of the prepared paperboard were tested against the Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, and it showed efficient activity against both the microorganisms.

Keywords

Cowdung Banana fiber Chemical pulping Mechanical Barrier Antimicrobial properties 

Notes

References

  1. Abrantes S, Amaral ME, Costa AP, Duarte AP (2007) Cynara cardunculus L. alkaline pulps: alternatives fibres for paper and paperboard production. Bioresour Technol 98:2873–2878.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2006.09.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ai J, Tschirner U (2010) Fiber length and pulping characteristics of switchgrass, alfalfa stems, hybrid poplar and willow biomasses. Bioresour Technol 101:215–221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.07.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brandelli A, Brum LFW, dos Santos JHZ (2017) Nanostructured bioactive compounds for ecological food packaging. Environ Chem Lett 15:193–204.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0621-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Jahan MS, Chowdhury DN, Islam MK (2006) Characterization and evaluation of golpata fronds as pulping raw materials. Bioresour Technol 97:401–406.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kindsigo M, Kallas J (2009) Wet oxidation of debarking water: changes in lignin content and biodegradability. Environ Chem Lett 7:121–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-008-0144-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kuswandi B (2017) Environmental friendly food nano-packaging. Environ Chem Lett 15:205–221.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-017-0613-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mishra SB, Mishra AK, Khan MA (2010) Decolourization of pulp and paper mill effluents using heat-treated coal: a comparison with activated charcoal. Environ Chem Lett 8:231–235.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-009-0211-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Moraes SG, Durán N, Freire RS (2006) Remediation of Kraft E1 and black liquor effluents by biological and chemical processes. Environ Chem Lett 4:87–91.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-006-0039-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Poykio R, Nurmesniemi H (2008) Calcium carbonate waste from an integrated pulp and paper mill as a potential liming agent. Environ Chem Lett 6:47–51.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-007-0110-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Poykio R, Nurmesniemi H, Kuokkanen T, Peramaki P (2006) Green liquor dregs as an alternative neutralizing agent at a pulp mill. Environ Chem Lett 4:37–40.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-005-0031-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Smidt E, Meissl K, Tintner J, Ottner F (2010) Interferences of carbonate quantification in municipal solid waste incinerator bottom ash: evaluation of different methods. Environ Chem Lett 8:217–222.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-009-0209-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Theapsak S, Watthanaphanit A, Rujiravanit R (2012) Preparation of chitosan-coated polyethylene packaging films by DBD plasma treatment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 4:2474–2482.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am300168a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Vishnuvarthanan M, Rajeswari N (2015) Effect of mechanical, barrier and adhesion properties on oxygen plasma surface modified PP. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 30:119–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2015.05.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Vishnuvarthanan M, Rajeswari N (2018) Food packaging: pectin–laponite–Ag nanoparticle bionanocomposite coated on polypropylene shows low O2 transmission, low Ag migration and high antimicrobial activity. Environ Chem Lett.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-018-0770-3 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Printing Technology, College of Engineering, GuindyAnna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations