Prediction of CO 2 absorption by physical solvents using a chemoinformatics-based machine learning model Original Paper First Online: 18 March 2019 Abstract
The rising atmospheric CO
2 level is partly responsible for global warming. Despite numerous warnings from scientists during the past years, nations are reacting too slowly, and thus, we will probably reach a situation needing rapid and effective techniques to reduce atmospheric CO 2. Therefore, advanced engineering methods are particularly important to decrease the greenhouse effect, for instance, by capturing CO 2 using solvents. Experimental testing of many solvents under different conditions is necessary but time-consuming. Alternatively, modeling CO 2 capture by solvents using a nonlinear fitting machine learning is a rapid way to select potential solvents, prior to experimentation. Previous predictive machine learning models were mainly designed for blended solutions in water using the solution concentration as the main input of the model, which was not able to predict CO 2 solubility in different types of physical solvents. To address this issue, here, we developed a new descriptor-based chemoinformatics model for predicting CO 2 solubility in physical solvents in the form of mole fraction. The input factors include organic structural and bond information, thermodynamic properties, and experimental conditions. We studied the solvents from 823 data, including methanol (165 data), ethanol (138), n-propanol (98), n-butanol (64), n-pentanol (59), ethylene glycol (52), propylene glycol (54), acetone (51), 2-butanone (49), ethylene glycol monomethyl ether (46 data), and ethylene glycol monoethyl ether (47), using artificial neural networks as the machine learning model. Results show that our descriptor-based model predicts the CO 2 absorption in physical solvents with generally higher accuracy and low root-mean-squared errors. Our findings show that using a set of simple but effective chemoinformatics-based descriptors, intrinsic relationships between the general properties of physical solvents and their CO 2 solubility can be precisely fitted with machine learning. Keywords Chemoinformatics Greenhouse gas CO 2 Absorption Solubility Physical solvent Chemical descriptors Prediction Machine learning Artificial neural network (ANN) Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (
) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-019-00874-0 Notes Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Aaron D, Tsouris C (2005) Separation of CO
from flue gas: a review. Sep Sci Technol 40:321–348.
https://doi.org/10.1081/SS-200042244 CrossRef Google Scholar
Adzic RR, Zhang J, Sasaki K et al (2007) Platinum monolayer fuel cell electrocatalysts. Top Catal 46:249–262.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11244-007-9003-x CrossRef Google Scholar
Aeshala LM, Uppaluri RG, Verma A (2013) Effect of cationic and anionic solid polymer electrolyte on direct electrochemical reduction of gaseous CO
to fuel. J CO
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2013.09.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
Behler J, Parrinello M (2007) Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys Rev Lett.
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.98.146401 Google Scholar
Bezanehtak K, Combes GB, Dehghani F et al (2002) Vapor-liquid equilibrium for binary systems of carbon dioxide + methanol, hydrogen + methanol, and hydrogen + carbon dioxide at high pressures. J Chem Eng Data 47:161–168.
https://doi.org/10.1021/je010122m CrossRef Google Scholar
Böttcher T (2016) An additive definition of molecular complexity. J Chem Inf Model.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00723 Google Scholar
Browne MW (2000) Cross-validation methods. J Math Psychol 44:108–132.
https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1999.1279 CrossRef Google Scholar
Dai C, Wei W, Lei Z, Li C, Chen B (2015) Absorption of CO
with methanol and ionic liquid mixture at low temperatures. Fluid Phase Equilib 391:9–17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2015.02.002 CrossRef Google Scholar
Duan Z, Sun R (2003) An improved model calculating CO
solubility in pure water and aqueous NaCl solutions from 273 to 533 K and from 0 to 2000 bar. Chem Geol 193:257–271.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2541(02)00263-2 CrossRef Google Scholar
Gui X, Tang Z, Fei W (2011) Solubility of CO
in alcohols, glycols, ethers, and ketones at high pressures from (288.15 to 318.15) K. J Chem Eng Data 56:2420–2429.
https://doi.org/10.1021/je101344v CrossRef Google Scholar
Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0893-6080(89)90020-8 CrossRef Google Scholar
Koytsoumpa EI, Bergins C, Kakaras E (2018) The CO
economy: review of CO
capture and reuse technologies. J Supercrit Fluids 132:3–16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2017.07.029 CrossRef Google Scholar
Krupa SV, Kickert RN (1993) The greenhouse effect: the impacts of carbon dioxide (CO
), ultraviolet-B (UV-B) radiation and ozone (O
) on vegetation (crops). Vegetatio 104–105:223–238.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048155 CrossRef Google Scholar
Li H, Henkelman GA (2017) Dehydrogenation selectivity of ethanol on close-packed transition metal surfaces: a computational study of monometallic, Pd/Au, and Rh/Au catalysts. J Phys Chem C 121:27504–27510.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b09953 CrossRef Google Scholar
Li H, Zhang Z (2018) Mining the intrinsic trends of CO
solubility in blended solutions. J CO
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.06.008 CrossRef Google Scholar
Li B, Duan Y, Luebke D, Morreale B (2013) Advances in CO
capture technology: a patent review. Appl Energy 102:1439–1447.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.009 CrossRef Google Scholar
Li H, Chen F, Cheng K et al (2015) Prediction of zeta potential of decomposed peat via machine learning: comparative study of support vector machine and artificial neural networks. Int J Electrochem Sci 10:6044–6056
Li H, Liu Z, Liu K, Zhang Z (2017a) Predictive power of machine learning for optimizing solar water heater performance: the potential application of high-throughput screening. Int J Photoenergy 1:2.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4194251 Google Scholar
Li H, Zhang Z, Liu Z (2017b) Application of artificial neural networks for catalysis: a review. Catalysts 7:306.
https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7100306 CrossRef Google Scholar
Li H, Evans EJ, Mullins CB, Henkelman G (2018a) Ethanol decomposition on Pd-Au alloy catalysts. J Phys Chem C 122:22024–22032.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.8b08150 CrossRef Google Scholar
Li H, Luo L, Kunal P et al (2018b) Oxygen reduction reaction on classically immiscible bimetallics: a case study of RhAu. J Phys Chem C 122:2712–2716.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b10974 CrossRef Google Scholar
Li H, Shin K, Henkelman G (2018c) Effects of ensembles, ligand, and strain on adsorbate binding to alloy surfaces. J Chem Phys 149:174705.
https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5053894 CrossRef Google Scholar
Liu P, Lin H, Yang Y et al (2014) New insights into thermal decomposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon oxyradicals. J Phys Chem A 118:11337–11345.
https://doi.org/10.1021/jp510498j CrossRef Google Scholar
Liu P, Li Z, Roberts WL (2018a) The growth of PAHs and soot in the post-flame region. Proc Combust Inst 000:1–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2018.05.047 Google Scholar
Liu P, Zhang Y, Wang L et al (2018b) Chemical mechanism of exhaust gas recirculation on polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons formation based on laser-induced fluorescence measurement. Energy Fuels 32:7112–7124.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00422 CrossRef Google Scholar
Maeda T (2018) Technical note: how to rationally compare the performances of different machine learning models? PeerJ Preprints 6:e26714v1.
https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.26714v1 Google Scholar
Murad S, Gupta S (2000) A simple molecular dynamics simulation for calculating Henry’s constant and solubility of gases in liquids. Chem Phys Lett 319:60–64.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00085-3 CrossRef Google Scholar
Nawi NM, Khan A, Rehman MZ (2013) A new back-propagation neural network optimized. Iccsa 2013:413–426.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39637-3 Google Scholar
Padilla M, Baturina O, Gordon JP, Artyushkova K, Atanassov P, Serov A (2017) Selective CO
electroreduction to C
on porous Cu films synthesized by sacrificial support method. J CO
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.03.006 CrossRef Google Scholar
Park J-H, Jun C-H (2013) Multivariate process control chart for controlling the false discovery rate. Ind Eng Manag Syst 11:385–389.
https://doi.org/10.7232/iems.2012.11.4.385 Google Scholar
Park J, Jun CH (2015) A new multivariate EWMA control chart via multiple testing. J Process Control.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2015.01.007 Google Scholar
Paul S, Ghoshal AK, Mandal B (2008) Theoretical studies on separation of CO
by single and blended aqueous alkanolamine solvents in flat sheet membrane contactor (FSMC). Chem Eng J 144:352–360.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2008.01.036 CrossRef Google Scholar
Secuianu C, Feroiu V, Geană D (2008) Phase behavior for carbon dioxide + ethanol system: experimental measurements and modeling with a cubic equation of state. J Supercrit Fluids 47:109–116.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2008.08.004 CrossRef Google Scholar
Secuianu C, Feroiu V, Geanǎ D (2009) Phase equilibria experiments and calculations for carbon dioxide + methanol binary system. Cent Eur J Chem 7:1–7.
https://doi.org/10.2478/s11532-008-0085-5 CrossRef Google Scholar
Singh S, Gautam RK, Malik K, Verma A (2017) Ag-Co bimetallic catalyst for electrochemical reduction of CO
to value added products. J CO
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.01.022 CrossRef Google Scholar
Specht DF (1991) A general regression neural network. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 2:568–576.
https://doi.org/10.1109/72.97934 CrossRef Google Scholar
Svozil D, Kvasnicka V, Pospichal J (1997) Introduction to multi-layer feed-forward neural networks. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 39:43–62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7439(97)00061-0 CrossRef Google Scholar
Tetko IV, Livingstone DJ, Luik AI (1995) Neural network studies. 1. Comparison of overfitting and overtraining. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 35:826–833.
https://doi.org/10.1021/ci00027a006 CrossRef Google Scholar
Tontiwachwuthikul P, Meisen A, Lim CJ (1992) CO
absorption by NaOH, monoethanolamine and 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol solutions in a packed column. Chem Eng Sci 47:381–390.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(92)80028-B CrossRef Google Scholar
Tsivintzelis I, Missopolinou D, Kalogiannis K, Panayiotou C (2004) Phase compositions and saturated densities for the binary systems of carbon dioxide with ethanol and dichloromethane. Fluid Phase Equilib 224:89–96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2004.06.046 CrossRef Google Scholar
Wang Y, Xiao J, Suzek TO, Zhang J, Wang J, Bryant SH (2009) PubChem: a public information system for analyzing bioactivities of small molecules. Nucleic Acids Res 37:W623–W633.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp456 CrossRef Google Scholar
Wei CC, Puxty G, Feron P (2014) Amino acid salts for CO
capture at flue gas temperatures. Chem Eng Sci 107:218–226.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.11.034 CrossRef Google Scholar
Yim JH, Jung YG, Lim JS (2010) Vapor-liquid equilibria of carbon dioxide + n-propanol at elevated pressure. Korean J Chem Eng 27:284–288.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-009-0342-0 CrossRef Google Scholar
Yu CH, Huang CH, Tan CS (2012) A review of CO
capture by absorption and adsorption. Aerosol Air Qual Res 12:745–769.
https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.05.0132 CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhang G, Eddy Patuwo B, Hu MY (1998) Forecasting with artificial neural networks. Int J Forecast 14:35–62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-2070(97)00044-7 CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhang Z, Chen F, Rezakazemi M, Zhang W, Lu C, Chang H, Quan X (2018a) Modeling of a CO
-piperazine-membrane absorption system. Chem Eng Res Des 131:375–384.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2017.11.024 CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhang Z, Li H, Chang H, Pan Z, Luo X (2018b) Machine learning predictive framework for CO
thermodynamic properties in solution. J CO
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.04.025 CrossRef Google Scholar
Zhang Z, Li Y, Zhang W, Wang J, Soltanian MR, Olabi AG (2018c) Effectiveness of amino acid salt solutions in capturing CO
: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 98:179–188.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.019 CrossRef Google Scholar Copyright information
© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019