Asia Europe Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 69–85 | Cite as

Nagorno-Karabakh: obstacles to the resolution of the frozen conflict

  • Pavlína BláhováEmail author
Original Paper


The enduring deadlock in peace negotiations between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh has created a special, “frozen” phase in the conflict cycle. Several cases of skirmishes, escalating in 2016 during the Four-Day War, demonstrate the security threat the conflict represents. Simultaneously, ongoing unsuccessful peace talks and escalations and de-escalations of violence at the line of contact indicate the failure to transform the conflict in either a peaceful or a violent way. This paper seeks to identify conditions contributing to the stalemate of the conflict. The key actors contributing to the conflict’s “frozenness” are the political leadership of Armenia and Azerbaijan and third parties represented by the Minsk Group. The failure to achieve a peaceful transformation is given by political hostilities carried out through negative labelling, uncompromising statements and the self-victimisation of the belligerents. Such activities deepen the grievances within the Azerbaijani and Armenian populaces, which in response to such behaviour does not support any concessions in negotiations. At the same time, the Minsk Group does not provide any concrete model for a peaceful settlement nor does it apply pressure on the belligerents to grant concessions. A violent transformation of the conflict is not possible due to the presence of third parties in the region which deter the belligerents from full-scale war. These findings indicate that in order to avoid the future failure of negotiations and violent escalations at the line of contact, the political leaderships of Armenia and Azerbaijan need to withdraw from mutual hostilities, the negotiation agenda and framework need to be changed and the third parties involved have to actively participate in the peace process.



I would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers and my colleagues Jan Ludvik and Michal Smetana for their helpful and constructive comments and recommendations.

Funding information

This study received funding from the Charles University Research Centre programme UNCE/HUM/028 (Peace Research Center Prague/Faculty of Social Sciences) and the Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic, grant project VI20152019011.


  1. Akebo M (2016) Ceasefire agreements and peace processes. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrosio T (2011) Unfreezing the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict? Evaluating peacemaking efforts under the Obama administration. Ethnopolitics 10(1):93–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bar-Tal D, Chernyak-Hai L, Schori N, Gundar A (2009) A sense of self-perceived collective victimhood in intractable conflicts. Int Rev Red Cross 91(874):229–258.
  4. Baranick MJ, Schwabe S (2006) In pursuit of peace in Nagorno-Karabakh. The Cornwallis Group CXI: Analysis for Civil-Military Transition., 315–323Google Scholar
  5. Bebler A (2015) “Frozen Conflicts” in Europe. Barbara Budrich Publishers, Opladen-Berlin-TorontoGoogle Scholar
  6. Betts W (1999) Third party mediation: an obstacle to peace in Nagorno Karabakh. SAIS Rev 19(2):161–183. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brecher M (2017) Dynamics of the Arab-Israel conflict: past and present: intellectual odyssey II. Palgrave Macmillan, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Broers L (2015) From “frozen conflict” to enduring rivalry: reassessing the Nagorny Karabakh conflict. Nationalities Papers 43(4):556–576Google Scholar
  9. Corbetta R (2015) Between indifference and coercion: third-party intervention techniques in ongoing disputes. Conflict Mnag Peace 32(1):3–27.
  10. Cornell SE (2016) The fallacy of “compartmentalisation”: the West and Russia from Ukraine to Syria. European View 15:97–109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Croissant MP (1998) The Armenia-Azerbaijan conflict. Causes and implications. Greenwood Publishing Group, WestportGoogle Scholar
  12. CSTO (2002) Ustav Organizatsii Dogovora O Kollektivnoy Bezopasnosti.
  13. De Waal T (2010) Remaking the Nagorno-Karabakh peace process. Survival 54:159–176. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Waal T (2013) Nagorny Karabakh: Closer to War than Peace. Russia and Eurasia Summary, Chatham HouseGoogle Scholar
  15. Erzse A (2015) An axe to grind: an overview of Hungary’s ‘axe murder case’ and its effects on the international community. Interstate—Journal of International Affairs, 2014/2015(1). Retrieved from
  16. Fisher RJ (2016) Assessing the contingency model of third-party intervention in successful cases of prenegotiation. In: Fisher RJ (ed) A North American Pioneer in interactive conflict resolution. Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice, vol 14. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  17. Freizer S (2015) Twenty years after the Nagorny Karabakh ceasefire: an opportunity to move towards more inclusive conflict resolution. Caucasus Survey 1:109–122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gahramanova A (2007) Peace strategies in “frozen” ethno-territorial conflicts: integrating reconciliation into conflict management. Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung, MannheimerGoogle Scholar
  19. Gahramanova A (2010) Paradigms of political mythologies and perspectives of reconciliation in the case of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Int Negot 15(1):133–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gasparyan A (1999) Dinamika Karabakhskogo konflikta i rol’ Rossiyskoy Federatsii v yego uregulirovanii. Tsentral'naya Aziya i Kavkaz, No. 6. Retrieved from
  21. Geukijan O (2016) Ethnicity, nationalism and conflict in the South Caucasus: Nagorno-Karabakh and the legacy of Soviet nationalities policy. Routledge, AbingdonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Greig JM, Diehl PF (2006) Softening up: making conflicts more amenable to diplomacy. Int Interact 32(4):355–384.
  23. Hofmann C, Schneckener U (2011) Engaging non-state armed actors in state- and peace-building: options and strategies. Int Rev Red Cross 93(883):603–621.
  24. Hopmann PT (2015) Minsk Group mediation of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict: confronting an “intractable conflict” In IFSH (ed.) OSCE Yearbook 2014. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 167–179Google Scholar
  25. Huseynov T (2005) Mountainous Karabakh: conflict resolution through powersharing and regional integration. Peace, Conflict and Development: An Interdisciplinary Journal 6. Retrieved from
  26. Huseynov T (2010) Mountainous Karabakh: new paradigms for peace and development in the 21st century. Int Negot 15:7–31Google Scholar
  27. Ivanov SM, Zhuravel VP (2009) Regional’nyye konflikty na postsovetskom prostranstve i rol’ rossii v ikh uregulirovanii. Institut mirovoy ekonomiki i mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy. Pravo i bezopasnost 4(33):15–19Google Scholar
  28. Kemp W (2016) OSCE peace operations: soft security in hard environments. International Peace Institute, New York Available at: Google Scholar
  29. Kendzior S (2012) The axe murderer who became a Facebook hero, Al Jazeera, 5 September.
  30. Kaldor M, Karl T, Said Y (eds) (2007) Oil wars. Pluto Press, London, Ann Arbor, MI Retrieved from Google Scholar
  31. Kochariyan S (2016) Why is the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict still not resolved? Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia.
  32. Korostelina KV (2014) Political Insults: How Offenses Escalate Conflict. Oxford Scholarship Online.
  33. Krüger H (2010) The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict: a legal analysis. Springer, HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ludvik J, Smetana M (2018) Between war and peace: dynamic reconceptualization of ‘frozen conflicts’ (this issue)Google Scholar
  35. McGarry J, O'Leary B (2016) Power-Sharing executives: Consociational and centripetal formulae and the case of Northern Ireland. Ethnopolitics 15(5):497–519Google Scholar
  36. Mehtyev E (2005) Armenia-Azerbaijan Prague process: road map to peace or stalemate for uncertainty? Conflict Studies Research Center.
  37. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation (2016) Kontseptsiya vneshney politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii.
  38. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Armenia, Speech delivered by Ambassador Tabibian (2004), available at:
  39. Newman E, Richmond O (2006) Peace building and spoilers. Confl Secur Dev 6(1):101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taras, R., Ganguly, R. (2010). Understanding Ethnic Conflict. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. The Office of the President of Armenia (2012) President Serzh Sargsyan invited an extraordinary meeting with the heads of diplomatic missions.
  42. The Office of the President of Azerbaijan (2012) Closing speech by Ilham Aliyev at the conference on the results of the third year into the “State program on the socioeconomic development of districts for 2009–2013”.
  43. The Office of the President of Azerbaijan (2017) Speech by Ilham Aliyev at the opening of 72nd session of UN general assembly.
  44. OSCE (2004) Report of the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group to the OSCE Ministerial Council MC.GAL/9/04.
  45. OSCE (2005) Statement of the Minsk Group co-chairs.
  46. OSCE (2012) Reply of the delegation of the Republic of Azerbaijan, HDIM.DEL./0565/12.
  47. Panarin S (1999) Konflikty v Zakavkaz’ye: pozitsii storon, perspektivy uregulirova-niya, vozmozhnyy vklad Rossii. Vestnik Yevrazii 1(2):113–126Google Scholar
  48. Pillar R (2014) Negotiating Peace: War Termination as a Bargaining Process. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  49. Pokalova E (2015) Conflict resolution in frozen conflicts: timing in Nagorno-Karabakh. J Balk Near East Stud 17(1):68–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Potier T (2001) Conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh, Abkhazia and South Ossetia: a legal appraisal. Kluwer Law International, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  51. Razmanova T (2008) PA NATO condemns ceasefire breach between Azerbaijan and Armenia, trend, 5 March.
  52. Smith JDD (1995) Stopping wars: defining the obstacles to cease-fire. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  53. Smolnik F (2012) Secessionist rule: protracted conflict and configurations of non-state authority. Campus Verlag, FrankfurtGoogle Scholar
  54. Stedman J (1997) Spoiler problems in peace processes. Int Secur 22(2):5–53. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sterling J (2012) Axe murderer’s pardon stirs fears of war, CNN, 6 September.
  56. UN (2012) Letter dated 10 October 2012 from the Permanent Representative of the Republic of Azerbaijan to the United Nations Office and other international organizations in Geneva addressed to the President of the Human Rights Council. A/HRC/21/G/12.
  57. Vaserman A, Ginat R (1994) National, territorial or religious conflict? The case of Nagorno Karabakh. Stud Confl Terror 17(4):345–362Google Scholar
  58. Vostrikov SV (1999) Karabakhskiy krizis i politika Rossii na Kavkaze. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost 3:73–86Google Scholar
  59. Wallensteen P, Svensson I (2014) Talking peace: international mediation in armed conflicts. J Peace Res 51(2):315–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Williams JR (2009) The Nagorno Karabakh Conflict: Problems and Possibilities for Conflict Resolution. Georgia Southern University, StatesboroGoogle Scholar
  61. Zamejc A (2013) Seeking peace: what needs to be done for the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Journal of Conflict Transformation: Caucasus Edition. Retrieved from
  62. Zartman IW (2001) The timing of peace initiatives: hurting stalemates and ripe moment. The Global Review of Ethnopolitics 1(1):8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zartman IW (1983) The strategy of preventive diplomacy in third world conflicts. In: Alexander George (ed) Managing US-Soviet Rivalry. Westview Press, ColoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Researcher at the Center for Security Policy, Faculty of Social SciencesCharles University in PraguePragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations