Asia Europe Journal

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 15–30 | Cite as

The role of international brokers in frozen conflicts: the case of transnistria

  • Magdalena DembińskaEmail author
  • Frédéric Mérand
Original Paper


The “frozen” conflict between Moldova and its separatist Transnistrian region—which developed into a de facto state—is dynamic. Despite an active nation-building project to support Transnistria’s independence and a stated willingness to join Russia, Transnistria is juggling between Russia and Europe. While economically dependent on the former’s subsidies and security guarantees, Transnistrian economic ties with the West are growing strong. While most studies are interested in the geopolitical game and the role of external actors, this article argues for a complementary approach that links macro- with meso-level analysis through the role of externally oriented domestic agents. First, the article shows that Transnistria pursues dual alignment in order to survive and provide the population with public goods for which they need external resources. Although Transnistria relies heavily on its patron state, Russia, facing recurrent crisis and external constraints, it has to search for complementary sources of income. Dual alignment is the result of this “multiple asymmetric dependence.” Second, the article argues that local intermingled economic and political interests, embodied by businessmen with close ties not only to Russia but also to Europe, account for how this balancing act is sustained. These informal international brokers or “double agents” mobilize their political connections to support dual alignment while using their Western and Eastern business connections to consolidate their power in Transnistria. It is further argued that the role of international brokers embedded in Russian and European networks and engaging in cross-border cooperation helps understand why the Transnistrian frozen conflict seems to be withering.


Funding information

This study received funding from the Charles University Research Centre program UNCE/HUM/028 (Peace Research Center Prague/Faculty of Social Sciences) and the Ministry of Interior of the Czech Republic, grant project VI20152019011. Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC grant number 435-2016-0604).


  1. Andriuta C (2007) Rusia vrea sa taie pensile acordate transnistrenilor., 23 November 2007. (21 December 2017)
  2. Baghdasaryan G (2013) ‘Working the enemy’s mill’ – putting the brake on internal development in Nagorny Karabakh: a media study of the image of the ‘enemy’. In: Javakhishvili J, Kvarchelia L (eds) Myths and Conflict in the South Caucasus, vol 2. Instrumentalisation of Conflict in Political Discourse. International Alert, London, pp 92–108Google Scholar
  3. Bagnibov V (2008) Olegu Markovitchu Baevy 60. Pazdravlyayem. Gazeta ‘Zarya Pridniestrovya’ 47:1461, 21 November. (21 December 2017)
  4. Bakke KM, O’Loughlin J, Toal G, Ward MD (2014) “Convincing State-Builders? Disaggregating Internal Legitimacy in Abkhazia.” International Studies Quarterly 58(3):591–607Google Scholar
  5. Beyer J, Wolff S (2016) Linkage and leverage effects on Moldova’s Transnistria problem. East European Politics 32(3):335–354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blakkisrud H, Kolstø P (2011) From secessionist conflict toward a functioning state: processes of state- and nation-building in Transnistria. Post-Soviet Affairs 27(2):178–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bobick M (2012) There’s a new ‘sheriff’ in town: corruption and captive markets in Transnistria. Havighurst Centre, Miami UniversityGoogle Scholar
  8. Breuilly J (1993) Nationalism and the state, 2nd edn. Manchester University Press, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  9. Broers L (2005) The politics of non-recognition and democratisation. In: Broers L (ed) The limits of leadership: elites and societies in the Nagorny-Karabakh Peace Process. Conciliation Resources, London. Accessed 26 August 2013,
  10. Brubaker R (1996) Nationalism reframed. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Całus K (2013) An aided economy. The characteristics of the Transnistrian economic model. Center for Eastern Studies OSW Commentary, 14 May 2013.
  12. Całus K (2016a) The DCFTA in Transnistria: who gains? New Eastern Europe, 15 January 2016.
  13. Całus K (2016b) Transnistrain ‘House of Cards.’ New Eastern Europe, 7 June 2016.
  14. Caspersen N (2008) Separatism and democracy in the Caucasus. Survival 50(4):116–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caspersen N (2009) Playing the recognition game: external actors and de facto states. The International Spectator 44(4):47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cenusa D (2017) Is DCFTA implemented in Transnistrian region or not? IPN, Chisinau. Google Scholar
  17. Chalupa I (2014) Needing better control in Ukraine War, Moscow sends in an Ols KGB hand. Atlantic Council, 17 July. (21 December 2017)
  18. Clogg R (2008) The politics of identity in post-soviet Abkhazia: managing diversity and unresolved conflict. Nationalities Papers 36(2):305–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Coppieters B (2001) Ethno-federalism and civic state-building policies. Perspectives on the Georgian-Abkhaz conflict. Regional and Federal Studies 11(2):69–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dembińska M, Campana A (2017) Frozen conflicts and internal dynamics of de facto states: perspectives and directions for research. Int Stud Rev 19(2):254–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dembińska M, Danero Iglesias J (2013) The making of an empty Moldovan category within a multiethnic Transnistrian nation. East Eur Polit Soc 27(3):413–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Devyatkov A (2017a) Russia and Transnistria in a patron-client relationship. Published on 17/04/2017.
  23. Devyatkov A (2017b) Never sans sheriff: consolidating power in Transnistria. New Eastern Europe, 7 August 2017.
  24. Dezalay Y, Garth B (2002) The internationalization of palace wars: lawyers, economists, and the contest to transform Latin American states. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dezalay Y, Garth B (2011) Hegemonic battles, professional rivalries, and the international division of labor in the market for the import and export of state-governing expertise. Int Political Sociol 5(3):276–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freedom House (2016) Transnistria report. Electoral Process.
  27. Hill WH (2012) Russia, the near abroad and the west: lessons from the Moldova-Transdniestria conflict. Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Johns Hopkins University Press, Washington, DC/Baltimore, MDGoogle Scholar
  28. Hobsbawm EJ (1983) Introduction: inventing tradition. In: Hobsbawm E, Ranger T (eds) The invention of tradition. Cambridge University, Cambridge Press, pp 1–14Google Scholar
  29. Istomin I, Bolgova I (2016) Transnistrian strategy in the context of Russian–Ukrainian relations: the rise and failure of ‘dual alignment’. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 16(1):169–194. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Karasac H (2002) Actors of the new ‘Great Game,’ Caspian oil politics. J South Eur Balk 4(1):15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kennedy R (2016) The limits of soft balancing: the frozen conflict in Transnistria and the challenge to EU and NATO strategy. Small Wars and Insurgencies 27(3):512–537. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. King C (2001) The benefits of ethnic war: understanding Eurasia’s unrecognised states. World Politics 53(4):24–552Google Scholar
  33. Kolossov V, O'Loughlin J (2011) After the Wars in the South Caucasus State of Georgia: Economic Insecurities and Migration in the De Facto States of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Eurasian Geography and Economics 52(5):631–654Google Scholar
  34. Kolstø P (2006) The Sustainibility of unrecognised quasi-states. J Peace Res 43(6):723–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kolstø P, Blakkisrud H (2012) De facto states and democracy: the case of Nagorno-Karabakh. Communis Post-Commun 45(1–2):141–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kolstø P, Paukovic D (2014) The short and brutish life of Republika Srpska Krajina: failure of a de facto state. Ethnopolitics 13(4):309–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lungu K (2016) What role does Russia play in Transnistria? European Council on Foreign Relations.
  38. Lynch D (2004) Engaging Eurasia’s separatist states: unresolved conflicts and de facto states. United States Institute of Peace Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  39. McLaughlin D (2014) Shadowy veteran of pro-Russia rebellions in Ukraine. The Irish Times, 30 July. (21 December 2017)
  40. O’Loughlin J, Kolossov V, Toal G (2011) Inside Abkhazia: survey of attitudes in a de facto state. Post-Soviet Affairs 27(1):1–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ÓBeacháin D (2012) The dynamics of electoral politics in Abkhazia. Communis Post-Commun 45(1–2):165–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oleksy P (2015) Transnistria: it is more complicated than you think. New Eastern Europe, 9 December 2015Google Scholar
  43. OSCE (1997) Memorandum on the foundations for normalization of relations between the Republic of Moldova and Transnistria. Moscow.
  44. Özkan B (2008) Who gains from the ‘no war no peace’ situation? A Critical Analysis of the Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict Geopolitics 13(1):572–599Google Scholar
  45. Pegg S (1998) International society and the de facto state. Ashgate, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  46. Popescu N (2006a) Democracy in secessionism: Transnistria and Abkhazia’s domestic policies. Center for Policy Studies, Brussels Accessed 27 August 2011Google Scholar
  47. Popescu N (2006b) Outsourcing de facto statehood: Russia and the secessionist entities in Georgia and Moldova. CEPS Policy Brief 109, JuneGoogle Scholar
  48. Popescu N (2010) EU foreign policy and post-soviet conflicts: stealth intervention. Routledge, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Popsoi M (2016) Transnistria: change of leadership, but not policy. Eurasia Daily Monitor 13:198Google Scholar
  50. Presidential election in Transnistria: chances of candidates (2016) Eurasia Daily, December 1st.
  51. Prohnitchi V, Lupusor A (2013) Transnistria and the deep comprehensive free trade agreement: a little stone that overturns a great wain? Policy notes, 2nd Series, no. 2, Expert Group, ChisinauGoogle Scholar
  52. Quinlan PD (2008) A foot in both camps: Moldova and the Transnistrian conundrum from the Kozak memorandum. East European Quarterly 42(2):129–160Google Scholar
  53. Rogstad A (2018) The next Crimea? Getting Russia’s Transnistria policy right. Problems of Post-Communism 65(1):49–64Google Scholar
  54. Surhone LM, Tennoe MT, Henssonow SF (2010) Yevgeny Shevchuk. BetaScript Publishing, VDM Verlag Dr. Muller Aktiengesellschaft & Co., Saarbrücken. Accessed 21 Dec 2017
  55. Schöpflin G (2000) Nations, identity, power. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  56. Secrieru S (2016) Transnistria zig-zagging towards a CDFTA. Policy paper. PISM: The Polish Institute of International Affairs 4:145, January 2016Google Scholar
  57. Smith AD (1999) Myths and memories of the nation. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. Soloviev V (2017) An ideal conflict on the Dniester Open Democracy.
  59. Thoric V, Silitcaia N (2016) Investigation: media sheriffs from Transnistria. Rise Moldova, 3 May. (21 December 2017)
  60. Toal G, O’Loughlin J (2013a) Inside South Ossetia: a survey of attitudes in a de facto state. Post-Soviet Affairs 29(2):136–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Toal G, O’Loughlin J (2013b) Land for peace in Nagorny Karabakh? Political geographies and public attitudes inside a contested de facto state. Territory, Politics, Governance 1(2):158–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Waal T de (2016) An eastern European frozen conflict the EU got right. Politico, 16 February 2016.
  63. Wolf S (2011) A resolvable frozen conflict? Designing a settlement for Transnistria. Nationalities Papers 39(6):863–870CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversité de MontréalMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations