Multi-GNSS fractional cycle bias products generation for GNSS ambiguity-fixed PPP at Wuhan University
- 170 Downloads
The School of Geodesy and Geomatics (SGG) at Wuhan University has been generating GPS fractional cycle bias (FCB) products for users to realize ambiguity-fixed precise point positioning (PPP) since 2015. Along with the development of multiple Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS), there is an urgent need to provide multi-GNSS FCB products for the PPP ambiguity resolution (AR) with multi-constellation observations. This study focuses on the multi-GNSS FCB estimation, in which the FCB products of GPS, Galileo, BDS and QZSS are generated. We describe here the detailed estimation method and the significant improvements to the new service. The FCB quality, as well as the PPP AR performance, is evaluated. The mean standard deviations of wide-lane FCBs relative to CODE are 0.019, 0.005, 0.015 and 0.008 cycles, while those of narrow-lane are 0.021, 0.021, 0.057 and 0.010 cycles for GPS, Galileo, BDS and QZSS, respectively. The comparison with CNES GPS and Galileo FCBs indicates their good consistency with the corresponding FCBs. Compared with GPS-only PPP AR, the convergence time and time to first fix of the four-system PPP AR can be reduced by 27.3 and 29.4% in the static mode, respectively, while the corresponding improvements are 42.6 and 51.9% in the kinematic mode, respectively. These results demonstrate that our SGG FCB service can provide high-precision and reliable four-system FCB corrections for worldwide users to conduct ambiguity-fixed PPP processing.
KeywordsMulti-GNSS Fractional cycle bias Precise point positioning Ambiguity resolution
This study was supported by China National Funds for Distinguished Young Scientists (No. 41825009). The authors are grateful to the many individuals and organizations worldwide who contribute to the International GNSS Service.
- Bisnath S, Langley R (2001) Precise orbit determination of low earth orbiters with GPS point positioning. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2001, Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, California, USA, January, pp 725–733Google Scholar
- Chen K (2004) Real-time precise point positioning and its potential applications. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2014, Institute of Navigation, Long Beach, California, USA, September, pp 1844–1854Google Scholar
- Collins P, Lahaye F, Héroux P, Bisnath S (2008) Precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution using the decoupled clock model. In: Proceedings of ION GNSS 2008, Institute of Navigation, Savannah, Georgia, pp 1315–1322Google Scholar
- Gendt G, Dick G, Reigber CH (1998) Demonstration of NRT GPS water vapor monitoring for numerical weather prediction in Germany. International Workshop on GPS Meteorology Tsukaba, vol 82, pp 361–370Google Scholar
- Hatch R (1982) The synergism of GPS code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the third international symposium on satellite doppler positioning at Physical Sciences Laboratory of New Mexico State University, vol 2, pp 1213–1231Google Scholar
- Kouba J (2009) A guide to using International GNSS Service (IGS) products. https://igscb.jpl.nasa.gov/igscb/resource/pubs/UsingIGSProductsVer21.pdf
- Liu Y, Ye S, Song W, Lou Y, Chen D (2016) Integrating GPS and bds to shorten the initialization time for ambiguity-fixed PPP. GPS Solut 17(21):333–343Google Scholar
- Melbourne WG (1985) The case for ranging in GPS-based geodetic systems. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, pp 373–386Google Scholar
- Wu JT, Wu SC, Hajj GA, Bertiger WI, Lichten SM (1993) Effects of antenna orientation on GPS carrier phase. Manuscr Geod 18(2):91–98Google Scholar
- Wübbena G (1985) Software developments for geodetic positioning with GPS using TI-4100 code and carrier measurements. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on precise positioning with the global positioning system, Rockville, pp 403–412Google Scholar