The between-receiver phase inter-system bias (ISB) in multi-GNSS integration needs to be calibrated when fixing the inter-system double difference (DD) ambiguities. As a result, the DD ambiguity fixing performance is affected by the accuracy of the ISB calibration; however, those effects have not been investigated until now. Also, the knowledge about the ISB characteristics is not enough which can lead to failure of ambiguity fixing with ISB calibration value such as obtained by the lookup table method. Our study first integrates the regularization method to the existing particle filtering fractional ISB (F-ISB) estimation to derive more precise F-ISB estimates. Afterward, the effects of the F-ISB accuracy on DD ambiguity fixing in single-epoch GPS L1-Galileo E1 integration are investigated. We show that the errors of F-ISB can degrade the success rate of single-epoch ambiguity fixing, and thus, more precise F-ISB values lead to higher empirical success rates. Finally, the characteristics of the F-ISB are investigated based on baselines shorter than 20 km from the GNSS network of International GNSS Services. According to the 132 F-ISB estimates obtained using data collected from day of year 001 2016 to DOY 001, 2019, the F-ISB values for 4 receiver brands including Leica, Septentrio, Trimble and Javad are analyzed. The receiver-type and software-version combinations from the same manufacturer and with similar F-ISB values are regarded as one group and all the receivers can be classified into 6 groups. With F-ISB of Leica receiver group set to zero value, the other groups have F-ISB values of 0.000 m, + 0.055 m and + 0.095 m and the L1-E1 F-ISBs between different groups are provided in a lookup table for practical use.
GPS/Galileo Carrier phase Inter-system bias (ISB)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 41804022, 41374002), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 2682018CX33), the State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and earth’s Dynamics (Institute of Geodesy and Geophysics, CAS) (No. SKLGED2018-3-1-E) and the Sichuan Provincial Science and Technology Program (No. 2015JQO046). Linguo Yuan is funded by the National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals.
Arulampalam S, Maskell S, Gordon N, Clapp T (2002) A tutorial on particle filters for online nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian tracking. IEEE Trans Signal Process 50(2):174–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock Y, Nikolaidis RM, Jonge PJ, Bevis M (2000) Instantaneous geodetic positioning at medium distances with the Global Positioning System. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 105(B12):28223–28253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucet A, Freitas N, Gordon N (2001) Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euler H, Schaffrin B (1991) On a measure of discernibility between different ambiguity solutions in the static-kinematic GPS-mode. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on kinematic systems in geodesy, surveying, and remote sensing. Springer, Berlin, pp 285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ge M, Gendt G, Rothacher M, Shi C, Liu J (2008) Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations. J Geod 82(7):389–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khodabandeh A, Teunissen P (2016) PPP-RTK and inter-system biases: the ISB look-up table as a means to support multi-system PPP-RTK. J Geod 90(9):837–851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li X, Ge M, Dai X, Ren X, Mathias F, Jens W (2015) Accuracy and reliability of multi-GNSS real-time precise positioning: GPS, GLONASS, BeiDou, and Galileo. J Geod 89(6):607–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu X, Zhang S, Zhang Q, Ding N, Yang W (2019) A fast satellite selection algorithm with floating high cut-off elevation angle based on ADOP for instantaneous multi-GNSS single-frequency relative positioning. Adv Space Res 63(3):1234–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odijk D, Teunissen P (2013a) Characterization of between-receiver GPS-Galileo inter-system biases and their effect on mixed ambiguity resolution. GPS Solut 17(4):521–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odijk D, Teunissen P (2013b) Estimation of differential inter-system biases between the overlapping frequencies of GPS, Galileo, BeiDou and QZSS. In: Proceedings of the 4th international colloquium scientific and fundamental aspects of the Galileo programme, Prague, Czech Republic, December 2013Google Scholar
Odolinski R, Teunissen P (2019) An assessment of smartphone and low-cost multi-GNSS single-frequency RTK positioning for low, medium and high ionospheric disturbance periods. J Geod 93(5):701–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odolinski R, Teunissen P, Odijk D (2014) Combined BDS, Galileo, QZSS and GPS single-frequency RTK. GPS Solut 19(1):151–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paziewski J, Wielgosz P (2015) Accounting for Galileo-GPS inter-system biases in precise satellite positioning. J Geod 89(1):81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar