Advertisement

GPS Solutions

, 23:28 | Cite as

1 Hz GPS satellites clock correction estimations to support high-rate dynamic PPP GPS applied on the Severn suspension bridge for deflection detection

  • Xu TangEmail author
  • Xingxing Li
  • Gethin Wyn Roberts
  • Craig Matthew Hancock
  • Huib de Ligt
  • Fei Guo
Original Article
  • 102 Downloads

Abstract

The use of GPS for deflection and vibration detection in structures requires a data rate of 1 Hz or higher. We investigate the advantages of utilizing high-rate satellite clocks in a dynamic PPP processing strategy specifically applied to the measurement of the deflections of bridges. A dataset consisting of 96 globally distributed stations was used for GPS satellite clocks estimates. The undifferenced float ambiguity (FAmb) and the Zenith Total Delay (ZTD) parameters were first estimated using PPP in static mode. The 1 Hz clock products of the GPS satellites were then successfully estimated by applying the FAmb and tropospheric delays as constraints to the carrier phase. The techniques are compared to 30-s and 300-s clock corrections obtained from the IGS, as well as double differenced solutions, through two experiments. The first experiment uses a rotating-arm apparatus, consisting of a portable rig located at the University of Nottingham Ningbo China, incorporating a 4 m long arm that rotates at a constant speed through the use of an electric motor. The 1-s GPS satellite clocks gave the most precise and stable PPP solution. The second experiment investigates the dynamic deflections of the Severn Bridge’s suspension cables and towers, estimated using both the PPP, using our 1-s clock corrections as well as the IGS’s 30-s and 300-s clock corrections, and the double differenced (DD) GPS data processing method. Correlation coefficient and standard deviation of the PPP solution and DD solution reflect the bridge’s displacement waveform consistency and accuracy, respectively. Numerical analysis of the correlation coefficient and standard deviation of the time series, processed with different satellite clock intervals, implies that improvement can be achieved by applying the short interval satellites clock products that we propose. The strong agreement of the waveforms, calculated from the high-rate PPP, with the DD and the bridge load data, demonstrates that high-rate PPP is a viable alternative to the DD method for structural monitoring and an optimal option at times when DD is impossible due to the failure or inappropriateness of using a reference station.

Keywords

Satellite clock correction Bridge deflection monitoring Precise point positioning Real-time kinematic 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the IGS for providing the high-rate GPS observations, satellite clock and orbital products. Authors are grateful to the anonymous reviewers, whose comments significantly improved this manuscript. This work is supported by the Young Scientist program of the Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) with a project code 41704024; another 2 general programs of NSFC with project codes No.41774034 and No. 41774030 and NSFC key project with No. 41830110; the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. LY16D040001, as well as Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau—China as part of the project Structural Health Monitoring of Infrastructure in the Logistics Cycle (2014A35008).

References

  1. Ashkenazi V, Roberts GW (1997) Experimental monitoring of the humber bridge using GPS. Proc Inst Civ Eng 120(4):177–182Google Scholar
  2. Bock H, Dach R, Jäggi A, Beutler G (2009) High-rate GPS clock corrections from CODE: support of 1 Hz applications. J Geod 83(11):1083–1094.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-009-0326-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feng Y, Gu S, Shi C, Rizos C (2013) A reference station-based GNSS computing mode to support unified precise point positioning and real-time kinematic services. J Geod 87(10–12):945–960.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-013-0659-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kaloop MR, Li H (2009) Monitoring of bridge deformation using GPS technique KSCE. J Civ Eng 13(6):423–431.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-009-0423-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Liu Y, Ye S, Song W, Lou Y, Chen D (2017) Integrating GPS and BDS to shorten the initialization time for ambiguity-fixed PPP. GPS Solut 21(2):333–343.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-016-0525-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moschas F, Avallone A, Saltogianni V, Stiros SC (2014) Strong motion displacement waveforms using 10-Hz precise point positioning GPS: an assessment based on free oscillation experiments. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 43(12):1853–1866.  https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.2426 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Msaewe HA, Hancock CM, Psimoulis PA, Roberts GW, Bonenberg L, de Ligt H (2017) Investigating multi-GNSS performance in the UK and China based on a zero-baseline measurement approach. Measurement 102:186–199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Niell AE (1996) Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths. J Geophys Res 101(B2):3227–3246 DOI.  https://doi.org/10.1029/95jb03048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Roberts GW, Brown CJ, Tang X, Meng X, Ogundipe O (2014) A tale of five bridges; the use of GNSS for monitoring the deflections of bridges. J Appl Geod 8(4):241–264.  https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2014-0013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tang X, Li X (2017a) Differenced measurements between satellites applied on RTK PPP for structure monitoring. In: J. Sun et al. (eds), China satellite navigation conference (CSNC) 2017. Proceedings: Volume 1, lecture notes in electrical engineering 437: 277–284, May 23–25, Shanghai, China.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-4588-2_24
  11. Tang X, Roberts GW, Li X, Hancock CM (2017b) Real-time kinematic PPP GPS for structure monitoring applied on the severn suspension bridge, UK. Adv Space Res 60(5):925–937.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Yi TH, Li HN, Gu M (2013) Experimental assessment of high-rate GPS receivers for deformation monitoring of bridge. Measurement 46(1):420–432.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2012.07.018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Nottingham Ningbo ChinaNingboChina
  2. 2.Wuhan UniversityWuhanChina
  3. 3.University of the Faroe IslandsTórshavnFaroe Islands

Personalised recommendations