Advertisement

The social preferences of the native inhabitants, and the decision how many asylum seekers to admit

  • Oded StarkEmail author
  • Marcin Jakubek
  • Krzysztof Szczygielski
Original Paper
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

We consider a tax-funded policy of admitting and integrating asylum seekers in a country in which the incomes of the native inhabitants are differentiated; for the sake of simplicity, we assume that there are just two groups of native inhabitants: high-income natives and low-income natives. As a consequence of their social preferences, the latter experience disutility caused by relative deprivation. Because integrating the asylum seekers into the mainstream labor force and thereby into the income distribution of the native population “from below” reduces the relative deprivation of the low-income natives, admitting and integrating asylum seekers can be socially beneficial. We derive the optimal number of asylum seekers by maximizing the natives’ social welfare function that incorporates these considerations. We find that as long as the cost of admission and integration is not exceptionally high, this number is strictly positive. We then address the issue of how to distribute a given number of asylum seekers among several receiving countries. We find that, rather than allocating the asylum seekers in proportion to the population of each country, aggregate welfare will be maximized through an allocation that is increasing in the within-country difference between the incomes of the high-income natives and the low-income natives. Additionally, we formulate conditions under which admission of the optimal number of asylum seekers is socially preferable to a direct transfer of income from high-income natives to low-income natives.

Keywords

Admission and integration of asylum seekers Social preferences Relative deprivation Tax-funded integration policy Maximization of social welfare 

JEL Classification

D60 F02 F22 I31 J61 J68 

Notes

References

  1. Blanchflower, David G. and Oswald, Andrew J. (2008). “Hypertension and happiness across nations.” Journal of Health Economics 27(2): 218-233.Google Scholar
  2. Blau, Francine D. and Kahn, Lawrence M. (2015). “Immigration and the distribution of incomes.” In Chiswick, Barry R. and Miller, Paul W. (eds.), Handbook of the Economics of International Migration. Amsterdam: North Holland, pp. 793-843.Google Scholar
  3. Bodvarsson, Örn B. and Van den Berg, Hendrik (2013). The Economics of Immigration: Theory and Policy. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Borjas, George J. (2017). “The wage impact of the Marielitos: A reappraisal.” ILR Review 70(5): 1077-1110.Google Scholar
  5. Borjas, George J. and Monras, Joan (2017). “The labour market consequences of refugee supply shocks.” Economic Policy 32(91): 361-413.Google Scholar
  6. Card, David (2001). “Immigrant inflows, native outflows, and the local labor market impacts of higher immigration.” Journal of Labor Economics 19(1): 22-64.Google Scholar
  7. Card, David (2005). “Is the new immigration really so bad?” Economic Journal 115(507): F300-F323.Google Scholar
  8. Card, David, Mas, Alexandre, Moretti, Enrico, and Saez, Emmanuel (2012). “Inequality at work: The effect of peer salaries on job satisfaction.” American Economic Review 102(6): 2981-3003.Google Scholar
  9. Cohen-Goldner, Sarit and Paserman, M. Daniele (2011). “The dynamic impact of immigration on natives’ labor market outcomes: Evidence from Israel.” European Economic Review 55(8): 1027-1045.Google Scholar
  10. Cohn, Alain, Fehr, Ernst, Herrmann, Benedikt, and Schneider, Frédéric (2014). “Social comparison and effort provision: Evidence from a field experiment.” Journal of the European Economic Association 12(4): 877-898.Google Scholar
  11. Council of the EU (2018). “European Council conclusions, 28 June 2018,” Press Release 421/18, 29/06/2018.Google Scholar
  12. Dustmann, Christian, Frattini, Tommaso, and Preston, Ian P. (2013). “The effect of immigration along the distribution of wages.” Review of Economic Studies 80(1): 145-173.Google Scholar
  13. Fan, C. Simon and Stark, Oded (2011). “A theory of migration as a response to occupational stigma.” International Economic Review 52(2): 549-571.Google Scholar
  14. Fliessbach, Klaus, Weber, Bernd, Trautner, Peter, Dohmen, Thomas, Sunde, Uwe, Elger, Christian E., and Falk, Armin (2007). “Social comparison affects reward-related brain activity in the human ventral striatum.” Science 318(5854): 1305-1308.Google Scholar
  15. Foged, Mette and Peri, Giovanni (2016). “Immigrants’ effect on native workers: New analysis on longitudinal data.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 8(2): 1-34.Google Scholar
  16. Frey, Bruno S. and Stutzer, Alois (2002). Happiness and Economics: How the Economy and Institutions Affect Human Well-being. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Goerke, Laszlo and Pannenberg, Markus (2015). “Direct evidence for income comparisons and subjective well-being across reference groups.” Economics Letters 137: 95-101.Google Scholar
  18. Hübschmann, Zuzanna (2015). “Migrant integration programs: The case of Germany.” Global Migration Research Paper no. 11, Global Migration Centre, Geneva.Google Scholar
  19. Kifle, Temesgen (2009). “The effect of immigration on the earnings of native-born workers: Evidence from Australia.” Journal of Socio-Economics 38(2): 350-356.Google Scholar
  20. LaLonde, Robert J. and Topel, Robert H. (1991). “Labor market adjustments to increased immigration.” In Abowd, John M. and Freeman, Richard B. (eds.), Immigration, Trade, and the Labor Market. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 167-199.Google Scholar
  21. Luttmer, Erzo F. P. (2005). “Neighbors as negatives: Relative earnings and well-being.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(3): 963-1002.Google Scholar
  22. Manacorda, Marco, Manning, Alan, and Wadsworth, Jonathan (2012). “The impact of immigration on the structure of male wages: Theory and evidence from Britain.” Journal of the European Economic Association 10(1): 120-151.Google Scholar
  23. Mayda, Anna Maria (2006). “Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants.” Review of Economics and Statistics 88(3): 510-530.Google Scholar
  24. Official Journal of the European Union (2015). Council Decision (EU) 2015/1601 of 22 September 2015 establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece, OJ L 248, 24.9.2015: 80-94.Google Scholar
  25. Ruiz, Isabel and Vargas-Silva, Carlos (2018). “Differences in labour market outcomes between natives, refugees and other migrants in the UK.” Journal of Economic Geography 18(4): 855-885.Google Scholar
  26. Stark, Oded (2013). “Stressful integration.” European Economic Review 63: 1-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stark, Oded, Bielawski, Jakub, and Falniowski, Fryderyk (2017). “A class of proximity-sensitive measures of relative deprivation.” Economics Letters 160: 105-110.Google Scholar
  28. Stark, Oded, Bielawski, Jakub, and Jakubek, Marcin (2015). “The impact of the assimilation of migrants on the well-being of native inhabitants: A theory.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 111: 71-78.Google Scholar
  29. Stark, Oded and Fan, C. Simon (2011). “Migration for degrading work as an escape from humiliation.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 77(3): 241-247.Google Scholar
  30. Stark, Oded and Hyll, Walter (2011). “On the economic architecture of the workplace: Repercussions of social comparisons among heterogeneous workers.” Journal of Labor Economics 29(2): 349-375.Google Scholar
  31. Stark, Oded, Hyll, Walter, and Wang, Yong (2012). “Endogenous selection of comparison groups, human capital formation, and tax policy.” Economica 79(313): 62-75.Google Scholar
  32. Stark, Oded and Taylor, J. Edward (1991). “Migration incentives, migration types: The role of relative deprivation.” Economic Journal 101(408): 1163-1178.Google Scholar
  33. Takahashi, Hidehiko, Kato, Motoichiro, Matsuura, Masato, Mobbs, Dean, Suhara, Tetsuya, and Okubo, Yoshiro (2009). “When your gain is my pain and your pain is my gain: Neural correlates of envy and schadenfreude.” Science 323(5916): 937-939.Google Scholar
  34. Walker, Iain and Smith, Heather J. (2002). Relative Deprivation: Specification, Development, and Integration. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Zizzo, Daniel J. and Oswald, Andrew J. (2001). “Are people willing to pay to reduce others’ incomes?” Annales d’Economie et de Statistique 63-64: 39-65.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kiel Institute 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oded Stark
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Marcin Jakubek
    • 2
  • Krzysztof Szczygielski
    • 3
  1. 1.ZEF, University of BonnBonnGermany
  2. 2.Institute of EconomicsPolish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland
  3. 3.University of WarsawWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations