Early sympathetic neural responses during a cold pressor test linked to pain perception
- 30 Downloads
There is considerable interindividual variability in the perception of pain. Given that pain management is a major public health problem, gaining insight into the underlying physiology of these perceptual differences is important. We tested the hypothesis that when interindividual variability in initial muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) responses to a cold pressor test (CPT) is identified, the divergent responses will be linked to differences in pain perception in healthy young men and women.
In the supine position, blood pressure (BP) and MSNA were measured at baseline and during a 2-min CPT. Immediately following the CPT, pain was rated (range 0–10).
Two groups were established: positive responders (Pos, n = 12) and negative responders (Neg, n = 12) based on the initial (first 30 s) MSNA response profiles (Pos: 12 ± 9, Neg: −3 ± 3 bursts/min, P < 0.0001). MSNA response profiles throughout the CPT were different between groups (P < 0.0001). Peak MSNA increases were different (Pos: 27 ± 11, Neg: 9 ± 5 bursts/min, P < 0.0001) and corresponded with initial MSNA responses (R2 = 0.6881, P < 0.0001). Blood pressure responses were also different throughout the CPT (P < 0.0001). Most importantly, the perception of pain induced by the CPT was different between the two groups (Pos: 8 ± 1, Neg: 4 ± 1, P < 0.0001).
The results indicate that in healthy young men and women, there are divergent initial sympathetic neural responses to a given painful stimulus that are linked to the magnitude of pain perception. These findings highlight the distinctive sympathetic patterns that may contribute to the considerable interindividual variability in the perception of pain.
KeywordsPain Blood pressure Muscle sympathetic nerve activity Individual differences
We are grateful to the study volunteers for their participation. This study was supported, in part, by an AHA Grant-In-Aid (13GRNT16990064), the Harry S. Moss Heart Trust, and Department of Defense—US Army grant (W81XWH1820012). JPM was supported by a British Heart Foundation Travel Fellowship.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
None of the authors have any financial or personal conflict of interest to disclose.
- 7.Burns JW, Quartana PJ, Bruehl S, Janssen I, Dugan SA, Appelhans B, Matthews KA, Kravitz HM (2015) Chronic pain, body mass index and cardiovascular disease risk factors: tests of moderation, unique and shared relationships in the study of women’s health across the nation (SWAN). J Behav Med 38:372–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Carroll D, Davey Smith G, Sheffield D, Willemsen G, Sweetnam PM, Gallacher JE, Elwood PC (1996) Blood pressure reactions to the cold pressor test and the prediction of future blood pressure status: data from the Caerphilly study. J Hum Hypertens 10:777–780Google Scholar
- 25.van Hecke O, Hocking L, Torrance N (2017) Chronic pain, depression and cardiovascular disease linked through a shared genetic predisposition: analysis of a family-based cohort and twin study. PloS One 12:1–19Google Scholar
- 27.Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Advancing Pain Research, Care, and Education. Relieving pain in America: a blueprint for transforming prevention, care, education, and research [Online]. National Academies Press (US). http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK91497/. Accessed 30 Aug 2017
- 33.Maixner W, Gracely RH, Zuniga JR, Humphrey CB, Bloodworth GR (1990) Cardiovascular and sensory responses to forearm ischemia and dynamic hand exercise. Am J Physiol 259:R1156–R1163Google Scholar
- 52.Swieboda P, Filip R, Prystupa A, Drozd M (2013) Assessment of pain: types, mechanism and treatment. Ann Agric Environ Med AAEM Spec 1:2–7Google Scholar
- 53.Thomas CB, Duszynski KR (1982) Blood pressure levels in young adulthood as predictors of hypertension and the fate of the cold pressor test. Johns Hopkins Med J 151:93–100Google Scholar