Advertisement

Classification of Aortic Dissection and Rupture on Post-contrast CT Images Using a Convolutional Neural Network

  • Robert J. HarrisEmail author
  • Shwan Kim
  • Jerry Lohr
  • Steve Towey
  • Zeljko Velichkovich
  • Tim Kabachenko
  • Ian Driscoll
  • Brian Baker
Article

Abstract

Aortic dissections and ruptures are life-threatening injuries that must be immediately treated. Our national radiology practice receives dozens of these cases each month, but no automated process is currently available to check for critical pathologies before the images are opened by a radiologist. In this project, we developed a convolutional neural network model trained on aortic dissection and rupture data to assess the likelihood of these pathologies being present in prospective patients. This aortic injury model was used for study prioritization over the course of 4 weeks and model results were compared with clinicians’ reports to determine accuracy metrics. The model obtained a sensitivity and specificity of 87.8% and 96.0% for aortic dissection and 100% and 96.0% for aortic rupture. We observed a median reduction of 395 s in the time between study intake and radiologist review for studies that were prioritized by this model. False-positive and false-negative data were also collected for retraining to provide further improvements in subsequent versions of the model. The methodology described here can be applied to a number of modalities and pathologies moving forward.

Keywords

Aortic Dissection Rupture Convolutional neural network Machine learning 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Criado FJ: Aortic dissection: a 250-year perspective. Texas Hear. Inst. J., 2011Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    De León Ayala IA, Chen YF: Acute aortic dissection: An update. Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences., 2012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. A. J. DeBakey ME, Henly MS, Cooley DA, Morris GC Jr, Crawford EW, “Surgical Management of Dissection Aneurysms of the Aorta,” J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, vol. Jan, no. 49, pp. 130–149, 1965.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sebastià C, Pallisa E, Quiroga S, Alvarez-Castells A, Dominguez R, Evangelista A: Aortic Dissection: Diagnosis and Follow-up with Helical CT. RadioGraphics 2013Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Assar AN, Zarins CK: Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: A surgical emergency with many clinical presentations. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 85:268–273, 2009CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. G. Jianning Li, Long Cao, Yangyang Ge, Cheng W, Bowen M, “Multi-Task Deep Convolutional Neural Network for the Segmentation of Type B Aortic Dissection,” 2018.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever, and G. E. Hinton, “ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks,” 2012.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J: Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2016Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chang PD, Kuoy E, Grinband J, Weinberg BD, Thompson M, Homo R, Chen J, Abcede H, Shafie M, Sugrue L, Filippi CG, Su MY, Yu W, Hess C, Chow D: Hybrid 3D/2D convolutional neural network for hemorrhage evaluation on head CT. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 39:1609–1616, 2018CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Virtual RadiologicEden PrairieUSA

Personalised recommendations