Advertisement

Journal of Digital Imaging

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 841–848 | Cite as

Remote Real-Time Ultrasound Supervision via Commercially Available and Low-Cost Tele-Ultrasound: a Mixed Methods Study of the Practical Feasibility and Users’ Acceptability in an Emergency Department

  • Stig Holm JensenEmail author
  • Iben Duvald
  • Rasmus Aagaard
  • Stine Catharina Primdahl
  • Poul Petersen
  • Hans Kirkegaard
  • Jesper Weile
Article

Abstract

Minor emergency departments (ED) struggle to access sufficient expertise to supervise learners of lung and cardiac point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Using tele-ultrasound (tele-US) for remote supervision may remedy this situation. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of real-time supervision via tele-US when applied to an everyday ED clinic. We conducted a mixed methods study that assessed practical feasibility, determined performance, and explored users’ acceptability of supervision via tele-US. Technical performance was assessed quantitatively by the ratio in mean gray value between images on site and as received by the supervisor, and by after-compression frame rate. Qualitatively, 12 exploratory semi-structured interviews were conducted with exposed junior doctors and supervisors. Remote supervision via tele-US was performed with 10 junior doctors scanning 45 included patients. During performance assessment, neither alternating internet connection nor software significantly changed the mean gray value ratio. The lowest median frame rate of 4.6 (interquartile range [IQR]: 3.1–5.0) was found by using a 4G internet connection; the highest of 28.5 (IQR: 28.5–29.0) was found with alternative computer and local area network internet connection. In interviews, supervisors stressed the importance of preserving frame rate, and junior doctors emphasized a need for shared ultrasound terminology. In the qualitative analysis, setup mobility, accessibility, and time consumption were emphasized as being of key importance for future clinical implementations. Remote supervision via a commercially available and low-cost tele-US setup is operational for both junior doctors and supervisors when applied to lung and cardiac POCUS scans of hospitalized patients.

Keywords

Point-of-care ultrasound Tele-ultrasound 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Emergency Department, Regional Hospital West Jutland and doctors and patients participating in the study. The authors especially want to thank Professor Bo Løfgren and Associate Professor Lars Bolvig for participation in project discussions.

Author Contribution

All authors contributed in the planning of the work described. SHJ, RA, and JW conducted the quantitative data collection, and SHJ and ID conducted the qualitative data collection. SHJ, ID, and JW analyzed and interpreted the results. All authors critically revised the content and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Holger & Ruth Hesse’s Mindefond and the Knud og Edith Eriksens Mindefond. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analyses, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. This research was not sponsored by any company. None of the authors have any financial relationship with Apple; Lenovo; MM Vision; Visicom Media; Logitech; GE Healthcare; Marshall; Epiphan Video; Skype; National Institutes of Health, USA; Ookla; or any of their products. The authors have full control of data.

Supplementary material

10278_2018_157_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (79 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 79 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Labovitz AJ, Noble VE, Bierig M, Goldstein SA, Jones R, Kort S, Porter TR, Spencer KT, Tayal VS, Wei K: Focused Cardiac Ultrasound in the Emergent Setting: A Consensus Statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23(12):1225–1230, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    International Liaison Committee on Lung Ultrasound for the International Consensus Conference on Lung U, Volpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G et al.: International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med 38(4):577–591, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moore CL, Copel JA: Point-of-care ultrasonography. N Engl J Med 364(8):749–757, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirkpatrick AW, McKee I, McKee JL, Ma I, McBeth PB, Roberts DJ et al.: Remote just-in-time telementored trauma ultrasound: a double-factorial randomized controlled trial examining fluid detection and remote knobology control through an ultrasound graphic user interface display. Am J Surg 211(5):894–902 e1, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dyer D, Cusden J, Turner C, Boyd J, Hall R, Lautner D, Hamilton DR, Shepherd L, Dunham M, Bigras A, Bigras G, McBeth P, Kirkpatrick AW: The clinical and technical evaluation of a remote telementored telesonography system during the acute resuscitation and transfer of the injured patient. J Trauma 65(6):1209–1216, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zennaro F, Neri E, Nappi F, Grosso D, Triunfo R, Cabras F, Frexia F, Norbedo S, Guastalla P, Gregori M, Cattaruzzi E, Sanabor D, Barbi E, Lazzerini M: Real-Time Tele-Mentored Low Cost “Point-of-Care US” in the Hands of Paediatricians in the Emergency Department: Diagnostic Accuracy Compared to Expert Radiologists. PLoS One 11(10):e0164539, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J: The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy 13(2):92–98, 2008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Popov V, Popov D, Kacar I, Harris RD: The feasibility of real-time transmission of sonographic images from a remote location over low-bandwidth Internet links: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(3):W219–W222, 2007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW: NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Meth 9(7):671–675, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kvale S, Brinkmann S: InterViews : learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing, 2nd edition, Vol. xviii. Los Angeles: Sage Publications, 2009, 354 pGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    McBeth PB, Hamilton T, Kirkpatrick AW: Cost-effective remote iPhone-teathered telementored trauma telesonography. J Trauma 69(6):1597–1599, 2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boniface KS, Shokoohi H, Smith ER, Scantlebury K: Tele-ultrasound and paramedics: real-time remote physician guidance of the Focused Assessment With Sonography for Trauma examination. Am J Emerg Med 29(5):477–481, 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    McBeth P, Crawford I, Tiruta C, Xiao Z, Zhu GQ, Shuster M, Sewell L, Panebianco N, Lautner D, Nicolaou S, Ball CG, Blaivas M, Dente CJ, Wyrzykowski AD, Kirkpatrick AW: Help is in your pocket: the potential accuracy of smartphone- and laptop-based remotely guided resuscitative telesonography. Telemed J E Health 19(12):924–930, 2013CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Imaging Informatics in Medicine 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Emergency DepartmentRegional Hospital West JutlandHerningDenmark
  2. 2.Research Center for Emergency Medicine, Department of Clinical MedicineAarhus UniversityAarhus NDenmark
  3. 3.Interdisciplinary Centre for Organizational Architecture (ICOA), Business and Social SciencesAarhus UniversityAarhusDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Business Development and Technology, Business and Social SciencesAarhus UniversityHerningDenmark
  5. 5.Department of Internal MedicineRegional Hospital RandersRandersDenmark

Personalised recommendations