Advertisement

Odontology

pp 1–7 | Cite as

Consumption of snacks and dental caries among Finnish young men: a cross-sectional epidemiological study

  • Tarja TannerEmail author
  • Laura Harju
  • Jari Päkkilä
  • Pertti Patinen
  • Leo Tjäderhane
  • Vuokko Anttonen
Open Access
Original Article
  • 97 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of consumption of snack products, as well as the association between snacking and restorative treatment need, and associated factors among a healthy Finnish male population. Approximately 8500 conscripts answered a computer-based questionnaire covering their snacking habits and other health behaviours. Restorative treatment need and history (DT, DMFT) were examined by trained and calibrated dentists. Cross-tabulations were used to investigate the associations between snacking habits and the other researched variables, and logistic regression analyses (odds ratio and 95% confidence interval) were used to investigate the variables influencing the restorative treatment need. In the present study, almost one-third of the study group consumed snack products daily, most often fizzy and energy drinks. Only 10% had received a diet counselling. The most common situations involving snacking were at the cinema and while playing computer games. According to Pearson’s Chi square test, snacking was associated with smoking and snuffing and infrequent tooth brushing (p < 0.001). According to the regression analyses, daily snacking, smoking, and doing exercise daily increased the odds for restorative treatment need whereas higher education level and tooth brushing twice or more often per day decreased the odds for restorative treatment need. It can be concluded that daily snacking is common among Finnish young men and is associated with restorative treatment need. Snacking is also associated with other harmful oral and general health habits. Individual dietary counselling should be routinely offered to everybody in dental clinics.

Keywords

Dental caries Diet counselling Health behaviour Physical exercise Snacking 

Introduction

Over the past 15 years, the sales of chocolate and sweets have increased in Finland, although at the same time the sales of sugar have remained steady. In 2005, the total import of chocolate and sweets were approximately 135MEur, while in 2016, the respective figure was 221 MEur [1].

Especially adolescents and young adults snack several times daily [2, 3]. Typical snacks in Finland include sweets, fizzy drinks, crisps, and light meals (such as bread, porridge, muesli) [4]. In recent decades, an increasing proportion of daily energy intake has been received from snacks. Hoppu et al. [2] have reported that up to 41% of daily energy intake of Finnish adolescents originates from sugary snacks and drinks, which is more than from any daily meal. Sugar-sweetened juice, soft drinks, and sweets are the most common sources of sucrose among Finnish adults [5]. The frequency of the intake of free sugars or sugar in food plays a significant role in the development of dental caries lesions [6]. Recently, the same has also been shown to be true for the total sugar intake [7, 8], especially when combined with poor oral hygiene. Recent literature on dietary patterns, including snacking in association with oral health, is scarce.

Demineralisation of enamel and dentine is caused by bacteria in dental plaque [9]. Oral bacteria can ferment all common mono- and disaccharides, together with hydrolysed polysaccharide starch. Therefore, these carbohydrates are potentially cariogenic [10]. Even though the amount of sugar in diet is an important risk factor for dental caries, its cariogenic influence can be decreased using fluoride tooth paste [8, 11], having a good oral hygiene and balanced diet, and decreasing the consumption of high-sugar snacks between the main meals [12]. Harmful dietary habits and low tooth brushing frequency are both associated with caries experience [6, 13].

Although the prevalence of dental caries has significantly decreased in the industrialised countries during past decades, this trend has shown signs of reversing [14], particularly in terms of childhood caries [15]. A previous study from Finland also suggests a stagnation in the improvement of the cariological status among young males [16].

In Finland, military service is obligatory for men, and voluntary for women, under 28 years old, except if they have a physical or mental disability preventing the service [17]. Because 80% of men in each age cohort complete their service, the mandatory military service has provided an excellent opportunity in the past decades for epidemiological studies among young men.

Our hypothesis was that most young Finnish men snack daily and snacking is associated with both harmful health behaviours such as less frequent tooth brushing, smoking and snuffing, as well as favourable behaviours like high physical exercise activity. Another hypothesis was that the daily snacking is associated with both caries experience and restorative treatment need. The aim of this study was to investigate the prevalence of frequent snacking which is associated with both general and oral health.

Methods

The calibration procedure, study protocol, study population, and questionnaire have been described in detail in previously published articles [16, 18, 19]. The study population comprised Finnish male and female conscripts born in 1990, 1991, and 1992 (mean age 19.6 years). A total of 8545 conscripts were requested to answer a computer-assisted questionnaire. Due to limited time, not everyone had an opportunity to answer the questionnaire [19]. In the questionnaire the response rate varied slightly between the questions (range from 8537 to 8545).

The following questions were used in the analyses: During the past 6 months, how often have you: Exercised or done sports?/Been to the movies, theatre, or sports events or played music or read?/Spent time with friends, played with friends?/Been to bars or pubs?/Watched TV or played computer games?/Been outdoors in the nature or gone fishing or hunting?/Done handicrafts (woodwork, metal work, painting)?/Done motor sports (car, motor cycle)?); How often do you eat/drink the following snacks: sweets/chocolate/crisps/fizzy drinks/energy drinks/sports drinks?; How often do you consume snack products in the following situations: commuting to school/work, at school/work, commuting from school/work to home, at home, playing computer/other devices, watching television/videos/films, reading books/magazines, spending time with friends, exercising, doing other activities?; How often do you use xylitol chewing gum?; Answers for previous questions contained three options: Never or hardly ever/Every day or almost every day/Occasionally during the week. In addition, following questions were asked: What is your education? (comprehensive school/vocational school/university of applied sciences/vocational school and matriculation exam or upper secondary school/matriculation exam or upper secondary school/college or university/other); How often do you brush your teeth? (never or hardly ever/occasionally/every day). For those who reported brushing their teeth every day, an additional question was asked: How many times a day do you brush your teeth? (once a day/twice a day/more often than twice a day); Have you received individual diet counselling? (yes/no). The final three questions were: Do you smoke? (no/1–5 cigarettes daily/10–20 cigarettes daily/> 20 cigarettes daily); Do you use snuff?; How often have you exercised during the past 6 months?. For the questions concerning the use of snuff and physical exercise the options were: Never or hardly ever/Every day or almost every day/Occasionally.

Clinical information was collected from the outcome of oral health screenings carried out on 13,564 Finnish male conscripts who entered military service in 2011. Because of the low number of female conscripts (n = 255), females were excluded from the final analyses. The oral health screening was performed as a part of the obligatory general health inspection during the conscripts’ first 2 weeks in the military service. There were no refusals to participate, as the clinical examination was obligatory. A representative sample of the 2011 batch of conscripts was achieved by examining all the conscripts in a total of 15 garrisons and every fifth conscript in the alphabetical order in the five largest garrisons. The dentists were trained and calibrated in two full-day sessions in November 2010 and June 2011. The inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement regarding the teeth treatment need were determined for both sessions separately [16]. Caries experience was indicated by the mean DMFT (number of decayed, filled and missing teeth due to dental caries). The DT value represented the need for restorative treatment (both primary and secondary caries lesions). Third molars were excluded from all the analyses.

For statistical regression modelling, the DT value was used as the response variable. It was dichotomised as follows: DT = 0 or DT > 0. To enable analysing the subjects’ snacking habits, the responses to the questions concerning snacking (How often do you eat/drink the following snacks: sweets/chocolate/crisps/fizzy drinks/energy drinks/sports drinks?) were collated and categorised as follows: those who consumed at least one snack product every day or almost every day and those who did not report regular snacking. The confounding variables were categorised as follows: non-smokers and those smoking at least one cigarette daily and non-snuffers and those using snuff at least occasionally during the week. Those who use xylitol chewing gum every day or almost every day and those who did not report regular use. The responses to the two questions dealing with tooth brushing were combined and categorised in two different ways: first, they were categorised into those brushing their teeth less often than once a day, once a day or twice or more often per day, and then to those brushing their teeth twice or more often per day and the rest. The education level was dichotomised into vocational school and the rest. The daily exercise activity was dichotomised into those exercising daily or almost every day and the rest, and individual health promotion was dichotomised as yes or no.

Cross-tabulation was used to analyse the association between snacking habits and other health behaviours such as exercise activity, tooth brushing frequency, smoking or snuffing, individual health promotion (Have you received individual diet counselling? yes/no), education level, and language of the home municipality. Pearson’s Chi square test was used to study the statistical significance between the groups. Statistical significance was determined at p value < 0.05. The binary logistic regression analysis (adjusted, OR, 95% CI) was used for analysing the association between restorative treatment need (DT = 0, DT > 0) and snacking habits and other health behaviours. The mean (SD) DT and DMFT values were calculated in association with the dichotomised frequency of daily snacking. All analyses were executed using the SPSS software (versions 23.0, SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL) and R software (version 3.1.2. A language and environment for statistical computing; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, URL; http://www.R-project.org).

Results

Almost one-third (30.0%) of the study group consumed snack products daily. Of these, 63.8% consumed one snack product daily whereas 22.8% consumed two snack products. Of those who reported daily snacking, 73.3% consumed fizzy drinks and 28.8% consumed energy drinks. The respective figures for the entire study population were 22.0% and 8.7%. Among those who reported daily snacking, tooth brushing twice or more often per day was not as common (46.5%) as among the rest of the study population (n = 3317, 55.5%) (p < 0.001) (Table 1a). The educational background of the vocational school was more common among the daily snackers (58.0%) compared to those who did not snack daily (52.0%) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in the conscripts’ daily physical exercise activity between those who consumed snack products daily and those who did not. Approximately 40% of those snacking daily also exercised daily, while the respective figure among the non-snackers was 40.6% (Table 1b).
Table 1

Cross tabulation and Pearson χ2-tests on association between snacking, brushing, and exercise activity among participants

Consumption of snacks %

Teeth brushing

No snack products

At least one snack product daily

p value

(a) n = 8 537

 Less often than once a day

9.3% (555)

12.0% (311)

 

 Once a day

35.2% (2101)

41.4% (1062)

 

 Twice or more per day

55.5% (3317)

46.5% (1191)

< 0.001

 Total

100% (5973)

100% (2564)

 

Consumption of snacks %

Exercise activity

No snack products

At least one snack product daily

p value

(b) n = 8545

 Daily or almost every day

40.6% (2426)

40.4% (1036)

 

 Occasionally

50.5% (3020)

46.0% (1181)

 

 Never or hardly ever

8.9% (532)

13.6% (350)

< 0.001

 Total

100% (5978)

100% (2567)

 

Smoking at least ten cigarettes per day was statistically significantly more common among those snacking at least one snack product daily compared to the subjects who did not report daily snacking (33.4% vs 23.6%; p < 0.001). The subjects who reported daily snacking also reported daily snuffing more often (11.1%) than those who did not snack (8.1%) (p < 0.001).

More than half of the study population had played computer games or watched television daily during the past 6 months. However, spending time with friends and going to movies, theatre or sports events, playing music or reading were even more common activities (Fig. 1a). Snack products were most commonly consumed while watching a film at the cinema (Fig. 1b). The majority (89.5%) of the study population brushed their teeth every day or almost every day, and 73.5% of them used xylitol chewing gum. Only about one-tenth (12.2%) had received an individual counselling on dietary issues.
Fig. 1

a Distribution of activities which conscripts have done every day or almost every day during the past 6 months. b Prevalence of daily snacking during the activities which conscripts have done during the past 6 months

The prevalence of restorative treatment need was statistically significantly (p < 0.001) higher among the conscripts who consumed snacks regularly (52.5%) compared to those who did not (45.0%) (Table 2). Consumption of xylitol chewing gum daily, again, was less common among those with restorative treatment need (18.5%) than the rest (22.9%) (p < 0.001).
Table 2

Distribution of restorative treatment need and mean DT/DMFT of participants dichotomised according to snacking habits

Group

DT

DMFT

Restorative treatment need of participants n (%)

Mean (SD)

Mean (SD)

Yes

No

At least one snack product daily or almost every day (29.8%)

1.83 (3.00)

4.90 (4.62)

1347 (52.5%)

1220 (47.5%)

No snack products daily (70.2%)

1.35 (2.38)

3.99 (4.05)

2 689 (45.0%)

3 289 (55.0%)

p value

< 0.001

< 0.001

 

< 0.001

Tests used: independent sample t tests and cross-tabulation and Pearson’s Chi square tests (n = 8545)

According to the logistic regression analysis, daily consumption of snacks and smoking significantly increased the odds for restorative treatment need, while brushing teeth twice a day and a higher education level decreased the odds (Table 3).
Table 3

Adjusted logistic regression analysis on association between explanatory variables and restorative treatment need (DT > 0)

Snacking

  

No snack products

1

 

At least one snack product daily

1.19

(1.07, 1.32)

Tooth brushing

Less often than twice a day

1

 

Twice or more often per day

0.80

(0.73, 0.88)

Education

Vocational school

1

 

Matriculation exam or upper secondary school or other

0.56

(0.51, 0.62)

Individual health promotion on healthy diet

Yes

1

 

No

0.90

(0.78, 1.03)

Smoking

No

1

 

Yes

1.63

(1.47, 1.81)

Snuffing

No

1

 

Yes

1.02

(0.91, 1.15)

Exercise activity

Other

1

 

Daily

1.09

(0.99, 1.20)

Xylitol chewing gum

No

1

 

Yes

0.89

(0.76, 1.03)

Discussion

Finnish young men seem to snack frequently, for instance, while playing computer games. Fizzy and energy drinks are common snack products consumed. As hypothesized, snacking is associated with both smoking and snuffing, but against our hypothesis not with physical activity. Regular snacking is associated with restorative treatment need and history.

In a Swedish study by Bruno-Ambrosius et al. [20], approximately 20% of the subjects consumed sweet snacks daily or almost every day, which is in line with our results. Some other studies have also received similar results concerning snacking frequency [3, 21]. In our study, daily consumption of sweets was reported by almost 7%, which is somewhat higher than in a recent Finnish school oral health survey [22], when 5% of vocational school-aged boys reported consuming sweets or chocolate daily. Surprisingly, although, almost a third of the study population consumed snacks daily and a half had restorative treatment need [16], only 10% of the subjects had received dietary counselling.

Snacking seems to be associated with other harmful health behaviours such as smoking and snuffing. In addition, those who report brushing their teeth less frequently snack more often. In the present study, there was no association between snacking and high activity of physical exercise, which is contradictory with results from a study on young athletes [23]. However, there was a light association between high physical exercise activity and restorative treatment need.

In the present study, approximately one-tenth of the study population reported daily consumption of energy drinks. Similar results were found in a recent Finnish study [22], in which 8% of men in vocational school reported consuming energy drinks daily or almost daily. The respective figure for men in upper secondary school (i.e. the Finnish equivalent of American high school) was 2%. This supports our finding that the lower educational background is associated with snacking. The reason for that is not known. Perhaps good cognitive skills due to a higher educational background can also protect against unhealthy behaviours such as snacking, but also with snuffing and smoking [18].

According to a recent Swedish study [24], regular consumption of fizzy drinks is associated with poor oral health and an unhealthy lifestyle per se. In this study, the DMFT and DT values were significantly higher among the conscripts who consumed at least one snack product daily and the tooth brushing frequency was low. Our results concerning the association between caries indices and associated factors are supported by existing literature. Akarslan et al. [6] have found a similar correlation between the DMFT index and snacking frequency. However, contrary to our study, they found no significant association between snacking habits and tooth brushing frequency [6]. Sabbah et al. [25] have found an association between the DMFT and DT values and lower education level, which was true here as well. This outcome is also supported by Nguyen et al. [26], who reported that the dental caries is negatively associated with education and healthy diet. Previous studies have found differences in the oral health behaviour [6, 23], caries prevalence [25], and associated factors [26] between males and females, which could not be studied here due to the limited number of females in the study population.

Dental caries is a significant public health problem among Finnish young men, as almost half of the young men have at least one tooth needing restorative treatment and only around 20% are completely caries free [16]. One reason may be that this age group have lived their teens in time when snacking and consumption of fizzy drinks have increasingly replaced regular meals [27]. Bernabe et al. [8] have reported that the frequency of sugar consumption and the amount of consumed sugars are associated with dental caries in Finnish adults, which supports our results. Sheiham et al. [7] have also reported a similar link between sugar consumption and caries.

An interesting and alarming finding of this study is that only a small proportion of the conscripts had received individual dietary counselling. Reasons for this can only be speculated. In Finland, not everyone routinely visits dental hygienists, who are specialists in health promotion in the field of public dental care. It is also possible that the dentists are not used to give diet counselling or even referring the patient to oral hygienist for this. The dentists may even consider an individual dietary counselling outside the scope of their job description. They may not be aware of new methods for oral health promotion like motivational interviewing which is an effective way to motivate adolescents to improve their poor dietary and oral hygiene behaviours [28]. Health promotion may also be challenging. According to a study by Stokes et al. [29], even if young people are aware of the risk factors threatening their oral health, they may not consider changing their health behaviour as important. Perhaps, these young people live more in the present without thinking about the potential consequences of their choices and behaviours in future.

The strength of this study is large and representative study population was born in the early 1990s in Finland. Investigating the variety of different background variables associated with snacking and oral health can also be considered advantageous for this study. However, not everyone had a chance to answer the computer-based questionnaire due to time constraints in the health examinations of the defence forces. Therefore, the response rate was lower than the number of participants in the clinical screening. The number of responses also varied slightly between the questions. These can be considered as a shortcoming of this study. The study was performed during the conscripts’ first two weeks of military service. Therefore, it can be assumed that the military service had not yet influenced the conscripts’ health behaviour and they could also recall behaviours in civil life. It would have been valuable if the questions about the snacking habits had been more precise, such as questions about the frequency of snacking per day. Another weakness was the limited number of female conscripts, which meant that all the results concerning females had to be excluded from the analyses. A cross-sectional study can only provide a snapshot of conscripts’ health habits and association, which makes it impossible to draw cause–effect conclusions about the association between snacking and dental caries.

It can be concluded that daily snacking is common and associates with other harmful health behaviours and restorative treatment need among Finnish conscripts. Individual dietary counselling should be routinely offered as part of dental treatment and especially caries controlling in dental clinics. This could be beneficial for general health as well.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Open access funding provided by University of Oulu including Oulu University Hospital. We acknowledge the dental staff at the dental clinics of the Finnish Defense Forces for their great collaboration and work in conducting the field survey and collecting data.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Tarja Tanner, Laura Harju, Jari Päkkilä, Pertti Patinen, Leo Tjäderhane, and Vuokko Anttonen. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Tarja Tanner and Laura Harju and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethical Committee of the Northern Ostrobothnia Hospital District (a positive statement on the plan on 29 March 2010), The Centre for Military Medicine and the Finnish Defence Forces (AG14218/23 June 2010) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Regarding the ethical approvals, the conscripts gave their consent to use their patient records by answering the voluntary computer-assisted questionnaire.

References

  1. 1.
    Forkful of facts. Finnish Food Industry Statistics. https://www.ruokatieto.fi/sites/default/files/Flash/tietohaarukka_2018_englanti.pdf. Accessed Nov 2019.
  2. 2.
    Hoppu U, Lehtisalo J, Tapanainen H, Pietinen P. Dietary habits and nutrient intake of Finnish adolescents. Public Health Nutr. 2010;13:965–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ovaskainen M-L, Tapanainen H, Pakkala H. Changes in the contribution of snacks to the daily energy intake of Finnish adults. Appetite. 2010;54:623–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ovaskainen M-L, Reinivuo H, Tapanainen H, Hannila M-L, Korhonen T, Pakkala H. Snacks as an element of energy intake and food consumption. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006;60:494–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Paturi M, Tapanainen H, Reinivuo H, Pietinen P (eds). The National FINDIET 2007 Survey Publications of the National Public Health Institute B23/2008 (in Finnish with an English summary). http://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/78088/2008b23.pdf. Accessed Nov 2019.
  6. 6.
    Akarslan ZZ, Sadik B, Sadik E, Erten H. Dietary habits and oral health related behaviors in relation to DMFT indexes of a group of young adult patients attending a dental school. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2008;13:E800–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sheiham A, James WP. A reappraisal of the quantitative relationship between sugar intake and dental caries: the need for new criteria for developing goals for sugar intake. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:863.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-14-863.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernabé E, Vehkalahti MM, Sheiham A, Lundqvist A, Suominen AL. The shape of the dose-response relationship between sugars and caries in adults. J Dent Res. 2016;95:167–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moynihan P, Petersen PE. Diet, nutrition and the prevention of dental diseases. Public Health Nutr. 2004;7:201–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van Loveren C, Lingström P. Diet and dental caries. In: Fejerskov O, Nyvad B, Kidd E, editors. Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. 3rd ed. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell; 2015. p. 136–7.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Duggal MS, Toumba KJ, Amaechi BT, Kowash MB, Higham SM. Enamel demineralization in situ with various frequencies of carbohydrate consumption with and without fluoride toothpaste. J Dent Res. 2001;80:1721–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Touger-Decker R, van Loveren C. Sugars and dental caries. Am J Clin Nutr. 2003;78:881S–92S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Anttonen V, Hausen H, Seppä L, Niinimaa A. Effect of dietary habits on laser fluorescence values of visually sound occlusal surfaces among Finnish schoolchildren. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:124–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kassebaum NJ, Bernabé E, Dahiya M, Bhandari B, Murray CJ, Marcenes W. Global burden of untreated caries: a systematic review and metaregression. J Dent Res. 2015;94(5):650–8.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034515573272.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anil S, Anand PS. Early childhood caries: prevalence, risk factors, and prevention. Front Pediatr. 2017;18(5):157.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2017.00157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tanner T, Kämppi A, Päkkilä J, et al. Prevalence and polarization of dental caries among young, healthy adults: cross-sectional epidemiological study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2013;71:1436–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Siilasmaa R, Ahtisaari M, Ala-Pietilä P et al. Finnish mandatory military service. A report. Ministry of Defense, Helsinki; 2010. ISBN: 978-951-25-2135-7 nid. ISBN: 978-951-25-2136-4 (in Finnish).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Päkkilä J, Anttonen V, Patinen P, et al. Profiling of smokers and snuffers among young Finnish men—cross-sectional epidemiological study. Acta Odontol Scand. 2017;75:577–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Anttonen V, Tanner T, Kämppi A, Päkkilä J, Tjäderhane L, Patinen P. A methodological pilot study on oral health of young, healthy males. Dent Hypotheses. 2012;3:106–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bruno-Ambrosius K, Swanholm G, Twetman S. Eating habits, smoking and toothbrushing in relation to dental caries: a 3-year study in Swedish female teenagers. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2005;15:190–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Freeman R, Heimonen H, Speedy P, Tuutti H. Determinants of cariogenic snacking in adolescents in Belfast and Helsinki. Eur J Oral Sci. 2000;108:504–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    Anttonen V, Kemppainen A, Niinimaa A, Pesonen P, Tjäderhane L, Laitinen J. Dietary and oral hygiene habits of active athletes and adolescents attending ordinary junior high schools. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2014;24:358–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hasselkvist A, Johansson A, Johansson A-K. Association between soft drink consumption, oral health and some lifestyle factors in Swedish adolescents. Acta Odontol Scand. 2014;72:1039–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sabbah W, Suominen A, Vehkalahti M, Aromaa A, Bernabe E. The role of behaviour in inequality in increments of dental caries among Finnish adults. Caries Res. 2015;49:34–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nguyen L, Häkkinen U, Knuuttila M, Järvelin M-R. Should we brush twice a day? Determinants of dental health among young adults in Finland. Health Econ. 2008;17:267–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Popkin B, Adair L, Ng S. Global nutrition transition and the pandemic of obesity in developing countries. Nutr Rev. 2012;70:3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Wu L, Gao X, Lo ECM, Ho SMY, McGrath C, Wong MCM. Motivational interviewing to promote oral health in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2017;61:378–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stokes E, Ashcroft A, Platt MJ. Determining Liverpool adolescents´ beliefs and attitudes in relation to oral health. Health Educ Res. 2006;21:192–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cariology, Endodontology and Pediatric Dentistry, Research Unit of Oral Health SciencesUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of OuluOuluFinland
  3. 3.Centre for Military MedicineFinnish Defence ForcesRiihimäkiFinland
  4. 4.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial DiseasesUniversity of Helsinki, Helsinki University HospitalHelsinkiFinland
  5. 5.Medical Research UnitOulu University Hospital and University of OuluOuluFinland

Personalised recommendations