The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of thickeners with different levels of thickness on the sizes of particles in food boluses. In medical and nursing care, thickeners are used to make food safe for patients with dysphagia. However, the effect of thickeners on the foods they are added to, especially during swallowing, is still unclear. The bolus particles of 20 healthy volunteers were photographed, and the digital images were used to estimate the sizes of particles in them. Eight test samples with thickeners with different levels of thickness were tested: six grades of thickened carrot juice with raw carrots in it, raw carrot with banana, and raw carrot alone. The particle homogeneity index (HI) and particle size index (SI) just before swallowing were calculated. The viscosities of the liquid part of the test samples were also measured. The number of mastication cycles across the test samples was not significantly different. However, significant differences were found in SI and HI across the test samples: the absolute values of SI and HI tended to rise as the thickness of the test sample increased. The viscosity of the liquid part of the test sample also increased as the thickness increased. The differences in the thickness of food had an influence on the bolus particle sizes just before swallowing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
This study was supported by JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C), Grant number 16K11628.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
van der Bilt A, Engelen L, Pereira L, van der Glas H, Abbink J. Oral physiology and mastication. Physiol Behav. 2006;89:22–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amemiya K, Hisano M, Ishida T, Soma K. Relationship between the flow of bolus and occlusal condition during mastication–computer simulation based on the measurement of characteristics of the bolus. J Oral Rehabil. 2002;29:245–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyron M, Gierczynski I, Hartmann C, Loret C, Dardevet D, Martin N, et al. Role of physical bolus properties as sensory inputs in the trigger of swallowing. PLoS One. 2011;6:e21167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai E, Iizuka T, Kobayashi H. Effect of adding a thickening agent on the properties of minced samples prepared from foods with different physical properties. J Integrat Stud Diet Habits. 2013;23:195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woda A, Mishellany A, Peyron M. The regulation of masticatory function and food bolus formation. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:840–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz J, Lucas P. Swallow thresholds in human mastication. Arch Oral Biol. 1995;40:401–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishellany-Dutour A, Renaud J, Peyron M, Rimek F, Woda A. Is the goal of mastication reached in young dentates, aged dentates and aged denture wearers? Br J Nutr. 2008;99:121–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontijn-Tekamp F, van der Bilt A, Abbink J, Bosman F. Swallowing threshold and masticatory performance in dentate adults. Physiol Behav. 2004;83:431–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hwang J, Kim D, Bae J, Kang S, Seo K, Kim B, et al. The effect of rheological properties of foods on bolus characteristics after mastication. Ann Rehabil Med. 2012;36:776–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugimoto K, Iegami C, Iida S, Naito M, Tamaki R, Minagi S. New image analysis of large food particles can discriminate experimentally suppressed mastication. J Oral Rehabil. 2012;39:405–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen J, Khandelwal N, Liu Z, Funami T. Influences of food hardness on the particle size distribution of food boluses. Arch Oral Biol. 2013;58:293–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen J, Lolivret L. The determining role of bolus rheology in triggering a swallowing. Food Hydrocolloids. 2011;25(3):325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prinz J, Lucas P. An optimization model for mastication and swallowing in mammals. Proc Biol Sci. 1997;264:1715–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hiraoka T, Palmer J, Brodsky M, Yoda M, Inokuchi H, Tsubahara A. Food transit duration is associated with the number of stage II transport cycles when eating solid food. Arch Oral Biol. 2017;81:186–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kano H, Kurogi T, Shimizu T, Nishimura M, Murata H. Viscosity and adhesion strength of cream-type denture adhesives and mouth moisturizers. Dent Mater J. 2012;31(6):960–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loret C, Walter M, Pineau N, Peyron M, Hartmann C, Martin N. Physical and related sensory properties of a swallowable bolus. Physiol Behav. 2011;104:855–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuo K, Palmer J. Anatomy and physiology of feeding and swallowing: normal and abnormal. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008;19(691–707):vii.Google Scholar
Palmer J, Hiiemae K, Matsuo K, Haishima H. Volitional control of food transport and bolus formation during feeding. Physiol Behav. 2007;91:66–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelen L, Fontijn-Tekamp A, van der Bilt A. The influence of product and oral characteristics on swallowing. Arch Oral Biol. 2005;50:739–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishellany A, Woda A, Engineer R, Peyron M. The challenge of mastication: preparing a bolus suitable for deglutition. Dysphagia. 2006;21:87–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Glas H, Kim E, Mustapa A, Elmanaseer W. Selection in mixtures of food particles during oral processing in man. Arch Oral Biol. 2018;85:212–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okada A, Honma M, Nomura S, Yamada Y. Oral behavior from food intake until terminal swallow. Physiol Behav. 2007;90(1):172–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar