Intelligent hybrid model for financial crisis prediction using machine learning techniques

  • J. Uthayakumar
  • Noura MetawaEmail author
  • K. Shankar
  • S. K. Lakshmanaprabu
Original Article


Financial crisis prediction (FCP) plays a vital role in the economic phenomenon. The precise prediction of the number and possibility of failing firms acts as an index of the growth and strength of a nation’s economy. Traditionally, several methods have been presented for effective FCP. On the other hand, the classification performance and prediction accuracy and data legality is not good enough for practical applications. In addition, many of the developed methods perform well for some of the particular dataset but not adaptable to different dataset. Hence, there is a requirement to develop an efficient prediction model for better classification performance and adaptable to diverse dataset. This paper presents a cluster based classification model, comprises of two stages: improved K-means clustering and a fitness-scaling chaotic genetic ant colony algorithm (FSCGACA) based classification model. In the first stage, an improved K-means algorithm is devised to eliminate the wrongly clustered data. Then, a rule-based model is selected to design to fit the given dataset. At the end, FSCGACA is employed for seeking the optimal parameters of the rule-based model. The proposed algorithm is employed to a collection of three benchmark dataset which include qualitative bankruptcy dataset, Weislaw dataset and Polish dataset. A detailed statistical analysis of the dataset is also given. The results analysis ensured that the presented FCP model is superior to other classification model based on the different measures and also found to be more appropriate for diverse dataset.


FCP K-means algorithm Genetic algorithm Ant colony optimization 


  1. Abellán J, Mantas CJ (2014) Improving experimental studies about ensembles of classifiers for bankruptcy prediction and credit scoring. Expert Syst Appl 41(8):3825–3830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ala’raj M, Abbod MF (2016) Classifiers consensus system approach for credit scoring. Knowl Based Syst 104:89–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atiya AF (2001) Bankruptcy prediction for credit risk using neural networks: a survey and new results. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 12(4):929–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chauhan N, Ravi V, Chandra DK (2009) Differential evolution trained wavelet neural networks: application to bankruptcy prediction in banks. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):7659–7665CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen HL et al (2011) An adaptive fuzzy K-nearest neighbor method based on parallel particle swarm optimization for bankruptcy prediction. In: Huang J, Cao L, Srivastava J (eds) Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. Springer, Berlin, pp 249–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Evans R, Pfahringer B, Holmes G (2011) Clustering for classification. In: 2011 7th international conference on information technology in Asia (CITA 11). IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  7. Fedorova E, Gilenko E, Dovzhenko S (2013) Bankruptcy prediction for Russian companies: application of combined classifiers. Expert Syst Appl 40(18):7285–7293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guojun G, Chaoqu M, Jianhong W (2007) Data clustering: theory, algorithm and application, 1st edn. ASA-SIAM, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  9. Kim MJ, Han I (2003) The discovery of experts’ decision rules from qualitative bankruptcy data using genetic algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 25(4):637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Korsunsky AM, Constantinescu A (2006) Work of indentation approach to the analysis of hardness and modulus of thin coatings. Mater Sci Eng A 423(1–2):28–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin VA, Balaji S, Lakshmi TM, Venkatesan VP (2012) An analysis on qualitative bankruptcy prediction using fuzzy ID3 and ant colony optimization algorithm. In: International conference on pattern recognition, informatics and medical engineering, pp 416–421Google Scholar
  12. Martin A, Uthayakumar J, Nadarajan M (2014) Qualitative_Bankruptcy data set. UCI machine learning repository. Accessed 1 Oct 2018
  13. Min JH, Lee Y-C (2005) Bankruptcy prediction using support vector machine with optimal choice of kernel function parameters. Expert Syst Appl 28(4):603–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Naveen N et al (2010) Differential evolution trained radial basis function network: application to bankruptcy prediction in banks. Int J BioInspir Comput 2(3–4):222–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ohlson JA (1980) Financial ratios and the probabilistic prediction of bankruptcy. J Account Res 18:109–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Paramjeet, Ravi V (2011) Bacterial foraging trained wavelet neural networks: application to bankruptcy prediction in banks. Int J Data Anal Tech Strateg 3(3):261–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pietruszkiewicz W (2008) Dynamical systems and nonlinear Kalman filtering applied in classification. In: Proceedings of the 7th IEEE international conference on cybernetic intelligent systems, CIS 2008Google Scholar
  18. Ravi V, Pramodh C (2008) Threshold accepting trained principal component neural network and feature subset selection: application to bankruptcy prediction in banks. Appl Soft Comput 8:1539–1548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ravisankar P, Ravi V (2009) Failure prediction of banks using threshold accepting trained kernel principal component neural network. In: Proceedings of the IEEE world congress on nature & biologically inspired computing, NaBIC 2009Google Scholar
  20. Reddy KN, Ravi V (2013) Differential evolution trained kernel principal component WNN and kernel binary quantile regression: application to banking. Knowl Based Syst 39:45–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sarkar S, Sriram RS (2001) Bayesian models for early warning of bank failures. Manag Sci 47(11):1457–1475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sharma N, Arun N, Ravi V (2013) An ant colony optimisation and Nelder–Mead simplex hybrid algorithm for training neural networks: an application to bankruptcy prediction in banks. Int J Inf Decis Sci 5(2):188–203Google Scholar
  23. Shin K-S, Lee TS, Kim H-J (2005) An application of support vector machines in bankruptcy prediction model. Expert Syst Appl 28(1):127–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sun L, Shenoy PP (2007) Using Bayesian networks for bankruptcy prediction: some methodological issues. Eur J Oper Res 180(2):738–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tkaczyk ER, Mauring K, Tkaczyk AH et al (2008) Control of the blue fluorescent protein with advanced evolutionary pulse shaping. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 376(4):733–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tomczak S (2016) Polish companies bankruptcy data data set. UCI machine learning repository. Accessed 15 Sept 2018
  27. Tsai C-F, Wu J-W (2008) Using neural network ensembles for bankruptcy prediction and credit scoring. Expert Syst Appl 34(4):2639–2649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. ul Hassan E, Zainuddin Z, Nordin S (2017) A review of financial distress prediction models: logistic regression and multivariate discriminant analysis. Indian Pac J Account Finance 1(3):13–23Google Scholar
  29. Vasu M, Ravi V (2011) Bankruptcy prediction in banks by principal component analysis threshold accepting trained wavelet neural network hybrid. In: Proceedings of the international conference on data mining, USAGoogle Scholar
  30. Vieira SM, Sousa JMC, Runkler TA (2010) Two cooperative ant colonies for feature selection using fuzzy models. Expert Syst Appl 37(4):2714–2723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wang Y, Li B, Weise T (2010) Estimation of distribution and differential evolution cooperation for large scale economic load dispatch optimization of power systems. Inf Sci 180(12):2405–2420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. West RC (1985) A factor-analytic approach to bank condition. J Bank Finance 9(2):253–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhang G et al (1999) Artificial neural networks in bankruptcy prediction: general framework and cross-validation analysis. Eur J Oper Res 116(1):16–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang Y, Wu L, Wang S (2011) UCAV path planning based on FSCABC. Information 14(3):687–692Google Scholar
  35. Zhang Y, Wu L, Wang S (2013a) UCAV path planning by fitness-scaling adaptive chaotic particle swarm optimization. Math Probl Eng 2013:9Google Scholar
  36. Zhang Y, Wang S, Ji G (2013b) A rule-based model for bankruptcy prediction based on an improved genetic ant colony algorithm. Math Probl Eng 2013:10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Uthayakumar
    • 1
  • Noura Metawa
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • K. Shankar
    • 4
  • S. K. Lakshmanaprabu
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Computer SciencePondicherry UniversityPuducherryIndia
  2. 2.Faculty of CommerceMansoura UniversityMansouraEgypt
  3. 3.Anderson College of BusinessRegis UniversityDenverUSA
  4. 4.School of ComputingKalasalingam Academy of Research and EducationKrishnankoilIndia
  5. 5.Department of Electronics and Instrumentation EngineeringB. S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and TechnologyChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations