Construction of fast retrieval model of e-commerce supply chain information system based on Bayesian network

  • Le Kang
  • Yeping ChuEmail author
  • Kaijun Leng
  • Inneke Van Nieuwenhuyse
Original Article


Bayesian network is a kind of uncertainty knowledge expression and reasoning tool, and it is an effective means to solve problems in related fields such as information retrieval. Considering the characteristics of e-commerce supply chain supply information and Bayesian network, a cognitive big data analysis method for intelligent information system is designed. The model uses a set of information sample documents to describe the query requirements and the documents to be detected. By calculating the similarity between them, the return results of the general search engine are sorted, thereby retrieving the supply chain supply information required by the user. Through numerical results, the precision of the source information retrieval model based on Bayesian network is also significantly higher than that of the trust network model and the inference network model, and the experimental data shows that the Bayesian network model has better retrieval performance than the trust network model and the inference network model. Therefore, when conducting large-scale e-commerce supply chain supply information collection, Bayesian network-based source information retrieval model is effective.


Fast retrieval model E-commerce supply chain Bayesian network 



  1. Alnemr R, Koenig S, Eymann T et al (2010) Enabling usage control through reputation objects: a discussion on e-commerce and the internet of services environments. J Theor Appl Electron Commer Res 5(2):59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cherkaoui M (2013) A comprehensive model of the effects of online store image on purchase intention in an e-commerce environment. Electron Commer Res 13(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Franklin J (2010) The elements of statistical learning: data mining, inference and prediction. J R Stat Soc 99(466):567Google Scholar
  4. Harris AJL, Hahn U, Madsen JK et al (2016) The appeal to expert opinion: quantitative support for a Bayesian network approach. Cogn Sci 40(6):1496–1533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kaijun L, Ya B, Linbo J, Han-Chi F, Inneke VN (2018) Research on agricultural supply chain system with double chain architecture based on blockchain technology. Future Gener Comput Syst 86:641–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ke Q, Shaofei W, Wang M, Zou Y (2018) Evaluation of developer efficiency based on improved DEA model. Wirel Pers Commun 12(4):3843–3849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leng K, Shi W, Chen J, Lv Z (2015) Design of an I-shaped less-than-truckload cross-dock: a simulation experiment study. Int J Bifurc Chaos 25(14):1152–1165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu M, Qu M, Zhao B (2016) Research and citation analysis of data mining technology based on Bayes algorithm. Mobile Netw Appl 22(3):1–9Google Scholar
  9. Lu H, Setiono R, Liu H (1996) Effective data mining using neural networks. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 8:957–961CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morales C, Moral S (2016) Modeling aircrew information management for estimation of situational awareness using dynamic Bayesian networks. Simul Model Pract Theory 65:93–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pontes HM, Griffiths MD (2017) The development and psychometric evaluation of the internet disorder scale (IDS-15). Addict Behav 64:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Runge J (2015) Quantifying information transfer and mediation along causal pathways in complex systems. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 113(19):8273–8277Google Scholar
  13. Shaofei W, Wang M, Zou Y (2018a) Research on internet information mining based on agent algorithm. Future Gener Comput Syst 86:598–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shaofei W, Wang M, Zou Y (2018b) Sewage information monitoring system based on wireless sensor. Desalin Water Treat 121:73–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith AD (2006) Informational exchanges and dynamics of internet pornography in an e-commerce environment. Int J Bus Innov Res 1(1):170–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stigler SM (1982) Thomas Bayes’s Bayesian inference. J R Stat Soc Ser A (Gen) 145(2):250–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Suzuki J (2016) A theoretical analysis of the BDeu scores in Bayesian network structure learning. Behaviormetrika 1(1):1–20Google Scholar
  18. Vallati C, Mingozzi E, Zonidis N et al (2016) BETaaS: a platform for development and execution of machine-to-machine applications in the internet of things. Wirel Pers Commun Int J 87(3):1071–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wong ML, Lee SY, Leung KS (2005) Using cooperative coevolution for data mining of bayesian networks. Decis Support Syst 38(3):451–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business AdministrationHubei University of EconomicsWuhanChina
  2. 2.National Academy of Economics StrategyChina Academy of Social SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Faculty of Business EconomicsUniversiteit HasseltHasseltBelgium

Personalised recommendations