Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 57–68 | Cite as

Effects of hydration and mineralization on the deformation mechanisms of collagen fibrils in bone at the nanoscale

  • Marco Fielder
  • Arun K. NairEmail author
Original Paper


Bone is a biomaterial with a structural load-bearing function. Investigating the biomechanics of bone at the nanoscale is important in application to tissue engineering, the development of bioinspired materials, and for characterizing factors such as age, trauma, or disease. At the nanoscale, bone is composed of fibrils that are primarily a composite of collagen, apatite crystals (mineral), and water. Though several studies have been done characterizing the mechanics of fibrils, the effects of variation and distribution of water and mineral content in fibril gap and overlap regions are unexplored. We investigate how the deformation mechanisms of collagen fibrils change as a function of mineral and water content. We use molecular dynamics to study the mechanics of collagen fibrils of 0 wt%, 20 wt%, and 40 wt% mineralization and 0 wt%, 2 wt%, and 4 wt% hydration under applied tensile stresses. We observe that the stress–strain behavior becomes more nonlinear with an increase in hydration, and an increase in mineral content for hydrated fibrils under tensile stress reduces the nonlinear stress versus strain behavior caused by hydration. The Young’s modulus of both non-mineralized and mineralized fibrils decreases as the water content increases. As the water content increases, the gap/overlap ratio increases by approximately 40% for the non-mineralized cases and 16% for the highly mineralized cases. Our results indicate that variations in mineral and water content change the distribution of water in collagen fibrils and that the water distribution changes the deformation of gap and overlap regions under tensile loading.


Mineralization in bone Mechanisms of deformation Molecular modeling of bone Collagen fibrils 



MF and AKN would like to thank the support from Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Arkansas, and also the Arkansas High Performance Computing Center (AHPCC). Authors also acknowledge the support in part by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under the Grants ARI#0963249, MRI#0959124, and EPS#0918970, and a grant from Arkansas Science and Technology Authority, managed by Arkansas High Performance Computing Center. We also acknowledge partial support from NSF Grant IIA 1457888.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Ahsan AS (2017) Effect of intrafibrillar mineralization on the mechanical properties of osteogenesisimperfecta bone using a cohesive finite element approach. The University of Texas, SanAntonioGoogle Scholar
  2. Andriotis OG, Desissaire S, Thurner PJ (2018) Collagen Fibrils: Nature’s Highly Tunable Nonlinear Springs. ACS nano 12:3671–3680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bala Y, Seeman E (2015) Bone's Material Constituents and their Contribution to Bone Strength in Health, Disease, and Treatment. Calcif Tissue Int 97:308–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beniash E (2011) Biominerals-hierarchical nanocomposites: the example of bone. Wires Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 3:47–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bevington P, Robinson DK (2003) Data reduction and error analysis for the physical sciences. McGraw-Hill EducationGoogle Scholar
  6. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonar LC, Lees S, Mook HA (1985) Neutron-Diffraction Studies of Collagen in Fully Mineralized Bone. J Mol Biol 181:265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Currey JD (2002) Bones: structure and mechanics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  9. Depalle B, Qin Z, Shefelbine SJ, Buehler MJ (2016) Large deformation mechanisms, plasticity, and failure of an individual collagen fibril with different mineral content. J Bone Miner Res 31:380–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dorozhkin SV, Epple M (2002) Biological and medical significance of calcium phosphates. Angew Chem Int Ed 41:3130–3146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dubey DK, Tomar V (2013) Ab initio investigation of strain dependent atomistic interactions at two tropocollagen-hydroxyapatite interfaces. J Eng Mater Technol 135:021015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eppell S, Smith B, Kahn H, Ballarini R (2006) Nano measurements with micro-devices: mechanical properties of hydrated collagen fibrils. J R Soc Interface 3:117–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fantner GE, Adams J, Turner P, Thurner PJ, Fisher LW, Hansma PK (2007) Nanoscale ion mediated networks in bone: osteopontin can repeatedly dissipate large amounts of energy. Nano Lett 7:2491–2498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fratzl P (ed) (2008) Collagen: structure and mechanics, an introduction. In: Collagen. Springer, Boston, pp 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao H, Ji B, Jäger IL, Arzt E, Fratzl P (2003) Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: lessons from nature. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100:5597–5600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gautieri A, Vesentini S, Redaelli A, Buehler MJ (2011) Hierarchical structure and nanomechanics of collagen microfibrils from the atomistic scale up. Nano Lett 11:757–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gul-E-Noor F, Singh C, Papaioannou A, Sinha N, Boutis GS (2015) Behavior of water in collagen and hydroxyapatite sites of cortical bone: fracture, mechanical wear, and load bearing studies. J Phys Chem C 119:21528–21537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gupta HS, Seto J, Wagermaier W, Zaslansky P, Boesecke P, Fratzl P (2006) Cooperative deformation of mineral and collagen in bone at the nanoscale. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103:17741–17746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamed E, Lee Y, Jasiuk I (2010) Multiscale modeling of elastic properties of cortical bone. Acta Mech 213:131–154CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Hang F, Barber AH (2011) Nano-mechanical properties of individual mineralized collagen fibrils from bone tissue. J R Soc Interface 8:500–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Humphrey W, Dalke A, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14:33–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jäger I, Fratzl P (2000) Mineralized collagen fibrils: a mechanical model with a staggered arrangement of mineral particles. Biophys J 79:1737–1746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kinney JH, Pople JA, Driessen CKH, Breunig TM, Marshall GW, Marshall SJ (2001) Intrafibrillar mineral may be absent in dentinogenesis imperfecta type II (DI-II). J Dent Res 80:1555–1559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lees S, Prostak KS, Ingle VK, Kjoller K (1994) The loci of mineral in turkey leg tendon as seen by atomic-force microscope and electron-microscopy. Calcif Tissue Int 55:180–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lin L, Samuel J, Zeng X, Wang X (2017) Contribution of extrafibrillar matrix to the mechanical behavior of bone using a novel cohesive finite element model. J Mech Behav Biomed 65:224–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Liu Y, Thomopoulos S, Chen C, Birman V, Buehler MJ, Genin GM (2014) Modelling the mechanics of partially mineralized collagen fibrils, fibres and tissue. J R Soc Interface 11:20130835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MacKerell AD Jr, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL Jr, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102:3586–3616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Minary-Jolandan M, Yu M-F (2009) Nanomechanical heterogeneity in the gap and overlap regions of type I collagen fibrils with implications for bone heterogeneity. Biomacromolecules 10:2565–2570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mueller KH, Trias A, Ray RD (1966) Bone density and composition: age-related and pathological changes in water and mineral content. JBJS 48:140–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nair AK, Gautieri A, Chang S-W, Buehler MJ (2013) Molecular mechanics of mineralized collagen fibrils in bone. Nat Commun 4:1724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nair AK, Gautieri A, Buehler MJ (2014) Role of intrafibrillar collagen mineralization in defining the compressive properties of nascent bone. Biomacromolecules 15:2494–2500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nudelman F, Pieterse K, George A, Bomans PHH, Friedrich H, Brylka LJ, Hilbers PAJ, de With G, Sommerdijk NAJM (2010) The role of collagen in bone apatite formation in the presence of hydroxyapatite nucleation inhibitors. Nat Mater 9:1004–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Nyman JS, Roy A, Shen XM, Acuna RL, Tyler JH, Wang XD (2006) The influence of water removal on the strength and toughness of cortical bone. J Biomech 39:931–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Orgel JPRO, Irving TC, Miller A, Wess TJ (2006) Microfibrillar structure of type I collagen in situ. P Natl Acad Sci USA 103:9001–9005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pang X, Lin L, Tang B (2017) Unraveling the role of calcium ions in the mechanical properties of individual collagen fibrils. Sci Rep 7:46042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Plimpton S (1995) Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular-dynamics. J Comput Phys 117:1–19CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Poundarik AA, Diab T, Sroga GE, Ural A, Boskey AL, Gundberg CM, Vashishth D (2012) Dilatational band formation in bone. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:19178–19183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rauch F, Glorieux FH (2004) Osteogenesis imperfecta. Lancet 363:1377–1385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Samuel J, Sinha D, Zhao JC-G, Wang X (2014) Water residing in small ultrastructural spaces plays a critical role in the mechanical behavior of bone. Bone 59:199–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Samuel J, Park J-S, Almer J, Wang X (2016) Effect of water on nanomechanics of bone is different between tension and compression. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 57:128–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sasaki N, Odajima S (1996) Elongation mechanism of collagen fibrils and force–strain relations of tendon at each level of structural hierarchy. J Biomech 29:1131–1136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Streeter I, de Leeuw NH (2010) Atomistic modeling of collagen proteins in their fibrillar environment. J Phys Chem B 114:13263–13270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tang Y, Ballarini R, Buehler MJ, Eppell SJ (2010) Deformation micromechanisms of collagen fibrils under uniaxial tension. J R Soc Interface 7:839–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thomopoulos S, Marquez JP, Weinberger B, Birman V, Genin GM (2006) Collagen fiber orientation at the tendon to bone insertion and its influence on stress concentrations. J Biomech 39:1842–1851CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Timmins PA, Wall JC (1977) Bone water. Calcif Tissue Res 23:1–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tourell MC, Momot KI (2016) Molecular dynamics of a hydrated collagen peptide: insights into rotational motion and residence times of single-water bridges in collagen. J Phys Chem B 120:12432–12443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Uhlig MR, Magerle R (2017) Unraveling capillary interaction and viscoelastic response in atomic force microscopy of hydrated collagen fibrils. Nanoscale 9:1244–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. van der Rijt JA, van der Werf KO, Bennink ML, Dijkstra PJ, Feijen J (2006) Micromechanical testing of individual collagen fibrils. Macromol Biosci 6:697–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang Y, Azais T, Robin M, Vallee A, Catania C, Legriel P, Pehau-Arnaudet G, Babonneau F, Giraud-Guille MM, Nassif N (2012) The predominant role of collagen in the nucleation, growth, structure and orientation of bone apatite. Nat Mater 11:724–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wells HC, Sizeland KH, Kayed HR, Kirby N, Hawley A, Mudie ST, Haverkamp RG (2015) Poisson’s ratio of collagen fibrils measured by small angle X-ray scattering of strained bovine pericardium. J Appl Phys 117:044701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wess TJ, Hammersley A, Wess L, Miller A (1995) Type-I collagen packing, conformation of the triclinic unit-cell. J Mol Biol 248:487–493Google Scholar
  52. Yang L, Fitie CF, van der Werf KO, Bennink ML, Dijkstra PJ, Feijen J (2008) Mechanical properties of single electrospun collagen type I fibers. Biomaterials 29:955–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhang DJ, Chippada U, Jordan K (2007) Effect of the structural water on the mechanical properties of collagen-like microfibrils: a molecular dynamics study. Ann Biomed Eng 35:1216–1230CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Multiscale Materials Modeling Lab, Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA
  2. 2.Institute for Nanoscience and EngineeringUniversity of ArkansasFayettevilleUSA

Personalised recommendations