Advertisement

Observations of near-inertial oscillations along the Brazilian continental shelf break

  • Pedro Paulo de FreitasEmail author
  • Felipe de Luca Lopes Amorim
  • Guilherme Nogueira Mill
  • Vladimir Santos da Costa
  • Mariela Gabioux
  • Mauro Cirano
  • Afonso de Moraes Paiva
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on Coastal Ocean Forecasting Science supported by the GODAE OceanView Coastal Oceans and Shelf Seas Task Team (COSS-TT) - Part II

Abstract

Near-inertial oscillations (NIO) are intermittent motions with a frequency close to the inertial frequency and represent an important fraction of the energy to the currents in the upper ocean. Based on hourly velocity records at the shelf break covering the top 50 m of the water column in 5 locations and one additional location at Cabo Frio upwelling system (22° S) covering the top 200 m of water column with hourly velocity and temperature measurements, the aim of the present study is to characterize NIO along the Brazilian continental shelf break (16° S–31.5° S) describing the spatial variability of inertial energy in the mixed layer and the role of the NIO in the high-frequency hydrodynamic. The sites between 31.5° S and 28.5° S were those that revealed more near-inertial energy and higher relative importance of the near-inertial band for the variance of the currents (29% and 31%, respectively). This is associated with the proximity between the inertial frequency and the sea breeze frequency in this region, which delimits an inertial resonance area for the NIO around 30° S. The near-inertial currents between 31.5° S and 23.5° S range between 30 and 50 cm s−1 and decrease toward the locations at lower latitudes, where the range is between 5 and 25 cm s−1. Vertical shear of the order of 10−3 s−1 was reached during NIO events between 31.5° S and 23.5° S in the upper layer of the ocean (mixed layer, seasonal thermocline, and upper permanent thermocline) and can play an important role in the vertical mixing along the Brazilian continental shelf break. The NIO events analyzed at Cabo Frio upwelling system exhibited a mean duration of around 7.6 days, upward vertical phase velocity of the order of 10−1 cm s−1, vertical wavelengths of the order of 102 m, and vertical downward group velocity of the order of 10−2 cm s−1. Nevertheless, the magnitude of the vertical propagation of energy and duration of the events demonstrate the importance of NIO as a source of kinetic energy to the ocean interior.

Keywords

Near-inertial energy Mixed layer Vertical shear Cabo Frio upwelling 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by PETROBRAS and approved by the Brazilian oil regulatory agency ANP (Agência Nacional de Petróleo, Gás Natural e Biocombustíveis), under the special participation Oceanographic Modeling and Observation Network (REMO) researchproject. Mauro Cirano and Pedo Paulo de Freitas were supported by a CNPq research grant and a CAPES scholarship, respectively. We also thank the two anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful comments.

References

  1. Alford MH, Whitmont M (2007) Seasonal and spatial variability of near-inertial kinetic energy from historical moored velocity records. J Phys Oceanogr 37(8):2022–2037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alford MH, MacKinnon JA, Simmons HL, Nash JD (2016) Near-inertial internal gravity waves in the ocean. Annu Rev Mar Sci 8(1):95–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alford MH, Sloyan BM, Simmons HL (2017) Internal waves in the East Australian Current. Geophys Res Lett 44(24):12,280–12,288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Assireu AT, Stevenson MR, Stech JL (2003) Surface circulation and kinetic energy in the SW Atlantic obtained by drifters. Cont Shelf Res 23(2):145–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Assireu AT, Dauhut T, dos Santos FA, Lorenzzetti JA (2017) Near-inertial motions in the Brazil Current at 24°S-36°S: observations by satellite tracked drifters. Cont Shelf Res 145:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campos EJD, Velhote D, da Silveira ICA (2000) Shelf break upwelling driven by Brazil Current cyclonic meanders. Geophys Res Lett 27(6):751–754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cao A, Guo Z, Song J, Lv X, He H, Fan W (2018) Near-inertial waves and their underlying mechanisms based on the South China Sea Internal Wave Experiment (2010–2011). J Geophys Res Oceans 123(7):5026–5040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castelao RM, Barth JA (2006) Upwelling around Cabo Frio, Brazil: the importance of wind stress curl. Geophys Res Lett 33:2–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaigneau A, Pizarro O, Rojas W (2008) Global climatology of near-inertial current characteristics from Lagrangian observations. Geophys Res Lett 35(13):L1363.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2008gl034060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chavanne CP, Firing E, Ascani F (2012) Inertial oscillations in geostrophic flow: is the inertial frequency shifted by ζ/2 or by ζ? J Phys Oceanogr 42(5):884–888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen C, Reid RO, Nowlin WD (1996) Near-inertial oscillations over the Texas-Louisiana shelf. J Geophys Res Oceans 101(C2):3509–3524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen G, Xue H, Wang D, Xie Q (2013) Observed near-inertial kinetic energy in the northwestern South China Sea. J Geophys Res 118:4965–4977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cuypers Y, Vaillant XL, Bouruet-Aubertot P, Vialard J, McPhaden MJ (2013) Tropical storm-induced near-inertial internal waves during the Cirene experiment: energy fluxes and impact on vertical mixing. J Geophys Res Oceans 118:358–380.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC007881 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. D’asaro EA (1985) Upper ocean temperature structure, inertial currents, and Richardson numbers observed during strong meteorological forcing. J Phys Oceanogr 15(7):943–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. D’asaro EA, Eriksen CC, Levine MD, Niiler P, Paulson CA, Meurs PV (1995) Upper-ocean inertial currents forced by a strong storm. Part I: data and comparisons with linear theory. J Phys Oceanogr 25(11):2909–2936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Elipot S, Lumpkin R (2008) Spectral description of oceanic near-surface variability. Geophys Res Lett 35(5):L05606.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl032874 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elipot S, Lumpkin R, Prieto G (2010) Modification of inertial oscillations by the mesoscale eddy field. J Geophys Res Oceans 115(C09010).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jc005679
  18. Evans DL, Signorini SS (1985) Vertical structure of the Brazil Current. Nature 315(6014):48–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Franks PJS (1994) Thin layers of phytoplankton: a model of formation by near-inertial wave shear. Deep-Sea Res 42(1):75–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Garrett C (2001) What is the “near-inertial” band and why is it different from the rest of the internal wave spectrum? J Phys Oceanogr 31(4):962–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Garrett C, Munk W (1975) Space-time scales of internal waves: a progress report. J Geophys Res 80(3):291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gille ST, Smith SGL, Statom NM (2005) Global observations of the land breeze. Geophys Res Lett 32(5):L05605.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL022139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gonella JA (1972) A rotary-component method for analysing meteorological and oceanographic vector time series. Deep-Sea Res Oceanogr Abstr 19(12):833–846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hyder P, Simpson JH, Xing J, Gille ST (2011) Observations over an annual cycle and simulations of wind-forced oscillations near the critical latitude for diurnal–inertial resonance. Cont Shelf Res 31(15):1576–1591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kundu PK (1976) An analysis of inertial oscillations observed near Oregon coast. J Phys Oceanogr 6(6):879–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kunze E (1985) Near-inertial wave propagation in geostrophic shear. J Phys Oceanogr 15(5):544–565CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lucas AJ, Pitcher GC, Probyn TA, Kudela RM (2014) The influence of diurnal winds on phytoplankton dynamics in a coastal upwelling system off southwestern Africa. Deep-Sea Res II Top Stud Oceanogr 101:50–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Miranda LB, Castro Filho BM (1982) Geostrophic flow conditions of the Brazil Current at 19°S. Ciencia Interamer 22(1–2):44–48Google Scholar
  29. Munk W, Wunsch C (1998) Abyssal recipes ii: energetics of tidal and wind mixing. Deep-Sea Res I Oceanogr Res Pap 45(12):1977–2010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nam S, Send U (2013) Resonant diurnal oscillations and mean alongshore flows driven by sea/land breeze forcing in the coastal Southern California Bight. J Phys Oceanogr 43(3):616–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson RG, Stramma L (1991) Upper-level circulation in the South Atlantic Ocean. Prog Oceanogr 26(1):1–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pollard R (1980) Properties of near-surface inertial oscillations. J Phys Oceanogr 10:385–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pollard R, Millard R (1970) Comparison between observed and simulated wind-generated inertial oscillations. Deep-Sea Res Oceanogr Abstr 17(4):813–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rivas A, Piola A (2005) Near inertial oscillations at the shelf off northern Patagonia. Atlântica (Rio Grande) 27(2):75–86Google Scholar
  35. Saha S, Moorthi S, Pan H, Wu X, Wang J, Nadiga S, Tripp P, Kistler R, Woollen J, Behringer D, Liu H, Stokes D, Grumbine R, Gayno G, Wang J, Hou Y, Chuang H, Juang HH, Sela J, Iredell M, Treadon KR, Delst DPV, Keyser D, Derber J, Ek M, Meng J, Wei RYH, Lord S, Vand Den Dool H, Kumar A, Wang W, Long C, Chelliah M, Xue Y, Huang B, Schemm J, Ebisuzaki W, Lin R, Xie P, Chen M, Zhou S, Higgins W, Zou C, Liu Q, Chen Y, Han Y, Cucurull L, Reynolds RW, Rutledge G, Goldberg M (2010) The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 91:1015–1057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shearman RK (2005) Observations of near-inertial current variability on the new England shelf. J Geophys Res Oceans 110(C2):C02012.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004jc002341 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shearman RK, Lentz SJ (2004) Observations of tidal variability on the New England shelf. J Geophys Res Oceans 109(C6):C06010.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jc001972 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Silveira ICA, Schmidt ACK, Campo EJD, Godoi SS, Ikeda Y (2000) The Brazil Current off the Eastern Brazilian Coast. Rev Bras Oceanogr 48(2):171–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Simmons HL, Alford MH (2012) Simulating the long-range swell of internal waves generated by ocean storms. Oceanography 25(2):30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Simpsons JH, Rippeth T (2002) Forced oscillations near the critical latitude for diurnal-inertial resonance. J Phys Oceanogr 32:177–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sobarzo M, Shearman RK, Lentz S (2007) Near-inertial motions over the continental shelf off concepción, central Chile. Prog Oceanogr 75(3):348–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Stech JL, Lorenzzetti JA (1992) The response of the South Brazil Bight to the passage of wintertime cold fronts. J Geophys Res Oceans 97(C6):9507–9520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Subeesh M, Unnikrishnan A (2016) Observed internal tides and near-inertial waves on the continental shelf and slope off Jaigarh, central west coast of India. J Mar Syst 157:1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Valentin JL (2001) The Cabo Frio upwelling system, Brasil. In: Seeliger U, Kjerfve B (eds) Coastal marine ecosystems of Latin America, Ecological Studies, vol 144. Springer, Berlin, pp 97–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Webster F (1968) Observations of inertial-period motions in the deep sea. Rev Geophys 6(4):473–490Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pedro Paulo de Freitas
    • 1
    Email author
  • Felipe de Luca Lopes Amorim
    • 1
    • 2
  • Guilherme Nogueira Mill
    • 1
  • Vladimir Santos da Costa
    • 1
  • Mariela Gabioux
    • 1
  • Mauro Cirano
    • 3
  • Afonso de Moraes Paiva
    • 1
  1. 1.Ocean Engineering ProgramFederal University of Rio de Janeiro (COPPE/UFRJ)Rio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Wadden Sea Research StationList/SyltGermany
  3. 3.Institute of GeosciencesFederal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)Rio de JaneiroBrazil

Personalised recommendations