Advertisement

Ocean Dynamics

, Volume 69, Issue 3, pp 301–311 | Cite as

A statistic of water mass intrusions in the south Indian Ocean between 100° E and 110° E

  • Matthias TomczakEmail author
Article

Abstract

The concept of water type richness wtr and inversion count inv is introduced and applied to high-resolution Argo float data in a meridional strip in the southern Indian Ocean as a test to evaluate the use of the concept for a global analysis of water mass intrusions in the upper 2 km of the ocean. It is found that wtr is a suitable parameter to identify regions of high-intrusion activity in the Antarctic Intermediate Water and below but is too much determined by the meridional sea surface temperature (SST) gradient in the upper 500 m to be of much use in that depth range. Inv, on the other hand, is derived from vertical gradients, which avoids the influence of the SST gradient, and is therefore a good indicator of inversion activity throughout the water column.

The analysis finds large numbers of inversions in the upper 1 km of the ocean north of 22° S in the frontal region between the Australasian Mediterranean Water and the Indian Central Water, somewhat lower inversion frequency in the subtropical front south of 40° S, and very low inversion numbers in the region between. This region, however, displays numerous inversions in the depth range 600–1950 m, which contains only few inversions in the south and in the north.

Keywords

Water mass Intrusions Water type richness Inversion count Indian Ocean 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Critical comments from anonymous reviewers contributed significantly to the final version of the paper.

References

  1. André X, Moreau B, Le Reste S (2015) Argos-3 satellite communication system: implementation on the Arvor oceanographic profiling floats. J Atmos Ocean Technol 32:1902–1914.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-14-00219.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beal LM (2007) Is interleaving in the Agulhas Current driven by near-inertial velocity perturbations? J Phys Oceanogr 37:932–945.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JPO3040.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cole ST, Wortham C, Kunze E, Owens WB (2015) Eddy stirring and horizontal diffusivity from Argo float observations: geographic and depth variability. Geophys Res Lett 42:3989–3997.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL063827 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. England MH, Huang F (2005) On the interannual variability of the Indonesian Throughflow and its linkage with ENSO. J Clim 18:1435–1444.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3322.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Feistel R, Wright DG, Jackett DR, Miyagawa K, Reissmann JH, Wagner W, Overhoff U, Guder C, Feistel A, Marion GM (2010) Numerical implementation and oceanographic application of the thermodynamic potentials of liquid water, water vapour, ice, seawater and humid air – part 1: background and equations. Ocean Sci 6:633–677.  https://doi.org/10.5194/os-6-633-2010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flament P (2002) A state variable for characterizing water masses and their diffusive stability: spiciness. Prog Oceanogr 54:493–501.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6611(02)00065-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gaillard F, Autret E, Thierry V, Galaup P, Coatanoan C, Loubrieu T (2009) Quality control of large Argo datasets. J Atmos Ocean Technol 26:337–351.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECHO552.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giglio D, Johnson GC (2017) Middepth decadal warming and freshening in the South Atlantic. J Geophys Res 122:973–979.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JC012246 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hosoda S, Ohira T, Nakamura T (2008) A monthly mean dataset of global oceanic temperature and salinity derived from Argo float observations. JAMSTEC Rep Res Dev 8:47–59.  https://doi.org/10.5918/jamstecr.8.47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Huang RX (2011) Defining the spicity. J Mar Res 69:545–559.  https://doi.org/10.1357/002224011799849390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jackett DR, McDougall TJ (1985) An oceanographic variable for the characterization of intrusions and water masses. Deep-Sea Res (A) 32:1195–1207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0198-0149(85)90003-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. James C, Tomczak M, Helmond I, Pender L (2002) Summer and winter surveys of the subtropical front of the southeastern Indian Ocean 1997–1998. J Mar Syst 37:129–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-7963(02)00199-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johnson GC, Toole JM, Larson NG (2007) Sensor corrections for sea-bird SBE-41P and SBE-41 CTDs. J Atmos Ocean Technol 24:1117–1130.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH2016.1
  14. Kolodziejcyk N, Gaillard F (2012) Observation of spiciness interannual variability in the Pacific pycnocline. J Geophs Res 117:C12018.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008365
  15. Kolodziejcyk N, Reverdin G, Gaillard F, Lazar A (2014) Low-frequency thermohaline variability in the subtropical South Atlantic pycnocline during 2002-2013. Geophys Res Lett 41:6468–6475.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li Y, Wang F (2015) Thermocline spiciness variations in the tropical Indian Ocean observed during 2003–2014. Deep-Sea Res Pt I: Oceanogr Res Papers 97:52–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2014.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li Y, Wang F (2012) Low-frequency spiciness variations in the tropical Pacific Ocean observed during 2003–2012. Geophys Res Lett L23601(6 pp.):39.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053971 Google Scholar
  18. Mensah V, Le Menn M, Morel Y (2009) Thermal mass correction for the evaluation of salinity. J Atmos Ocean Technol 26:665–672.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JTECH0612.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Meyers G (1996) Variation of Indonesian throughflow and the El Niño-Southern Oscillation. J Geophys Res 101:12,255–12,263.  https://doi.org/10.1029/95JC03729
  20. Owens WB, Wong APS (2009) An improved calibration method for the drift of the conductivity sensor on autonomous CTD profiling floats by Θ-S climatology. Deep-Sea Res I 56:450–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roemmich D, Johnson GC, Riser S, Davis R, Gilson J, Owens WB, Garzoli SL, Schmid C, Ignaszewski M (2009) The Argo program: observing the global ocean with profiling floats. Oceanography 22(2):34–43.  https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2009.36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rudels B, Kuzmina N, Schauer U, Stipa T, Zhurbas V (2009) Double-diffusive convection and interleaving in the Arctic Ocean – distribution and importance. Geophysica 45:199–213Google Scholar
  23. Sabu P, Jenson VG, Anilkumar N, Chacko R, Valsala V, Achuthankutty CT (2015) Observations of watermass modification by mesoscale eddies in the subtropical frontal region of the Indian ocean sector of southern ocean. Deep-Sea Res II Top Stud Oceanogr 118:152–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2015.04.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sasaki YN, Schneider N, Maximenko N, Lebedev K (2010) Observational evidence for propagation of decadal spiciness anomalies in the North Pacific. Geophys Res Lett 37:L07708, 5pp.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042716
  25. Schodlok M, Tomczak M (1997) The circulation south of Australia derived from an inverse model. Geophys Res Lett 24:2781–2784.  https://doi.org/10.1029/97GL02576 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Thadathil P, Bajish CC, Behera S, Gopalakrishna VV (2012) Drift in salinity data from Argo profiling floats in the sea of Japan. J Atmos Ocean Technol 29:129–132.  https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-11-00018.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tomczak M (1999) Some historical, theoretical and applied aspects of quantitative water mass analysis. J Mar Res 57:275–303.  https://doi.org/10.1357/002224099321618227 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tomczak M (2007) Variability of Antarctic intermediate water properties in the South Pacific Ocean. Ocean Sci 3:363–377.  https://doi.org/10.5194/os-3-363-2007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. van Sebille E, Sen Gupta A, Santoso A, England MH, Böning CW (2014) Pacific-to-Indian Ocean connectivity: Tasman leakage, Indonesian Throughflow, and the role of ENSO. J Geophys Res Oceans 119:1365–1382.  https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JC009525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whalen CB, Talley LD, McKinnon JA (2012) Spatial and temporal variability of global ocean mixing inferred from Argo profiles. Geophys Res Lett 39:L18612 (6 pages).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL053196 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Woo M, Pattiaratchi C (2008) Hydrography and water masses off the Western Australian coast. Deep-Sea Res I 55:1090–1104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2008.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wright DG, Pawlowicz R, McDougall TJ, Feistel R, Marion GM (2011) Absolute salinity, “density salinity” and the reference-composition salinity scale: present and future use in the seawater standard TEOS-10. Ocean Sci 7:1–26.  https://doi.org/10.5194/os-7-1-2011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wu L, Jing Z, Riser S, Visbeck M (2011) Seasonal and spatial variations of Southern Ocean diapycnal mixing from Argo profiling floats. Nat Geosci 4:363–366.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yao W, Shi J (2017) Pacific-Indian interocean circulation of the Antarctic Intermediate Water around South Australia. Acta Oceanol Sin 36(7):4–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-017-1078-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yao W, Shi J, Zhao X (2017) Freshening of Antarctic Intermediate Water in the South Atlantic Ocean in 2005 – 2014. Ocean Sci 13:521–530.  https://doi.org/10.5194/os-13-521-2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. You Y, Tomczak M (1993) Thermocline circulation and ventilation in the Indian Ocean derived from water mass analysis. Deep-Sea Res I 40:13–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-0637(93)90052-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Science and EngineeringFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations