Advertisement

Simulation of the 1953 storm surge in the North Sea

  • Byung Ho Choi
  • Kyeong Ok Kim
  • Jin-Hee Yuk
  • Han Soo Lee
Article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Topical Collection on the 15th International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting in Liverpool, UK, September 10-15, 2017

Abstract

The 1953 North Sea floods, the Big Flood, was one of the worst natural disasters in Europe in modern times and is probably one of the most studied severe coastal floods. Several factors led to the devastating storm surge along the southern North Sea coast in combination of strong and sustained northerly winds, invert barometric effect, high spring tide, and an accumulation of the large surge in the Strait of Dover. However, the storm waves and their roles during the 1953 North Sea storm surge are not well investigated. Therefore, the effect of wave setup due to breaking waves in the storm surge processes is investigated through numerical experiments. A coupled process-based tide-wave-surge model was used to investigate and simulate the storm surge in the North Sea during January 31–February 1, 1953 and validated by comparing with historical water level records at tide gauges and wave observations at light vessels in the North Sea. Meteorological forcing inputs for the period, January 27–February 3, 1953 are reproduced from ERA-20C reanalysis data with a constant correction factor for winds. From the simulation results, it is found that, in addition to the high water due to wind setup, wave setup due to breaking waves nearshore play a role of approximately 10% of the storm surge peaks with approximately 0.2 m. The resulting modeling system can be used extensively for the preparedness of the storm surge and wave of extreme condition, and usual barotropic forecast.

Keywords

Storm surge The North Sea Wave setup Coupled wave-tide-surge model Unstructured mesh 1953 North Sea storm 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank two anonymous reviewers, whose valuable comments helped us improve the quality of this paper.

Funding information

The study was supported by the Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (17K06577) from JSPS, Japan, and the project titled ‘Study of Air-Sea Interaction and Process of RI Typhoon’, funded by the Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea. The study was also supported by the project entitled ‘Solving Grand-challenge Problems in Science and Engineering to Expand Utilization of Supercomputing’ at Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information.

Supplementary material

10236_2018_1223_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (5.5 mb)
ESM 1 (PDF 5589 kb)
10236_2018_1223_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (46 kb)
Table 3 (XLSX 46 kb)

References

  1. Atkinson JH, Westerink JJ, Hervouet JM (2004) Similarities between the quasi-bubble and the generalized wave continuity equation solutions to the shallow water equations. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 45:689–714.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.700 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Battjes JA (1972) Radiation stresses in short-crested waves. J Mar Res 30:56–64Google Scholar
  3. Baxter PJ (2005) The east coast Big Flood, 31 January–1 February 1953: a summary of the human disaster. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 363:1293–1312.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Booij N, Ris RC, Holthuijsen LH (1999) A third-generation wave model for coastal regions, 1. Model description and validation. J Geophy Res 104:7649–7666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bunya S, Dietrich JC, Westerink JJ, Ebersole BA, Smith JM, Atkinson JH, Jensen R, Resio DT, Luettich RA, Dawson C, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Powell MD, Westerink HJ, Roberts HJ (2010) A high-resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave, and storm surge model for southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part I: model development and validation. Mon Weather Rev 138:345–377.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009mwr2906.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Choi B, Min B, Kim K, Yuk J (2013) Wave-tide-surge coupled simulation for typhoon Maemi. China Ocean Eng 27:141–158.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13344-013-0013-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Compo GP, Whitaker JS, Sardeshmukh PD, Matsui N, Allan RJ, Yin X, Gleason BE, Vose RS, Rutledge G, Bessemoulin P, Brönnimann S, Brunet M, Crouthamel RI, Grant AN, Groisman PY, Jones PD, Kruk MC, Kruger AC, Marshall GJ, Maugeri M, Mok HY, Nordli Ø, Ross TF, Trigo RM, Wang XL, Woodruff SD, Worley SJ (2011) The twentieth century reanalysis project. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.776 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dawson C, Westerink JJ, Feyen JC, Pothina D (2006) Continuous, discontinuous and coupled discontinuous–continuous Galerkin finite element methods for the shallow water equations. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 52:63–88.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fld.1156 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Ronde JG, Gerritsen H (1989) The 1953 storm simulated with the Dutch Continental Shelf model. Unpublished WL|Delft Hydraulics/Rijkswaterstaat Report Z307 (in Dutch), 51 ppGoogle Scholar
  10. Dietrich JC, Bunya S, Westerink JJ, Ebersole BA, Smith JM, Atkinson JH, Jensen R, Resio DT, Luettich RA, Dawson C, Cardone VJ, Cox AT, Powell MD, Westerink HJ, Roberts HJ (2010) A high-resolution coupled riverine flow, tide, wind, wind wave, and storm surge model for southern Louisiana and Mississippi. Part II: synoptic description and analysis of hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Mon Weather Rev 138:378–404.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2009mwr2907.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Flather RA (1984) A numerical model investigation of the storm surge of 31 January and 1 February 1953 in the North Sea. Q J R Meteorol Soc 110:591–612.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49711046503 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gerritsen H (2005) What happened in 1953? The Big Flood in the Netherlands in retrospect. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 363:1271–1291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hansen W (1956) Theorie zur Errechnung des Wasserstandes und der Strömungen in Randmeeren nebst Anwendungen1. Tellus 8:287–300.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2153-3490.1956.tb01227.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hickey KR (2001) The storm of 31 January to 1 February 1953 and its impact on Scotland. Scott Geogr J 117:283–295.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00369220118737129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Holthuijsen LH, Herman A, Booij N (2003) Phase-decoupled refraction–diffraction for spectral wave models. Coast Eng 49:291–305.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-3839(03)00065-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Howarth MJ (1990) Atlas of tidal elevations and currents around the British Isles. Proudman Oceanography Laboratory, LondonGoogle Scholar
  17. IOC, IHO, BODC (2003) Centenary edition of the GEBCO digital atlas, published on CD-ROM on behalf of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and the International Hydrographic Organization as part of the General Bathymetric Chart of the OceansGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen J, Frank T, Wahl T, Dangendorf S (2011) Analyse von hochaufgelösten Tidewasserständen und Ermittlung des MSL an der deutschen Nordseeküste. KFKI-Projekt AMSeL. Universität Siegen, SiegenGoogle Scholar
  19. Lawford CAL (1954) Currents in the North Sea during the 1953 gale. Weather 9:67–72.  https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1477-8696.1954.tb01742.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee HS, Yamashita T, Hsu JRC, Ding F (2013) Integrated modeling of the dynamic meteorological and sea surface conditions during the passage of Typhoon Morakot. Dyn Atmos Oceans 59:1–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2012.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Longuet-Higgins MS, Stewart R (1964) Radiation stresses in water waves; a physical discussion, with applications. Deep-Sea Res Oceanogr Abstr 11:529–562.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-7471(64)90001-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Luettich R, Westerink J (2004) Formulation and numerical implementation of the 2D/3D ADCIRC. Finite element model version 44.XXGoogle Scholar
  23. Lyard F, Lefevre F, Letellier T, Francis O (2006) Modelling the global ocean tides: modern insights from FES2004. Ocean Dyn 56:394–415.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-006-0086-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matsumoto K, Takanezawa T, Ooe M (2000) Ocean tide models developed by assimilating TOPEX/POSEIDON altimeter data into hydrodynamical model: a global model and a regional model around Japan. J Oceanogr 56:567–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. MetOffice (2014) 1953 East coast flood – 60 years on. doi:http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/news/in-depth/1953-east-coast-flood
  26. Muir Wood R, Drayton M, Berger A, Burgess P, Wright T (2005) Catastrophe loss modelling of storm-surge flood risk in eastern England. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 363:1407–1422.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1575 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ostsee KN-U (1969) Zusammenfassung der Untersuchungsergebnisse der ehemaligen Arbeitsgruppe “Sturmfluten” und Empfehlungen für ihre Nutzanwendung beim Seedeichbau. Die Küste 17:Heide, Holstein: Boyens. S. 81–103Google Scholar
  28. Poli P, Hersbach H, Tan D, Dee D, Th’epaut J-N, Simmons A, Peubey C, Laloyaux P, Komori T, Berrisford P, Dragani R, Tr’emolet Y, Holm E, Bonavita M, Isaksen L, Fisher M (2013) The data assimilation system and initial performance evaluation of the ecmwf pilot reanalysis of the 20th-century assimilating surface observations only (era-20c). ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, p 14Google Scholar
  29. Rijkswaterstaat, KNMI (1961) Verslag over de stormvloed van 1953 (Report on the 1953 Flood). the Netherlands (In Dutch with English Summary)Google Scholar
  30. Rossiter JR (1954) The north sea storm surge of 31 January and 1 February 1953. Philos Trans Royal Soc A 246:371–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Schneider T, Weber H, Franke J, Brönnimann S (2013) The storm surge event of the Netherlands in 1953. In: Brönnimann S, Martius O (eds) Weather extremes during the past 140 years, Geographica Bernensia, vol G89, pp 35–43.  https://doi.org/10.4480/GB2013.G89.04 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Tomczak G (1955) Was lehrt uns die Holland-Sturmflut 1953. Die Küste Doppelheft 1/2 3. Boyens, Heide, Holstein, pp 78–95Google Scholar
  33. Wadey MP, Haigh ID, Nicholls RJ, Brown JM, Horsburgh K, Carroll B, Gallop SL, Mason T, Bradshaw E (2015) A comparison of the 31 January–1 February 1953 and 5–6 December 2013 coastal flood events around the UK. Front Mar Sci 2.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00084
  34. WAMDI (1988) The WAM model—a third generation ocean wave prediction model. J Phys Oceanogr 18:1775–1810.  https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0485(1988)018<1775:twmtgo>2.0.co;2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Westerink JJ, Luettich RA, Feyen JC, Atkinson JH, Dawson C, Roberts HJ, Powell MD, Dunion JP, Kubatko EJ, Pourtaheri H (2008) A basin- to channel-scale unstructured grid hurricane storm surge model applied to southern Louisiana. Mon Weather Rev 136:833–864.  https://doi.org/10.1175/2007mwr1946.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wolf J, Flather RA (2005) Modelling waves and surges during the 1953 storm. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 363:1359–1375.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zijlema M (2010) Computation of wind-wave spectra in coastal waters with SWAN on unstructured grids. Coast Eng 57:267–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coastaleng.2009.10.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringSungkyunkwan UniversitySuwonRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Marine Environmental Research CenterKorea Institute of Ocean Science and TechnologyBusanRepublic of Korea
  3. 3.Division of National SupercomputingKorea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI)DaejeonRepublic of Korea
  4. 4.Graduate School for International Development and Cooperation (IDEC)Hiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations