Advertisement

A new sea catfish, Netuma patriciae (Siluriformes: Ariidae), from the Philippines

  • Yumeka Takahashi
  • Seishi KimuraEmail author
  • Hiroyuki Motomrua
Full Paper

Abstract

A new sea catfish (Ariidae), Netuma patriciae, is described based on the holotype and nine paratypes, 127.3–303.4 mm in standard length, collected from Panay and Luzon islands, Philippines. The new species most resembles N. thalassina (Rüppell 1837), in sharing counts of anal-fin rays (17–19 in N. patriciae, 15–17 in N. thalassina) and a distinct dorsomedian head groove (longitudinal length of the groove, 33.7–40.1% of head length, 22.3–31.0%). However, the new species can be easily distinguished from the latter in having fused vomerine tooth patches, and more numerous free vertebrae (43–44 vs. 41–42 in N. thalassina). Although N. bilineata (Valenciennes in Cuvier and Valenciennes 1840a) has also fused vomerine tooth patches, the new species is distinguished by having fewer free vertebrae (43–44 vs. 47–51 in N. bilineata) and longer dorsomedian head groove (33.7–40.1% of head length vs. 0–9.7%). The new species can also be easily distinguished from both N. thalassina and N. bilineata by having a filamentous dorsal-fin ray (longest dorsal-fin ray 26.9–35.9% of standard length vs 20.3–23.3% in N. thalassina, 20.9–25.3% in N. bilineata, standard length > 127 mm) and a U-shaped junction of dorsomedian head ridge (vs. V-shaped in both species).

Keywords

Teleostei Fork-tailed catfish Netuma thalassina Netuma bilineata Taxonomy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are deeply indebted to P. J. Kailola (University of the South Pacific and Pacific Dialogue Ltd) for permission to use her observation data and photos in the present article, critical comments and suggestions on the manuscript, and great help with the English. We express sincere gratitude to the following persons and institutions for loan and/or donation of specimens: M. McGrouther, A. Hay and S. Reader (AMS); D. Catania (CAS); Y. Kai (FAKU); G. Duhamel, P. Pruvost, R. Causse and Z. H. Gabsi (MNHN); S. Awata (Osaka City University, formerly of SMB); T. Shimotani (SMB); F. Krupp, J. Stecher and H. Zetsche (SMF); A. Arshad (Universiti Putra Malaysia); M. A. Ghaffar (Universiti Malaysia Terengannu); and K. Laishram (ZSI). We thank Y. Kai (FAKU) and H. Suzuki (ex-student of FRLM) for their valuable advice on molecular procedure and analysis; I. Kobayashi and staff of the Life Science Research Center, Center for Molecular Biology and Genetics, Mie University, for nucleotide sequences; and students of FRLM for their cooperation in field collections. The holotype (KAUM–I. 98403 from the Philippines) was collected under a Memorandum of Agreement for joint research made by and among the Department of Agriculture of the Republic of the Philippines (DA), the University of the Philippines Visayas (UPV), the Kagoshima University Museum, the Research Institute for Humanity and Nature, and Tokai University, facilitated by S. L. Sanchez [Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources (BFAR), DA]. P. J. Alcala (DA) provided a Prior Informed Consent Certificate, and I. P. Cabacaba and S. M. S. Nolasco (BFAR, DA) provided a fish specimen Export Certificate (No. 2016-39812). This study was supported in part by JSPS (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science) KAKENHI awarded to S. K. (23570114 and 16K07840); and by the Multilateral Cooperative Research Program (Coastal Oceanography), Asian Core Program, and Core-to-Core Program of the JSPS.

Supplementary material

10228_2019_719_MOESM1_ESM.docx (27 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 27 kb)

References

  1. Betancur-R R (2009) Molecular phylogenetics and evolutionary history of ariid catfishes revisited: a comprehensive sampling. BMC Evol Biol  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-175 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Bleeker P (1846a) Siluroideorum bataviensium conspectus diagnosticus. Verh Batav Genootsch Kunst 21:1–60Google Scholar
  3. Bleeker P (1846b) Siluroideorum bataviensium species nuperrime detectae. Nat Geneesk Arch Ned Ind 3:284–293Google Scholar
  4. Bleeker P (1858) De visschen van den Indischen Archipel beschreven en toegelicht. Deel I. Siluri. Acta Soc Sci Indo-Neêrl 4:i–xii + 1–370Google Scholar
  5. Broad G (2003) Fishes of the Philippines: A guide to identification of families. Anvil Publishing, Inc. Mandaluyong CityGoogle Scholar
  6. Cuvier G, Valenciennes A (1840a) Histoire naturelle des poissons, vol. 14. Chez Pitois-Levrault, ParisGoogle Scholar
  7. Cuvier G, Valenciennes A (1840b) Histoire naturelle des poissons, vol. 15. Chez Cn. Pitois, ParisGoogle Scholar
  8. Day F (1870) On the fishes of the Andaman Islands. Proc Zool Soc Lond 1870:677–705Google Scholar
  9. Day F (1877) The fishes of India; being a natural history of the fishes known to inhabit the seas and fresh waters of India, Burma, and Ceylon. Bernard Quaritch, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Dmitrenko EM (1974) Arius dayi sp n (Cypriniformes, Ariidae) from the Arabian Sea. Vestn Zool 1974(3):37–41Google Scholar
  11. Ferraris CJ (2007) Checklist of catfishes, recent and fossil (Osteichthyes: Siluriformes), and catalogue of siluriform primary types. Zootaxa 1418:3–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ferraris CJ, McGrouther MA, Parkinson KL (2000) A critical review of the types and putative types of southern Asian marine and freshwater fish species in the Australian Museum named by Francis Day. Rec Aust Mus 52:289–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fowler HW (1941) Contributions to the biology of the Philippine Archipelago and adjacent regions. The fishes of the groups Elasmobranchii, Holocephali, Isospondyli, and Ostarophysi obtained by the United States Bureau of Fisheries steamer “Albatross” in 1907 to 1910, chiefly in the Philippine Islands and adjacent seas. US Natl Mus Bull 100 13:1–879Google Scholar
  14. Fricke R, Eschmeyer WN (2019) A guide to fish collections in the Catalog of fishes. Electronic version, updated 2 January 2019. http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/ichthyology/catalog/collections.asp. Accessed 24 January 2019
  15. Hamilton F (1822) An account of the fishes found in the river Ganges and its branches. Archibald Constable and Company, EdinburghCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Herre AW (1953) Check list of Philippine fishes. US Fish Wildlife Serv Res Rep 20:1–977Google Scholar
  17. Hubbs CL, Lagler KF (1947) Fishes of the Great Lakes region. Bull Cranbrook Inst Sci 26:1–186Google Scholar
  18. Jordan DS, Hubbs CR (1925) Record of fishes obtained by David Starr Jordan in Japan, 1922. Mem Carnegie Mus 10:93–346Google Scholar
  19. Kailola PJ (1986) Ariidae systematics: comparison of the giant sea catfishes Arius thalassinus and A. bilineatus of the Indo-Pacific. In: Uyeno T, Arai R, Taniuchi T, Matsuura K (eds) Indo-Pacific fish biology. Ichthyol Soc Japan, Tokyo, pp 540–549Google Scholar
  20. Kailola PJ (1999) Order Siluriformes Ariidae (=Tachysuridae) Sea catfishes (fork-tailed catfishes). In: Carpenter KE, Niem VH (eds) FAO species identification guide for fishery purposes. The living marine resources of the western Central Pacific, vol. 3. Batoid fishes, chimaeras and bony fishes. Part 1 (Elopidae to Linophrynidae). FAO, Rome, pp 1827–1879Google Scholar
  21. Kailola PJ (2004) A phylogenetic exploration of the catfish family Ariidae (Otophysi: Siluriformes). Beagle (Rec Mus Art Galleries NT) 20:87–166Google Scholar
  22. Kimura S (2015) Netuma thalassinus (Rüppell, 1837). In: Kimura S, Arshad A, Imamura H, Ghaffar MA (eds) Fishes of the northwestern Johor Strait, peninsular Malaysia. Univ Putra Malaysia Press, Serdang, Malaysia and Mie Univ, Tsu, p 24Google Scholar
  23. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, and Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lakra WS, Verma MS, Goswam M, Lal KK, Mohindra V, Punia P, Gopalakrishnan A, Singh KV, Ward RD, Hebert P (2011) DNA barcoding Indian marine fishes. Mol Ecol Resour 11:60–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marceniuk AP, Menezes NA (2007) Systematics of the family Ariidae (Ostariophysi, Siluriformes), with a redefinition of the genera. Zootaxa 1416:3–126Google Scholar
  26. Ogilby J D (1898) New genera and species of fishes. Proc Linn Soc NSW 23:280–299Google Scholar
  27. Rüppell WPES (1837) Neue Wirbelthiere zu der Fauna von Abyssinien gehörig. Fische des Rothen Meeres. Siegmund Schmerber, Frankfurt am MainGoogle Scholar
  28. Sauvage H-E (1883) Description de quelques poissons de la collection du Muséum d’histoire naturelle. Bull Soc Philom Paris 7:156–161Google Scholar
  29. Schroeder RE (1980) Philippine shore fishes of the western Sulu Sea. Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, Quezon CityGoogle Scholar
  30. Tamura K and Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Tilak R (1965) The comparative morphology of the osteocranium and the Weberian apparatus of the Tachysuridae (Pisces: Siluroidei). J Zool 146:150–174Google Scholar
  32. Ward RD, Zemlak TS, Innes BH, Last PR, Hebert PDN (2005) DNA barcoding Australia’s fish species. Phil Trans R Soc B Bio Sci 360:1847–1857CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Whitehead PJP, Talwar PK (1976) Francis Day (1829–1889) and his collections of Indian fishes. Bull British Mus (Nat Hist) Hist Ser 5 (1): 1–189, pls 1–4Google Scholar
  34. Whitley GP (1941) Ichthyological notes and illustrations. Austral Zool 10:1–50Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ichthyological Society of Japan 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate School of BioresourcesMie UniversityTsuJapan
  2. 2.The Kagoshima University MuseumKagoshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations