Advertisement

Ichthyological Research

, Volume 66, Issue 3, pp 393–399 | Cite as

Size-dependent habitat use in the stream goby Rhinogobius flumineus is affected by a larger sympatric congener

  • Yumeki OtoEmail author
  • Reiji Masuda
Full Paper

Abstract

The study of changes in intraspecific habitat use when closely related species coexist aids our understanding of the relationships between intra- and interspecific interactions in fishes. However, evidence of this phenomenon is few and shown in a very limited number of taxa. In particular, the stream goby [Rhinogobius flumineus (Mizuno, 1960)] is known for intraspecific variation in habitat use. We used underwater visual surveys to investigate this species’ size-dependent habitat use, both in isolation and in the presence of a sympatric congener, Rhinogobius nagoyae Jordan & Seale, 1906. A generalized linear mixed model and multiple comparison tests revealed that in the absence of R. nagoyae, R. flumineus body length was positively correlated with river flow velocity. This correlation disappeared when R. flumineus coexisted with R. nagoyae. Additionally, R. nagoyae density increased with flow velocity. Observations of interspecific territorial behavior revealed that larger individuals dominated in male–male competition regardless of species combination. Of the two species, R. nagoyae is significantly larger, so it was likely to exclude even relatively big R. flumineus individuals from fast riffles, the habitat preferred by both species. This study demonstrated that interspecific competition dominates intraspecific competition under sympatric conditions with larger related species.

Keywords

Habitat use Interspecific competition Intraspecific competition Size dependence Stream goby 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to K. Watanabe, H. Nakagawa, Y. Yamasaki, and R. Ito (Kyoto University) for constructive comments on the manuscript. Suggestions from laboratory colleagues are also greatly appreciated. Comments from reviewers substantially improved the quality of the manuscript. All experiments in this study complied with the current laws of Japan.

References

  1. Allan JD, Russek E (1985) The quantification of stream drift. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolnick DI, Svanbäck R, Araújo MS, Persson L (2007) Comparative support for the niche variation hypothesis that more generalized populations also are more heterogeneous. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:10075–10079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bolnick DI, Ingram T, Stutz WE, Snowberg LK, Lau OL, Paull JS (2010) Ecological release from interspecific competition leads to decoupled changes in population and individual niche width. Proc Roy Soc Lond B 277:1789–1797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davey AJH, Hawkins SJ, Turner GF, Doncaster CP (2005) Size-dependent microhabitat use and intraspecific competition in Cottus gobio. J Fish Biol 67:428–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dobriyal P, Badola R, Tuboi C, Hussain SA (2017) A review of methods for monitoring streamflow for sustainable water resource management. Appl Water Sci 7:2617–2628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Grant JWA, Noakes DLG (1988) Aggressiveness and foraging mode of young-of-the-year brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis (Pisces, Salmonidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 22:435–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Harvey BC, Stewart AJ (1991) Fish size and habitat depth relationships in headwater streams. Oecologia 87:336–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hirashima K, Tachihara K (2006) Longitudinal distribution and dietary habits of the genus Rhinogobius in the Genka River of northern Okinawa Island, Japan. Jpn J Ichthyol 53:71–76Google Scholar
  9. Ishida Y, Takemon Y, Ikebuchi S (2005) Differences in habitat preference of benthic fish among erosional–depositional reaches under different flow regimes. Ann Disas Prev Res Inst Kyoto Univ 48:935–943Google Scholar
  10. Ishino K, Tsuji K, Iwata A, Suzuki T, Mizuno N, Koshikawa T, Kishi Y, Sawara Y, Takahashi S (2005) Gobiidae. In: Kawanabe H, Mizuno N, Hosoya K (eds) Freshwater fishes of Japan, 3rd edn. Yama-to-keikoku-sha, Tokyo, pp 585–623Google Scholar
  11. Ito S, Iwao H, Sakata J, Inoue M, Omori K, Yanagisawa Y (2016) Simultaneous spawning by female stream goby Rhinogobius sp. and the association with brood cannibalism by nesting males. J Fish Biol 89:1592–1602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ito S, Koike H, Omori K, Inoue M (2006) Comparison of current-velocity tolerance among six stream gobies of the genus Rhinogobius. Ichthyol Res 53:301–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ito S, Yanagisawa Y (2003) Mate choice and mating pattern in a stream goby of the genus Rhinogobius. Environ Biol Fish 66:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Katano O (1990) Dynamic relationships between the dominance of male dark chub, Zacco temmincki, and their acquisition of females. Anim Behav 40:1018–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kondo M, Maeda K, Hirashima K, Tachihara K (2013) Comparative larval development of three amphidromous Rhinogobius species, making reference to their habitat preferences and migration biology. Mar Freshwater Res 64:249–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maruyama A, Onoda Y, Yuma M (2008) Variation in behavioural response to oxygen stress by egg‐tending males of parapatric fluvial and lacustrine populations of a landlocked goby. J Fish Biol 72:681–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Miyaji D, Kawanabe H, Mizuno N (1976) Rhinogobius flumineus. In: Colored illustrations of the freshwater fishes of Japan. Hoiku-sha, Osaka, pp 355–356Google Scholar
  18. Mizuno N (1960) Study on a freshwater goby, Rhinogobius similis Gill, with a proposition on the relationships between land-locking and speciation of some freshwater gobies in Japan. Mem Col Sci Univ Kyoto Ser B 27:97–115Google Scholar
  19. Mizuno N (1961) Study on the gobioid fish, “Yoshinobori” Rhinogobius similis Gill–I. Comparison of life histories of thee ecological types. Bull Jpn Soc Sci Fish 27:6–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakano S (1995) Individual differences in resource use, growth and emigration under the influence of a dominance hierarchy in fluvial red-spotted masu salmon in a natural habitat. J Anim Ecol 64:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakano S and Furukawa-Tanaka T (1994) Intra- and interspecific dominance hierarchies and variation in foraging tactics of two species of stream dwelling chars. Ecol Res 9:9–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Quevedo M, Svanbäck R, Eklöv P (2009) Intrapopulation niche partitioning in a generalist predator limits food web connectivity. Ecology 90:2263–2274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org
  24. Sone S, Inoue M, Yanagisawa Y (2001) Habitat use and diet of two stream gobies of the genus Rhinogobius in south-western Shikoku, Japan. Ecol Res 16:205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Suk H, Choe JC (2002) The presence of eggs in the nest and female choice in common freshwater gobies (Rhinogobius brunneus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:211–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Svanbäck R, Eklöv P, Fransson R, Holmgren K (2008) Intraspecific competition drives multiple species resource polymorphism in fish communities. Oikos 117:114–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Takagi M, Sekiya I, Shibakawa R, Shimizu T, Kawanishi R, Inoue M (2012) Genetic influence of the dam isolations in the Kamo and Nakayama River systems on the common fresh water goby populations Rhinogobius spp. Ecol Civil Eng 15:161–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Takahashi D, Kohda M, Yanagisawa Y (2001) Male–male competition for large nests as a determinant of male mating success in a Japanese stream goby, Rhinogobius sp. DA. Ichthyol Res 48:91–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tamada K (2009) Variations in clutch and egg sizes in the amphidromous goby Rhinogobius sp. CB along a river course and within a spawning season. Ichthyol Res 56:69–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tamada K (2011) River bed features affect the riverine distribution of two amphidromous Rhinogobius species. Ecol Freshw Fish 20:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Uehara SI (1996) Distributions of six species of Rhinogobius on the coastal area of Ise Bay, Japan. Jpn J Ichthyol 43:89–99Google Scholar
  32. Usio N, Nakano S (1998) Influences of microhabitat use and foraging mode similarities on intra- and interspecific aggressive interactions in a size-structured stream fish assemblage. Ichthyol Res 45:19–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wentworth CK (1922) A scale of grade and class terms for clastic sediments. J Geol 30:377–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yamazaki Y, Haramoto S, Fukasawa T (2006) Habitat uses of freshwater fishes on the scale of reach system provided in small streams. Environ Biol Fish 75:333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ichthyological Society of Japan 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AgricultureKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Maizuru Fisheries Research Station, Field Science Education and Research CenterKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Division of Biological Science, Department of Zoology, Graduate School of ScienceKyoto UniversityKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations