Advertisement

Ichthyological Research

, Volume 66, Issue 3, pp 319–329 | Cite as

Contrasting effects of dams with and without reservoirs on the population density of an amphidromous goby in southwestern Japan

  • Yoshifumi Sumizaki
  • Ryota Kawanishi
  • Mikio InoueEmail author
  • Motohiro Takagi
  • Koji Omori
Full Paper
  • 99 Downloads

Abstract

Dam construction affects the distribution and abundance of freshwater fishes, particularly for diadromous species. Amphidromous fishes spawn in rivers, and hatched larvae descend to the sea (or standing water body such as lakes) immediately after hatching, grow there typically for a few months, and then ascend rivers as small juveniles. Landlocked populations of amphidromous fishes above dams and their migration between dam reservoirs and inlet streams (landlocked migration) have often been reported. In these cases, population density in the inlet streams may be increased by dam reservoirs, owing to reduced migration distance, which results in higher return rates. On the other hand, dams without reservoirs do not promote landlocked migration and merely act as a barrier to their upstream migration, resulting in decreased population density. In this study, we examined such contrasting effects of dams with and without reservoirs on the population density of an amphidromous goby, Rhinogobius fluviatilis, in two river systems (the Shigenobu and Yoshino Rivers) of Shikoku Island, Japan. In the Shigenobu River, where more than 300 sediment-control dams and weirs (barriers without reservoirs) have been installed, our analysis showed that the goby density decreased sharply with increasing the number of barriers higher than or equal to 2 m. On the other hand, in the Yoshino River, where we investigated both landlocked populations above water storage dams (with reservoirs) and non-landlocked populations in tributaries without water storage dams, the analysis showed that the goby density increased with decreasing the distance from standing water body (i.e. the sea or dam reservoirs). Furthermore, monthly surveys at sites above and below a water storage dam showed that the recruitment of ascending juveniles above the dam was more abundant and seasonally earlier than that below the dam, probably owing to reduced migration distance and increased return rates. Our results have implications for understanding how dams alter natural distribution patterns of amphidromous fishes.

Keywords

Amphidromy Barrier effect Landlocking Migration Rhinogobius 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Shugo Kikuchi, Nobuyoshi Kotera, Yasutaka Hida, Satoshi Yano, Yuta Kudo and Yuka Fujiwara for help in the field, and Takaaki Shimizu, Masaki Shibuya, Jyun-ya Shibata, Tadao Kunihiro, Hidejiro Onishi and Hideki Hamaoka for various advice throughout the study. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for useful comments that improved the manuscript. This research was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS KAKENHI Grant number 19510236 to M. Takagi), a grant from the Water Resources Environment Center (to K. Omori and M. Inoue), and partly by the Environmental Research and Technology Development Fund (S9) of the Ministry of Environment, Japan. The survey in this study was conducted with the permission of Ehime Prefectural Government and complied with the current laws in Japan.

References

  1. Bain MB, Finn JT, Booke HE (1985) Quantifying stream substrate for habitat analysis studies. N Am J Fish Manage 5:499–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, second edition. Springer, NYGoogle Scholar
  3. Cooney PB, Kwak TJ (2013) Spatial extent and dynamics of dam impacts on tropical island freshwater fish assemblages. BioScience 63:176–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fukushima M, Kameyama S, Kaneko M, Nakao K, Steel EA (2007) Modelling the effects of dams on freshwater fish distributions in Hokkaido, Japan. Freshw Biol 52:1511–1524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hitt NP, Eyler S, Wofford JEB (2012) Dam removal increases American eel abundance in distant headwater streams. Trans Am Fish Soc 141:1171–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Holmquist JG, Schmidt-Gengenbach JM, Yoshioka BB (1998) High dams and marine-freshwater linkages: effects on native and introduced fauna in the Caribbean. Conserv Biol 12:621–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Iguchi K, Mizuno N (1999) Early starvation limits survival in amphidromous fishes. J Fish Biol 54:705–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Johnson PTJ, Olden JD, Vander Zanden MJ (2008) Dam invaders: impoundments facilitate biological invasions into freshwaters. Front Ecol Environ 6:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Katano O, Nakamura T, Abe S, Yamamoto S, Baba Y (2006) Comparison of fish communities between above- and below-dam sections of small streams: barrier effect to diadromous fishes. J Fish Biol 68:767–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kawanabe H, Mizuno N (1989) Freshwater fishes of Japan. Yama-kei, Tokyo, pp 584–603Google Scholar
  11. Kawanishi R, Inoue M, Takagi M, Miyake Y, Shimizu T (2011) Habitat factors affecting the distribution and abundance of the spinous loach Cobitis shikokuensis in southwestern Japan. Ichthyol Res 58:202–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kikuchi S, Inoue M (2014) Population fragmentation of a stream-resident salmonid by dams: downstream progress of extinctions from headwaters. Ecol Civil Eng 17:17–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kingsford RT (2000) Ecological impacts of dams, water diversions and river management on floodplain wetland in Australia. Austral Ecol 25:109–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. LeMoine MT, Bodensteiner LR (2014) Barriers to upstream passage by two migratory sculpins, prickly sculpin (Cottus asper) and coastrange sculpin (Cottus aleuticus), in northern Puget Sound lowland streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 71: 1758–1765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McDowall RM (2010) Why be amphidromous: expatrial dispersal and the place of source and sink population dynamics? Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 20:87–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mizuno N (1976) Studies on a freshwater fish, Rhinogobius brunneus (Pisces: Gobiidae) III. Distribution of four colour types in Shikoku and Kyushu Islands. Physiol Ecol Japan 17:373–381Google Scholar
  17. Morita K, Morita SH, Yamamoto S (2009) Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on salmonid fishes: lessons from white-spotted charr in Japan. Ecol Res 24:711–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morita K, Yamamoto S (2002) Effects of habitat fragmentation by damming on the persistence of stream-dwelling charr populations. Conserv Biol 16:1318–1323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Morita K, Yamamoto S, Hoshino N (2000) Extreme life history change of white-spotted char (Salvelinus leucomaenis) after damming. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 57:1300–1306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moriyama A, Yanagisawa Y, Mizuno N, Omori K (1998) Starvation of drifting goby larvae due to retention of free embryos in upstream reaches. Environ Biol Fish 52:321–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nakamura T (2001) Estimation of the distribution of genetically pure populations of the Japanese charr by inquiring survey. J Jpn Soc Erosion Control Eng 53:3–9Google Scholar
  22. Nakano S, Inoue M, Kuwahara T, Toyoshima T, Hojyo H, Fujito E, Sugiyama H, Okuyama S, Sasa K (1995) Freshwater fish fauna in the Teshio and Nakagawa Experimental Forests and adjacent areas with reference to damming effects on their distribution. Res Bull Hokkaido Univ For 52:95–109Google Scholar
  23. Nakano S, Maekawa K, Yamomoto S (1990) Change of the life cycle of Japanese charr following artificial lake construction by damming. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 56:1901–1905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/.
  25. Reid SM, Mandrak NE, Carl LM, Wilson CC (2008) Influence of dams and habitat condition on the distribution of redhorse (Moxostoma) species in the Grand River watershed, Ontario. Environ Biol Fish 81:111–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sakai H, Arai T, Imai C, Sugiyama H, Sato H, Jeon SR (2004) Landlocked populations of an amphidromous goby, Rhinogobius sp. CO. Japan J Ichthyol 51:175–180Google Scholar
  27. Shimoda K, Nakano S, Yamamoto S (2002) Landlocking of anadromous white-spotted charr Salvelinus leucomaenis by damming. Japan J Ichthyol 49:25–32Google Scholar
  28. Sone S, Inoue M, Yanagisawa Y (2001) Habitat use and diet of two stream gobies of the genus Rhinogobius in south-western Shikoku, Japan. Ecol Res 16:205–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sone S, Inoue M, Yanagisawa Y (2006) Competition between two congeneric stream gobies for habitat in southwestern Shikoku, Japan. Ichthyol Res 53:19–3Google Scholar
  30. Takagi M, Sekiya I, Shibakawa R, Shimizu T, Kawanishi R, Inoue M (2012) Genetic influence of the dam isolations in the Kamo and Nakayama River systems on the common freshwater goby populations Rhinogobius spp. Ecol Civil Eng 15:161–70Google Scholar
  31. Takagi M, Shibakawa R, Shimizu T, Omori K, Inoue M (2013) Genetic divergence and landlocking of a common freshwater goby Rhinogobius fluviatilis in the Yoshino River system. Ecol Civil Eng 16:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takagi M, Yano S, Shibakawa R, Shimizu T, Ohara K, Sumizaki Y, Kawanishi R, Inoue M (2011) Landlocking and genetic differentiation of a common freshwater goby Rhinogobius sp. LD caused by Ishite-gawa Dam in the Shigenobu River system. Ecol Civil Eng 14:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tamada K (2011) River bed features affect the riverine distribution of two amphidromous Rhinogobius species. Ecol Freshw Fish 20:23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tsunagawa T, Arai T (2008) Flexible migration of Japanese freshwater gobies Rhinogobius spp. as revealed by otholith Sr:Ca ratios. J Fish Biol 73:2421–2433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Uehara S (1984) Distributions of four colour types of the freshwater goby, Rhinogobius brunneus, in the Tohoku District, Japan. Sci Rep Yokosuka City Mus 32:33–49Google Scholar
  36. Winston MR, Taylor CM, Pigg J (1991) Upstream extirpation of four minnow species due to damming of a prairie stream. Trans Am Fish Soc 120:98–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Yamasaki YY, Nishida M, Suzuki T, Mukai T, Watanabe K (2015) Phylogeny, hybridizaion, and life history evolution of Rhinogobius gobies in Japan, inferred from multiple nuclear gene sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 90:20–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Ichthyological Society of Japan 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshifumi Sumizaki
    • 1
  • Ryota Kawanishi
    • 1
    • 4
  • Mikio Inoue
    • 1
    Email author
  • Motohiro Takagi
    • 2
    • 5
  • Koji Omori
    • 3
  1. 1.Graduate School of Science and EngineeringEhime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of AgricultureEhime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan
  3. 3.Center for Marine Environmental StudiesEhime UniversityMatsuyamaJapan
  4. 4.Faculty of Environmental Earth ScienceHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  5. 5.South Ehime Fisheries Research CenterEhime UniversityAinanJapan

Personalised recommendations