Advertisement

Effort and ability attributions as explanation for differences in study choice after failure: evidence from a hypothetical vignette study among first-entry bachelor students in a Belgian university

  • Sebastiano CincinnatoEmail author
  • Nadine Engels
  • Els Consuegra
Article
  • 39 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates to what extent differences in ability and effort attributions can explain students’ reluctance to reorient after failure in the first year at the university. Reluctance to reorient after failure increases the likelihood of drop out. The empirical investigation is based on a sample of fulltime first-entry bachelor students enrolled in a social or behavioural science study programme at a Belgian university (N = 432). These students were asked to assess their study choices in a hypothetical failure scenario. Logit regression indicates that attributing failure to lack of ability is associated with a stronger tendency to reorient after failure. Furthermore, path analysis suggests that male students’ reluctance to reorient after failure is at least partially explained by their weaker tendency to attribute failure to lack of ability. Given the malleability of attributions, we argue that study counselling services can benefit from the insights of this study.

Keywords

Higher education Study choice Student background Attribution Ability Effort 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge our institution, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, for funding the project that made this research possible. We would also like to express our gratitude to Prof. Dr. Bram Spruyt and the reviewers for their insightful feedback on earlier drafts of this manuscript.

References

  1. Abramson, L. Y., Seligman, M. E., & Teasdale, J. D. (1978). Learned helplessness in humans: critique and reformulation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 87(1), 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alon, S., & Gelbgiser, D. (2011). The female advantage in college academic achievements and horizontal sex segregation. Social Science Research, 40(1), 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arias Ortiz, E., & Dehon, C. (2013). Roads to success in the Belgian French Community’s higher education system: predictors of dropout and degree completion at the Université Libre de Bruxelles. Research in Higher Education, 54(6), 693–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cincinnato, S., Engels, N., & Consuegra, E. (2019). From failure to success: Study reorientation, student background and degree completion at university? Evidence from Belgium. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  5. Bar-Tal, D., Goldberg, M., & Knaani, A. (1984). Causes of success and failure and their dimensions as a function of SES and gender: a phenomenological analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyer, S. (1998). Gender differences in causal attributions by college students of performance on course examinations. Current Psychology, 17(4), 346–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boudon, R. (1989). Subjective rationality and the explanation of social behavior. Rationality and Society, 1(2), 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boudon, R. (1996). The “cognitivist” model: a generalized “rational-choice model.”. Rationality and Society, 8(2), 123–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boudon, R. (2003). Beyond rational choice theory. Annual Review of Sociology, 29(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  11. Breen, R., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (1997). Explaining educational differentials: towards a formal rational action theory. Rationality and Society, 9(3), 275–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T. A., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender inequalities in education. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clark, B. R. (1960). The “cooling-out” function in higher education. American Journal of Sociology, 65(6), 569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, B. R. (1980). The “cooling out” function revisited. New Directions for Community Colleges, 1980(32), 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, L. M., & Lanza, S. T. (2010). Latent class and latent transition analysis: with applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  16. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2014). Modernisation of higher education in Europe: access, retention and employability 2014. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  17. European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice. (2018). The European Higher Education Area in 2018: Bologna process implementation report. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  18. Försterling, F. (1994). The functional value of realistic attributions. European Review of Social Psychology, 5(1), 151–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Försterling, F. (2001). Attribution: an introduction to theories, research and applications. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  20. Gabay-Egozi, L., Shavit, Y., & Yaish, M. (2015). Gender differences in fields of study: the role of significant others and rational choice motivations. European Sociological Review, 31(3), 284–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glaesser, J., & Cooper, B. (2014). Using rational action theory and Bourdieu’s habitus Theory together to account for educational decision-making in England and Germany. Sociology, 48(3), 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Graham, S. (1991). A review of attribution theory in achievement contexts. Educational Psychology Review, 3(1), 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hau, K.-T., & Salili, F. (1993). Measurement of achievement attribution: a review of instigation methods, question contents, and measurement formats. Educational Psychology Review, 5(4), 377–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haynes, T. L., Perry, R. P., Stupnisky, R. H., & Daniels, L. M. (2009). A review of attributional retraining treatments: fostering engagement and persistence in vulnerable college students. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: handbook of theory and research (pp. 227–272). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  25. Heider, F. (1958). The psychology of interpersonal relations. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelley, H. H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (pp. 192–238). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kelley, H. H., & Michela, J. L. (1980). Attribution theory and research. Annual Review of Psychology, 31(1), 457–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kuh, G. D., Kinzie, J., Buckley, J. A., Bridges, B. K., & Hayek, J. C. (2006). What matters to student success: a review of the literature. Washington, DC: National Postsecondary Education Cooperative.Google Scholar
  31. Lightbody, P., Siann, G., Stocks, R., & Walsh, D. (1996). Motivation and attribution at secondary school: the role of gender. Educational Studies, 22(1), 13–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lohbeck, A., Grube, D., & Moschner, B. (2017). Academic self-concept and causal attributions for success and failure amongst elementary school children. International Journal of Early Years Education, 25(2), 190–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miller, D. T., & Ross, M. (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mok, M. M. C., Kennedy, K. J., & Moore, P. J. (2011). Academic attribution of secondary students: gender, year level and achievement level. Educational Psychology, 31(1), 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Muenks, K., & Miele, D. B. (2017). Students’ thinking about effort and ability: the role of developmental, contextual, and individual difference factors. Review of Educational Research, 87(4), 707–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muthén, B. (1984). A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators. Psychometrika, 49(1), 115–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neugebauer, M., Neumeyer, S., & Alesi, B. (2016). More diversion than inclusion? Social stratification in the Bologna system. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 45, 51–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reimer, D., & Pollak, R. (2010). Educational expansion and its consequences for vertical and horizontal inequalities in access to higher education in West Germany. European Sociological Review, 26(4), 415–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reisel, L. (2011). Two paths to inequality in educational outcomes. Sociology of Education, 84(4), 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rodgers, T. (2013). Should high non-completion rates amongst ethnic minority students be seen as an ethnicity issue? Evidence from a case study of a student cohort from a British University. Higher Education, 66(5), 535–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R Package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2).Google Scholar
  43. Schindler, S., & Reimer, D. (2011). Differentiation and social selectivity in German higher education. Higher Education, 61(3), 261–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spruyt, B. (2015). Talent, effort or social background? European Societies, 17(1), 94–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stupnisky, R. H., Stewart, T. L., Daniels, L. M., & Perry, R. P. (2011). When do students ask why? Examining the precursors and outcomes of causal search among first-year college students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(3), 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Tein, J.-Y., Coxe, S., & Cham, H. (2013). Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in Latent Profile Analysis. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(4), 640–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tieben, N., & Wolbers, M. H. J. (2010). Transitions to post-secondary and tertiary education in the Netherlands: a trend analysis of unconditional and conditional socio-economic background effects. Higher Education, 60(1), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tolsma, J., Need, A., & de Jong, U. (2010). Explaining participation differentials in Dutch higher education: the impact of subjective success probabilities on level choice and field choice. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Triventi, M. (2013). The role of higher education stratification in the reproduction of social inequality in the labor market. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 32(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. van de Werfhorst, H. G., & Hofstede, S. (2007). Cultural capital or relative risk aversion? Two mechanisms for educational inequality compared. The British Journal of Sociology, 58(3), 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. van Rooij, E., Brouwer, J., Fokkens-Bruinsma, M., Jansen, E., Donche, V., & Noyens, D. (2018). A systematic review of factors related to first-year students’ success in Dutch and Flemish higher education. Pedagogische Studiën, 94(5), 360–404.Google Scholar
  52. Vossensteyn, H., Kottmann, A., Jongbloed, B., Kaiser, F., Cremonini, L., Stensaker, B., et al. (2015). Drop-out and completion in higher education in Europe. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  53. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: a history of ideas. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 28–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Multidisciplinary Institute for Teacher Education (MILO)Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations