Advertisement

European Journal of Psychology of Education

, Volume 34, Issue 4, pp 825–846 | Cite as

Preservice teachers’ evaluations of students’ achievement development in the context of school-track recommendations

  • Florian KlapprothEmail author
  • Birthe Doreen Fischer
Article

Abstract

We experimentally examined whether preservice teachers considered both the gender of primary school students and their development of GPAs, indicated by two successive school reports, when making secondary school-track recommendations. We used student vignettes to mimic real students and orthogonally varied student gender, their GPA development (positive vs. negative), and the grand mean of grades. We found that students who improved were more than twice as likely to be recommended for the highest track than those who deteriorated. Moreover, we could show that with deteriorating students, male participants preferred boys relative to girls. These results are discussed regarding possible rules of extrapolating current achievements and concerning the gender of students and participants, and conclusions are drawn with respect to preservice teacher education.

Keywords

School placement recommendation Development of achievement Preservice teachers Student gender Participant gender Experiment 

Notes

References

  1. Abs, H. J. (2006). Zur Bildung diagnostischer Kompetenz in der zweiten Phase der Lehrerbildung. In C. Allemann-Ghionda & E. Terhart (Eds.), Kompetenzen und Kompetenzentwicklung von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern (pp. 217–234). Weinheim: Beltz.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, K.-H., Bos, W., Richert, P., & Stubbe, T. C. (2007). Schullaufbahnpräferenzen am Ende der vierten Klassenstufe. In W. Bos, S. Hornberg, K.-H. Arnold, G. Faust, L. Fried, E.-M. Lankes, K. Schwippert, & R. Valtin (Eds.), IGLU 2006. Lesekompetenzen von Grundschulkindern in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich (pp. 271–297). Waxmann: Münster.Google Scholar
  3. Beyer, S. (1999). Gender differences in the accuracy of grade expectancies and evaluations. Sex Roles, 41(3/4), 279–296.Google Scholar
  4. Beyer, S., & Bowden, E. M. (1997). Gender differences in self-perceptions: convergent evidence from three measures of accuracy and bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(2), 157–172.Google Scholar
  5. Bianco, M., Harris, B., Garrison-Wade, D., & Leech, N. (2011). Gifted girls: gender bias in gifted referrals. Roeper Review, 33(3), 170–181.Google Scholar
  6. Bos, W., Voss, A., Lankes, E.-M., Schwippert, K., Thiel, O., & Valtin, R. (2004). Schullaufbahnempfehlungen von Lehrkräften für Kinder am Ende der vierten Jahrgangsstufe. In W. Bos, E.-M. Lankes, M. Prenzel, K. Schwippert, R. Valtin, & G. Walther (Eds.), IGLU - Einige Länder der Bundesrepublik Deutschland im nationalen und internationalen Vergleich (pp. 191–228). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  7. Branje, S. J. T., van Lieshout, C. F. M., & Gerris, J. R. M. (2007). Big five personality development in adolescence and adulthood. European Journal of Personality, 21(1), 45–62.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, C., & Mehringer, V. (2009). Familialer Hintergrund, Übertrittsempfehlungen und Schulerfolg bei Kindern mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund. In J. Hagedorn, V. Schurt, C. Steber, & W. Waburg (Eds.), Ethnizität, Geschlecht, Familie und Schule: Heterogenität als erziehungswissenschaftliche Herausforderung (pp. 55–79). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  9. Brennan, R. L. (2001). Generalizability theory. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Caro, D. H., Lenkeit, J., Lehmann, R., & Schwippert, K. (2009). The role of academic achievement growth in school track recommendation. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(4), 183–192.Google Scholar
  11. Carrothers, R. M., Gregory, S. W., & Gallagher, T. J. (2000). Measuring emotional intelligence of medical school applicants. Academic Medicine, 75(5), 456–463.Google Scholar
  12. Chalabaev, A., Sarrazin, P., Trouilloud, D., & Jussim, L. (2009). Can sex-undifferentiated teacher expectations mask an influence of sex stereotypes? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(10), 2469–2498.Google Scholar
  13. Chesterfield, R., & Enge, K. (1998). Gender, cognitive categorization, and classroom interaction patterns of Guatemalan teachers. Human Organization, 57(1), 108–116.Google Scholar
  14. Colom, R., & Lynn, R. (2004). Testing the developmental theory of sex differences in intelligence on 12-18 year olds. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(1), 75–82.Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, H. (1985). Models of teacher expectation communication. In J. B. Dusek (Ed.), Teacher expectancies (pp. 135–158). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Cooper, H., Lowe, C., & Baron, R. (1976). Pattern of past performance and expected future performance: a reversal of the unexpected primacy effect. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 6(1), 31–39.Google Scholar
  17. Cronbach, L., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: theory of generalizability for scores and profiles. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Darom, E., & Rich, Y. (1988). Sex differences in attitudes toward school: student self-reports and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(3), 350–355.Google Scholar
  19. Dee, T. S. (2007). Teachers and the gender gaps in student achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 42, 528–554.Google Scholar
  20. Driessen, G. (2007). The feminization of primary education: effects of teachers’ sex on pupil achievement, attitudes and behaviour. Review of Education, 53, 183–203.Google Scholar
  21. Ehrenberg, R., Goldhaber, D., & Brewer, D. (1995). Do teachers’ race, gender, and ethnicity matter? Evidence from the National Educational Longitudinal Study of 1988. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(3), 547–560.Google Scholar
  22. Evans, S. C., Roberts, M. C., Keeley, J. W., Blossom, J. B., Amaro, C. M., Garcia, A. M., Odar Stough, C., Canter, K. S., Robles, R., & Reed, G. M. (2015). Vignette methodologies for studying clinicians’ decision-making: validity, utility, and application in ICD-11 field studies. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(2), 160–170.Google Scholar
  23. Fennema, E., Peterson, P. L., Carpenter, T. P., & Lubinski, C. A. (1990). Teachers’ attributions and beliefs about girls, boys and mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21(1), 55–69.Google Scholar
  24. Francis, B., Skelton, C., Carrington, B., Hutchings, M., Read, B., & Hall, I. (2008). A perfect match? Pupils’ and teachers’ views of the impact of matching educators and learners by gender. Research Papers in Education, 23(1), 21–36.Google Scholar
  25. Frome, P. M., & Eccles, J. S. (1998). Parents’ influence on children’s achievement-related perceptions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(2), 435–452.Google Scholar
  26. Glass, C., & Minnotte, K. L. (2010). Recruiting and hiring women in STEM fields. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 3(4), 218–229.Google Scholar
  27. Glock, S., & Karbach, J. (2015). Preservice teachers' implicit attitudes toward racial minority students: Evidence from three implicit measures. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 45, 55–61.Google Scholar
  28. Glock, S., Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Klapproth, F., & Böhmer, M. (2012). Improving terachers’ judgments: accountability affects teachers’ tracking decision. International Journal of Technology and Inclusive Education, 1, 89–98.Google Scholar
  29. Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2003). Looking in classrooms (9th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  30. Helbig, M. (2010). Sind Lehrerinnen für den geringeren Schulerfolg von Jungen verantwortlich? Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 62(1), 93–111.Google Scholar
  31. Holmlund, H., & Sund, K. (2005). Is the gender gap in school performance affected by the sex of the teacher? Working Paper 5/2005. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research.Google Scholar
  32. Hopf, D., & Hatzichristou, C. (1999). Teacher gender-related influences in Greek schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 1–18.Google Scholar
  33. Jaccard, J. (2001). Interaction effects in logistic regression. In Sage University papers series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07-135. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Jürges, H., & Schneider, K. (2011). Why young boys stumble: early tracking, age and gender bias in the German school system. German Economic Review, 12(4), 371–394.Google Scholar
  35. Jussim, L., Smith, A., Madon, S., & Palumbo, P. (1998). Teacher expectations. In J. Brophy (Ed.), Advances in research on teaching: expectations in the classroom (p. 148). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  36. Klapproth, F., Glock, S., Krolak-Schwertdt, S., Martin, R., & Böhmer, M. (2013). Prädiktoren der Sekundarschulempfehlung in Luxemburg. Ergebnisse einer Large-Scale-Untersuchung. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 16(2), 355–379.Google Scholar
  37. Klimstra, T. A., Hale, W. W., Raaijmaakers, Q. A. W., Branje, S. J. T., & Meeus, W. H. J. (2009). Maturation of personality in adolescence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(4), 898–912.Google Scholar
  38. KMK – Sekretariat der Ständigen Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (2010). Übergang von der Grundschule in Schulen des Sekundarbereichs I. Retrieved from http://www.kmk.org/ fileadmin/ veroeffentlichungen_beschluesse/ 2010/2010_10_18-Uebergang-Grundschule-S_eI1-Orientierungsstufe.pdf.
  39. Kristen, C. (2006). Ethnische Diskriminierung in der Grundschule? Die Vergabe von Noten und Bildungsempfehlungen. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 58(1), 79–97.Google Scholar
  40. Krolak-Schwerdt, S., Böhmer, M., & Gräsel, C. (2009). Verarbeitung von schülerbezogener Information als zielgeleiteter Prozess. Der Lehrer als “flexibler Denker”. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 23(34), 175–186.Google Scholar
  41. Kumar, R., & Lal, R. (2006). The role of self-efficacy and gender differences among the adolescents. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 32, 249–254.Google Scholar
  42. Lane, K. L., Givner, C. C., & Pierson, M. R. (2004). Teacher expectations of student behaviour: social skills necessary for success in elementary school classrooms. The Journal of Special Education, 38(2), 104–110.Google Scholar
  43. Lavy, V. (2004). Do gender stereotypes reduce girls’ human capital outcomes? Evidence from a natural experiment. NBER Working Paper, 10678.Google Scholar
  44. Lehmann, R. H., & Peek, R. (1997). Aspekte der Lernausgangslage von Schülerinnen und Schülern der fünften Jahrgangsstufe an Hamburger Schulen. Bericht über die Untersuchung im September 1996. Hamburg, Germany: Behörde für Schule, Jugend und Berufsausbildung.Google Scholar
  45. Li, J. (2005). Mind or virtue: Western and Chinese beliefs about learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 190–194.Google Scholar
  46. Lin, Y. C., & Raghubir, P. (2005). Gender differences in unrealistic optimism about marriage and divorce: are men more optimistic and women or realistic? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(2), 198–207.Google Scholar
  47. Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(404), 1198–1202.Google Scholar
  48. Lynn, R. (1999). Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: a developmental theory. Intelligence, 27(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  49. Marshall, W. A., & Tanner, J. M. (1970). Variations in the patterns of prepubertal changes in boys. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 45(239), 13–23.Google Scholar
  50. Martin, A., & Marsh, H. (2005). Motivating boys and motivating girls: does teacher gender really make a difference? Australian Journal of Education, 49(3), 320–334.Google Scholar
  51. Mertler, C. A. (2004). Secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: does classroom experience make a difference? American Secondary Education, 33, 49–64.Google Scholar
  52. Milek, A., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., Maaz, K., & Stubbe, T. C. (2009). Wie konsistent sind Referenzgruppeneffekte bei der Vergabe von Schulformempfehlungen? Bundeslandspezifische Analysen mit Daten der IGLU-Studie. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 12, 282–301.Google Scholar
  53. Neugebauer, M. (2011). Werden Jungen von Lehrerinnen bei den Übergangsempfehlungen für das Gymnasium benachteiligt? Eine Analyse auf Basis der IGLU-Daten. In A. Hadjar (Ed.), Geschlechtsspezifische Bildungsungleichheiten (pp. 235–260). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  54. Neugebauer, M., & Gerth, M. (2013). Weiblicher Schulkontext und Schulerfolg von Jungen. In R. Becker & A. Schulze (Eds.), Bildungskontexte (pp. 431–455). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  55. Niedersächsisches Kultusministerium. (2010). Bewertung des Arbeits- und Sozialverhaltens. Runderlass des Kultusministeriums. Hannover: Niedersächsisches Kultusministerium.Google Scholar
  56. OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow’s world—first results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  57. Parks, F. R., & Kennedy, J. H. (2007). The impact of race, physical attractiveness, and gender on education majors’ and teachers’ perceptions of students. Journal of Black Studies, 37(6), 936–943.Google Scholar
  58. Peugh, J. L., & Enders, C. K. (2004). Missing data in educational research: a review of reporting practices and suggestions for improvement. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 525–556.Google Scholar
  59. Phillips, D. (1991). Assessment in German schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 23(6), 544–548.Google Scholar
  60. Plante, I., de la Sablonnière, R., Aronson, J. M., & Théorêt, M. (2013). Gender stereotype endorsement and achievement-related outcomes: the role of competence beliefs and task values. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 225–235.Google Scholar
  61. Preckel, F., Zeidner, M., Goetz, T., & Schleyer, E. J. (2008). Female “big fish” swimming against the tide: the “big-fish-little-pond effect” and gender-ratio in special gifted classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(1), 78–96.Google Scholar
  62. Powell, T., & Siegle, D. (2000). Teacher bias in identifying gifted and talented students. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented Newsletter, Spring, 2000, 13–15.Google Scholar
  63. Ready, D., LoGerfo, L., Burkham, D. T., & Lee, V. E. (2005). Explaining girls’ advantage in kindergarten literacy learning: do classroom behaviors make a difference? Elementary School Journal, 106(1), 21–38.Google Scholar
  64. Reyna, C. (2000). Lazy, dump, or industrious: when stereotypes convey attribution information in the classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 12(1), 85–110.Google Scholar
  65. Ritter, D. (1989). Teachers’ perceptions of problem behaviour in general and special education. Exceptional Children, 55(6), 559–564.Google Scholar
  66. Rolison, M. A., & Medway, F. J. (1985). Teachers’ expectations and attributions for student achievement: effects of label, performance pattern, and special education intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 22(4), 561–573.Google Scholar
  67. Sabers, D. S., Cushing, K. S., & Berliner, D. C. (1991). Differences among teachers in a task characterized by simultaneity, multidimensional, and immediacy. American Education Research Journal, 28, 63–88.Google Scholar
  68. Schmitt, M. (2008). Die Bedeutung von sozialer Herkunft und bundeslandspezifischen Übergangsregelungen für die Grundschulempfehlung. In E.-M. Lankes (Ed.), Pädagogosche Professionalität als Gegenstand empirischer Forschung (pp. 111–121). Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  69. Schneider, T. (2011). Die Bedeutung der sozialen Herkunft und des Migrationshintergrundes für Lehrerurteile am Beispiel der Grundschulempfehlung. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 14(3), 371–396.Google Scholar
  70. Schulze, A., Wolter, F., & Unger, R. (2009). Bildungschancen von Grundschülern: Die Bedeutung des Klassen- und Schulkontextes am Übergang auf die Sekundarstufe I. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 61(3), 411–435.Google Scholar
  71. Segeritz, M., Stanat, P. & Walter, O. (2010). Muster des schulischen Erfolgs von Mädchen und Jungen mit Migrationshintergrund. In C. P. Allemann-Ghionda, Stanat, K. Göbel, & C. Röhner (Eds.), Migration, Identität, Sprache und Bildungserfolg. 55. Beiheft der Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 165–186.Google Scholar
  72. Senatsverwaltung für Bildung, Jugend und Wissenschaft. (2015). Berliner Schulwegweiser. In Wohin nach der Grundschule? Berlin: SenBJW.Google Scholar
  73. Shavelson, R. J., & Webb, N. M. (2006). Generalizability theory. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, & P. B. Elmore (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 309–322). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  74. Siegle, D., & Reis, S. M. (1994). Gender differences in teacher and student perceptions of student ability and effort. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 6, 86–92.Google Scholar
  75. Stahl, N. (2007). Schülerwahrnehmung und -beurteilung durch Lehrkrafte. In H. Ditton (Ed.), Kompetenzaufbau und Laufbahnen im Schulsystem. Ergebnisse einer Längsschnittuntersuchung an Grundschulen (pp. 171–198). Waxmann: Münster.Google Scholar
  76. Stubbe, T. C. (2009). Bildungsentscheidungen und sekundäre Herkunftseffekte: Soziale Disparitäten bei Hamburger Schülerinnen und Schülern der Sekundarstufe I. Münster: Waxmann.Google Scholar
  77. Stubbe, T. C., & Bos, W. (2008). Schullaufbahnempfehlungen von Lehrkräften und Schullaufbahnentscheidungen von Eltern am Ende der vierten Jahrgangsstufe. Empirische Pädagogik, 22, 49–63.Google Scholar
  78. Taylor, P. B., Gunter, P. L., & Slate, J. R. (2001). Teachers’ predictions of inappropriate student behavior as a function of teachers’ and students’ gender and ethnic background. Behavioral Disorders, 26(2), 146–151.Google Scholar
  79. Tiedemann, J. (2002). Teachers’ gender stereotypes as determinants of teachers perceptions in elementary school mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(1), 49–62.Google Scholar
  80. Timmermans, A. C., de Boer, H., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2016). An investigation of the relationship between teachers’ expectations and teachers’ perceptions of student attributes. Social Psychology of Education, 19(2), 217–240.Google Scholar
  81. Trautwein, U., & Baeriswyl, F. (2007). Wenn leistungsstarke Klassenkameraden ein Nachteil sind: Referenzgruppeneffekte bei Übertrittsentscheidungen. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 21(2), 119–133.Google Scholar
  82. Van Ophuysen, S. (2008). Zur Veränderung der Schulfreude von Klasse 4 bis 7. Eine Längsschnittanalyse schulformspezifischer Effekte von Ferien und Grundschulübergang. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 22(34), 293–306.Google Scholar
  83. Weinstein, N. D. (1989). Optimistic biases about personal risks. Science, 246(4935), 1232–1233.Google Scholar
  84. Zeidner, M., & Schleyer, E. J. (1999). The big-fish-little-pond effect for academic self-concept, test anxiety, and school grades in gifted children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 305–329.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Instituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada, Lisboa, Portugal and Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medical School BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations