Computer-based assessment of reading ability and subtypes of readers with reading comprehension difficulties: a study in French children from G2 to G9
- 119 Downloads
Reading difficulties in school are very challenging for teachers due to many different reader subtypes in one and the same class. Moreover, there are few easy-to-use tools enabling teachers to assess reading ability. According to the Simple View of Reading (Hoover and Gough in Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160, 1990), efficient reading comprehension is the result of an interaction between word reading (through three word representation levels: orthographic, phonological, and semantic) and comprehension (through three processing types: literal, text-connecting, and gap-filling inferences). Difficulties in one of these components, or in both, should lead to difficulties in reading comprehension and bring about different reader subtypes. This study aims, first, to examine the validity of the tool and, second, to explore performance reading patterns of children with reading difficulties. A population of 485 typically developing French children from grade 2 to grade 9 was tested using three computerized tasks that recorded accuracy and speed: lexical quality to examine the three levels of word representation; silent reading and listening comprehension to examine both literal and inferential processing. Results showed the appropriateness of the tool but also identified a number of limits. It was possible with the results to detect 76 children with reading comprehension difficulties and to divide them into 5 clusters essentially according to their word reading performances. The results are discussed in relation to the theoretical frameworks used to build the tool.
KeywordsComputerized assessment Reading ability Reader comprehension difficulties French children
The authors are very grateful to the company ADEPRIO for designing the software program DiCoLec used in this study. The first author currently benefits from a grant from Fondation Orange. The authors thank the master’s degree students who participated in the data collection. Finally, the authors thank the teachers, families, and children who agreed to take part in this study.
Compliance with ethical standards
The present study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (Word Medical Association, 2001). It was approved by the laboratory ethics committee. All the participants’ parents were informed and gave their consent for their children to participate in this study.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., Gooden, R., & Bentum, K. E. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: an alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219407310838.Google Scholar
- Abbott, R. D., Fayol, M., Zorman, M., Casalis, S., Nagy, W., & Berninger, V. W. (2016). Relationships of French and English morphophonemic orthographies to word reading, spelling, and reading comprehension during early and middle childhood. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 0829573516640336.Google Scholar
- Association, W. M. (2001). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 79(4), 373.Google Scholar
- Beauvais, L., Bouchafa, H., Beauvais, C., Kleinsz, N., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2018). Tinfolec: A new French web-based test for reading assessment in primary school. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, in press. https://doi.org/10.1177/0829573518771130.
- Ecalle, J., Kleinsz, N., & Magnan, A. (2013). Computer-assisted learning in young poor readers: The effect of grapho-syllabic training on the development of word reading and reading comprehension. Computers in Human 2 Behavior, 29(4), 1368–1376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.01.041.
- Ecalle, J. (2014). Tinfolec: Test informatisé de lecture. Lyon: Gerip.Google Scholar
- Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256.Google Scholar
- Davey, J. W., Gugiu, P. C., & Coryn, C. L. (2010). Quantitative methods for estimating the reliability of qualitative data. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(13), 140–162.Google Scholar
- Grigorenko, E. L., Klin, A., & Volkmar, F. (2003). Annotation: Hyperlexia: disability or superability? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44(8), 1079–1091.Google Scholar
- Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2(2), 127–160.Google Scholar
- Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple View of Reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21(2), 85–97.Google Scholar
- Khomsi, A., & Khomsi, J. (2003). Bilan de Lecture Informatisé (BLI). Paris: Editions Du Centre de Psychologie Appliquée (ECPA).Google Scholar
- Lynch, L., Fawcett, A. J., & Nicolson, R. I. (2000). Computer-assisted reading intervention in a secondary school: an evaluation study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 333–348.Google Scholar
- Lysenko, L., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Wade, A. (2014). Improving literacy skills with ABRACADABRA. Perspectives on Language and Literacy, 40(3), 11.Google Scholar
- Magnan, A., Liger, C., Jabouley, D., & Ecalle, J. (2010). Une aide informatisée auprès de jeunes apprentis lecteurs en difficulté. Glossa: Effet d’un entraînement grapho-syllabique.Google Scholar
- Mailloux, S. L., Johnson, M. E., Fisher, D. G., & Pettibone, T. J. (1995). How reliable is computerized assessment of readability? Computers in Nursing, 13, 221–221.Google Scholar
- Narvaez, D., Van Den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A. B. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 488–496.Google Scholar
- Oakhill, J., Cain, K., & McCarthy, D. (2015). Inference processing in children: the contributions of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge. In E. J. O’Brien, A. E. Cooke, & R. F. Lorch Jr. (Eds.), Inferences during reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Perfetti, C. A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. Precursors of Functional Literacy, 11, 67–86.Google Scholar
- PISA, O. (2014). Results: What students know and can do—student performance in mathematics, reading and science. v. I. PISA. OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Pourcin, L., Sprenger-Charolles, L., El Ahmadi, A., & Colé, P. (2016). Reading and related skills in grades 6, 7, 8 and 9: French normative data from EVALEC. Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 66(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2015.11.002.Google Scholar
- Singleton, C. (2001). Computer-based assessment in education. Educational and Child Psychology, 18(3), 58–74.Google Scholar
- Sprenger-Charolles, L., Colé, P., Béchennec, D., & Kipffer-Piquard, A. (2005). French normative data on reading and related skills from EVALEC, a new computerized battery of tests (end grade 1, grade 2, grade 3, and grade 4). Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée/European Review of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 157–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2004.11.002.Google Scholar
- Wang, S., Jiao, H., Young, M. J., Brooks, T., & Olson, J. (2008). Comparability of computer-based and paper-and-pencil testing in K–12 reading assessments A meta-analysis of testing mode effects. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 68(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164407305592.Google Scholar